Gwendolyn A. McMillin

Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing

Well‐characterized genes that affect warfarin metabolism (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9) and sensitivity (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1)) explain one‐third of the variability in therapeutic dose before the international normalized ratio (INR) is measured. To determine genotypic relevance after INR becomes available, we derived clinical and pharmacogenetic refinement algorithms on the basis of INR values (on day 4 or 5 of therapy), clinical factors, and genotype. After adjusting for INR, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes remained significant predictors (P < 0.001) of warfarin dose. The clinical algorithm had an R2 of 48% (median absolute error (MAE): 7.0 mg/week) and the pharmacogenetic algorithm had an R2 of 63% (MAE: 5.5 mg/week) in the derivation set (N = 969). In independent validation sets, the R2 was 26–43% with the clinical algorithm and 42–58% when genotype was added (P = 0.002). After several days of therapy, a pharmacogenetic algorithm estimates the therapeutic warfarin dose more accurately than one using clinical factors and INR response alone.

Genetics informatics trial (GIFT) of warfarin to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT): rationale and study design.

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is higher after the total hip or knee replacement surgery than after almost any other surgical procedure; warfarin sodium is commonly prescribed to reduce this peri-operative risk. Warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window with high inter-individual dose variability and can cause hemorrhage. The genetics-informatics trial (GIFT) of warfarin to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a 2 × 2 factorial-design, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of warfarin-dosing strategies. GIFT will answer two questions: (1) does pharmacogenetic (PGx) dosing reduce the rate of adverse events in orthopedic patients; and (2) is a lower target international normalized ratio (INR) non-inferior to a higher target INR in orthopedic participants? The composite primary endpoint of the trial is symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE (identified on screening ultrasonography), major hemorrhage, INR⩾4, and death.

Pharmacogenetic allele nomenclature: International workgroup recommendations for test result reporting

This article provides nomenclature recommendations developed by an international workgroup to increase transparency and standardization of pharmacogenetic (PGx) result reporting. Presently, sequence variants identified by PGx tests are described using different nomenclature systems. In addition, PGx analysis may detect different sets of variants for each gene, which can affect interpretation of results. This practice has caused confusion and may thereby impede the adoption of clinical PGx testing. Standardization is critical to move PGx forward.

Direct Measurement of Free Copper in Serum or Plasma Ultrafiltrate

Copper is an essential element and, under conditions of overload, a toxicant. A dramatic example of copper toxicity is Wilson disease (WD), a treatable but often fatal condition that is difficult to diagnose and monitor. A method for direct measurement of free copper concentrations in serum or plasma ultrafiltrate by inductively coupled mass spectrometry was developed and validated to assist with diagnosis and monitoring WD. The method was shown to be accurate (94%-109% recoveries), linear (0.5-800 microg/dL [0.08-126 micromol/L]), and precise (coefficient of variation, < 15% over the analytic measurement range). A reference interval (0-10 microg/dL [0-1.6 micromol/L]) was determined parametrically with 137 healthy adult (20-59 years) blood donors. No statistically significant difference was observed in males (n = 69) vs females (n = 68). Free copper concentrations for patients diagnosed with WD were at least 6-fold greater than the upper limit of the reference interval before treatment but fell within the reference interval after treatment.

A rapid and fully-automated method for the quantitation of tricyclic antidepressants in serum using turbulent-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND We describe a fully-automated turbulent-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of tricyclic antidepressant drugs (amitriptyline, desipramine, imipramine, and nortriptyline) in serum. METHODS Human serum and an internal standard were injected directly onto a Cyclone-P online solid-phase extraction (SPE) column (0.5 x 50 mm). Following removal of serum proteins and other components the analytes were transferred to a Hypersil Gold C-18 (50 x 3 mm) analytical column. Elution occurred with a gradient of water and acetonitrile each with 0.1% formic acid. Analytes were ionized and detected over a 3.5 min analysis time by electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry with selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Matrix effects were well-characterized and carryover, precision, linearity, recovery and limits of detection and quantitation were evaluated. RESULTS The simple and complex precision CVs for all compounds were < or = 16%. The limits of detection and quantitation for all drugs were < or = 3 ng/ml and <20 ng/ml, respectively. Recoveries were between 97 and 114%. Slopes for method comparison plots were all >0.96. Proficiency testing materials had values within 2 SDI of peer group means for all drugs. CONCLUSION Based on validation data, this is a specific, sensitive fully-automated method for rapid quantitation of tricyclic antidepressants in serum.

