Grigoris Chatzimavroudis

Endoscopic techniques and management of foreign body ingestion and food bolus impaction in the upper gastrointestinal tract : A retrospective analysis of 139 cases

Background Ingested foreign bodies and food bolus impaction are frequently seen in endoscopic practice. Successful foreign body and food bolus removal may depend on the method used, the choice of device, and the experience level of the endoscopist, although few papers report experience and outcome of tertiary centers. Aim To investigate the effectiveness of our protocol designed for removal of ingested foreign bodies and food boluses. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of foreign body ingestion and food bolus impaction from 1994 to 2005 identified by computer search. Patients were excluded if medical record was incomplete. Results The analysis included 171 patients. Foreign bodies and impacted food boluses were found in 77 and 62 patients, respectively. In 32 cases (23%), the foreign bodies passed spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract. The overall success rate for endoscopic management was obtained in 137 patients (98.6%). Surgical removal of a foreign body was required in only 2 cases (1.4%). According to the type and location of the foreign object and food bolus we used Dormia baskets, retrieval forceps, polypectomy snares, and all sizes of Roth net. No complications relating to the endoscopic procedure were observed; 50 patients (35.2%) had an underlying esophageal disease. Conclusions Endoscopic removal of upper gastrointestinal tract foreign bodies and food bolus impaction is efficacious and safe. Especially the Roth net is the best device for safe retrieval of food boluses and button disc batteries.

A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Deep cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) is paramount for the success of endoscopic biliary intervention. The aim of the present study was to compare standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire (HGW) in the selective cannulation of the CBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 332 patients were randomly assigned to cannulation with a standard catheter (n = 165) or a HGW (n = 167). If cannulation had not succeeded after 10 minutes with the technique assigned at randomization, a further attempt was made for an additional 10 minutes using the alternative technique. The following were assessed: primary and overall selective cannulation, time to cholangiography, number of pancreatic opacifications and guide-wire pancreatic duct insertions, and complication rates. RESULTS The primary success rate of selective CBD cannulation was higher in the HGW (81.4 %) than in the standard catheter group (53.9 %; P < 0.001). The overall cannulation rate after crossover was comparable between the two groups (standard catheter 84 % vs. HGW 83.8 %; P = 0.19). Time required for primary selective CBD cannulation was 3.53 +/- 0.32 minutes in the standard catheter vs. 4.48 +/- 0.32 minutes in the HGW group ( P = 0.04), and the number of insertions of the guide wire into the pancreatic duct was 3.29 +/- 0.47 in the standard catheter vs. 2.7 +/- 0.21 in the HGW group ( P = 0.22). Pancreatic opacifications occurred 3.19 +/- 0.20 times in the standard catheter vs. 1.50 +/- 0.22 times in the HGW group ( P < 0.001). Precut techniques were used in 56 patients (16.9 %) (n = 31 in the standard catheter vs. n = 25 in the HGW group; P = 0.07). The frequency of postinterventional pancreatitis and hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups. A young woman developed post-ERCP hemolytic crisis due to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. There was no procedure-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS The use of HGW, as primary technique or as a secondary technique after failure of cannulation with a standard catheter, achieves a high rate of selective CBD cannulation.

A comparative study of 10-Fr vs. 7-Fr straight plastic stents in the treatment of postcholecystectomy bile leak

BackgroundBiliary decompression is a key factor in the treatment of postcholecystectomy bile leak. However, the optimal size of the stent introduced by therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is yet to be determined. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of two straight plastic stents with different sizes (10-Fr and 7-Fr) in the treatment of postcholecystectomy bile leak.MethodsBetween January 2003 and August 2006, 63 patients underwent therapeutic ERCP for postcholecystectomy bile leak. After visualization of the bile duct injury, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed and the patients were randomized to receive either a 7-Fr (31 subjects, group A) or a 10-Fr (32 subjects, group B) straight plastic stent for four weeks. The success of the endoscopic treatment was determined by the elimination of the symptoms and the removal of the drain without any adverse outcomes.ResultsThe endoscopic intervention was successful in 29 patients of group A (93.54%) and in 31 patients of group B (96.87%). In the remaining two patients of group A, the 7-Fr stent was substituted by a 10-Fr stent after 7 days because the leak remained unaffected, resulting in healing of the leaks. Surgery was required in the remaining one patient of group B. Eight patients developed post-ERCP pancreatitis (5 mild, 2 moderate, 1 severe), which was treated conservatively.ConclusionsThis trial suggests that the stent size does not affect the outcome of the endoscopic intervention in postcholecystectomy bile leaks due to minor biliary tract injury; however, larger cohorts are required to confirm the optimal stent size in bile leaks due to major bile duct injury.

