Günter Auerswald

Plasma and albumin-free recombinant factor VIII: pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in previously treated pediatric patients.

Summary.  Background: The pharmacokinetics of factor VIII replacement therapy in preschool previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A have not been well characterized. Objectives: To assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of a plasma‐free recombinant FVIII concentrate, ADVATE [Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), Plasma/Albumin‐Free Method, rAHF‐PFM], in children < 6 years of age with severe hemophilia. Patients/methods: Fifty‐two boys, one girl, mean (± SD) age 3.1 ± 1.5 years and ≥ 50 days of prior FVIII exposure, were enrolled in a prospective study of ADVATE rAHF‐PFM at 23 centers. Results: The mean terminal phase half‐life (t1/2) was 9.88 ± 1.89 h, and the mean adjusted in vivo recovery (IVR) was 1.90 ± 0.43 IU dL−1 (IU kg−1)−1. Over the 1–6‐year age range, t1/2 of rAHF‐PFM increased by 0.40 h year−1. IVR increased by 0.095IU dL−1(IU kg−1)−1 (kg m−2)−1 in relation to body mass index (BMI). Patients primarily received prophylaxis. Median (range) annual joint bleeds were 0.0 (0.0–5.8), 0.0 (0.0–6.1) and 14.2 (0.0–34.5) for standard prophylaxis, modified prophylaxis and on‐demand treatment, respectively. Bleeds were managed in 90% (319/354) of episodes with one or two rAHF‐PFM infusions; response was rated excellent/good in 93.8% of episodes. Over a median 156 exposure days, no FVIII inhibitors were detected and no related severe adverse events or unusual non‐serious adverse events were seen. Conclusions: Children < 6 years of age appear to have shorter FVIII t1/2 and lower IVR values than older subjects. However, these parameters increased with age (t1/2) and BMI (adjusted IVR), respectively. rAHF‐PFM was clinically effective and well tolerated, with no signs of increased immunogenicity in previously treated young children with hemophilia A.

Thrombosis in inherited factor VII deficiency.

Summary.  Thrombosis in congenital factor (F) VII deficiency was investigated through extensive phenotypic and molecular‐genetic studies. Patients with a history of thrombosis among 514 entries in the FVII Deficiency Study Group database were evaluated. Thrombotic events were arterial in one case, disseminated intravascular coagulation in another and venous in seven. Gene mutations were characterized in eight patients: three were homozygous, three compound heterozygous and two heterozygous. FXa and IIa generation assays were consistent with the genetic lesions. One patient was heterozygous for the FV Leiden and one for the FIIG20210A mutation. In seven patients, surgical interventions and/or replacement therapies had a close temporal relationship with thrombosis, while in the remaining, events were apparently spontaneous. Thromboses were not associated with any specific age, phenotype, mutation zygosity or thrombophilic abnormalities. In particular, severe FVII deficiency did not seem to offer protection from strong thrombosis risk factors such as surgery and replacement therapy.

Secondary prophylaxis with recombinant activated factor VII improves health-related quality of life of haemophilia patients with inhibitors

Summary.  Haemophilia patients with inhibitors characteristically have impaired joint function and reduced health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). This analysis examined whether secondary prophylaxis with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) improves HRQoL vs. conventional on‐demand therapy in patients with haemophilia with inhibitors and frequent bleeds. After a 3‐month preprophylaxis period, 22 patients received daily rFVIIa prophylaxis (90 or 270 μg kg−1) for 3 months, followed by 3 months’ postprophylaxis. Days of hospitalization, absence from school/work and mobility aids requirements were recorded. HRQoL was assessed by EuroQoL (EQ‐5D) questionnaire, visual analogue scale (VAS), derived Time to Trade‐Off (TTO) scores and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). rFVIIa prophylaxis significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced bleeding frequency vs. prior on‐demand therapy. Hospitalization (5.9% vs. 13.5%; P = 0.0026) and absenteeism from school/work (16.7% vs. 38.7%; P = 0.0127) decreased during prophylaxis; these effects tended to be maintained during postprophylaxis. HRQoL (evaluated by EQ‐5D) tended to improve during and after rFVIIa prophylaxis. Notably, pain decreased and mobility increased in 40.9% and 27.3% of patients, respectively, at the end of the postprophylaxis period vs. preprophylaxis. Median VAS score increased from 66 to 73 (P = 0.048), and TTO scores suggested better HRQoL (0.62 vs. 0.76; P = 0.054) during postprophylaxis than preprophylaxis. Small to moderate changes in effect sizes were reported for VAS and TTO scores. Median QALYs were 0.68 (VAS) and 0.73 (TTO). Reductions in bleeding frequency with secondary rFVIIa prophylaxis were associated with improved HRQoL vs. on‐demand therapy.

