Guang Jian Liu

Systematic assessment and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of fasudil in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage

PurposeCerebral vasospasm (CVS) is a frequent and unpredictable complication in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and often leads to poor outcomes. This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of fasudil in the treatment of CVS in patients with SAH.MethodsA search was conducted using the full-text database of Chinese scientific journals, the Wanfang Database (January 1999 to November 2010), the Chinese Medical Association Digital Journal Database, PubMed, the Cochrane library, OVID, and EMBase (searching through November 2010).ResultsA total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The incidence rates of symptomatic CVS and CVS confirmed by angiography among the patients in the fasudil group were only 48% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–0.72, P = 0.0005) and 40% (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0–67, P = 0.0004) respectively of that of the control group. The odds ratios of cerebral infarction for all cases and cerebral infarction for CVS cases in the fasudil group were only 50% (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34–0.76, P = 0.0009) and 43% (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0008) respectively of that of the control group.ConclusionsFasudil greatly reduces the occurrence of CVS and cerebral infarction in SAH patients, significantly improves the clinical outcomes of the patients (as assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale). Because of the limited number of trials and samples available for analysis, the conclusions from the present study still need to be validated with results from large randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Prophylactic Use of Nimodipine in Patients with an Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cerebral vasospasm is an important cause of poor outcomes in subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of nimodipine in the prevention of cerebral vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. METHODS We searched Pubmed, OVID, Embase, the Cochrane library, the stroke clinical trial registry, and the National Science and Technology Library database and collected prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trials of the prophylactic use of nimodipine for aneurismal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. A meta-analysis was performed on the studies that met the criteria for inclusion. RESULTS Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and 1514 patients finished trial observation for the different indicators. Compared with the placebo group, fully recovered (all cases) patients increased 64% in the nimodipine group (P = 0.0002, OR = 1.64, 95 percent CI 1.26 - 2.13, NNT=-1.048), fully recovered or moderately disabled (all cases) patients increased 79 percent (P = 0.0007, OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.28 - 2.51, NNT = -5.889), patient death (in cerebral vasospasm cases) decreased 74% (P = 0.008, OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 - 0.71, NNT = 2.298), the incidence of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm decreased 46% (P < 0.00001, OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.69, NNT = 1.952), the incidence of delayed neurological function deficits (all cases) decreased 38% (P < 0.0001, OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.50 - 0.78, NNT = 1.078), the occurrence of cerebral infarction (on CT scan) decreased 58% (P = 0.001, OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.81, NNT = 3.314), the occurrence of cerebral infarction (in cerebral vasospasm cases) decreased 65% (P = 0.003, OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 - 0.69, NNT = 3.688), the occurrence of cerebral infarction (all cases) decreased 48% (P < 0.00001, OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.66, NNT = 1.196), and the difference in recurrent haemorrhage and adverse reactions between the nimodipine and placebo groups was not statistically significant (nimodipine group versus placebo group, recurrent haemorrhage P = 0.15, OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.50 - 1.11; adverse reaction P = 0.59, OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.71 - 1.81). CONCLUSION Compared with placebo, nimodipine can significantly improve clinical outcomes, as assessed by self-formulated standards and Glasgow outcome scores, and it can significantly reduce the occurrence of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm and delayed neurological function deficits (all cases), as well as cerebral infarction, although the incidence rate of recurrent haemorrhage and adverse reactions is not significantly reduced by nimodipine.

Incidence of Augmentation in Primary Restless Legs Syndrome Patients May Not Be That High: Evidence From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AbstractAugmentation is a common complication of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS) during treatment; however, its incidence rate remains unclear.The aim of this study is investigate the rate of augmentation during RLS treatment.We searched 6 databases, including PubMed, OVID, Embase, Wiley citations, Web of Science research platform (including SciELO Citation Index, Medline, KCI Korean Journal Database, the Web of Science™ Core Collection), and the Cochrane library, and screened the reference lists of the included trials and recently published reviews.Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that reported augmentation events during RLS treatment.Primary RLS patients older than 18 years.No restrictions regarding intervention types were applied.Three investigators independently extracted and pooled the data to analyze the augmentation rate of the total sample and of patient subgroups with different interventions, treatment durations and drug regimens and different geographic origins. Fixed-effects or random-effects model was used for pooled analysis.A total of 60 studies involving 11,543 participants suggested an overall augmentation rate of 5.6% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.0–7.7). The augmentation incidence was 6.1% (95% CI, 4.1–9.1) for long-term treatment and 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4–7.3) for short-term treatment. In addition, 27.1% (95% CI, 12.3–49.5) of the levodopa-treated patients, 6.0% (95% CI, 4.1–8.8) of the patients treated with dopamine agonists, and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.2–3.3) of the patients taking pregabalin or gabapentin developed augmentation. Augmentation occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 5.0–10.3) of the patients taking immediate-release drugs and in 1.7% (95% CI, 0.6–5.0) of the patients taking transdermal application.The main limitations are that the augmentation rates were not evaluated according to drug dosage, gender, and age and symptom severity.Approximately 5 to 6 in 100 RLS patients developed augmentation during treatment.

