Grigori Smirnov

Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.

Background Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal obstructions of the nasolacrimal pathway. The benefit of silicone tubing after DCR is still controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR. Methods Forty-six consecutive primary EN-DCR procedures were performed in 42 patients during 2004-2007. The patients were randomized into two study groups according to whether silicone tubing was used or not. Results The overall success rate after primary EN-DCR was 89%: with silicone tubes it was 78%, and without silicone tubes it was 100%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.049). The follow-up period was 6 months and included three follow-up visits: 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. If inserted, the silicone tubes were removed at the 2-month visit. Conclusion The results of our prospective, randomized study showed that the use of silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR is not necessary.

Silicone tubing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: is it necessary?

Background Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is increasing in popularity as a treatment of nasolacrimal obstructions because it has proven to be an effective and safe procedure. In this study the success of EN-DCR combined with or without bicanalicular silicone stents was evaluated in patients with nasolacrimal obstructions. Methods Forty-two consecutive EN-DCR procedures were performed in 36 patients during 2000–2004. The surgery was primary in 23 cases and revision in 19 cases. Bicanalicular silicone stents were inserted in 18 cases and in 24 cases stenting was avoided. Results The overall success rate after EN-DCR was 81%. The success rate of EN-DCR was 89% with silicone tubing and 75% without silicone tubing. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 4 months. Conclusion In our retrospective study no significant statistical differences were seen between the patients with stenting compared with patients without stenting. However, prospective, randomized studies are clearly needed to answer the question of whether the use of stents is advisable.

Mitomycin C in revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.

Background Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective and safe procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, sometimes scarring of the rhinostomy site caused by fibrosis may occur, particularly in revision operations. The application of intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC), an antiproliferative agent, has been introduced as one possible technique to improve the outcome. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate if the use of MMC improves the success in endonasal revision DCR procedure. Methods Thirty revision EN-DCR procedures were performed during 2004–2010. The patients were randomized into two study groups, according to whether the intraoperative MMC was used or not. The technique of EN-DCR procedure in both groups was the same, but in the MMC group, at the end of the procedure a piece of tampon soaked in MMC (0.4 mg/mL) was placed into the rhinostoma for 5 minutes. No silicone stents were inserted. The surgical outcome at the 6-month follow-up visit was considered successful if the lacrimal sac irrigation succeeded and if the patients’ symptoms were relieved. Results The success rate after revision EN-DCR with MMC was 93% and without MMC was 60%. The overall success rate was 77%. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The relief of the symptoms between groups in both the Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Symptom Score and ocular symptoms was statistically significant (p = 0.007 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusion The results of our study indicate that the application of intraoperative mitomycin C may improve the outcome in revision EN-DCR.

Symptom score questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults - a novel tool to assess the outcome after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy*

BACKGROUND The incidence of nasolacrimal pathway obstruction increases with age, and dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a commonly applied surgical technique to treat severe cases. However, no disease-specific tools to assess the symptoms and the subjective outcome after DCR have been established. We have developed a specific Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Symptom Score (NLDO-SS) questionnaire to evaluate the outcome, and tested it in a prospective clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN Prospective clinical follow-up study. METHODS Sixty-eight consecutive primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) procedures were performed in 64 patients during 2004-2008. Preoperatively and during the three follow-up visits (at 1 week, 2 and 6 months), the patients filled in the NLDO-SS, and at the second and third follow-up visits they also filled in the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire. At one year after the operation, a GBI questionnaire was sent to the patients. RESULTS The surgical success rate of EN-DCR was 93 %. EN-DCR resulted in a significant reduction in all of the eight symptoms scores of the NLDO-SS (p= 0.001). The GBI scores indicated a significant benefit at 2 months (+37 (SD; 28) and an even higher benefit at 6 months after surgery (+52 (SD; 29), p= 0.001), but no further improvement was found between 6 and 12 months (+52 vs +52, p= 1.0). The correlation between the total GBI and NLDO-SS was significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS EN-DCR significantly improves the quality of life as measured by the GBI. The NLDO-SS correlated with the GBI and gave more information about the benefits after EN-DCR than GBI alone. The NLDO-SS proved to be an effective tool to evaluate lacrimal obstructions and EN-DCR benefits. Further studies to validate NLDO-SS are needed.