Recombinant, activated factor VII for surgery in factor VII deficiency: a prospective evaluation – the surgical STER

Excessive bleeding represents a major complication of surgical interventions and its control is especially relevant in patients with Congenital Bleeding Disorders (CBD). In factor VII (FVII) deficiency, scanty data on surgery is available to guide treatment strategies. The STER (Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry) is a multi‐centre, prospective, observational, web‐based study protocol providing the frame for a structured and detailed data collection. Inhibitor occurrence was checked in a centralized fashion. Forty‐one surgical operations (24 ‘major’ and 17 ‘minor’) were performed in 34 subjects with a carefully characterized FVII deficiency under the coverage of recombinant activated Factor VII (rFVIIa). Bleeding occurred during three major interventions of orthopaedic surgery, but rFVIIa was given at very low dose in each case. An antibody to FVII was observed in one patient who underwent a multiple dental extraction. No thromboses were reported during the 30‐d follow up period. Replacement therapy with rFVIIa proved effective when suitable doses were used, which, during the period of maximum bleeding risk (the day of operation), were calculated (Receiver Operated Characteristic analysis) to be of at least 13 μg/kg/body weight per single dose and no less than three administrations. This indication is important especially in the case of major surgery.

Immune tolerance induction in patients with severe hemophilia with inhibitors: expert panel views and recommendations for clinical practice

For hemophilia patients with inhibitors, immune tolerance induction (ITI) may help to restore clinical response to factor (F) VIII or FIX concentrates. Several ITI regimens and protocols exist; however, despite 30 yr of progressive investigation, the ITI evidence base relies mainly on observational data. Expert opinion, experience, and interpretation of the available evidence are therefore valuable to support clinical decision‐making. At the Sixth Zürich Haemophilia Forum, an expert panel considered recent data and consensus to distill key practice points relating to ITI. The panel supported current recommendations that, where feasible, ITI should be offered early to children and adults (ideally ≤5 yr of inhibitor detection) when inhibitor titers are <10 Bethesda units (BU) and should be stopped when successful tolerance is achieved. For hemophilia A inhibitor patients, ITI can be founded on recombinant FVIII at high doses. The panel considered that patients with a high bleeding frequency should be offered additional prophylaxis with a bypassing agent. For patients with hemophilia B, there may be a benefit of genetic testing to indicate the risk for inhibitors. ITI is often less effective and associated with a greater risk of side effects in these patients. For high‐titer inhibitor (≥5 BU) hemophilia B patients, the panel advised that bypassing agents could be offered on demand in addition to ITI. Within future ITI regimens, there may be a role for additional immunosuppressant therapies. Participants agreed that research is needed to find alternatives to ITI therapy that offer durable and sustained effects and reduced rates of complications.

A systematic overview of the first pasteurised VWF/FVIII medicinal product, Haemate P/ Humate -P: history and clinical performance.

Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) and haemophilia A (HA) lack, to varying degrees, the von Willebrand factor (VWF) and coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) that are critical for normal haemostasis. These conditions in turn make patients prone to uncontrolled bleeding. Historically, patients with severe forms of VWD or HA were crippled before adulthood and their life expectancy was significantly reduced. Over the past decades, specific coagulation factor replacement therapies including Haemate®P, have been developed to help patients achieve and maintain normal haemostasis. Haemate®P is a human, plasma‐derived VWF/FVIII medicinal product, which was first licensed in Germany in 1981 for the treatment of HA‐associated bleeding. It has since then come to be accepted as the gold standard for both the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in VWD, especially in cases where desmopressin [1‐deamino‐8‐D‐arginine vasopressin (DDAVP)] has been ineffective. Haemate®P was the first effectively virus‐inactivated (pasteurisation: 60°C for 10 h in aqueous solution) FVIII product, whereby the risk of potentially threatening infective complications of plasma‐derived products was reduced. Haemate®P was also shown to have a VWF multimer profile remarkably close to that of normal plasma. This bibliographic review presents previously unpublished clinical data of Haemate®P, based upon internal clinical study reports of the proprietor, CSL Behring, in addition to data already presented in other publications. The data demonstrate a predictable and well‐characterised pharmacokinetic profile, and a proven record of short‐ and long‐term safety, while effectively correcting the haemostatic defects in VWD and HA. Recently available data have also shown Haemate®P to be of haemostatic value in exceptional clinical circumstances including surgical interventions. By virtue of its plasma‐derived combination of VWF and FVIII, in addition to its high VWF:FVIII content ratio (2.4:1), Haemate®P is also associated with successful immune tolerance induction in those patients developing inhibitor antibodies. Although the theoretical risk of thromboembolic complications does exist while receiving Haemate®P, as it does with any FVIII replacement therapy, the incidence of such complications has remained notably low. Given the robust data that have accumulated for the use of Haemate®P, dosing recommendations are also described in this review; the recommendations are tailored to patient‐specific contexts including baseline VWF and FVIII levels in plasma and the type of surgical intervention being undertaken. A wide variety of studies have also provided data on paediatric and geriatric populations, all of which have suggested that Haemate®P can be safely and effectively used in a wide variety of clinical circumstances.

