Gualtiero Palareti

Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT)

BACKGROUND Bleeding is the most serious complication of the use of oral anticoagulation in the prevention and treatment of thromoboembolic complications. We studied the frequency of bleeding complications in outpatients treated routinely in anticoagulation clinics. METHODS In a prospective cohort from thirty-four Italian anticoagulation clinics, 2745 consecutive patients were studied from the start of their oral anticoagulation (warfarin in 64%, acenocourmarol in the rest). The target anticoagulation-intensity was low (international normalised ratio [INR] < or = 2.8) in 71% of the patients and high (> 2.8) in the remainder. We recorded demographic details and the main indication for treatment and, every 3-4 months, INR and outcome events. Such events included all complications (bleeding, thrombosis, other), although only bleeding events are reported here, and deaths. We divided bleeding into major and minor categories. FINDINGS 43% of the patients were women. Nearly three-fifths of the patients were aged 60-79; 8% were over 80. The main indication for treatment was venous thrombolism (33%), followed by non-ischaemic heart disease (17%). Mean follow-up was 267 days. Over 2011 patient-years of follow-up, 153 bleeding complications occurred (7.6 per 100 patient-years). 5 were fatal (all cerebral haemorrhages, 0.25 per 100 patient-years), 23 were major (1.1), and 125 were minor (6.2). The rate of events was similar between sexes, coumarin type, size of enrolling centre, and target INR. The rate was higher in older patients: 10.5 per 100 patient-years in those aged 70 or over, 6.0 in those aged under 70 (relative risk 1.75, 95% Cl 1.29-2.39, p < 0.001). The rate was also higher when the indication was peripheral and/or cerebrovascular disease than venous thromboembolism plus other indications (12.5 vs 6.0 per 100 patient-years) (1.80, 1.2-2.7, p < 0.01), and during the first 90 days of treatment compared with later (11.0 vs 6.3, 1.75, 1.27-2.44, p < 0.001). A fifth of the bleeding events occurred at low anticoagulation intensity (INR < 2, rate 7.7 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The rates were 4.8, 9.5, 40.5, and 200 at INRs 2.0-2.9, 3-4.4, 4.5-6.9, and over 7, respectively (relative risks for INR > 4.5, 7.91, 5.44-11.5, p < 0.0001). INTERPRETATION We saw fewer bleeding events than those recorded in other observational and experimental studies. Oral anticoagulation has become safer in recent years, especially if monitored in anticoagulation clinics. Caution is required in elderly patients and anticoagulation intensity should be closely monitored to reduce periods of overdosing.

Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

BACKGROUND The objective of this article is to summarize the published literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral anticoagulant drugs that are currently available for clinical use and other aspects related to their management. METHODS We carried out a standard review of published articles focusing on the laboratory and clinical characteristics of the vitamin K antagonists; the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate; and the direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban RESULTS The antithrombotic effect of each oral anticoagulant drug, the interactions, and the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity are described in detail and discussed without providing specific recommendations. Moreover, we describe and discuss the clinical applications and optimal dosages of oral anticoagulant therapies, practical issues related to their initiation and monitoring, adverse events such as bleeding and other potential side effects, and available strategies for reversal. CONCLUSIONS There is a large amount of evidence on laboratory and clinical characteristics of vitamin K antagonists. A growing body of evidence is becoming available on the first new oral anticoagulant drugs available for clinical use, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Natural history and risk factors for thrombosis in 360 patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: A four-year prospective study from the italian registry

PURPOSE To assess the natural history and risk factors for thrombosis in a large cohort of unselected patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred sixty consecutive patients (118 males, 242 females, median age 39 years [range 2 to 78]) fulfilling the currently accepted criteria for diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) (n = 326) and/or raised immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG ACA) (n = 185) were collected from 16 Italian institutions and prospectively observed for a median of 3.9 years (range 0.5 to 5). Main endpoints were the occurrence of arterial or venous thrombosis, the outcome of pregnancies, and any severe complications leading to hospitalization or death. RESULTS Thirty-four patients developed a thrombotic complication, with a total incidence of 2.5% patient-years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two independent risk factors for thrombotic events: a previous thrombosis (RR 4.9; 95% CI, 1.76 to 13.7; P < 0.005) and IgG ACA titer above 40 units (RR 3.66; 95% CI, 1.24 to 10.8; P < 0.01). A total of 28 pregnancies were observed in 25 women and 11 (39%) were abortive. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were significantly more frequent in women with a history of miscarriage or vascular occlusion (9/16, 56%) than in asymptomatic women (2/12, 17%) (P = 0.035). Four patients developed non-Hodgkins lymphoma during the follow-up. Eighteen patients died. Vascular events and hematological malignancies represented the most frequent causes of death (n = 5 for each). CONCLUSIONS The present study shows that: (a) previous thrombosis and ACA titer > 40 U are independent predictors of thrombosis; (b) history of miscarriage or vascular disease is significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcome; (c) hematological malignancies can develop during follow-up in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Aprotinin and transfusion requirements in orthotopic liver transplantation: a multicentre randomised double-blind study

