Guillaume Boulanger

Socio-economic costs of indoor air pollution: A tentative estimation for some pollutants of health interest in France

An evaluation of the socio-economic costs of indoor air pollution can facilitate the development of appropriate public policies. For the first time in France, such an evaluation was conducted for six selected pollutants: benzene, trichloroethylene, radon, carbon monoxide, particles (PM2.5 fraction), and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). The health impacts of indoor exposure were either already available in published works or were calculated. For these calculations, two approaches were followed depending on the available data: the first followed the principles of quantitative health risk assessment, and the second was based on concepts and methods related to the health impact assessment. For both approaches, toxicological data and indoor concentrations related to each target pollutant were used. External costs resulting from mortality, morbidity (life quality loss) and production losses attributable to these health impacts were assessed. In addition, the monetary costs for the public were determined. Indoor pollution associated with the selected pollutants was estimated to have cost approximately €20 billion in France in 2004. Particles contributed the most to the total cost (75%), followed by radon. Premature death and the costs of the quality of life loss accounted for approximately 90% of the total cost. Despite the use of different methods and data, similar evaluations previously conducted in other countries yielded figures within the same order of magnitude.

Environmental Exposure of the Adult French Population to Permethrin

This work aims to assess the exposure to permethrin of the adult French population from available contamination measurements of outdoor air, indoor air, and settled dust. Priority is given to the assessment of chronic exposure, given the potential of permethrin to induce cancers and/or endocrine disorders. A statistical method was devised to calculate exposure to permethrin by different pathways (inhalation, indirect dust ingestion, and dermal contact). This method considers anthropometric parameters, the populations space-time budget, and recent methods for calculating dermal exposure. Considering the media of interest, our results pointed to house dust as the main environmental source of permethrin exposure, followed by indoor and outdoor air. Dermal contact and indirect dust ingestion may be more important exposure pathways than inhalation. A sensitivity analysis indicated that exposure estimates were mainly affected by variability within contamination data. This study is the first step in aggregated exposure and risk assessment due to pyrethroid exposure. Outdoor air, indoor air, and settled dust may constitute significant exposure sources, in addition to diet, which could be important. The next step entails assessing internal doses and estimating the proportion of each exposure source and pathway relative to internal exposure.

Revision of French Occupational Exposure Limits of Asbestos and Recommendation of Measurement Method: Can the Dimensional Characteristics of the Asbestos Fibers (Long, Thin, Short) Be Taken Into Account?

In France, the present regulations on occupational exposure to asbestos fibers take into account fibers (FRp: fibers measured for industrial hygiene) with the following dimensions: L > 5 μm, D < 3 μm, and L/D > 3 where L is the length and D the diameter of the fiber. The limit value is set at 0.1 f/cm3 for 1 hr. By definition short asbestos fibers (SAFs) are the fibers with 0.5 μm < L< 5 μm, D < 3 μm, and L/D ≥ 3; thin asbestos fibers (TAFs) are the fibers with L ≥ 5 μm, D < 0.2 μm, and L/D ≥ 3. The aim assigned to the French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety (AFSSET) Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL) Committee, was essentially to evaluate the following elements: the relevance of the present French OEL, knowing that this limit excludes the counting of SAFs and TAFs; the consistency of the OEL in light of the different varieties of asbestos by studying possible differential toxicity according to the type of asbestos (chrysotile vs. amphiboles); and the assessment of different measuring methods and their adaptation for taking into account the dimensional characteristics of the asbestos fibers (long, thin, short). In conclusion of this appraisal, AFSSET is calling for the OEL for asbestos to be lowered. Presently set at 0.1 f/cm3 (100 f/L), this leads to an excess risk for a worker that cannot be regarded as acceptable. Initially and without delay, AFSSET is suggesting lowering it to 10 f/L, as an average over 8 hr, In addition, AFSSET recommends that over a period of 15 minutes a concentration equal to 5 times the 8-hr value (8-hr OEL) should not be exceeded, in order to protect workers from the effects of potential peaks in exposure. Moreover, AFSSET recommends changing from optical to electronic microscopy to count asbestos fibers, within the framework of workplace regulations. This will allow thin asbestos fibers to be included.