Guus de Waard

Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators

Abstract Background Our understanding of human coronary physiological behaviour is derived from animal models. We sought to describe physiological behaviour across a large collection of invasive pressure and flow velocity measurements, to provide a better understanding of the relationships between these physiological parameters and to evaluate the rationale for resting stenosis assessment. Methods and results Five hundred and sixty-seven simultaneous intracoronary pressure and flow velocity assessments from 301 patients were analysed for coronary flow velocity, trans-stenotic pressure gradient (TG), and microvascular resistance (MVR). Measurements were made during baseline and hyperaemic conditions. The whole cardiac cycle and the diastolic wave-free period were assessed. Stenoses were assessed according to fractional flow reserve (FFR) and quantitative coronary angiography DS%. With progressive worsening of stenoses, from unobstructed angiographic normal vessels to those with FFR ≤ 0.50, hyperaemic flow falls significantly from 45 to 19 cm/s, Ptrend < 0.001 in a curvilinear pattern. Resting flow was unaffected by stenosis severity and was consistent across all strata of stenosis ( Ptrend > 0.05 for all). Trans-stenotic pressure gradient rose with stenosis severity for both rest and hyperaemic measures ( Ptrend < 0.001 for both). Microvascular resistance declines with stenosis severity under resting conditions ( Ptrend < 0.001), but was unchanged at hyperaemia (2.3 ± 1.1 mmHg/cm/s; Ptrend = 0.19). Conclusions With progressive stenosis severity, TG rises. However, while hyperaemic flow falls significantly, resting coronary flow is maintained by compensatory reduction of MVR, demonstrating coronary auto-regulation. These data support the translation of coronary physiological concepts derived from animals to patients with coronary artery disease and furthermore, suggest that resting pressure indices can be used to detect the haemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses.

Doppler-Derived Intracoronary Physiology Indices Predict the Occurrence of Microvascular Injury and Microvascular Perfusion Deficits After Angiographically Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background—A total of 40% to 50% of patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction develop microvascular injury (MVI) despite angiographically successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated whether hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) immediately after angiographically successful PCI predicts MVI at cardiovascular magnetic resonance and reduced myocardial blood flow at positron emission tomography (PET). Methods and Results—Sixty patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction were included in this prospective study. Immediately after successful PCI, intracoronary pressure–flow measurements were performed and analyzed off-line to calculate HMR and indices derived from the pressure–velocity loops, including pressure at zero flow. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and H215O PET imaging were performed 4 to 6 days after PCI. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, MVI was defined as a subendocardial recess of myocardium with low signal intensity within a gadolinium-enhanced area. Myocardial perfusion was quantified using H215O PET. Reference HMR values were obtained in 16 stable patients undergoing coronary angiography. Complete data sets were available in 48 patients of which 24 developed MVI. Adequate pressure–velocity loops were obtained in 29 patients. HMR in the culprit artery in patients with MVI was significantly higher than in patients without MVI (MVI, 3.33±1.50 mm Hg/cm per second versus no MVI, 2.41±1.26 mm Hg/cm per second; P=0.03). MVI was associated with higher pressure at zero flow (45.68±13.16 versus 32.01±14.98 mm Hg; P=0.015). Multivariable analysis showed HMR to independently predict MVI (P=0.04). The optimal cutoff value for HMR was 2.5 mm Hg/cm per second. High HMR was associated with decreased myocardial blood flow on PET (myocardial perfusion reserve <2.0, 3.18±1.42 mm Hg/cm per second versus myocardial perfusion reserve ≥2.0, 2.24±1.19 mm Hg/cm per second; P=0.04). Conclusions—Doppler-flow–derived physiological indices of coronary resistance (HMR) and extravascular compression (pressure at zero flow) obtained immediately after successful primary PCI predict MVI and decreased PET myocardial blood flow. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.trialregister.nl. Unique identifier: NTR3164.

