Guang-Liang Jiang

The Prevention of Colitis by E Prostanoid Receptor 4 Agonist through Enhancement of Epithelium Survival and Regeneration

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often triggered and/or exacerbated by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Among various prostanoids affected by NSAIDs, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), in particular, seems to play critical roles in IBD via the EP4 receptor, one of the four PGE2 receptor subtypes (EP1–4). An EP4 agonist, [[3-[[(1R,2S,3R)-3-hydroxy-2-[(1E,3S)-3-hydroxy-4-[3-(methoxymethyl)phenyl]-1-butenyl]-5-oxocyclopentyl]thio]propyl]thio]-acetic acid, C22H30O6S2 (ONO-AE1–329), for example, when topically applied, has been reported to ameliorate typical colitis symptoms by suppressing the production of cytotoxic cytokines in the dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis model. EP4 agonists are also known, however, for their ability to protect epithelial cells from apoptosis in vitro, which may contribute to the protection of mucosal barrier functions. To investigate this potential application, we have tested another EP4-selective agonist in the DSS-indomethacin mouse colitis model. 7-[2-(3-Hydroxy-4-phenyl-but-1-enyl)-6-oxo-piperidin-1-yl]-heptanoic acid methyl ester, C23H33NO4 (AGN205203), an analog from the 8-azapiperidinone series of EP4 agonists, is metabolically and chemically more stable than the ONO agonist, because of its lack of oxidizable sulfur atoms in the α-chain and of 11-OH group, a potential source of β-elimination reaction. Treatment of mice subcutaneously with AGN205203 at 3 mg/kg/day minimized colitis symptoms, such as weight loss, diarrhea, and colonic bleeding. Further histological examination of colons revealed healthy surface columnar epithelial cells free of erosion and ulceration compared with those without the drug treatment. At cellular level, the drug treatment decreased colon epithelial apoptosis, prevented goblet cell depletion, and promoted epithelial regeneration. AGN205203 may be unique among known EP4 agonists for its metabolic and chemical stability, and it is amenable to systemic applications for the prevention and recovery of IBD.

Comparison of Prostaglandin E2 Receptor Subtype 4 Agonist and Sulfasalazine in Mouse Colitis Prevention and Treatment

Prodrugs of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), such as sulfasalazine, have been the mainstay for the treatment and maintenance of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for decades, which is attributable to their antiadaptive immune activity. However, 5-ASA compromises regeneration of intestinal epithelia and induces apoptosis. The majority of patients eventually undergo colectomy. Agonists for the prostaglandin E2 subtype 4 (EP4) receptor have been shown to protect epithelial barrier against colitis-inducing agents and could be valuable alternatives for sulfasalazine. Here, we compared sulfasalazine and a novel EP4 agonist for their abilities to prevent colitis induction and relieve symptoms of established colitis in a dextran sulfate sodium–indomethacin mouse model. The EP4 agonist dose-dependently alleviated weight loss in colitis mice. Compared with sulfasalazine at 100 mg/kg on the colitis induction model, the EP4 agonist at 0.2 mg/kg was superior in reducing colitis symptoms, preventing increase of innate immune cells, and ameliorating inflammation in colon. In mice with established colitis, sulfasalazine quickly reversed weight loss but with fading efficacy. The EP4 agonist, in contrast, had slow but sustained effects on body weight gain and was more efficacious in epithelial regeneration. Such temporal differences between sulfasalazine and the EP4 agonist actions seemingly led to no additive effect in combination therapy. In conclusion, the EP4 agonist would be more efficacious in the maintenance of remission because of both anti-innate immune responses and epithelial regeneration activity, whereas sulfasalazine would be more suitable for induction of remission because of its rapid onset of antiadaptive inflammation action.