Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gunnar Husebø is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gunnar Husebø.


PLOS ONE | 2014

Predictors of exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - results from the Bergen COPD Cohort Study

Gunnar Husebø; Per Bakke; Marianne Aanerud; Jon A. Hardie; Thor Ueland; Rune Grønseth; Louise Jeanette Pauline Persson; Pål Aukrust; Tomas Eagan

Background COPD exacerbations accelerate disease progression. Aims To examine if COPD characteristics and systemic inflammatory markers predict the risk for acute COPD exacerbation (AECOPD) frequency and duration. Methods 403 COPD patients, GOLD stage II-IV, aged 44–76 years were included in the Bergen COPD Cohort Study in 2006/07, and followed for 3 years. Examined baseline predictors were sex, age, body composition, smoking, AECOPD the last year, GOLD stage, Charlson comorbidity score (CCS), hypoxemia (PaO2<8 kPa), cough, use of inhaled steroids, and the inflammatory markers leucocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1), and osteoprotegrin (OPG). Negative binomial models with random effects were fitted to estimate the annual incidence rate ratios (IRR). For analysis of AECOPD duration, a generalized estimation equation logistic regression model was fitted, also adjusting for season, time since inclusion and AECOPD severity. Results After multivariate adjustment, significant predictors of AECOPD were: female sex [IRR 1.45 (1.14–1.84)], age per 10 year increase [1.23 (1.03–1.47)], >1 AECOPD last year before baseline [1.65 (1.24–2.21)], GOLD III [1.36 (1.07–1.74)], GOLD IV [2.90 (1.98–4.25)], chronic cough [1.64 (1.30–2.06)] and use of inhaled steroids [1.57 (1.21–2.05)]. For AECOPD duration more than three weeks, significant predictors after adjustment were: hypoxemia [0.60 (0.39–0.92)], years since inclusion [1.19 (1.03–1.37)], AECOPD severity; moderate [OR 1.58 (1.14–2.18)] and severe [2.34 (1.58–3.49)], season; winter [1.51 (1.08–2.12)], spring [1.45 (1.02–2.05)] and sTNF-R1 per SD increase [1.16 (1.00–1.35)]. Conclusion Several COPD characteristics were independent predictors of both AECOPD frequency and duration.


European Clinical Respiratory Journal | 2014

The Bergen COPD microbiome study (MicroCOPD): rationale, design, and initial experiences.

Rune Grønseth; Ingvild Haaland; Harald G. Wiker; Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen; Elise Orvedal Leiten; Gunnar Husebø; Øistein Svanes; Per Bakke; Tomas Eagan

Background Recent methodological developments, in particular new sequencing methods for bacterial RNA/DNA, have shown that microorganisms reside in airways that do not suffer from acute infection and that respiratory microbiota might vary according to airways disease status. We aim to establish high-quality sampling methods for lower airways microbiota as well as describe the respiratory microbiome in subjects with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to relate the microbiome to disease development, progression, and the host immune system. Methods The Bergen COPD microbiome study (MicroCOPD) is a longitudinal study aiming to collect data from 200 subjects with COPD as well as 150 individuals without COPD. At baseline, subjects go through a bronchoscopy in which protected specimen brushes, small-volume lavage, bronchoalveolar lavage, and bronchial biopsies provide a unique chance to analyze the microbiota and the host immune system status. These variables will be related to baseline clinical parameters (lung function, smoking status, exacerbation frequency, arterial blood gases, comorbidities, and medications) as well as follow-up parameters (lung function changes, exacerbation frequency, mortality, and more). Results Per date more than 150 bronchoscopies have been performed, equally distributed between cases and controls, with a very low complication frequency. Conclusions MicroCOPD will provide unique data on a large material, with insight on a new field of respiratory research.


ERJ Open Research | 2017

Protected sampling is preferable in bronchoscopic studies of the airway microbiome

Rune Grønseth; Christine Drengenes; Harald G. Wiker; Solveig Tangedal; Yaxin Xue; Gunnar Husebø; Øistein Svanes; Sverre Lehmann; Marit Aardal; Tuyen Hoang; Tharmini Kalananthan; Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen; Elise Orvedal Leiten; Marianne Aanerud; Eli Nordeide; Ingvild Haaland; Inge Jonassen; Per Bakke; Tomas Eagan

The aim was to evaluate susceptibility of oropharyngeal contamination with various bronchoscopic sampling techniques. 67 patients with obstructive lung disease and 58 control subjects underwent bronchoscopy with small-volume lavage (SVL) through the working channel, protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) and bilateral protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling. Subjects also provided an oral wash (OW) sample, and negative control samples were gathered for each bronchoscopy procedure. DNA encoding bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced and bioinformatically processed to cluster into operational taxonomic units (OTU), assign taxonomy and obtain measures of diversity. The proportion of Proteobacteria increased, whereas Firmicutes diminished in the order OW, SVL, PBAL, PSB (p<0.01). The alpha-diversity decreased in the same order (p<0.01). Also, beta-diversity varied by sampling method (p<0.01), and visualisation of principal coordinates analyses indicated that differences in diversity were smaller between OW and SVL and OW and PBAL samples than for OW and the PSB samples. The order of sampling (left versus right first) did not influence alpha- or beta-diversity for PSB samples. Studies of the airway microbiota need to address the potential for oropharyngeal contamination, and protected sampling might represent an acceptable measure to minimise this problem. Protected bronchoscopic sampling is most suitable for identification of a distinct airway microbiome http://ow.ly/qIIy30eqB9M


