Guillem Bori

Outcome of Acute Prosthetic Joint Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacilli Treated with Open Debridement and Retention of the Prosthesis

ABSTRACT The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of acute prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to gram-negative bacilli (GNB) treated without implant removal. Patients with an acute PJI due to GNB diagnosed from 2000 to 2007 were prospectively registered. Demographics, comorbidity, type of implant, microbiology data, surgical treatment, antimicrobial therapy, and outcome were recorded. Classification and regression tree analysis, the Kaplan-Meier survival method, and the Cox regression model were applied. Forty-seven patients were included. The mean age was 70.7 years, and there were 15 hip prostheses and 32 knee prostheses. The median number of days from the time of arthroplasty was 20. The most frequent pathogens were members of the Enterobacteriaceae family in 41 cases and Pseudomonas spp. in 20 cases. Among the Enterobacteriaceae, 14 were resistant to ciprofloxacin, while all Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. The median durations of intravenous and oral antibiotic treatment were 14 and 64 days, respectively. A total of 35 (74.5%) patients were in remission after a median follow-up of 463 days (interquartile range, 344 to 704) days. By use of the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, a C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration of ≤15 mg/dl (P = 0.03) and receipt of a fluoroquinolone, when all GNB isolated were susceptible (P = 0.0009), were associated with a better outcome. By use of a Cox regression model, a CRP concentration of ≤15 mg/dl (odds ratio [OR], 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 12.5; P = 0.043) and receipt of a fluoroquinolone (OR, 9.09; 95% CI, 1.96 to 50; P = 0.005) were independently associated with better outcomes. Open debridement without removal of the implant had a success rate of 74.5%, and the factors associated with good prognosis were a CRP concentration at the time of diagnosis ≤15 mg/dl and treatment with a fluoroquinolone.

Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in early post‐surgical prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement

Experience with debridement and prosthesis retention in early prosthetic joint infections (PJI) due to Staphylococcus aureus is scarce. The present study aimed to evaluate the outcome and predictors of failure. Patients prospectively registered with an early PJI due to S. aureus and 2 years of follow-up were reviewed. Demographics, co-morbidity, type of implant, clinical manifestations, surgical treatment, antimicrobial therapy and outcome were recorded. Remission was defined when the patient had no symptoms of infection, the prosthesis was retained and C-reactive protein (CRP) was ≤ 1 mg/dL. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Fifty-three patients with a mean ± SD age of 70 ± 10.8 years were reviewed. Thirty-five infections were on knee prosthesis and 18 were on hip prosthesis. The mean ± SD duration of intravenous and oral antibiotics was 10.6 ± 6.7 and 88 ± 45.9 days, respectively. After 2 years of follow-up, 40 (75.5%) patients were in remission. Variables independently associated with failure were the need for a second debridement (OR 20.4, 95% CI 2.3-166.6, p 0.006) and a CRP > 22 mg/dL (OR 9.8, 95% CI 1.5-62.5, p 0.01). The onset of the infection within the 25 days after joint arthroplasty was at the limit of significance (OR 8.3, 95% CI 0.8-85.6, p 0.07). Debridement followed by a short period of antibiotics is a reasonable treatment option in early PJI due to S. aureus. Predictors of failure were the need for a second debridement to control the infection a CRP > 22 mg/dL and the infection onset within the first 25 days after joint arthroplasty.

Usefulness of histological analysis for predicting the presence of microorganisms at the time of reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection.

BACKGROUND Appropriate interpretation of a frozen section has a relatively high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of infection when septic loosening of a prosthesis is suspected. However, its usefulness for predicting the presence of microorganisms at the time of reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection is not well defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of histological analysis in this situation. METHODS From January 2002 to February 2006, a total of twenty-one patients underwent reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. Histological studies and cultures of specimens of periprosthetic tissue that had been obtained at the time of reimplantation were retrospectively reviewed. The results of culture were considered positive when the same microorganism was isolated in at least two samples. Two histological criteria were used to diagnose infection: (1) Criterion A (the Feldman criterion), defined as the presence of at least five neutrophils per high-power field (x400) in at least five separate microscopic fields and (2) Criterion B (the Athanasou criterion), defined as the presence of at least one neutrophil per high-power field (x400), on average, after examination of ten microscopic fields. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each of these criteria were calculated with use of microbiological results as the gold standard for defining infection. RESULTS Seven of the twenty-one patients had a positive result on culture, and the most common microorganism was coagulase-negative staphylococcus. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of frozen-section analysis were 28.5%, 100%, 100%, and 73.6%, respectively, according to the Feldman criterion and 71.4%, 64.2%, 50%, and 81.8%, respectively, according to the Athanasou criterion. The numbers of lymphocytes and plasma cells did not help in the diagnosis of infection. Fibrosis was more common in patients without an infection. CONCLUSIONS The probability of infection is high when at least five neutrophils per high-power field are found in the periprosthetic tissue, but it is not possible to rule out infection when the number of neutrophils is less than five. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level I.

Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed during Ischemia

BACKGROUND There is no clinical trial analyzing the best moment to infuse an antibiotic during knee arthroplasty performed during ischemia. We designed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy should be administered before tourniquet inflation or just before tourniquet deflation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent a primary knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive (1) 1.5 g of cefuroxime 10-30 min before inflation of the tourniquet and placebo 10 min before release of the tourniquet (standard arm) or (2) placebo 10-30 min before inflation of the tourniquet and 1.5 g of cefuroxime 10 min before release of the tourniquet (experimental arm). In both arms, a postoperative dose of 1.5 g of cefuroxime was given 6 h after the surgical procedure. The main variables associated with the rate of deep-tissue infection after 3 and 12 months of follow-up were gathered. Continuous variables were compared using Students t test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi(2) test or Fishers exact test. RESULTS From September 2004 through December 2005, a total of 908 patients were randomized, 442 and 466 of whom were allocated to the standard and experimental arms, respectively. There were no differences between treatment arms in terms of age, sex, comorbidity, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, duration of surgery, need of blood transfusion, or fourth-day hematocrit. The rates of deep-tissue infection among the standard and experimental groups were 3.4% and 1.9%, respectively, at 3 months of follow-up (P = .21) and 3.6% and 2.6%, respectively, at 12 months of follow-up (P = .44). CONCLUSION The administration of prophylactic antibiotics just before tourniquet release was not inferior to standard antibiotic prophylaxis.

Low sensitivity of histology to predict the presence of microorganisms in suspected aseptic loosening of a joint prosthesis.

Intraoperative histology has a high specificity and sensitivity when a septic prosthesis loosening is suspected. However, its usefulness to predict the presence of microorganisms when aseptic loosening is suspected is not well defined. Intraoperative histology and cultures from periprosthetic tissue of 61 revision arthroplasties performed owing to suspected aseptic loosening were retrospectively reviewed. Frozen sections were evaluated following Mirras criteria (adapted by Feldman). Culture was considered positive when the same microorganism was isolated in at least two samples. The cultures were positive in 12 cases and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common microorganisms (11 cases). In six out of 12 cases (50%), the histology revealed more than five polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of histology to detect the presence of microorganisms was 50, 81, 40 and 86%, respectively. In conclusion, intraoperative histology using Mirras criteria had a low sensitivity to predict the presence of microorganisms in samples from suspected aseptic prosthetic loosening.

Neutrophils in frozen section and type of microorganism isolated at the time of resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection

IntroductionThe histology of periprosthetic tissue is a gold standard for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. However, the specificity and sensitivity of histology has never been 100%. In the present study we hypothesized that the type of microorganism could be related to the effectiveness of histology in the detection of infection.Material and methodsFrozen sections and cultures from periprosthetic tissue of 38 revision arthroplasties taken at the time of resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection were retrospectively reviewed. Frozen sections were evaluated following Feldman’s criteria. A culture was considered positive when the same microorganism was isolated in at least two samples or when pus was present around the prosthesis. The literature providing information on histology and microbiology of arthroplasty-associated infection was reviewed.ResultsCoagulase-negative staphylococcus (CNS) was the etiology in 13 cases, Gram-negative bacilli in 8, Staphylococcus aureus in 7, Candida sp in 2, Peptococcus sp in 2, Enterococcussp in 1 and S. pneumoniae in 1. No microorganism was isolated in four cases. Almost all the frozen sections in the 38 cases were positive except in 2 of the 13 that were caused by CNS (15.3%). The articles reviewed supported our findings.ConclusionFrozen section is a useful test to intraoperatively confirm an infection when preoperative septic loosening is suspected. However, histology has false-negative results when the infection is due to low-virulence microorganisms.

Interface membrane is the best sample for histological study to diagnose prosthetic joint infection

The objective of our study was to study which is the most accurate specimen for histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections (pseudocapsule or interface membrane). This is a prospective study including hip revision arthroplasties performed from January 2007 to June 2009. Specimens from pseudocapsule and from interface membrane were obtained from each patient. The histology was considered positive for infection when ≥5 neutrophils per high-power field ( × 40) were found. Definitive diagnosis of infection was considered when ≥2 cultures were positive for the same microorganism. According to the definition of infection, patients were classified in two groups: (A) patients with aseptic loosening in whom cultures obtained during surgery were negative and (B) patients with prosthetic joint infection. A total of 69 revisions were included in the study; 57 were classified in group A and 12 in group B. In group B, the percentage of positive interface membrane histology was significantly higher than the percentage of positive pseudocapsule histology (83 vs 42%, P=0.04, Fishers exact test). The results suggest that periprosthetic interface membrane is the best specimen for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Efficacy of debridement in hematogenous and early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections.