Changes in Coronary Blood Flow After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From a Patient Study and an Experimental Porcine Model.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the effects of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on baseline and hyperemic flow in both culprit and nonculprit arteries. BACKGROUND An impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR) after AMI is related to worse outcomes. The individual contribution of resting and hyperemic flow to the reduction of CFR is unknown. Furthermore, it is unclear whether currently used experimental models of AMI resemble the clinical situation with respect to coronary flow parameters. METHODS Intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements were obtained in culprit and nonculprit arteries immediately after successfully revascularized ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 40). Stable patients without obstructive coronary artery disease served as control subjects and were selected by propensity-score matching (n = 40). Similar measurements in an AMI porcine model were taken both before and immediately after 75-min balloon occlusion of the left circumflex artery (n = 11). RESULTS In the culprit artery, CFR was 36% lower than in matched control subjects (Δ = -0.9; 1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 2.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.001) with consistent observations in swine (Δ = -0.9; 1.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.4 ± 0.9 for after and before AMI, respectively; p = 0.04). An increased baseline and a decreased hyperemic flow contributed to the reduction in CFR in both patients (baseline flow: Δ = +5 and hyperemic flow: Δ = -7 cm/s) and swine (baseline flow: Δ = +8 and hyperemic flow: Δ = -6 cm/s). Similar changes were observed in nonculprit arteries (CFR: 2.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 for STEMI patients and control subjects; p < 0.001). CFR significantly correlated with infarct size as a percentage of the left ventricle in both patients (r = -0.48; p = 0.001) and swine (r = -0.61; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS CFR in both culprit and nonculprit coronary arteries decreases after AMI with contributions from both an increased baseline flow and a decreased hyperemic flow. The decreased CFR after AMI in culprit and nonculprit vessels is not a result of pre-existing microvascular dysfunction, but represents a combination of post-occlusive hyperemia, myocardial necrosis, hemorrhagic microvascular injury, compensatory hyperkinesis, and neurohumoral vasoconstriction.

Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Discordance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: An Analysis Using Doppler-Derived Coronary Flow Measurements

Objectives The study sought to determine the coronary flow characteristics of angiographically intermediate stenoses classified as discordant by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). Background Discordance between FFR and iFR occurs in up to 20% of cases. No comparisons have been reported between the coronary flow characteristics of FFR/iFR discordant and angiographically unobstructed vessels. Methods Baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were compared across 5 vessel groups: FFR+/iFR+ (108 vessels, n = 91), FFR–/iFR+ (28 vessels, n = 24), FFR+/iFR– (22 vessels, n = 22), FFR–/iFR– (208 vessels, n = 154), and an unobstructed vessel group (201 vessels, n = 153), in a post hoc analysis of the largest combined pressure and Doppler flow velocity registry (IDEAL [Iberian-Dutch-English] collaborators study). Results FFR disagreed with iFR in 14% (50 of 366). Baseline flow velocity was similar across all 5 vessel groups, including the unobstructed vessel group (p = 0.34 for variance). In FFR+/iFR– discordants, hyperemic flow velocity and CFR were similar to both FFR–/iFR– and unobstructed groups; 37.6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.1 to 50.4) cm/s vs. 40.0 [IQR: 29.7 to 52.3] cm/s and 42.2 [IQR: 33.8 to 53.2] cm/s and CFR 2.36 [IQR: 1.93 to 2.81] vs. 2.41 [IQR: 1.84 to 2.94] and 2.50 [IQR: 2.11 to 3.17], respectively (p > 0.05 for all). In FFR–/iFR+ discordants, hyperemic flow velocity, and CFR were similar to the FFR+/iFR+ group; 28.2 (IQR: 20.5 to 39.7) cm/s versus 23.5 (IQR: 16.4 to 34.9) cm/s and CFR 1.44 (IQR: 1.29 to 1.85) versus 1.39 (IQR: 1.06 to 1.88), respectively (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions FFR/iFR disagreement was explained by differences in hyperemic coronary flow velocity. Furthermore, coronary stenoses classified as FFR+/iFR– demonstrated similar coronary flow characteristics to angiographically unobstructed vessels.

Dissecting the Effects of Ischemia and Reperfusion on the Coronary Microcirculation in a Rat Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background Microvascular injury (MVI) after coronary ischemia-reperfusion is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Both ischemia and reperfusion are involved in MVI, but to what degree these phases contribute is unknown. Understanding the etiology is essential for the development of new potential therapies. Methods and Findings Rats were divided into 3 groups receiving either 30 minutes ischemia, 90 minutes ischemia or 30 minutes ischemia followed by 60 minutes reperfusion. Subsequently hearts were ex-vivo perfused in a Langendorff-model. Fluorescence and electron microscopy was used for analysis of capillary density, vascular permeability and ultrastructure. Most MVI was observed after 30 minutes ischemia followed by 60 minutes reperfusion. In comparison to the 30’ and 90’ ischemia group, wall thickness decreased (207.0±74 vs 407.8±75 and 407.5±71, p = 0.02). Endothelial nuclei in the 30’-60’ group showed irreversible damage and decreased chromatin density variation (50.5±9.4, 35.4±7.1 and 23.7±3.8, p = 0.03). Cell junction density was lowest in the 30’-60’ group (0.15±0.02 vs 2.5±0.6 and 1.8±0.7, p<0.01). Microsphere extravasation was increased in both the 90’ ischemia and 30’-60’ group. Conclusions Ischemia alone for 90 minutes induces mild morphological changes to the coronary microcirculation, with increased vascular permeability. Ischemia for 30 minutes, followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion, induces massive MVI. This shows the direct consequences of reperfusion on the coronary microcirculation. These data imply that a therapeutic window exists to protect the microcirculation directly upon coronary revascularization.