Etoricoxib for pain management during thyroid surgery—a prospective, placebo-controlled study

Objective To assess the efficacy of etoricoxib in pain treatment during thyroid surgery. Design Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Setting A secondary-level central hospital in Finland. Patients Sixty-nine consecutive patients (59 women) aged 18 to 70 years who underwent thyroid surgery. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 34) or placebo (n = 35) by mouth 60 minutes before surgery. After surgery oxycodone 2 mg administered intravenously was provided for rescue analgesia. Main Outcome Measures Oxycodone consumption during the first 6 (primary) and the 7 to 24 hours (secondary) after surgery. Results During the first 6 hours, all patients in the placebo group and 31 of 34 patients in the etoricoxib group were given oxycodone for rescue analgesia (P = 0.072). In the 7 to 24 postsurgical hours, 25 of 35 patients in the placebo group versus 16 of 34 patients in the etoricoxib group needed rescue analgesics (mean difference 24%, 95% CI −1 to 47%, P = 0.039). Conclusion Etoricoxib 120 mg reduced pain in the 7 to 24 postsurgical time period but did not have opioid-sparing effect during the first 6 hours after surgery.

Strong expression of HSP47 in metaplastic nasal mucosa may predict a poor outcome after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study

Purpose:  Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is an effective and safe procedure for patients with post‐saccal obstruction of the nasolacrimal pathway. The aim of DCR is to relieve symptoms by creating a bypass between the lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity. The most common reason for failure is stenosis caused by a fibrotic process at the rhinostomy site. In this prospective study we assessed the expression of heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), a regulator of fibrosis, in the biopsies of nasal mucosa isolated from patients undergoing primary endoscopic DCR (EN‐DCR).

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy as Treatment for Lower Lacrimal Pathway Obstructions in Adults: Review Article:

Obstruction of the lacrimal pathway is manifested by epiphora, infection, and blurred vision as well as ocular and facial pain. Conservative treatments only achieve temporary relief of symptoms, thus surgery is the treatment of choice. Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is recognized as the most suitable treatment for patients with obstructions of the lacrimal system at the level of the sac or in the nasolacrimal duct. The aim of this operation is to create a bypass between the lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity. During the past 2 decades, advances in rigid endoscopic equipment and other instruments have made it possible to obtain more information about the anatomic landmarks of the nasolacrimal system, which led to the development of less-invasive and safer endoscopic techniques. However, many parts of the treatment process related to endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) still remain controversial. This article reviews the published literature about the technical issues associated with the success of EN-DCR, and clarifies the pros and cons of different pre- and postoperative procedures in adults with lower lacrimal pathway obstructions.

Validation of a symptom-score questionnaire and long- term results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

