Guilherme Janson

Rapid Maxillary Expansion—Tooth Tissue-Borne Versus Tooth-Borne Expanders: A Computed Tomography Evaluation of Dentoskeletal Effects

This study evaluated rapid maxillary expansion (RME) dentoskeletal effects by means of computed tomography (CT), comparing tooth tissue-borne and tooth-borne expanders. The sample comprised eight girls aged 11 to 14 years presenting Class I or II malocclusions with posterior unilateral or bilateral crossbite that were randomly divided into two treatment groups, palatal acrylic (Haas-type) and hygienic (Hyrax) expanders. All appliances were activated up to the full seven mm capacity of the expansion screw. The patients were subjected to a spiral CT scan before expansion and after a three-month retention period when the expander was removed. One-millimeter-thick axial sections were scanned parallel to the palatal plane, comprising the dentoalveolar area and the base of the maxilla up to the inferior third of the nasal cavity. Multiplanar reconstruction was used to measure maxillary transverse dimensions and posterior teeth inclination by means of a computerized method. The results showed that RME produced a significant increase in all measured transverse linear dimensions, decreasing in magnitude from dental arch to basal bone. The transverse increase at the level of the nasal floor corresponded to one-third of the amount of screw activation. Tooth-borne (Hyrax) and tooth tissue-borne (Haas-type) expanders tended to produce similar orthopedic effects. In both methods, RME led to buccal movement of the maxillary posterior teeth, by tipping and bodily translation. The second premolars displayed more buccal tipping than the appliance-supporting teeth. The tooth tissue-borne expander produced a greater change in the axial inclination of appliance-supporting teeth, especially first premolars, compared with the tooth-borne expander.

Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height

Maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimensions were evaluated in subjects who had excessive, normal, and short lower anterior face height in relation to upper face height. Sexual dimorphism was also investigated. The dentoalveolar heights were compared between Class I and Class II, dental and skeletal malocclusions. The sample was drawn from the Burlington Growth Centre sample and consisted of 188 male and 156 female subjects at age 12 years, for whom lateral head films were available. This sample was classified into excessive, normal, and short lower anterior face height, using the ratio upper anterior face height/lower anterior face height (UAFH/LAFH). The results showed that the dentoalveolar heights are significantly different between faces with excessive, normal, and short lower anterior face heights, except for the lower posterior dental height, which showed no difference between short and normal lower anterior face height subjects. All dentoalveolar heights are larger for male subjects except for the upper posterior dental height. Dentoalveolar heights are similar between Class I and Class II dental and skeletal malocclusions. The upper teeth present a higher correlation to the UAFH/LAFH ratio than the lower teeth. Stepwise regression analysis shows that 22% of the variation in the ratio is explained by the maxillary and mandibular molars and 41% is explained by the maxillary and mandibular incisors.

Nickel hypersensitivity reaction before, during, and after orthodontic therapy

Nickel is a strong biological sensitizer and consequently may induce a delayed hypersensitivity reaction (type IV immune response). Because nickel is a component of the majority of the orthodontic alloys, the objectives of this cross-sectional study were to determine the prevalence of nickel hypersensitivity reaction before, during, and after orthodontic therapy with conventional stainless steel brackets and wires; to evidence the induction of this reaction by the orthodontic appliances; and to characterize the nickel hypersensitive persons. Nickel patch tests and a questionnaire were used to evaluate the hypersensitivity to this metal. The total sample consisted of 170 patients, 105 females and 65 males, from the orthodontic department at Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo. They were divided into three groups as follows: A (n = 60), patients before the beginning of orthodontic therapy; B (n = 66), patients currently undergoing orthodontic treatment, and C (n = 44), patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment previously. The chi-square test (chi2) showed an allergic reaction in 28.3% of the total sample with 23% female and 5.3% male. This indicated a gender difference (chi2 = 10.75, p < 0.001). There was a positive association between nickel hypersensitivity and previous personal allergic history to metals (chi2 = 34.88, p < 0.0001) as well as with the daily use of metal objects (chi2 = 11.95, p < 0.0005). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of contact dermatitis among the three groups (chi2 = 0.39, p = 0.848). This suggests that orthodontic therapy with conventional stainless steel appliances does not initiate or aggravate a nickel hypersensitivity reaction.

Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of measurements made on 3-dimensional digital models obtained with a surface laser scanner (D-250; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). METHODS Twenty orthodontic dental casts of permanent dentitions were selected. Three-dimensional images were obtained on this scanner and analyzed by using the Geomagic Studio 5 software (Raindrop Geomagic, Inc, Morrisville, NC). Measurements were made with a digital caliper directly on the dental casts and also digitally on the digital models. Fifteen anatomic dental points were identified, and a total of 11 linear measurements were taken from each cast, including arch length and width. Dependent t tests were used to evaluate intraexaminer reproducibility and measurement accuracy on the digital models. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found between the measurements made directly on the dental casts and on the digital models. CONCLUSIONS Linear measurements on digital models are accurate and reproducible. Digital models obtained with the surface laser scanner are reliable for measurements of arch width and length.

Stability of anterior open bite nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition

This study cephalometrically evaluated the long-term stability of anterior open bite nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition after a mean period of 5 years. The experimental group consisted of 21 patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances from whom cephalometric headfilms were obtained at the pretreatment, posttreatment, and postretention stages. Two control groups were used. The first, with ages comparable with the experimental group before treatment, was used only to characterize it. The second control group, with normal occlusion, was longitudinally followed for a period comparable with the posttretention period and was used to compare the changes between groups during this period. The differences between the observation stages in the experimental group were analyzed with paired t tests, and the postretention changes were compared with the changes of the second control group with independent t tests. A statistically significant decrease of the obtained anterior overbite was demonstrated at the end of the postretention period. The primary factor that contributed to the overbite decrease was the smaller vertical development of the maxillary and mandibular incisors in the postretention period. Neither the pretreatment anterior open bite amount nor the magnitude of correction was associated with the long-term overbite decrease. However, 61.9% of the sample had a clinically stable open bite correction.