BACKGROUND Intraoperative hyperfibrinolysis contributes to bleeding during adult orthotopic liver transplantation. We aimed to find out whether aprotinin, a potent antifibrinolytic agent, reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which six liver-transplant centres participated. Patients undergoing primary liver transplantation were randomly assigned intraoperative high-dose aprotinin, regular-dose aprotinin, or placebo. Primary endpoints were intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Secondary endpoints were perioperative fluid requirements, postoperative blood transfusions, complications, and mortality. FINDINGS 137 patients received high-dose aprotinin (n=46), regular-dose aprotinin (n=43), or placebo (n=48). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin-treated patients, with a reduction of 60% in the high-dose group and 44% in the regular-dose group, compared with the placebo group (p=0.03). Total amount of red blood cell (homologous and autologous) transfusion requirements was 37% lower in the high-dose group and 20% lower in the regular-dose group, than in the placebo group (p=0.02). Thromboembolic events occurred in two patients in the high-dose group, none in the regular-dose group, and in two patients in the placebo group (p=0.39). Mortality at 30 days did not differ between the three groups (6.5%, 4.7%, and 8.3%; p=0.79). INTERPRETATION Intraoperative use of aprotinin in adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation significantly reduces blood-transfusion requirements and should be routinely used in patients without contraindications.

Predicting disease recurrence in patients with previous unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a proposed prediction score (DASH).

Summary.  Background:  In patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE), the optimal duration of anticoagulation is anchored on estimating the risk of disease recurrence.

Bleeding with anticoagulation therapy – Who is at risk, and how best to identify such patients

Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has been shown to be effective in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic complications in various clinical settings, including atrial fibrillation (AF), venous thromboembolism (VTE), acute coronary syndromes and after invasive cardiac procedures. Bleeding is the most important complication of VKAs and a major concern for both physicians and patients. The occurrence of bleeding during treatment is not only important for the treated subjects, but also for a correct and complete use of this therapy in all the subjects who have a clear clinical indication for anticoagulation. This review analyses the treatment- and person-associated risk factors for bleeding during VKAs and their combination in clinical prediction rules that have been proposed in the attempt to identify those patients at higher risk for bleeding. The clinical prediction rules may help physicians stratify patients into categories of risk and thus to evaluate their individual risk/benefit ratio of starting or prolonging an anticoagulant treatment.

Risk of Recurrence After a First Episode of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism Provoked by a Transient Risk Factor: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND We aimed to determine the risk of recurrence for symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) provoked by different transient risk factors. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Randomized Trials databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION Prospective cohort studies and randomized trials of patients with a first episode of symptomatic VTE provoked by a transient risk factor and treated for at least 3 months were identified. DATA EXTRACTION Number of patients and recurrent VTE during the 0- to 12-month and 0- to 24-month intervals after stopping therapy, study design, and provoking risk factor characteristics were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS Annualized recurrence rates were calculated and pooled across studies. At 24 months, the rate of recurrence was 3.3% per patient-year (11 studies, 2268 patients) for all patients with a transient risk factor, 0.7% per patient-year (3 studies, 248 patients) in the subgroup with a surgical factor, and 4.2% per patient-year (3 studies, 509 patients) in the subgroup with a nonsurgical factor. In the same studies, the rate of recurrence after unprovoked VTE was 7.4% per patient-year. The rate ratio for a nonsurgical compared with a surgical factor was 3.0 and for unprovoked thrombosis compared with a nonsurgical factor was 1.8 at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS The risk of recurrence is low if VTE is provoked by surgery, intermediate if provoked by a nonsurgical risk factor, and high if unprovoked. These risks affect whether patients with VTE should undergo short-term vs indefinite treatment.

Questions and answers on the use of dabigatran and perpectives on the use of other new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: A consensus document of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA)

Dabigatran and other new oral anticoagulants (OAC) represent a step forward in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). They indeed have been shown to be an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) without the burden of laboratory control. However, these new drugs compete with an effective and well-established therapy, thus bringing about a series of questions and doubts. In this report members of the board of the Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA) answer some questions every clinician might be confronted with.

