Gwenaëlle Aubry
Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gwenaëlle Aubry.
Archive | 2016
Gwenaëlle Aubry; Glenn Alexander Magee
Introduction Kant distinguishes between two philosophical schools: one in which knowledge is the fruit of rational labor and the other in which it is rather a kind of ecstasy , the mysterious “apotheosis” of intuition. It is in Plato that he finds the origin of the latter – referring to him as a “ Mytagogue ,” the founder of a sect, addressing himself only to initiates. The truth is that the “Greek light” is not the same as Kants “Enlightenment”: It is not a brightness gradually winning the battle against darkness, but rather a flash, a sudden and powerful illumination. This model certainly governs the Platonic tradition. It is for this reason that the question is not whether one can speak of mysticism and esotericism in relation to Platonism, but rather of how to do so. It is well known that “mysticism” comes from the Greek term mysteria , which refers to the mystery cults, mystes meaning “initiate.” But this linguistic fact leaves room for different inflections, depending on which aspect of the mysteric experience (i.e., the experience linked to mystery cults) is emphasized: the initiation, the revelation, the union with the divine, or the secret. These various inflections are precisely what we try to highlight. Thus, when Plato uses the “mysteric model,” it is mainly as a model of the initiation, that is, of the break with ordinary ways of life and thought that philosophy both provokes and requires. We may, then, wonder whether Platos philosophy is actually influenced by the mystery cults, and by the figures and trends of thought related to them (especially Orphism and Pythagoreanism). And we also have to ask whether Platonic philosophy is itself homologous to this tradition, insofar as it might be based on an esoteric teaching. From Plato to Plotinus, the inflection changes: What prevails in the model of Neoplatonism is not so much the initiatic scheme, as the union with the divine. Indeed, Plotinuss philosophy proceeds from a founding experience – the union with the One-Good – and develops as an inquiry into the conditions of its occurrence and recurrence. It is in this manner that the philosophy of Plotinus inherits the mysteric tradition and also has a decisive influence on what is commonly called the “mystical tradition,” particularly the Christian one.
Phronesis | 2008
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Études platoniciennes | 2007
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Mln | 2017
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Archive | 2014
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Archive | 2012
ca.ca. Porphyrios; Marie-Hélène Congourdeau; Tiziano Dorandi; Luc Brisson; Michael Chase; Gwenaëlle Aubry; Françoise Hudry
Europe | 2009
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Etudes Philosophiques | 2009
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Diotima | 2006
Gwenaëlle Aubry
Archive | 2004
Plotinus; Gwenaëlle Aubry