Gunilla Kumlien

ABO Incompatible Kidney Transplantations Without Splenectomy, Using Antigen‐Specific Immunoadsorption and Rituximab

ABO incompatible kidney transplantations have previously only been performed after several preoperative sessions of plasmapheresis and splenectomy, with the conventional triple‐drug immunosuppressive protocol being reinforced with antilymphocyte globulin and B‐cell‐specific drugs, such as cyclophosphamide or deoxyspergualine. We have designed a protocol without splenectomy, based on antigen‐specific immunoadsorption, rituximab and a conventional triple‐drug immunosuppressive protocol. The protocol calls for a 10‐day pretransplantation conditioning period, starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Antigen‐specific immunoadsorption was performed on pretransplantation days −6, −5, −2 and −1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. Furthermore, if there was a significant increase in the antibody titers, extra sessions were considered. Eleven patients have received transplants with this protocol. The ABO antibodies were readily removed by the antigen‐specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level post‐transplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects and all patients have normal renal transplant function. We conclude that after an infusion each of rituximab and IVIG, and antigen‐specific immunoadsorption; blood group‐incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with excellent results using standard immunosuppression and no splenectomy.

Successful Abo-incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab

Background. Historically, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations have only been undertaken after splenectomy and unspecific plasmapheresis and with quadruple drug immunosuppression plus B-cell specific drugs. We have evaluated a protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without splenectomy using antigen-specific immunoadsorption, rituximab, and a conventional triple-drug immunosuppressive regimen. Methods. The protocol called for a 10-day pretransplant conditioning period starting with one dosage of rituximab and followed by full dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. Antigen-specific immunoadsorption was performed on pretransplant days −6, −5, −4, and −1. After the last session, 0.5 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin was administered. Postoperatively, three more apheresis sessions were given every third day. Furthermore, if there was a significant increase in the antibody titers, extra sessions were considered. Results. Four patients have received transplants with this protocol. The donor-recipient blood groups were A2/O, B/O, B/A, and A1/O. The ABO-antibodies were readily removed by the antigen-specific immunoadsorption and were kept at a low level posttransplantation by further adsorptions. There were no side effects, and all patients have normal renal-transplant function. Conclusions. We conclude that after one infusion each of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin and antigen-specific immunoadsorption, blood–group-incompatible renal transplantations can be performed with standard immunosuppression and without splenectomy.

Implementation of a Protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation--a three-center experience with 60 consecutive transplantations

Background. A new protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation has recently been introduced. We report here on the joint experience of the implementation in Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden and Freiburg, Germany. Methods. The new protocol utilizes antigen-specific immunoadsorption to remove existing ABO-antibodies, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin to prevent the rebound of antibodies, and conventional tacrolimus, mycophenolate-mofetil, and prednisolone immunosuppression. Sixty consecutive ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations were included in the study. The outcome is compared with the results of 274 ABO-compatible live donor transplantations performed during the same period. Results. Two of the ABO-incompatible grafts have been lost (non-compliance and death with functioning graft). All the remaining 58 grafts had good renal function at a follow-up of up to 61 months. We did not observe any late rebound of antibodies and there were no humoral rejections. Graft survival was 97% for the ABO-incompatible compared with 95% for the ABO-compatible. Patient survival was 98% in both groups. There was a significant variation in preoperative A/B-antibody titer between the centers, with a median 1:8 in Uppsala, median 1:32 in Stockholm and median 1:128 in Freiburg. More preoperative antibody adsorptions were therefore needed in Freiburg than in Stockholm and Uppsala. Conclusions. The new protocol was easily implemented and there were no graft losses that could be related to ABO-incompatibility. A significant inter-institutional variation in the measurement of anti-AB-antibodies was found, having a substantial impact on the number of immunoadsorptions and consequently on the total cost for the procedure. A standardized fluorescence-activated cell sorting technique for antibody quantification is much needed.

ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Using Antigen-Specific Immunoadsorption and Rituximab: A 3-Year Follow-up

Background. In 2001 a protocol for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab was introduced at our center, short-term results being comparable with those of ABO-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney transplantation. Of greater importance, however, is long-term graft function, thus far not evaluated. The aim of this study was therefore to assess long-term results of this protocol. Methods. Twenty ABOi kidney recipients with more than 12-month follow-up were included in the study: all adult crossmatch negative ABOi kidney recipients (n=15) were compared with an adult ABOc living donor recipient control group (n=30), and all pediatric ABOi kidney recipients (<16 years of age) (n=5) were compared with a group of pediatric ABOc kidney recipients (n=18). Results. Mean follow-up was three years. There was no significant difference in patient survival, nor in graft survival or in the incidence of acute rejection in any of the groups. In the adult kidney recipients mean glomerular filtration rate was equivalent at all time points (79–83 mL/min), as was &Dgr;s-creatinine. In the pediatric groups, &Dgr;s-creatinine was similar but glomerular filtration rate lower among the ABOi kidney recipients. There was a significant reduction (P<0.0001) without rebound in A/B antibody titers after transplantation (median IgG 1:2 and median IgM 1:1>1 year posttransplant) compared with pretransplant levels (median IgG 1:32 and IgM 1:16). Conclusion. We conclude that ABOi kidney transplantation using antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab is equivalent to ABOc living donor kidney transplantation. ABOi transplantation after this protocol does not have a negative impact on long-term graft function.

Improved Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Recent Years. A Single-Center Study

We analyzed the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) over the past 2 decades. Between 1992 and 2009, 953 patients were treated with HSCT, mainly for a hematologic malignancy. They were divided according to 4 different time periods of treatment: 1992 to 1995, 1996 to 2000, 2001 to 2005, and 2006 to 2009. Over the years, many factors have changed considerably regarding patient age, diagnosis, disease stage, type of donor, stem cell source, genomic HLA typing, cell dose, type of conditioning, treatment of infections, use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), use of mesenchymal stem cells, use of cytotoxic T cells, and home care. When we compared the last period (2006-2009) with earlier periods, we found slower neutrophil engraftment, a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) of grades II-IV, and less chronic GVHD (cGHVD). The incidence of relapse was unchanged over the 4 periods (22%-25%). Overall survival (OS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) improved significantly in the more recent periods, with the best results during the last period (2006-2009) and a 100-day TRM of 5.5%. This improvement was also apparent in a multivariate analysis. When correcting for differences between the 4 groups, the hazard ratio for mortality in the last period was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.79; P < .001) and for TRM it was 0.63 (CI: 0.43-0.92; P = .02). This study shows that the combined efforts to improve outcome after HSCT have been very effective. Even though we now treat older patients with more advanced disease and use more alternative HLA nonidentical donors, OS and TRM have improved. The problem of relapse still has to be remedied. Thus, several different developments together have resulted in significantly lower TRM and improved survival after HSCT over the last few years.

Comparing the tube and gel techniques for ABO antibody titration, as performed in three European centers.

Data from 60 consecutive ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations performed in Stockholm, Sweden; Freiburg, Germany; and Uppsala, Sweden, revealed significant variation in preoperative A/B antibody levels, with median titers of 1:32, 1:128, and 1:8, respectively. We wanted to investigate whether these differences were method-related. The same samples from 21 healthy blood donors were analyzed in the three centers using current local methods. Results confirmed method-related differences, with higher A/B titers in Freiburg and lower titers in Uppsala compared with Stockholm. Results for the same sample differed by a median of three (range 0 to 6) titer steps. When the same number of samples were analyzed in the three centers using the same gel method and the same test erythrocytes, results differed by a median of one titer step (range 0 to 4) for the same sample. In conclusion, gel hemagglutination technique significantly decreases intercenter variation compared with tube technique.

Clinical experience with a new apheresis filter that specifically depletes ABO blood group antibodies

BACKGROUND: Although living kidney donors are increasingly being used, in most centers, 30 to 40 percent of potential donors are being turned down due to ABO mismatch. A protocol for ABO‐mismatched kidney transplantation without splenectomy and with antigen‐specific adsorption of ABO antibodies instead of nonspecific plasmapheresis was therefore designed.

Leukocyte Depleted, Unscreened Blood Products Give a Low Risk for CMV Infection and Disease in CMV Seronegative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients with Seronegative Stem Cell Donors

Leukocyte depletion (LD) by blood product filtration has been shown to be similarly effective to the use of screened, CMV seronegative blood products to prevent CMV disease in CMV seronegative allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) patients with CMV seronegative donors. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the risk for development of CMV infection requiring preemptive therapy and for CMV disease if unscreened products treated by prestorage LD is used. Forty-nine consecutive patients transplanted after June 1995 were included. As a control group, 33 patients transplanted from January 1992 to June 1995 in whom a combination of CMV seronegative and LD blood products were given. All patients were monitored weekly by a leukocyte-based PCR for CMV DNA detection. Preemptive therapy was initiated after two consecutively positive tests. No patient developed CMV disease in either group. CMV DNA was detected in 6/49 (p = NS) in the study group and in 3/33 patients in the historical control group. Two patients in the study group were given preemptive therapy compared to one patient in the control group. This study suggests that the risk for CMV disease and the need for preemptive therapy against CMV is low in CMV seronegative allogeneic SCT patients receiving grafts from CMV seronegative stem cell donors receiving LD blood products. Thus, this strategy can be safely used together with PCR monitoring and preemptive therapy.

The Stockholm experience with ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations without splenectomy

Abstract: Background: ABO‐incompatible kidney transplantations have previously only been performed after several pre‐operative sessions of plasmapheresis followed by splenectomy, and with the conventional triple‐drug immunosuppressive protocol being reinforced with anti‐lymphocyte globulin and B‐cell‐specific drugs. We have designed a protocol without splenectomy, based on antigen‐specific immunoadsorption, rituximab and a conventional triple‐drug immunosuppressive protocol.

Present Techniques for Antibody Removal

Renal transplantation into a patient with a positive cytotoxic cross-match or with an incompatible blood group inevitably results in acute humoral rejection, unless the HLA or anti-A/B antibodies have been removed before transplantation. Although there are several procedures to remove HLA and anti-A/B antibodies, plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption are the most commonly used. In this report, presently available techniques for antibody removal are briefly reviewed.