BACKGROUND According to the Federal Institution of Health Insurance, ENT doctors perform more skin prick tests for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR) than other medical specialties in Belgium. However, immunotherapy (IT) is not practiced by all. This study aims to obtain insight into IT practice by ENT doctors, the type of IT performed and the reasons not to perform IT. METHODOLOGY A questionnaire was sent to all registered ENT doctors of Belgium (n=648), involving questions on type and duration of ENT practice, geography and gender. In addition, the questionnaire informed about diagnosis of AR, indication for IT, type of IT performed, and reasons not to perform IT and referral pattern. RESULTS The response rate among ENT doctors was 54%, with 7% of responders being excluded as they do not diagnose AR. 81% of Belgian ENT doctors make the indication for IT in AR patients, with 19% neglecting the indication for IT in AR patients. The two main reasons for not indicating IT are lack of expertise and the perception of high costs associated with IT. 70% of ENT specialists are practicing IT themselves, with sublingual IT being mostly performed. Interestingly, IT is mostly frequently performed by those ENT doctors with long-standing ENT practice, in private practice and in Wallonia. CONCLUSION Despite the high prevalence of AR in ENT practice, IT is most frequently performed by ENT doctors with longstanding practice, working in private practice and/or in the French speaking part of Belgium. Among the different types of IT, sublingual IT is the most frequently performed means of IT by ENT doctors.OBJECTIVE To investigate the role of inflammation in non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) patients in a large series to establish the prevalence of different NAR-subtypes, clinical features and the role of nasal cytology in the diagnostic algorithm. METHODOLOGY Patients were selected out of 3650 individuals who spontaneously presented at our institution. We consecutively enrolled 519 NAR-patients in an analytical cross-sectional study between November 2007 and June 2013 (level of evidence: 3b). All patients underwent rhinological evaluation including symptoms questionnaire, endoscopy, CT scan, allergy tests and nasal cytology. RESULTS The inflammatory cell infiltrate affects the severity of symptoms differently, allowing for identification of different phenotypes of NAR. We distinguished two groups: “NAR without inflammation”(NAR-) and “NAR with inflammation”(NAR+), in addition to different NAR-subtypes with inflammation. A significant difference was observed in terms of clinical symptoms and association with comorbidities (previously diagnosed asthma and aspirin intolerance) between NAR–, NAR+ and between different NAR+ subtypes. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that NAR- and NAR with neutrophils behave similarly, showing lower symptom score values and a lower risk of association with comorbidities compared to NAR with eosinophils and mast cells (singularly or mixed). In our belief it is very important to establish the presence and type of inflammation in non-allergic rhinitis patients and nasal cytology is a very useful test in correct differential diagnosis.OBJECTIVE To assess the applicability of the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) curves in follow-up of children in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. METHODS Prospective study of 40 patients with AR, grouped in corticosteroid spray versus physiological saline solution use. Follow up for 10 weeks through clinical score and PNIF percentages in relation to the reference curves, with was-out at week 8. Statistical assessment of the effect of treatment on variation of PNIF and clinical score was calculated by ANOVA model and Multiple Comparison of Means Test - Least Significant Difference. RESULTS There was a statistically significant influence of the group, time and interaction between time and group on PNIF percentages. Throughout follow up, patients from the treatment group had mean PNIF percentages significantly higher than the placebo group. Clinical score results also demonstrated a statistically significant influence between the groups, time and interaction between time and group. CONCLUSION Increase in PNIF percentage values observed in children treated with intranasal corticosteroids revealed the applicability of PNIF curves in their follow up.OBJECTIVE This study aims to examine humans ́ abilities to localize odorants within the open field. METHODOLOGY Young participants were tested on a localization task using a relatively selective olfactory stimulus (2-phenylethyl-alcohol, PEA) and cineol, an odorant with a strong trigeminal component. Participants were blindfolded and had to localize an odorant source at 2 m distance (far-field condition) and a 0.4 m distance (near-field condition) with either two nostrils open or only one open nostril. RESULTS For the odorant with trigeminal properties, the number of correct trials did not differ when one or both nostrils were used, while more PEA localization trials were correctly completed with both rather than one nostril. In the near-field condition, correct localization was possible in 72-80% of the trials, irrespective of the odorant and the number of nostrils used. Localization accuracy, measured as spatial deviation from the olfactory source, was significantly higher in the near-field compared to the far-field condition, but independent of the odorant being localized. CONCLUSION Odorant localization within the open field is difficult, but possible. In contrast to the general view, humans seem to be able to exploit the two-nostril advantage with increasing task difficulty.BACKGROUND This study was designed to assess if illness perception, mood state and coping strategies differ according to allergic rhinitis (AR) persistence and severity. METHODS Illness perception, mood profiles, coping behaviors and rhinitis symptoms were assessed by means of validated tools inpatients classified according to the Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-one patients underwent data analysis. No difference in age, sex, socio-economic status, smoking habits was detected comparing patients according to AR severity, duration or 4 ARIA classes. Patients with intermittent AR reported higher scores than those with persistent AR in confusion-bewilderment of Profile of Mood States (POMS); patients with moderate/severe rhinitis had significantly higher scores than those with mild rhinitis in TSSS, Identity and Consequences. No differences were detected in all assessed outcomes in the 4 ARIA classes. CONCLUSIONS The patients perspective about AR is independent of persistence and severity of symptoms. This may explain why AR remains under-diagnosed and under-treated, even in its most severe forms. Self-management plans should consider the patients perspective.The assessment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis, like any other disease, may involve multiple possible disease manifestations, including subjective patient-reported outcomes, objective disease (e.g. endoscopy or radiographic), and physician-driven (e.g. need for systemic medications). Disease control is often used as a global metric of disease burden and represents the extent to which disease manifestations are within an acceptable range. Achieving control is an important treatment goal.The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 is the update of similar evidence based position papers published in 2005 and 2007 and 2012(1-3). The core objective of the EPOS2020 guideline is to provide revised, up-to-date and clear evidence-based recommendations and integrated care pathways in ARS and CRS. EPOS2020 provides an update on the literature published and studies undertaken in the eight years since the EPOS2012 position paper was published and addresses areas not extensively covered in EPOS2012 such as paediatric CRS and sinus surgery. EPOS2020 also involves new stakeholders, including pharmacists and patients, and addresses new target users who have become more involved in the management and treatment of rhinosinusitis since the publication of the last EPOS document, including pharmacists, nurses, specialised care givers and indeed patients themselves, who employ increasing self-management of their condition using over the counter treatments. The document provides suggestions for future research in this area and offers updated guidance for definitions and outcome measurements in research in different settings.BACKGROUND Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is a commonly used procedure in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). However, there is no generally accepted disease-specific questionnaire for assessing outcomes. METHODOLOGY We conducted a prospective study to initially validate a Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Symptom Score questionnaire(NLDO-SS) and to evaluate the long-term success of EN-DCR procedures. Seventy-six patients (86 eyes) were evaluated in follow-up visits at 1-8 years after EN-DCR. The patients completed the NLDO-SS questionnaire twice, first, at home and, second,after receiving information from the otorhinolaryngologist, during the visit. The surgical outcome was considered successful if the irrigation succeeded and if the patient symptoms were relieved as assessed with the NLDO-SS. RESULTS The diagnostic accuracy of the NLDO-SS was 84%, sensitivity 82%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 58%, negative predictive value 95%, odds ratio 26, risk ratio 11 and usefulness index 0.55. Cronbachs alpha was 0.85, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.87. The long-term success rate after EN-DCR was 79%. CONCLUSION The NLDO-SS iss a feasible clinical tool in assessing the success of EN-DCR. The success rate was found to decrease EN-DCR at long-term follow-up.

