Gurinder Bains

Skin heat dissipation: the influence of diabetes, skin thickness, and subcutaneous fat thickness.

BACKGROUND It is well established that diabetes impairs vascular endothelial function. However, the impact of impaired endothelial function on thermal conductivity of the skin, especially in relation to a constant versus a sudden heat stress, has not been established. Further, there is some evidence that aging reduces skin dermal thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness. Since these are important determinates of heat dissipation by the skin, these parameters also need to be examined in people with diabetes. METHODS Ninety subjects (30 younger individuals, 30 patients with diabetes, and 30 patients age-matched to the diabetes subjects) participated in two series of experiments to determine (1) the thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer and skin thickness and the skin response to a sudden heat stress and (2) the response to a continuous heat stress on the lower back. Skin thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness were assessed by ultrasound, and skin blood flow was examined by infrared laser Doppler flow meter. RESULTS People with diabetes had significantly less resting blood flow, blood flow in response to a single or continuous heat load, less subcutaneous fat, and thinner skin than either age-matched controls or younger people (P < 0.05). Subjects with diabetes also had the lowest concentration of red blood cells in their skin, implying a reduction in the number of capillaries in the skin. CONCLUSIONS Thinning of the skin and probably a reduction in capillaries in the dermal layer contribute to a reduction in the blood flow response to heat. People with diabetes, in particular, have reduced skin heat dissipation because of less resting blood flow and thinner skin than that seen in age-matched controls.

Dry heat, moist heat and body fat: are heating modalities really effective in people who are overweight?

Surface heating modalities are commonly used in physical therapy and physical medicine for increasing circulation, especially in deep tissues, to promote healing. However, recent evidence seems to indicate that in people who are overweight, heat transfer is impaired by the subcutaneous fat layer. The present investigation was conducted on 10 subjects aged 22–54 years, whose body mass index averaged 25.8±4.6. Subcutaneous fat above the quadriceps muscle varied from 0.51 to 0.86 cm of thickness. Three heating modalities were examined: the application of dry heat with a commercial chemical heat pack, hydrocollator heat packs (providing a type of moist heat), and a whirlpool, where conductive heat loss through water contact would be very high. The temperature of the skin and the temperature in the muscle (25 mm below the skin surface) were assessed by thermocouples. The results of the experiments showed that for heating modalities that are maintained in skin contact for long periods of time, such as dry heat packs (in place for 6 hours), subcutaneous fat did not impair the change in deep muscle temperature. In contrast, when rapid heat modalities were used, such as the hydrocollator and the whirlpool (15 minutes of sustained skin contact), the transfer of heat from the skin to deep muscle was significantly impaired in people with thicker subcutaneous fat layers. We observed that the greater the impairment in heat transfer to muscle from skin covered by body fat, the warmer the skin temperature increase during the modality.

The effects of skin moisture and subcutaneous fat thickness on the ability of the skin to dissipate heat in young and old subjects, with and without diabetes, at three environmental room temperatures

The Pennes model predicts the ability of the skin to dissipate heat as a function of conductive heat transfer and blood flow. Conductive heat exchange may be affected by skin moisture and subcutaneous fat thickness, factors not considered by Pennes. In the present investigation, we sought to expand the Pennes model by examining subcutaneous fat and skin moisture as factors of heat dissipation and their effects on heat exchange and blood flow. Subjects who were older (O) (mean age 64.2+/-5.9 years, n=15), had diabetes (D) (mean age 62+/-5.9 years, mean duration 13.2+/-9.1 years, n=15), and were younger (Y) (mean age 25.7+/-2.9 years, n=15) participated. Thermisters were placed in an iron heat probe and on the skin to measure the change in skin temperature to create a thermal change index to demonstrate the ability of the skin to dissipate heat. The lower back had the thickest subcutaneous fat layer for all subjects, which contributed to higher skin temperatures than the foot and hand in response to local and global heat. There was a significant inverse correlation between skin moisture and skin temperature after 5s of heat application (r=-0.73, p<0.001) with O and D having significantly less skin moisture than Y (p<0.05). O and D had significantly increased skin temperatures in response to local heat, as compared to Y, in all global temperatures (p<0.05). Thus, the Pennes model may need to be adjusted to take into consideration aging, diabetes, skin moisture, and subcutaneous fat thickness.