Relationship Between Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orthodontic Treatment: A Cross-sectional Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in individuals before and after orthodontic treatment. The sample comprised 200 individuals divided into four groups according to the type of malocclusion (class I or II) and the orthodontic treatment accomplished. An anamnestic questionnaire, comprising questions regarding the most frequent symptoms of TMD, was used to classify the sample according to the TMD presence and severity. A clinical examination, including TMJ and muscle palpation, mandibular range of motion, and joint noise analysis was performed. Based on the anamnestic questionnaire, 34% of the sample was considered as having mild TMD, whereas 3.5% had moderate TMD. A higher TMD prevalence was found in females. Joint noises (15.5%) followed by headache (13%) constituted the most frequent reported symptoms. The presence and severity of TMD have not shown any relationship with either the type of orthodontic mechanics or extraction protocols. On the other hand, a positive association was found between TMD and parafunctional habits and reported emotional tension. Orthodontic treatment is not associated with the presence of signs and symptoms of TMD.

Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone crest after orthodontic treatment.

This study evaluated and compared the heights of the alveolar bone crests (AC) among orthodontic patients treated with either the simplified standard edgewise technique (group 1, n = 30), the edgewise straight-wire system (group 2, n = 30), or bioefficient therapy (group 3, n = 26). These 3 groups were compared with an untreated control group (group 4, n = 30). A comparison by sex of AC height was also conducted. The first premolars were extracted in every treated patient, and measurements were performed on bitewing radiographs taken after a mean posttreatment period of 2.17 years. The distances from the AC to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) on the mesial and distal surfaces of the first molars and second premolars and on the distal surface of the canines were measured; the larger the distance, the greater the alveolar bone loss. The data were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and the Newman-Keuls test (P <.05) for comparison among the groups. Sex differences of the AC height were evaluated with the t test. All treated groups had larger, statistically significant CEJ-AC distances than the untreated group, primarily at the extraction areas. There were no consistent statistically significant differences in the areas among the treated groups. Mean distances of the CEJ-AC in boys were larger than or similar to those in girls. The patients in the treated groups showed a greater number of proximal surfaces with statistically significant differences between sexes, compared with the control subjects.

Class II subdivision treatment success rate with symmetric and asymmetric extraction protocols.

The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of Class II subdivision malocclusion patients treated with either symmetric or asymmetric extractions. The sample consisted of 51 patients with Class II subdivision malocclusion. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 28 patients who were treated with 4 premolar extractions. The 23 patients in group 2 were treated with 3 premolar extractions (2 maxillary premolars and 1 mandibular premolar on the Class I side). The initial and final study models were evaluated by means of Graingers treatment priority index (TPI). Individual evaluations of improvements in maxillary-to-mandibular dental midline deviation, overjet, and overbite were also made. The final mean TPI and the mean improvement in TPI and in the other variables of each group were compared with independent t tests. The results showed a statistically significant difference only for the improvement in maxillary-to-mandibular dental midline deviation of the groups. The 3-premolar-extraction group had a greater improvement of the initial interdental midline deviation. There is a tendency for a slightly better treatment success rate when Class II subdivision patients are treated with asymmetric extraction of 3 premolars, compared with extraction of 4 premolars.

Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy.

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. METHODS A sample of 405 mini-implants with 9 diameters from 1.2 to 2.0 mm was used. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were placed in artificial bone, and 25 were placed in pig iliac bone to evaluate placement torque (PT) and axial placement load (APL), which represents self-drilling efficacy. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were used to determine fracture torque (FT). The different diameters were compared regarding PT, FT, and APL. The fracture risk of each diameter was evaluated by the fracture resistance index (FT/PT × [FT-PT]). The PT and APL changes during placement were correlated. RESULTS Only PT and FT were different for all mini-implant diameter changes. PT and FT showed a strong correlation with the mini-implant diameter, but the APL was weakly to moderately correlated. The fracture resistance index was remarkably greater for each 0.1 mm added in diameter. The PT increased significantly, whereas the APL was progressively reduced during placement. CONCLUSIONS Increases in mini-implant diameters significantly influenced the increases of PT and FT on quantities that progressively reduced the fracture risk. The self-drilling efficacy was not strongly influenced by diameter.

Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION The aims of this meta-analysis were to quantify and to compare the amounts of distalization and anchorage loss of conventional and skeletal anchorage methods in the correction of Class II malocclusion with intraoral distalizers. METHODS The literature was searched through 5 electronic databases, and inclusion criteria were applied. Articles that presented pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric values were preferred. Quality assessments of the studies were performed. The averages and standard deviations of molar and premolar effects were extracted from the studies to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 studies were included in the systematic review. After the quality analysis, 2 articles were classified as high quality, 27 as medium quality, and 11 as low quality. For the meta-analysis, 6 studies were included, and they showed average molar distalization amounts of 3.34 mm with conventional anchorage and 5.10 mm with skeletal anchorage. The meta-analysis of premolar movement showed estimates of combined effects of 2.30 mm (mesialization) in studies with conventional anchorage and -4.01 mm (distalization) in studies with skeletal anchorage. CONCLUSIONS There was scientific evidence that both anchorage systems are effective for distalization; however, with skeletal anchorage, there was no anchorage loss when direct anchorage was used.