Rapid Screening for 67 Drugs and Metabolites in Serum or Plasma by Accurate-Mass LC–TOF-MS

Sixty-seven drugs and metabolites were detected in serum or plasma using a fast (7.5 min) liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF-MS) method. This method was developed as a blood drug screen, with emphasis on the detection of common drugs of abuse and drugs used to manage chronic pain. Qualitative drug detection may identify a drug exposure, assure patient adherence with prescribed therapy and document abstinence from non-prescribed medications. Compound identification is based on chromatographic retention time, mass, isotope spacing and isotope abundance. Data analysis software (Agilent) generates a compound score based on how well these observed criteria matched theoretical and empirical values. The method was validated using fortified samples and 299 residual patient specimens (920 positive results). All results were confirmed by gas chromatography-MS or LC-tandem MS. The accuracy of positive results (samples meeting all qualitative criteria for retention time, mass and compound score) was >90% for drugs and/or metabolites, except for two benzodiazepines. There were 35 false positive results (seven compounds, 3.8%) that could be distinguished by retention time and/or absence of metabolites. The most frequent was 6-acetylmorphine in the absence of morphine. The LC-TOF-MS targeted screening method presented represents a sensitive and specific technology for drug screening of serum or plasma.

Effect of Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing on Clinical Events and Anticoagulation Control Among Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: The GIFT Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Warfarin use accounts for more medication-related emergency department visits among older patients than any other drug. Whether genotype-guided warfarin dosing can prevent these adverse events is unknown. Objective To determine whether genotype-guided dosing improves the safety of warfarin initiation. Design, Setting, and Patients The randomized clinical Genetic Informatics Trial (GIFT) of Warfarin to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis included patients aged 65 years or older initiating warfarin for elective hip or knee arthroplasty and was conducted at 6 US medical centers. Enrollment began in April 2011 and follow-up concluded in October 2016. Interventions Patients were genotyped for the following polymorphisms: VKORC1-1639G>A, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, and CYP4F2 V433M. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, patients were randomized to genotype-guided (n = 831) or clinically guided (n = 819) warfarin dosing on days 1 through 11 of therapy and to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of either 1.8 or 2.5. The recommended doses of warfarin were open label, but the patients and clinicians were blinded to study group assignment. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the composite of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Patients underwent a screening lower-extremity duplex ultrasound approximately 1 month after arthroplasty. Results Among 1650 randomized patients (mean age, 72.1 years [SD, 5.4 years]; 63.6% women; 91.0% white), 1597 (96.8%) received at least 1 dose of warfarin therapy and completed the trial (n = 808 in genotype-guided group vs n = 789 in clinically guided group). A total of 87 patients (10.8%) in the genotype-guided group vs 116 patients (14.7%) in the clinically guided warfarin dosing group met at least 1 of the end points (absolute difference, 3.9% [95% CI, 0.7%-7.2%], P = .02; relative rate [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95]). The numbers of individual events in the genotype-guided group vs the clinically guided group were 2 vs 8 for major bleeding (RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-1.15), 56 vs 77 for INR of 4 or greater (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), 33 vs 38 for venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54-1.34), and there were no deaths. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty and treated with perioperative warfarin, genotype-guided warfarin dosing, compared with clinically guided dosing, reduced the combined risk of major bleeding, INR of 4 or greater, venous thromboembolism, or death. Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of personalized warfarin dosing. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01006733

Gene-based Warfarin Dosing Compared With Standard of Care Practices in an Orthopedic Surgery Population: A Prospective, Parallel Cohort Study