Upregulation of inflammatory genes in the nasal mucosa of patients undergoing endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Background Epiphora is a common complaint of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) in adults. The precise pathogenesis of NLDO is still unknown, but inflammatory processes are believed to be predisposing factors. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective surgical technique for treating symptomatic NLDO. The purpose of the procedure is to relieve the patient’s symptoms by creating an opening, ie, a rhinostoma, between the lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity. Although the success rates after EN-DCR are high, the procedure sometimes fails due to onset of a fibrotic process at the rhinostomy site. The aim of this prospective comparative study was to investigate inflammation-related gene expression in the nasal mucosa at the rhinostomy site. Methods Ten participants were consecutively recruited from eligible adult patients who underwent primary powered EN-DCR (five patients) or septoplasty (five controls). Nasal mucosa specimens were taken from the rhinostomy site at the beginning of surgery for analysis of gene expression. Specimens were taken from the same site on the lateral nasal wall for controls. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed for the inflammatory genes interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and CCL2, and because of a clear trend of increased inflammation in the EN-DCR samples, a wider PCR array was performed to compare inflammation-related gene expression in EN-DCR subjects and corresponding controls. Results Our qRT-PCR results revealed a clear trend of increased transcription of IL-6, IL-1β, and CCL2 (P=0.03). The same trend was also evident in the PCR array, which additionally revealed notable differences between EN-DCR subjects and controls with regard to expression of several other inflammation-related mediators. At 6-month follow-up, the success rate after primary EN-DCR was 60%, ie, in three of five patients. Conclusion The present study demonstrates that there is an intense inflammation gene expression response in the nasal mucosa of patients undergoing EN-DCR.