Risk of a first venous thrombotic event in carriers of a familial thrombophilic defect. The European Prospective Cohort on Thrombophilia (EPCOT)

Summary.  Background: Reliable risk estimates for venous thrombosis in families with inherited thrombophilia are scarce but necessary for determining optimal screening and treatment policies. Objectives: In the present analysis, we determined the risk of a first venous thrombotic event in carriers of a thrombophilic defect (i.e. antithrombin‐, protein C‐ or protein S deficiency, or factor V Leiden). Patients and methods: The asymptomatic carriers had been tested prior to this study in nine European thrombosis centers because of a symptomatic carrier in the family, and were followed prospectively for 5.7 years on average between March 1994 and January 2001. Annually, data were recorded on the occurrence of risk situations for venous thrombosis and events (e.g. venous thrombosis, death). Results: Twenty‐six of the 575 asymptomatic carriers (4.5%) and seven of the 1118 controls (0.6%) experienced a first deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism during follow‐up. Of these events, 58% occurred spontaneously in the carriers compared with 43% in the controls. The incidence of first events was 0.8% per year (95% CI 0.5–1.2) in the carriers compared with 0.1% per year (95% CI 0.0–0.2) in the controls. The highest incidence was associated with antithrombin deficiency or combined defects, and the lowest incidence with factor V Leiden. Conclusions: The incidence of venous events in asymptomatic individuals from thrombophilic families does not exceed the risk of bleeding associated with long‐term anticoagulant treatment in the literature (1–3%).

Warfarin withdrawal. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

SummaryWarfarin, like all the 4-hydroxycoumarin compounds, has an asymmetric carbon atom. The clinically available warfarin preparations consist of a racemic mixture of equal amounts of 2 distinct S and R isomers, the former being 4-times more potent as anticoagulant and more susceptible to drug interaction. Warfarin is highly water soluble and rapidly absorbed from the stomach and the upper gastrointestinal tract; its plasma concentrations peak 60 to 90 minutes after oral administration. Warfarin binds to the enzyme vitamin K 2,3-epoxide reductase in liver microsomes, stopping the cycle of vitamin K and reducing γ-carboxylation of the precursors of vitamin D-dependent pro- and anticoagulant factors. A variable fraction of the binding with the target enzyme, albeit small, can be reversed by competitive displacers, such as dithiol-reducing agent activity. Differences in dithiol-reducing activity have been suggested as a contributing factor to the wide interindividual differences in sensitivity to oral anticoagulants. The anticoagulant effect is caused by a small fraction of the drug, since most (97 to 99%) is protein bound (mainly to albumin) and ineffective. Drugs that can displace the albumin binding will increase the action of warfarin, even though this effect is counteracted by a more rapid elimination of the drug. The elimination half-life of warfarin varies greatly among individuals, ranging from 35 to 45 hours; the S isomer has, however, an average half-life shorter than the R isomer.The plasma levels of vitamin K-dependent proteins are determined by a dynamic equilibrium between their synthesis and half-life times. The delay before warfarin takes effect reflects the half-life of the clotting proteins; the levels of factor VII and protein C (with shorter half-lives) are reduced earlier, reaching steady inhibited levels in about 1 day, whereas factor II takes more than 10 days.Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) with warfarin or other coumarin derivatives is increasingly administered to patients for primary or secondary prevention of various arterial or venous thromboembolic diseases. If in some clinical conditions OAT is given indefinitely, in others — such as venous thromboembolism or after tissue heart valve replacement — anticoagulants are usually given only for the high risk period of thrombotic complication. A recent large prospective study performed by the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics showed that about 30% of the patients who began OAT for various clinical indications stopped treatment at different times, confirming that withdrawal from OAT is an occurrence that affects a large number of patients. The expression ‘rebound phenomenon’ was adopted to indicate a hypercoagulant condition occurring after warfarin withdrawal. A possible more frequent recurrence of thromboembolism after cessation of anticoagulation became a matter of controversy and many clinical studies, mostly observational and noncontrolled, reported on the issue with inconsistent results. Most authoritative commentators agreed that rebound phenomenon, though possible, was not clinically relevant and did not differ in frequency and intensity according to mode of withdrawal. Scientific interest in the topic waned until more sensitive methods for investigating blood hypercoagulability became available.In recent years, many studies (reviewed in the text) have investigated the levels of different markers of hypercoagulability [fibrinopeptide A, activated factor VII, prothrombin fragments F1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimers (DD)], consistently finding an increase in their values after cessation of anticoagulation. Changes in the levels of markers of activated blood coagulation were prospectively investigated by our group in 32 patients with venous thromboembolism who were randomly withdrawn abruptly or gradually from warfarin treatment. Our results indicate that interruption of anticoagulant treatment frequently elicits low grade activation of the haemostatic system, usually not detectable during steady-state anticoagulation. This phenomenon seems to be earlier and more intense after abrupt interruption, but also seems to occur after stepwise withdrawal. Although the activation of coagulation appears to be of limited extent and transient in most cases, it may in a few patients reach higher levels. It seems reasonable to suppose that these patients are at higher risk of thrombotic complications. We and others have suggested that gradual anticoagulant withdrawal would prevent and/or blunt the rebound phenomenon. However, the need to taper the anticoagulant dosage is still uncertain, since no convincing clinical evidence is as yet available. Specifically designed clinical trials are required to solve the issue.