Does skin moisture influence the blood flow response to local heat? A re-evaluation of the Pennes model

Pennes first described a model of heat transfer through the limb based only on calories delivered from a heat source, calories produced by metabolism and skin blood flow. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a moist versus a dry heat source on the skin in eliciting a blood flow response to add data to this model. Ten subjects were examined, both male and female, with a mean age of 32.5 ± 11.6 years, mean height of 172.8 ± 12.3 cm, and mean weight of 77.6 ± 19.5 kg. Skin temperature was measured by a thermocouple placed on the skin and skin blood flow measured by a laser Doppler flow meter. The results of the experiments using a dry heat pack (commercially available chemical 42°C cell dry heat source), moist hydrocollator pack (72.8°C) separated from the skin by eight layers of towels, and whirlpool at 40°C, showed that moist heat caused a significantly higher skin blood flow (about 500% greater) than dry heat (p < 0.01). Most of the greater increase in skin blood flow with moist heat was due to the greater rate of rise of skin temperature with moist versus dry heat while some of the increase in blood flow was due to the moisture itself. This could either be related to the greater heat flux across the skin with moist air or due to changing the ionic environment around skin thermo receptors by keeping the skin moist during heating. Skin thermo receptors are believed to be temperature sensitive calcium gated channels in endothelial cells which couple calcium influx to a release of nitric oxide. If true, reducing moisture in the skin might have the effect of altering ionic flux through these receptors. A correct model of skin heat flux should therefore take heat moisture content into consideration.

Multiple stressors and the response of vascular endothelial cells: the effect of aging and diabetes.

BACKGROUND The present study examined the effects of local heat, global heat, and the interaction between these two endothelial stressors on the blood flow of the skin of the foot in people who are older and who have diabetes. METHODS Subjects who were older (mean age 64.2 +/- 5.9 years) and were younger (mean age 25.7 +/- 2.9 years) and subjects who had diabetes (mean age 62 +/- 5.9 years, mean duration 13.2 +/- 9.1 years) participated. Subjects were exposed to three global temperatures (16 degrees C, 24 degrees C, and 32 degrees C), and the blood flow response was recorded on the foot with a laser Doppler flow meter for 30 s following applications of local heat (30 degrees C, 33.5 degrees C, and 37 degrees C) using a Peltier junction to clamp the skin for 2 min. RESULTS All three groups significantly increased blood flow from the 16-24 degrees C environments for the 37 degrees C application of local heat (P(Younger) = 0.02, P(Older) = 0.02, P(Diabetes) = 0.01). Those with diabetes and those who were older only increased blood flow 5% and 6% from the 24-32 degrees C environment, which was not statistically significant (P(Older) = 0.12, P(Diabetes) = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS There appears to be considerable blood flow reserve in younger subjects to tolerate heat stress. In contrast, older subjects and those with diabetes reach a critical level after which additional heat does not cause in increase in blood flow.

Moist Heat or Dry Heat for Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness

Background Heat is commonly used in physical therapy following exercise induced delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Most heat modalities used in a clinical setting for DOMS are only applied for 5 to 20 minutes. This minimal heat exposure causes little, if any, change in deep tissue temperature. For this reason, long duration dry chemical heat packs are used at home to slowly and safely warm tissue and reduce potential heat damage while reducing pain associated from DOMS. Clinically, it has been shown that moist heat penetrates deep tissue faster than dry heat. Therefore, in home use chemical moist heat may be more efficacious than dry heat to provide pain relief and reduce tissue damage following exercise DOMS. However, chemical moist heat only lasts for 2 hours compared to the 8 hours duration of chemical dry heat packs. The purpose of this study was to compare the beneficial effect of dry heat versus moist heat on 100 young subjects after exercise induce DOMS. Methods One hundred subjects exercised for 15 minutes accomplishing squats. Before and for 3 days after, strength, muscle soreness, tissue resistance, and the force to passively move the knee were recorded. Heat and moist heat were applied in different groups either immediately after exercise or 24 hours later. Results The research results of this study showed that immediate application of heat, either dry (8 hours application) or moist (2 hours application), had a similar preservation of quadriceps muscle strength and muscle activity. Results also revealed that the greatest pain reduction was shown after immediate application of moist heat. Never the less, immediate application of dry heat had a similar effect but to a lesser extent. Conclusion It should be noted that moist heat had not only similar benefits of dry heat but in some cases enhanced benefits, and with only 25% of the time of application of the dry heat.

Impact of hydrotherapy on skin blood flow: How much is due to moisture and how much is due to heat?