A comparative study of 50% dextrose and normal saline solution on their ability to create submucosal fluid cushions for endoscopic resection of sessile rectosigmoid polyps

BACKGROUND EMR traditionally performed by using normal saline solution (NS) plus epinephrine (E) as a submucosal fluid cushion does not maintain the submucosal elevation for a prolonged time. It was hypothesized that 50% dextrose (D(50)) plus E as a hypertonic, inexpensive, and easily available solution might be an ideal alternative for producing and maintaining more-prolonged mucosal elevation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate D(50)+E versus NS+E during an EMR of sessile rectosigmoid polyps (> 10 mm). DESIGN A prospective, double-blind, randomized study that compared EMR by using either D(50)+E or NS+E submucosal fluid cushions. SETTING Four tertiary endoscopic referral centers with 1370 polypectomies in 2006, performed by 5 experienced endoscopists. PATIENTS Patients treated for sessile rectosigmoid polyps (> 10 mm). INTERVENTIONS Polypectomy with D(50)+E or NS+E submucosal fluid cushions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS The duration of submucosal elevation, volume of solution, number of required injections to maintain the elevation, and observations for complications. RESULTS Ninety-two sessile rectosigmoid polyps were removed. Injected solution volumes and the number of injections to maintain submucosal elevation were lower in the D(50)+E group than in the NS+E group (P = .033 and P = .028, respectively). Submucosal elevation had a longer duration in the D(50)+E group (P = .043). This difference mainly included large (> or = 20 mm) and giant (> 40 mm) polyps. There were 6 and 1 cases of postpolypectomy syndrome in the D(50)+E and NS+E groups, respectively (P = .01). LIMITATIONS May be limited by inexperienced endoscopists lack of injection and polypectomy skills. CONCLUSIONS D(50)+E is superior to NS+E for an EMR, particularly in large and giant sessile polyps, but the risk of thermal tissue injury should be considered.

Migration of plastic biliary stents and endoscopic retrieval: an experience of three referral centers.

Background Proximal or distal migration of a plastic biliary stent is uncommon, but its management can be a technical challenge to the pancreatobiliary endoscopist. Patients and Methods All cases (n=51) of proximally and distally migrated plastic biliary stents over an 8-year period at 3 referral pancreaticobiliary centers were included in this retrospective study. Indications for stenting, risk factors for migration, presentation of migration, and various techniques used for stents retrieval are herein analyzed. Results Twenty-one proximal and 30 distal bile duct-migrated stents were identified. All patients with proximally and 17 (56.7%) with distally migrated stents were symptomatic. Choledocholithiasis, dilated common bile duct, short and large size stent were the main risk factors. The retrieval of proximally migrated stents was successful in 15 patients (71.4%) and in all symptomatic patients with distal migration. The retrieval techniques included forceps, Dormia basket, snare, Soehendra stent retriever, and balloon. One patient died of sepsis due to peritonitis from duodenal perforation from a distally migrated stent. Conclusions Retrieval of a proximally migrated stent requires experience with different endoscopic devices. Moreover, distal migration needs attention because it can cause severe complications.

