Guian Qian
Paul Scherrer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Guian Qian.
ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2014
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger
Both deterministic and probabilistic methods are used to analyze the integrity of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) subjected to pressurized thermal shocks (PTSs). The FAVOR code is applied to calculate the probabilities for crack initiation and failure of the RPV subjected to two transients, by considering crack distributions based on cracks observed in the Shoreham and pressure vessel research user facility (PVRUF) RPVs. The crack parameters, i.e. crack density, depth, aspect ratio, orientation and location are assumed as random variables following different distributions. KI of the cracks with the same depth increases with its aspect ratio. Both KI and KIC at the crack tip increase with crack depth, which is the reason why a deeper crack does not necessarily lead to a higher failure probability. The underclad crack is the most critical crack and the deeper crack is the least critical one in this study. Considering uncertainties of the transients results in higher failure probabilities.
ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2015
Guian Qian; V.F. González-Albuixech; Markus Niffenegger; Medhat Sharabi
The inner surface of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is assumed to be subjected to pressurized thermal shocks (PTSs) caused by the downstream of emergency cooling water. The downstream is not homogeneous but typically in a plume shape coming from the inlet nozzles.In this paper, both deterministic and probabilistic methods are used to assess the integrity of a model RPV subjected to PTS. The FAVOR code is used to calculate the probabilities for crack initiation and failure of the RPV considering crack distributions based on cracks observed in the Shoreham and PVRUF RPVs.The study shows that peak KI of the cracks inside the plume increases about 33% compared with that outside. The conditional probability inside the plume is more than eight orders of magnitude higher than outside the plume. In order to be conservative, it is necessary to consider the plume effect in the integrity assessment.Copyright
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2014
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger
Engineering Fracture Mechanics | 2013
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2013
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger
Corrosion Science | 2011
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger; Shu-Xin Li
International Journal of Solids and Structures | 2014
Guian Qian; V.F. González-Albuixech; Markus Niffenegger
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2011
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger
Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2014
V.F. González-Albuixech; Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping | 2013
Guian Qian; Markus Niffenegger; Wenxing Zhou; Shu-Xin Li