ABSTRACT Hydrotherapy and whirlpool are used to increase skin blood flow and warm tissue. However, recent evidence seems to show that part of the increase in skin blood flow is not due to the warmth itself but due to the moisture content of the heat. Therefore, two series of experiments were accomplished on 10 subjects with an average age of 24.2 ± 9.7 years and free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Subjects sat in a 37°C hydrotherapy pool under two conditions: one in which a thin membrane protecting their skin from moisture while their arm was submerged in water and the second where their arm was allowed to be exposed to the water for 15 minutes. During this period of time, skin and body temperature were measured as well as skin blood flow by a Laser Doppler Imager. The results of the experiments showed that the vapor barrier blocked any change in skin moisture content during submersion in water, and while skin temperature was the same as during exposure to the water, the blood flow with the arm exposed to water increased from 101.1 ± 10.4 flux to 224.9 ± 18.2 flux, whereas blood flow increased to only 118.7 ± 11.4 flux if the moisture of the water was blocked. Thus, a substantial portion of the increase in skin blood flow associated with warm water therapy is probably associated with moisturizing of the skin rather than the heat itself.

Autonomic Stress and Balance—the Impact of Age and Diabetes

INTRODUCTION Balance is impaired in the elderly and people with diabetes. However, the effect of attempted balance on the autonomic nervous system has not been investigated. METHODS Ten control subjects, 10 subjects with type 2 diabetes (age range, 21-75 years), and 10 older subjects age-matched to the subjects with diabetes were examined to determine the effect of diabetes and age on balance and the associated autonomic stress. Subjects were asked to stand on a balance platform for 1-min periods under four conditions: (1) quiet standing, (2) quiet standing with eyes closed, (3) quiet standing eyes closed with the platform allowed to move side to side over a central pivot that allows the edge of the platform to rotate 4 inches up and down, and (4) the same platform with eyes closed. Blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and sway were recorded. RESULTS Balance was worst in the subjects with diabetes, while the cardiovascular stress, as assessed by both heart rate and blood pressure, was greatest in the older group of subjects. But subjects with diabetes, while having a greater blood pressure response to the stress induced by balance, showed a poor heart rate response, probably due to diabetes-induced autonomic damage. CONCLUSION Autonomic damage in the subjects with diabetes masked much of the stress of the inability to optimize balance in this population.

What is more damaging to vascular endothelial function: Diabetes, age, high BMI, or all of the above?

Background It is well established that there is a reduction in the skin blood flow (SBF) in response to heat with age and diabetes. While it is known that high BMI creates a stress on the cardiovascular system and increases the risk of all cause of morbidity and mortality, little is known of the effect of high BMI on SBF response to heat. Since diabetes is associated with age and a higher BMI, the interrelationship between age, BMI and SBF needs to be investigated to better understand the contribution diabetes alone has to endothelial impairment. Material/Methods This study examined the SBF to heat in young and old people with low and high BMI and people with diabetes with high BMI to determine the contribution these variables have on SBF. Subjects were ten young and older people with BMI <20 and ten young and older people with BMI >20 and ten subjects with diabetes with BMI >20. The SBF response, above the quadriceps, was determined during a 6 minutes exposure to heat at 44°C. Results Even in young people, SBF after the stress of heat exposure was reduced in subjects with a high BMI. The effect of BMI was greatest in young people and lowest in older people and people with diabetes; in people with diabetes, BMI was a more significant variable than diabetes in causing impairment of blood flow to heat. BMI, for example, was responsible for 49% of the reduction in blood flow after stress heat exposure (R=−0.7) while ageing only accounted for 16% of the blood flow reduction (R=−0.397). Conclusions These results would suggest the importance of keeping BMI low not only in people with diabetes to minimize further circulatory vascular damage, but also in young people to diminish long term circulatory vascular compromise.

The effect of body fat, aging, and diabetes on vertical and shear pressure in and under a waist belt and its effect on skin blood flow.

BACKGROUND Much attention has been given to the effect of pressure on skin blood flow in the feet of older people and people with diabetes. However, little attention has been paid to other areas of the body, especially under the belt at the waist where pressure might be high during body movements associated with exercise. This may be very important when devices such as heat packs are worn during the day under the belt because their safety relies on appropriate skin blood flow to dissipate the heat; in diabetes populations burns have been seen. METHODS Forty male and female subjects, with and without diabetes, were examined in two series of experiments to assess the vertical and shear pressure under a belt worn during different common exercises. Vertical and shear pressure under the belt, belt tension, and shear pressure were measured with a Tactilus (Sensor Products, Madison, NJ) pressure mapping system. Eleven different body movements were examined. Then, from the recorded pressures, a second series of experiments examined skin blood flow at these same pressures. RESULTS The results of the experiments showed that there was little shear and vertical pressure in thin subjects during 10 different exercises. However, for overweight subjects, pressure under the belt was as high as 150 kPa. At these high levels of pressure, skin circulation was occluded. CONCLUSIONS In subjects with diabetes who are generally overweight and have impaired circulation, hot packs should be used with caution because of the low blood flows at rest and occlusion of the circulation under the belt with body movement.