Eradication Therapy in Helicobacter pylori-Positive Patients with Halitosis: Long-Term Outcome

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and long-term outcome of halitosis before and after eradication therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection. Subjects and Methods: Halitosis and dyspepsia-related symptoms were investigated by way of a questionnaire. Only patients with functional dyspepsia, H. pylori infection and no histological evidence of atrophy were included in the study. A total of 18 patients fulfilled these criteria and completed the study. Four to six weeks after the end of eradication treatment, endoscopy or [13C] breath test was performed to check for H. pylori in the gastric mucosa. Halitosis and dyspeptic symptoms were re-evaluated during and at the end of follow-up. Results:H. pylori infection was eradicated in all patients, in the 14/18 patients (77.8%) with triple drug therapy, and the 4/18 patients (22.2%) with quadruple drug therapy. During the follow-up period (mean 55.8 ± 21.3 months (range 6–108 months)) resolution of halitosis was observed in 16/18 patients (88.9%), while 2 patients (11.1%) (p < 0.001) continued to present with halitosis. Also, eradication therapy resulted in statistically significant relief of all dyspeptic symptoms, except bloating. Conclusion: Eradication of H. pylori in patients with functional dyspepsia and halitosis results in sustained resolution of halitosis during long-term follow-up in the majority of cases. This finding supports the existence of a link between H. pylori infection and halitosis and suggests that H. pylori eradication might be considered in patients with halitosis.

Outpatient therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe in patients aged 80 years and older.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM The aim of this observational prospective study was to evaluate the safety of outpatient therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a very elderly cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 600 patients were included in the study between June 2006 and June 2009. All underwent first therapeutic ERCP and were scheduled to be discharged on the same day following a postprocedure observation period of 6 hours. Of the 600 patients, 123 patients (group A) were re-admitted due to postprocedure complications that presented during the observation period, and 477 patients (group B) were discharged on the same day. Concomitant diseases, details of ERCP procedures, complications, and outcomes were all evaluated. The accuracy of the 6-hour postprocedure observation period, clinical criteria in predicting those patients aged 80 years and older in whom all therapeutic ERCP can be performed on an outpatient basis, and costs saved were all assessed. RESULTS There was a statistical difference in incidence of concomitant diseases between groups A and B (group A 84.5 % vs. group B 74.6 %; P = 0.020). However, there was no difference between the groups with regard to indication for ERCP and type of intervention. There was no difference in postprocedure complication rate between very elderly patients and younger patients (< 80 years), except for prolonged sedation or hypotension, which occurred more frequently in older (≥ 80 years) than in younger (< 80 years) patients (7.6 % vs. 3.2 %; P = 0.037). In group B, complications necessitating re-admission after the 6-hour observation period occurred in 10 patients (2.09 %) (patients ≥ 80 years 0.8 % and patients < 80 years 2.5 %). The costs saved by performing the procedure on an outpatient basis was calculated as 150 € per patient. CONCLUSION Outpatient therapeutic ERCP with postprocedure observation of 6 hours is a safe and cost-effective procedure in a significant proportion of very elderly patients.

Endoscopic mucosal resection of giant laterally spreading tumors with submucosal injection of hydroxyethyl starch: comparative study with normal saline solution.

Background: Normal saline (NS) plus epinephrine (E) is the traditionally used solution as submucosal fluid cushion for a safe and effective endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of sessile colorectal polyps. It was hypothesized that hydroxyethyl starch (HES), an inexpensive and easily available solution might be an ideal solution for prolonged elevation of submucosal cushion for an easy and safe EMR of giant colorectal lateral spreading tumors (LSTs). Patients and Methods: During a 6-year period, patients suffering from colorectal LSTs with a diameter of ≥30 mm were randomized to undergo EMR by using either HES+E (group A) or NS+E (group B) for submucosal fluid cushion. All patients who had undergone a colonoscopy set the diagnosis of LSTs. The LSTs were examined with standard white light and narrow-band imaging to accurately delinate their margins before resection. The initial volume of injected solution, the additional amount to maintain the submucosal cushion, the duration of submucosal elevation and post–EMR-related complications were recorded. After EMR, patients had a standard follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months and further if it was necessary using total colonoscopy. Results: Forty-nine patients suffering from giant LSTs were included in the study. No difference between the 2 groups was observed in patients’ characteristics, size of LSTs, and the initial volume of injected solution. However, the additional amount of solution to maintain submucosal elevation was lower in group A (median, 4 mL; range, 2 to 25) than in group B (median, 6 mL; range, 3 to 8; P=0.001). Moreover, submucosal elevation had a statistically longer duration in group A (median, 18.5 min; range, 14.5 to 28.4) than in group B (median, 20.15 min, range, 9.6 to 13.4; P<0.001), and there was a statistical difference on total procedure time in favor of group A [group A, 20.15 min (12 to 32.5) vs. group B, 22.8 min (18 to 34.5)]. One case of macroperforation, 2 cases of postpolypectomy syndrome, and 1 case of EMR-related bleeding were observed in the HES+E group, whereas 6 cases of EMR-related bleeding were observed in the NS+E group. During a median follow-up of 32 and 34 months, for HES+E and NS+E groups, respectively, 5 and 7 recurrences were observed, which were all treated endoscopically. Conclusions: HES+E injection produces a more prolonged submucosal elevation and lowers total procedure time than NS+E; however, the safety of EMR is not influenced.