Clinical significance of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in the treatment of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and Objective Currently, no satisfactory treatment is available for sciatica caused by herniated discs and/or spinal stenosis. The objective of this study is to assess the value of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in the treatment of sciatica. Methods Without language restrictions, we searched PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Clinical Trials Registers, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the China Academic Library and Information System. We then performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the enrolled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Results Nine prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two before-after controlled trials involving 531 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Our systematic assessment and meta-analysis demonstrated that in terms of the natural course of the disease, compared with the control condition, TNF-α inhibitors neither significantly relieved lower back and leg pain (both p>0.05) nor enhanced the proportion of patients who felt overall satisfaction (global perceived effect (satisfaction)) or were able to return to work (return to work) (combined endpoint; p>0.05) at the short-term, medium-term and long-term follow-ups. In addition, compared with the control condition, TNF-α inhibitors could reduce the risk ratio (RR) of discectomy or radicular block (combined endpoint; RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.00, p = 0.049) at medium-term follow-up, but did not decrease RR at the short-term (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.40, p = 0.508) and long-term follow-ups (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.03, p = 0.065). Conclusion The currently available evidence demonstrated that other than reducing the RR of discectomy or radicular block (combined endpoint) at medium-term follow-up, TNF-α inhibitors showed limited clinical value in the treatment of sciatica caused by herniated discs and/or spinal stenosis.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Gabapentin in Adults with Sleep Disturbance in Medical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background and purpose The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin in the treatment of sleep disturbance in patients with medical illness. Methods PubMed was searched for randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials that reported sleep changes during gabapentin treatment up to November 2015. Findings This review included 26 studies involving 4,684 participants. Except for Composite Endpoint 3 [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.05–0.22] compared with the placebo group, the gabapentin group showed superior outcomes on our endpoints: Composite Endpoint 1 (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28–0.71), Composite Endpoint 2 (SMD = −0.53, 95% CI: −0.77 to −0.30), Composite Endpoint 4 (SMD = −0.38, 95% CI: −0.58 to −0.19), Composite Endpoint 5 [risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.24–2.58], and Composite Endpoint 6 (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32–0.72). However, the patients in the gabapentin group showed worse tolerance than those in the placebo group (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08–1.76). Implications This study is the first to systematically assess the clinical value of gabapentin for the treatment of sleep disorders. We found that regardless the type of sleep outcomes, gabapentin displayed stable treatment efficacy for sleep disturbance in patients with medical illness. However, when an average dose of approximately 1,800 mg/day was used, the risk of treatment discontinuation or drug withdrawal was relatively high. We recommend that further studies confirm these findings in patients with primary sleep disorders.

Efficacy of Pramipexole for the Treatment of Primary Restless Leg Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

PURPOSE The objective of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of pramipexole for the treatment of primary moderate-to-severe restless leg syndrome (RLS). METHODS Databases of PubMed, OVID, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the Wiley Online Library, ArticleFirst, CALIS, Study, CNKI, and WanFang were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pramipexole for the treatment of primary moderate-to-severe RLS. A meta-analysis was then conducted to pool results. FINDINGS Twelve RCTs involving 3286 participants were included in this study. The mean (SD) treatment duration was 11.12 (5.72) weeks/person. The meta-analysis found that the post-treatment change in the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score of the pramipexole group was significantly superior to that of the placebo group (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -4.64; 95% CI, -5.95 to -3.33; n = 8). More patients in the pramipexole group reported at least a 50% reduction in the IRLS score after treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.73; n = 8). In terms of the scores for the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.66; n = 11) and the Patient Global Impression scale (RR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.81; n = 9), treatment outcomes of the pramipexole group were significantly superior to those of the placebo group. In terms of the change in quality of life (WMD = 5.39; 95% CI, 2.28 to 8.50; n = 4), the change in daytime tiredness (WMD = -0.61; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.01; n = 4), the change in the number of periodic limb movements per hour of sleep (WMD = -35.95; 95% CI, -56.42 to -15.48; n = 3), and the change in the quality of sleep (WMD = 3.60; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.50; n = 6), the treatment outcomes of the pramipexole group were significantly superior to those of the placebo group. IMPLICATIONS This meta-analysis study indicated that pramipexole could effectively improve the symptoms of patients with primary moderate-to-severe RLS, although the quality of evidence was relatively low. Future clinical trials focusing on the medium-term and long-term treatment outcomes and using mainly objective indicators for evaluation are warranted. It is also necessary to pay close attention to augmentation during medication.

The efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for the preventive treatment in atrial fibrillation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract Background: Novel oral anticoagulants, including direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct factor IIa inhibitors, have been used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for a decade. In this study, the efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants were assessed in AF patients. Methods: No language restrictions were applied. Study selection and data extraction were carried out by searching PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, the BIOSIS, the Web of Science, Clinical Trials Registers, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the China Academic Library and Information System. Each database was searched from its inception date to June 2013. Using odds ratio (OR) as an indicator, we systematically evaluated the primary efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints, as well as 10 secondary endpoints. Result: Compared to the control drugs, the novel oral anticoagulants showed an OR decreased by 26% (OR: 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62–0.88) for stroke or systemic embolism, decreased by 24% (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64–0.90) for major bleeding, decreased by 10% (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.95) for death from any cause, decreased by 27% for disabling or fatal stroke (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54–0.97), decreased by 31% (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60–0.8) for fatal bleeding, and decreased by 8% (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88–0.95) for serious adverse events. However, there was no significant difference in acute myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major, all bleeding events, all adverse events and liver function disorder, between the novel oral anticoagulants and control drugs (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to the control drugs, the novel oral anticoagulants showed higher efficiency and safety in patients with AF, as evidenced by their superior performance not only in reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism with a lower risk of major bleeding but also in decreasing the incidence of death from any cause, disabling or fatal stroke, serious adverse events and fatal bleeding.

A unilateral brachiocephalic vein thrombosis: cause of a rare, transient ischemic attack, a case report and review of the literature

The purpose of this report is to inform medical professionals of a case in which brachiocephalic vein thrombosis caused a transient ischemic attack (TIA). A brain computerized tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, head and lung CT angiography, jugular venography, cardiac color Doppler ultrasound scan, color Doppler ultrasound scan of the neck and lower vascular extremities and 24-hour, continuous electrocardiogram monitoring were performed. A 50-year-old male experienced a total of 31 onsets of weakness in the right side of his body, speech impairment and numbness in the right side of his body during a period of 20 days. Imaging results did not reveal evidence of a cerebral infarction. The potential of a TIA with an arterial origin and other causes were ruled out, and a left brachiocephalic vein thrombosis and left jugular vein congestion were discovered. Thus, the brachiocephalic vein thrombosis was considered to be the cause of the TIA. The patient received anticoagulant and antiplatelet aggregation treatment. On the following day after the termination of the TIA, a color Doppler ultrasound scan detected the opening of the jugular venous arch, but the blood flow that returned to the superior vena cava via the left brachiocephalic vein did not significantly increase. A brachiocephalic vein thrombosis can be the cause of a TIA. In addition to the anticoagulant and antiplatelet aggregation treatment, the opening of the collateral of veins, including that of the jugular venous arch, may play an important role in reducing venous congestion and in terminating TIAs.

The combined use of edaravone, diuretics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs caused acute kidney injury in an elderly patient with chronic kidney disease

The purpose of this study was to draw attention to the fact that the combined use of edaravone, diuretics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may lead to acute kidney injury. This study was a case report of acute kidney injury resulting from the combined use of the aforementioned types of drugs. A 77-year-old male patient with chronic kidney disease (third stage) who was treated with a combination of edaravone, diuretics, and NSAIDs showed significantly increased blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. Interestingly, the blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels returned to pretreatment levels after the medications were stopped. The patient’s score on the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was a nine, and the score on the Drug Interaction Probability Scale was a five. For elderly patients with chronic kidney disease, the combined use of edaravone, diuretics, and NSAIDs should be avoided.

Perirenal hemorrhage secondary to interventional radiology operation against head and neck vessels: two cases report and review of the literature

Due to the hidden hemorrhage and a lack of specificity in its manifestations, perirenal hemorrhage as a complication of interventional radiology procedures is not always diagnosed in a timely manner; furthermore, the cause of hemorrhage is often misidentified or uncertain. In this report, two cases of elderly male patients who each had a perirenal hemorrhage on the same side after an interventional radiology operation against head and neck vessels by the same operator on the same day are described. This study demonstrated that the perirenal hemorrhages in both patients were related to the interventional radiology operations, providing a reminder that operating gently and always keeping the guide wire in sight during the insertion are critical for reducing the incidence rate of perirenal hemorrhage.