Continuous infusion of B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII (ReFacto) in patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery: clinical experience.

Summary.  This retrospective, open‐label, non‐comparative study evaluated continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIII (ReFacto®), B‐domain deleted recombinant FVIII (BDDrFVIII), in patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery and requiring >5 consecutive days of treatment. Sixteen patients from eight centres underwent a total of 20 procedures. Haemostatic outcome was assessed as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ in 75% of procedures, and target FVIII:C levels were maintained throughout the continuous infusion period. The reported volume of blood loss during surgery was also within the normal range for non‐haemophilic patients for the type of surgery performed. Red blood cell transfusions were required to balance excessive blood loss during BDDrFVIII continuous infusion in eight (40%) procedures (seven patients), five with bleeding or requiring volume replacement and three to treat anaemia secondary to blood loss. Non‐serious adverse events considered by investigators as possibly or probably related to BDDrFVIII continuous infusion were infrequent (n = 5) considering the duration of treatment (n =239 cumulative days of continuous infusion), and all of these were mild‐to‐moderate in severity. No thromboembolic complications were reported except for one case of thrombophlebitis occurring at the infusion site. Only two patients (four events) experienced serious adverse bleeding; BDDrFVIII was otherwise well‐tolerated. These data show that continuous infusion of BDDrFVIII provides reliable haemostasis and is an effective and well‐tolerated regimen for patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery.

Haemophilia care in children--benefits of early prophylaxis for inhibitor prevention.

Summary.  Haemophilia therapy is aimed at treating and preventing bleeding episodes and related complications and clinical studies have shown that regular prophylaxis, started at an early age, is able to reduce physical impairment from haemophilic arthropathy. Today, the development of anti‐Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is the most serious treatment‐related complication of haemophilia therapy and a number of genetic and environmental risk factors have been identified in the past years. Clinical data show that early start of prophylaxis and the avoidance of intensive treatment periods may protect patients from inhibitor development. The mechanisms are not completely understood; yet, recent experimental data suggest that pro‐inflammatory or ‘danger signals’ may be involved in inducing tolerance vs. an effector immune response. So, exposure to a factor concentrate by itself may not be enough to trigger an immune response, while an intensive exposure to FVIII in the presence of such ‘danger signals’ can activate antigen‐presenting cells, up‐regulating co‐stimulatory signals for T lymphocytes and ultimately enhancing antibody production. The ‘optimal’ regimen for primary prophylaxis is still not identified and barriers to prophylaxis implementation remain relevant. Key issues include the optimal age at prophylaxis onset, the optimal dosage/schedule, the proper clinical and laboratory monitoring and patients’ compliance. Practical approaches to early prophylaxis as implemented in the haemophilia centres in Milan and Bremen are discussed in this respect.

Paediatric haemophilia with inhibitors: existing management options, treatment gaps and unmet needs

Summary.  Development of inhibitors is a severe complication of haemophilia posing many management challenges. While a long‐term goal in inhibitor patients is eradication of inhibitors through immune tolerance induction, bypassing agents such as recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) are essential for control of bleeding episodes. Paediatric patients with haemophilia and inhibitors are at particular risk of recurrent haemarthroses, and management of these patients should seek to avoid joint damage and support the child’s full social and physical development. Current options for management of bleeding complications include on‐demand treatment of acute bleeding episodes, secondary prophylaxis to avoid recurrent bleeds and surgery to treat affected joints. There is also a rationale for adopting prophylactic approaches to prevent bleeding in inhibitor patients, allowing this group similar opportunities for protection against arthropathy development as are given to non‐inhibitor patients. This paper, based on a roundtable meeting of haematology experts at the first Zürich Haemophilia Forum in May 2008, reviews the current evidence supporting more intense and prophylactic approaches to manage bleeding risk in paediatric haemophilia patients with inhibitors, and highlights the need for investigations of primary prophylaxis in this vulnerable patient group, to support best long‐term outcome.

The EPIC study: a lesson to learn

Inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII occur in about 30% of previously untreated patients (PUPs) and are the most serious complication of haemophilia A. It is unclear why some patients develop inhibitors and others do not.