CO2 Pneumoperitoneum Prolongs Survival in an Animal Model of Peritonitis Compared to Laparotomy

BACKGROUND The advantages of laparoscopic surgery have been well documented. However, the impact of pneumoperitoneum on sepsis sequelae is still equivocal. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, applied under different pressures and exposure times, on sepsis cascade and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 42 New Zealand rabbits, peritonitis was induced by the cecum ligation and puncture model. After 12 h, the animals were randomized in seven groups: a control group, four groups with pneumoperitoneum (10-15 mmHg for 60-180 min), and two groups with laparotomy (for 60 and 180 min). Blood samples were collected before cecum ligation and puncture, 12 h later and 1, 3, and 6 h after pneumoperitoneum desufflation or abdominal trauma closure to evaluate bacteremia, endotoxemia, white blood cells count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels. Furthermore, the mortality time was recorded in all animals. RESULTS Bacteremia and endotoxemia were induced in all groups. Endotoxemia levels were significantly more elevated in the group where pneumoperitoneum was performed under 15 mmHg for 180 min compared with all other groups at 1 and 3 h after pneumoperitoneum desufflation (P < 0.05), except when compared with the group where pneumoperitoneum was performed under 10 mmHg for 180 min. White blood cell and C-reactive protein levels showed similar trends for all groups. However, serum procalcitonin reached statistically higher levels (P < 0.05) in groups with laparotomy compared with groups with pneumoperitoneum and with the control group at 6 h. Survival was lower in the laparotomy groups compared with the pneumoperitoneum groups and with the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the presence of peritonitis, CO(2) pneumoperitoneum applied in clinically standard pressures, even for extended time intervals, reduces the severity of sepsis and prolongs survival.

Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with or without diarrhea: a Greek multicenter study.

BACKGROUND Wireless capsule endoscopy has become the gold standard for the examination of small bowel. However, its role in the evaluation of patients suffering from chronic abdominal pain is not yet clearly defined. We conducted an open-label prospective multi-center study to evaluate the yield and clinical outcome of capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with/without diarrhea. METHODS Seventy-two patients with chronic (>3months) abdominal pain with/without diarrhea in whom the underlying pathology could not be diagnosed by conventional modalities, underwent capsule endoscopy in either of the 6 participating centers. Patients were then followed up for clinical outcomes. RESULTS The overall diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy was 44.4%. More specifically, its diagnostic yield was 21.4% in patients with abdominal pain and negative inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), 66.7% in patients with abdominal pain and positive inflammatory markers, 0% in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea and negative inflammatory markers, and 90.1% in patients with abdominal pain, diarrhea and positive inflammatory markers. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses showed that abnormal C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significant factors related with positive capsule endoscopy findings. CONCLUSIONS Chronic abdominal pain with/without diarrhea should be accompanied by elevated inflammatory markers to be regarded as a valid indication for capsule endoscopy. The yield of capsule endoscopy in such patients is reasonably high and clinical outcomes of patients treated with capsule endoscopy findings as a guide are significant.