Hyperaemic microvascular resistance predicts clinical outcome and microvascular injury after myocardial infarction

Objectives Early detection of microvascular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) could identify patients at high risk of adverse clinical outcome, who may benefit from adjunctive treatment. Our objective was to compare invasively measured coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR) for their predictive power of long-term clinical outcome and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-defined microvascular injury (MVI). Methods Simultaneous intracoronary Doppler flow velocity and pressure measurements acquired immediately after revascularisation for AMI from five centres were pooled. Clinical follow-up was completed for 176 patients (mean age 60±10 years; 140(80%) male; ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) 130(74%) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 46(26%)) with median follow-up time of 3.2 years. In 110 patients with STEMI, additional CMR was performed. Results The composite end point of death and hospitalisation for heart failure occurred in 17 patients (10%). Optimal cut-off values to predict the composite end point were 1.5 for CFR and 3.0 mm Hg cm−1•s for HMR. CFR <1.5 was predictive for the composite end point (HR 3.5;95% CI 1.1 to 10.8), but not for its individual components. HMR ≥3.0 mm Hg cm−1 s was predictive for the composite end point (HR 7.0;95% CI 1.5 to 33.7) as well as both individual components. HMR had significantly greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MVI than CFR. HMR remained an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcome and MVI, whereas CFR did not. Conclusions HMR measured immediately following percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI with a cut-off value of 3.0 mm Hg cm−1 s, identifies patients with MVI who are at high risk of adverse clinical outcome. For this purpose, HMR is superior to CFR.

Invasive minimal Microvascular Resistance Is a New Index to Assess Microcirculatory Function Independent of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Background Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction portends a poor cardiovascular outcome. Invasive assessment of microcirculatory dysfunction by coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) is affected by coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study we propose minimal microvascular resistance (mMR) as a new measure of microcirculatory dysfunction and aim to determine whether mMR is influenced by CAD. Methods and Results We obtained 482 simultaneous measurements of intracoronary Doppler flow velocity and pressure. The mMR is defined as the ratio between distal coronary pressure and flow velocity during the hyperemic wave‐free period. Measurements were divided into 2 cohorts. Cohort 1 was a paired analysis involving 81 pairs with a vessel with and without CAD to investigate whether HMR, CFR, and mMR are modulated by CAD. CFR was lower, and HMR was higher, in vessels with CAD than in vessels without CAD: 2.12±0.79 versus 2.56±0.63 mm Hg·cm−1·s, P<0.001, and 2.61±1.22 versus 2.31±0.89 mm Hg·cm−1·s, P=0.04, respectively. mMR was equal in vessels with and without CAD: 1.54±0.77 versus 1.53±0.57 mm Hg·cm−1·s, P=0.90. Differences for CFR occurred when FFR was 0.60 to 0.80 or ≤0.60 but not when FFR ≥0.80. For HMR, the difference occurred only when FFR ≤0.60. For mMR, no difference was observed in any FFR stratum. Cohort 2 was used for validation and showed significant relationships for CFR and HMR with FFR: Pearson r=0.488, P<0.001 and −0.159, P=0.03, respectively; mMR had no association with FFR: Pearson r=0.055; P=0.32. Conclusions mMR is a novel index to assess microcirculatory dysfunction and is not modified by the presence of obstructive CAD.