Purposes To review patients with a hematogenous and early post-surgical prosthetic joint infection (PJI) due to S. aureus treated with debridement and retention of the implant and to compare their clinical characteristics and outcome. Methods From January 2000 all patients with a prosthetic joint infection treated in a single-center were prospectively registered and followed-up. All potentially variables associated with outcome were recorded. For the present study, cases with a hematogenous or early post-surgical PJI due to S. aureus treated with debridement and at least 2 years of follow-up were reviewed. Cox regression model to identify factors associated with outcome were applied. Results 12 hematogenous and 53 early post-surgical PJI due to S. aureus were included. Number of patients presenting with fever, leucocyte count, C-reactive protein concentration, and the number of bacteremic patients were significantly higher in hematogenous infections while the number of polymicrobial infections was lower in hematogenous than in early post-surgical infections. The global failure rate in hematogenous and early post-surgical PJI was 58.7% and 24.5%, respectively (p=0.02). The Cox regression model identified hematogenous infections (OR: 2.57, CI95%: 1.02–6.51, p=0.04) and the need of a second debridement (OR: 4.61, CI95%: 1.86–11.4, p=0.001) as independent predictors of failure. Conclusion Hematogenous infections were monomicrobial and had more severe symptoms and signs of infection than early post-surgical PJI. Hematogenous PJI due to S. aureus, using debridement with implant retention, had a worse outcome than early post-surgical infections.

Relationship between intraoperative cultures during hip arthroplasty, obesity, and the risk of early prosthetic joint infection: A prospective study of 428 patients

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between intraoperative cultures during hip arthroplasty, the different patient characteristics, and the risk of developing a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods A prospective observational study was performed. Patients who underwent elective THA from March 2007 to March of 2011 were included. Three samples were taken just after arthrotomy: synovial fluid inoculated into blood culture flasks (SF), a tissue sample (TS), and a swab of periprosthetic tissue (S). Patients received standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The PJI rate within the first 3 months after arthroplasty was recorded. Results 402 prostheses were included in the study. Contamination rate of synovial fluid was 10.2%. The most frequent isolated microorganism was coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (32 out of 41). Body mass index (BMI) was the only host characteristic associated with positive intraoperative culture (p=0.009). The PJI rate was 3.7%. Variables associated with PJI in the univariate and multivariate analysis were: age ≥67 years (p=0.012 OR: 5.35 (1.45–19.81); CI95%) and a BMI ≥35 (p=0.002, OR: 7.7 (2.12–27.85) CI95%). PJI rate among patients with BMI<35 with negative and positive intraoperative cultures was 3% and 2.7%, respectively, however, the rate among patients with BMI ≥ 35 was 15% and 25%, respectively. Conclusion A BMI ≥35 was associated with a higher risk of positive intraoperative culture during hip arthroplasty. In addition, a BMI ≥35 was independently associated with a high risk of PJI and the highest rate was documented among obese patients with positive intraoperative cultures.

Importance of selection and duration of antibiotic regimen in prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention.

OBJECTIVES Early prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are managed with debridement, implant retention and antibiotics (DAIR). Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for failure after stopping antibiotic treatment. METHODS From 1999 to 2013, early PJIs managed with DAIR were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The main variables potentially associated with outcome were gathered, and the minimum follow-up was 2 years. For the present study, only patients who were in remission after one debridement and without long-term antibiotic suppression were included. The primary endpoint was implant removal or the need to reintroduce antibiotic treatment due to failure. RESULTS One-hundred-and-forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The failure rate after a median duration of oral antibiotic treatment of 69 days (IQR 45-95 days) was 11.8%. In 92 cases, PJI was due to Gram-positive microorganisms, in 21 cases PJI was due to Gram-negative microorganisms and in 30 cases PJI was due to a polymicrobial infection with both Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. In Gram-positive infections, rifampicin administered in combination with linezolid, co-trimoxazole or clindamycin was associated with a higher failure rate (27.8%, P = 0.026) than that in patients receiving a combination of rifampicin with levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin (8.3%) or monotherapy with linezolid or co-trimoxazole (0%). Among patients with a Gram-negative infection, the use of fluoroquinolones was associated with a lower failure rate (7.1% versus 37.5%, P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS The only factor associated with failure was the oral antibiotic selection, not the duration of treatment. Linezolid, co-trimoxazole and clindamycin, but not levofloxacin, serum concentrations are reduced by rifampicin; a fact that could explain our findings. Further studies monitoring serum concentration could help to improve the efficacy of these antibiotics when administered in combination with rifampicin.