Warfarin remains a difficult drug to manage due to a narrow therapeutic range and wide interindividual variability in dose requirements. The relationship between warfarin sensitivity and CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants is strong, and is the basis for several proposed dosing algorithms. Here a gene-based dosing algorithm was compared with standard of care dosing in patients receiving warfarin to prevent venous thromboembolism after joint replacement surgery. Participants (n = 229) were adults (≥18 years) undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty and receiving warfarin under the direction of a dedicated anticoagulation services team. Patients were assigned to genotype-based or standard of care dosing arms in an alternating fashion. Initial dose for patients was determined by validated algorithms from Sconce 2005 and Pendleton 2008. Management was based on INR, but dose was adjusted less aggressively for patients with CYP2C9 variants. The primary endpoint was reduction in the incidence of adverse events; additional endpoints included time to first therapeutic INR (1.8-2.9), time to first supratherapeutic INR, and percent of INR determinations that fell below, within, and above the therapeutic range. Endpoints did not achieve statistical significance, possibly due to the management of this study by a dedicated and experienced anticoagulation services team. Trends in the data suggest that patients with genetic variants progressed to a therapeutic INR faster than patients in whom genetic variants were not detected, and there were fewer adverse events in the genotype-based dosing arm. In addition, the results of this study confirm those of others demonstrating clear relationship of genotype for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 with warfarin dose requirements; as the number of variants in these genes increases, the dose requirement decreases. Of note, the gene-based algorithm utilized here significantly underpredicted the dose requirement for participants with no variants, indicating that patients with no variants should be managed with a different algorithm than patients who inherit genetic variants in CYP2C9 and/or VKORC1. In conclusion, gene-based dosing did not improve warfarin management as defined by INR dose response, using the described protocols for implementation. Findings suggest alternative strategies for dosing based on the presence or absence of genetic variants is needed.

Prospective pilot trial of PerMIT versus standard anticoagulation service management of patients initiating oral anticoagulation

We performed a randomised pilot trial of PerMIT, a novel decision support tool for genotype-based warfarin initiation and maintenance dosing, to assess its efficacy for improving warfarin management. We prospectively studied 26 subjects to compare PerMIT-guided management with routine anticoagulation service management. CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype results for 13 subjects randomly assigned to the PerMIT arm were recorded within 24 hours of enrolment. To aid in INR interpretation, PerMIT calculates estimated loading and maintenance doses based on a patients genetic and clinical characteristics and displays calculated S-warfarin plasma concentrations based on planned or administered dosages. In comparison to control subjects, patients in the PerMIT study arm demonstrated a 3.6-day decrease in the time to reach a stabilised INR within the target therapeutic range (4.7 vs. 8.3 days, p = 0.015); a 12.8% increase in time spent within the therapeutic interval over the first 25 days of therapy (64.3% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.180); and a 32.9% decrease in the frequency of warfarin dose adjustments per INR measurement (38.3% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.007). Serial measurements of plasma S-warfarin concentrations were also obtained to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of the pharmacokinetic model during induction therapy. The PerMIT S-warfarin plasma concentration model estimated 62.8% of concentrations within 0.15 mg/l. These pilot data suggest that the PerMIT method and its incorporation of genotype/phenotype information may help practitioners increase the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of warfarin therapeutic management.

Rapid and specific quantification of ethylene glycol levels: adaptation of a commercial enzymatic assay to automated chemistry analyzers.

Ethylene glycol ingestion, accidental or intentional, can be a life-threatening emergency. Assays are not available from most clinical laboratories, and, thus, results often require many hours or days to obtain. Enzymatic assays, adaptable to automated chemistry analyzers, have been evaluated, but they have been plagued by analytic problems. With an alternative method of data analysis applied to an existing enzymatic assay, a modified assay was developed and validated on 2 different automated chemistry systems. Compared with a previously validated method based on gas chromatography with flame ionization detection, the modified enzymatic assay showed excellent agreement on patient samples (y = 1.0227x -1.24; r(2) = 0.9725), with a large analytic measuring range (2.5-300 mg/dL [0.4-48.4 mmol/L]). Interferences from propylene glycol, various butanediols, and other related compounds were almost entirely eliminated; when present, they generated error flags rather than falsely elevated ethylene glycol results. This modified assay should make it possible for more clinical laboratories to offer ethylene glycol measurements.