Doppler Versus Thermodilution-Derived Coronary Microvascular Resistance to Predict Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction or Stable Angina Pectoris

Coronary microvascular resistance is increasingly measured as a predictor of clinical outcomes, but there is no accepted gold-standard measurement. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of 2 invasive indices of microvascular resistance, Doppler-derived hyperemic microvascular resistance (hMR) and thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), at predicting microvascular dysfunction. A total of 54 patients (61 ± 10 years) who underwent cardiac catheterization for stable coronary artery disease (n = 10) or acute myocardial infarction (n = 44) had simultaneous intracoronary pressure, Doppler flow velocity and thermodilution flow data acquired from 74 unobstructed vessels, at rest and during hyperemia. Three independent measurements of microvascular function were assessed, using predefined dichotomous thresholds: (1) coronary flow reserve (CFR), the average value of Doppler- and thermodilution-derived CFR; (2) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived myocardial perfusion reserve index; and (3) CMR-derived microvascular obstruction. hMR correlated with IMR (rho = 0.41, p <0.0001). hMR had better diagnostic accuracy than IMR to predict CFR (area under curve [AUC] 0.82 vs 0.58, p <0.001, sensitivity and specificity 77% and 77% vs 51% and 71%) and myocardial perfusion reserve index (AUC 0.85 vs 0.72, p = 0.19, sensitivity and specificity 82% and 80% vs 64% and 75%). In patients with acute myocardial infarction, the AUCs of hMR and IMR at predicting extensive microvascular obstruction were 0.83 and 0.72, respectively (p = 0.22, sensitivity and specificity 78% and 74% vs 44% and 91%). We conclude that these 2 invasive indices of coronary microvascular resistance only correlate modestly and so cannot be considered equivalent. In our study, the correlation between independent invasive and noninvasive measurements of microvascular function was better with hMR than with IMR.

Kinetics of coagulation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction following successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) is most frequently caused by coronary occlusion due to formation of an intracoronary thrombus in reaction to rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Little is known about kinetics of coagulation markers after STEMI in patients treated according to current guidelines. We aimed to investigate kinetics of important coagulation markers in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated STEMI patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS 60 consecutive PCI-treated STEMI patients were prospectively included. Blood samples were collected immediately after as well as 1, 4 and 7 days following PCI. Samples collected 90 days after PCI served as baseline values. ADAMTS13 activity, VWF (von Willebrand factor) activity, VWF antigen, VWF propeptide, fibrinogen antigen, D-dimer, alpha2-antiplasmin (α2AP), plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin complex (PAP), prothrombin fragment F1+2 (F1+2), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) were measured. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed at 4-6 and 90 days after PCI in 49 patients and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct size and microvascular injury (MVI) were determined. RESULTS Immediately after PCI, ADAMTS13 activity, fibrinogen antigen and α2AP levels were significantly decreased and VWF activity, VWF antigen and VWF propeptide levels were significantly elevated, compared to baseline. Individual coagulation markers and different combinations thereof were not related to LVEF or infarct size at 90 days, or the occurrence of MVI at 4-6 days after PCI. CONCLUSION Coagulation parameters show a very dynamic profile in the early days after STEMI. However, individual coagulation parameters or combinations thereof do not predict CMR-defined LVEF, infarct size or MVI.

Coronary vasomotor function in infarcted and remote myocardium after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), coronary vasomotor function is impaired in the myocardial territory supplied by the culprit artery and in remote myocardium supplied by angiographically normal vessels. The aim was to investigate the temporal evolution of coronary vasodilatory reserve in patients with AMI by use of [15O]H2O positron emission tomography, after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods 44 patients with AMI and successful revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention were included. Subjects were examined 1 week and 3 months after AMI with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography to assess the coronary flow reserve (CFR). CFR was defined as the ratio of myocardial blood flow (MBF) during hyperaemia and rest. Additionally, 45 age-matched and sex-matched subjects underwent similar scanning procedures and served as controls. Results At baseline, CFR averaged 1.81±0.66 in infarcted myocardium versus 2.51±0.81 in remote myocardium (p<0.01). In comparison, CFR in the control group averaged 4.16±1.45 (p=0.001 vs both). During follow-up, the CFR increased to 2.74±0.85 in infarcted myocardium (p<0.01), and to 2.85±0.70 in remote myocardium (p<0.01). This was predominantly due to an increase in hyperaemic MBF, from 1.62±0.54 mL/min/g to 2.19±0.68 mL/min/g in infarcted myocardium (p<0.001), and 2.17±0.54 mL/min/g to 2.60±0.65 mL/min/g in remote myocardium (p<0.001). Conclusions CFR in infarcted and remote myocardium is impaired 1 week after AMI. After 3 months vasomotor function partially recovers. However, as compared with control patients, MBF remains impaired in culprit and reference territories in patients with AMI. Clinical trial registration NTR3164.