European Respiratory Journal | 2017

Growth differentiation factor-15 is a predictor of important disease outcomes in patients with COPD

Gunnar Husebø; Rune Grønseth; Lorena Lerner; Jeno Gyuris; Jon A. Hardie; Per Bakke; Tomas Eagan

Increased levels of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15) are associated with cachexia, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. The role of GDF15 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown. The study included 413 patients with COPD from the Bergen COPD Cohort Study. All patients had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <80% predicted, a FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio <0.7 and a history of smoking. Spirometry, fat free mass index, blood gases and plasma GDF15 were measured at baseline. Patients were followed for 3 years regarding exacerbations and changes in lung function, and 9 years for mortality. Yearly exacerbation rate, survival and yearly change in FEV1/FVC were evaluated with regression models. Median plasma GDF15 was 0.86 ng·mL−1 (interquartile range 0.64–1.12 ng·mL−1). The distribution was not normal and GDF15 was analysed as a categorical variable. High levels of GDF15 were associated with a higher exacerbation rate (incidence rate ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.1–1.74, p=0.006, adjusted values). Furthermore, high levels of GDF15 were associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.4–3.1, p<0.001) and an increased decline in both FEV1 (4.29% versus 3.25%) and FVC (2.63% versus 1.44%) in comparison to low levels (p<0.01 for both). In patients with COPD, high levels of GDF15 were independently associated with a higher yearly rate of exacerbations, higher mortality and increased decline in both FEV1 and FVC. In COPD, GDF15 predicts a higher mortality, increased COPD exacerbation rate and a faster decline in FEV1 and FVC http://ow.ly/yDgn307n0SO


American Journal of Physiology-lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology | 2016

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor, a role in COPD

Gunnar Husebø; Per Bakke; Rune Grønseth; Jon A. Hardie; Thor Ueland; Pål Aukrust; Tomas Eagan

Macrophage migration inhibitor factor (MIF) is a pluripotent cytokine associated with several different inflammatory conditions, but its role within lung inflammation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unclear. This study aimed to examine MIF in both stable COPD and during acute exacerbations (AECOPD). The study included 433 patients with COPD aged 41-76 and 325 individuals from the Bergen COPD cohort study who served as controls. All patients had an FEV1 of <80% predicted, FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.7, and a smoking history >10 pack-years. Serum levels of MIF were compared between the two groups at baseline, and for 149 patients, measurements were also carried out during AECOPD. Linear regression models were fitted with MIF as the outcome variable and adjusted for sex, age, body composition, smoking, and Charlson Comorbidity Score (CCS). Median MIF (interquartile range) in patients with COPD was 20.1 ng/ml (13.5-30.9) compared with 14.9 ng/ml (11.1-21.6) in controls (P < 0.01). MIF was bivariately associated with sex, body composition, and CCS (P < 0.05 for all). In the regression analyses, MIF was significantly higher in patients with COPD, coefficient 1.32 (P < 0.01) and 1.30 (P < 0.01) unadjusted and adjusted, respectively. In addition, in 149 patients during episodes of AECOPD, MIF was significantly elevated, with a median of 23.2 ng/ml (14.1-42.3) compared with measurements at stable disease of 19.3 ng/ml (12.4-31.3, P < 0.01). Serum levels of MIF were significantly higher in patients with COPD compared with controls. We also identified an additional increase in MIF levels during episodes of AECOPD.


European Respiratory Journal | 2014

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a biomarker in COPD?

Gunnar Husebø; Per Bakke; Jon A. Hardie; Thor Ueland; Rune Grønseth; Pål Aukrust; Tomas Eagan


European Respiratory Journal | 2017

Risk factors for lung cancer in COPD

Gunnar Husebø; Per Bakke; Jon A. Hardie; Rune Grønseth; Tomas Eagan


European Respiratory Journal | 2017

Who participates in a bronchoscopy study, and why?

Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen; Elise Orvedal Leiten; Tomas Eagan; Per Bakke; Sverre Lehmann; Eli Nordeide; Øistein Svanes; Ingvild Haaland; Gunnar Husebø; Rune Grønseth


European Respiratory Journal | 2017

Complications of research bronchoscopy in subjects with and without COPD

Elise Orvedal Leiten; Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen; Ingvild Haaland; Eli Nordeide; Sverre Lehmann; Gunnar Husebø; Øistein Svanes; Tomas Eagan; Per Bakke; Rune Grønseth


European Respiratory Journal | 2016

CAT-score is a predictor for mortality in COPD

Gunnar Husebø; Rebecka My Köll; Andreas Fleten Nielsen; Kristin Mestad; Agathe Krekvik Govertsen; Birger Norderud Lærum

Collaboration


Dive into the Gunnar Husebø's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tomas Eagan

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rune Grønseth

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingvild Haaland

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Øistein Svanes

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eli Nordeide

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sverre Lehmann

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge