Gyeong Hoon Kang

Aberrant CpG Island Hypermethylation Along Multistep Hepatocarcinogenesis

To determine the methylation profile of multiple tumor-related genes during multistep hepatocarcinogenesis, we investigated the methylation status of CpG islands of 9 genes, using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction for 60 paired hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC liver tissue samples, 22 dysplastic nodule (DN), 30 liver cirrhosis (LC), 34 chronic hepatitis (CH) and 20 normal liver samples. The methylation status of 9 genes was correlated to the clinicopathological findings of HCC patients. All HCC samples showed methylation of at least one gene, whereas it was shown in 72.7% of DN and 40% of LC, but was not shown in CH and normal liver samples (P < 0.001). The number of genes methylated showed a stepwise increase with the progression of stages (0 for normal liver and CH, 0.5 for LC, 1.5 for DN, and 3.7 for HCC (P < 0.001)). The genes frequently methylated in HCC were APC (81.7%), GSTP1 (76.7%), RASSF1A (66.7%), p16 (48.3%), COX-2 (35%), and E-cadherin (33.3%). COX-2, p16, RASSF1A, and TIMP-3 were not methylated in LC and CH from patients without concurrent HCC. Chronic liver diseases with concurrent HCC showed higher methylation frequencies of the tested genes, and a higher number of methylated genes than those without concurrent HCC. HCC patients with methylation of E-cadherin or GSTP1 showed poorer survival than those without (P = 0.034 and 0.043, respectively). In conclusion, our results indicated that CpG island methylation of tumor-related genes is an early and frequent event, and accumulates step-by-step during a multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. CpG island methylation of E-cadherin or GSTP1 might serve as a potential biomarker for prognostication of HCC patients.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Gastric Carcinoma Demonstrates Frequent Aberrant Methylation of Multiple Genes and Constitutes CpG Island Methylator Phenotype-Positive Gastric Carcinoma

CpG island methylation is an important mechanism for inactivating the genes involved in tumorigenesis. Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the tumors that exhibits a high frequency of aberrant CpG island methylation. There have been many reports suggesting a close link between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and the development of GC. However, little is known about the oncogenic mechanism of EBV in gastric carcinogenesis. Twenty-one cases of EBV-positive GC and 56 cases of EBV-negative GC were examined for aberrant DNA methylation of the CpG islands of 19 genes or loci and the differences in the methylation frequency between EBV-positive and -negative GCs were investigated to determine a role of aberrant methylation in EBV-related gastric carcinogenesis. The average number of methylated genes or loci was higher in EBV-positive GCs than in EBV-negative GCs (13.4 versus 7.8, respectively, P < 0.001). EBV-positive GCs showed methylation in at least 10 CpG islands (52.6% of the tested genes), whereas 62.5% of EBV-negative GCs showed methylation in <10 CpG islands. THBS1, APC, p16, 14-3-3 sigma, MINT1, and MINT25 were methylated at a frequency >90% in EBV-positive GCs. The methylation frequency difference in the respective CpG islands between EBV-positive and -negative GCs was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Among these genes or loci, the methylation frequency of p16 in the EBV-positive GCs was more than three times higher than in the EBV-negative GCs. The PTEN, RASSF1A, GSTP1, MGMT, and MINT2 were methylated in EBV-positive GCs at a frequency of more than three times that of the EBV-negative GCs. These results demonstrate a relationship between EBV and aberrant methylation in GC and suggest that aberrant methylation may be an important mechanism of EBV-related gastric carcinogenesis.

Identification of MicroRNA-21 as a Biomarker for Chemoresistance and Clinical Outcome Following Adjuvant Therapy in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. The high risk of recurrence following surgical resection provides the rationale for adjuvant therapy. However, only a subset of patients benefit from adjuvant therapy. Identification of molecular markers to predict treatment outcome is therefore warranted. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether expression of novel candidate biomarkers, including microRNAs, can predict clinical outcome in PDAC patients treated with adjuvant therapy. Methodology/Principal Findings Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded specimens from a cohort of 82 resected Korean PDAC cases were analyzed for protein expression by immunohistochemistry and for microRNA expression using quantitative Real-Time PCR. Cox proportional hazards model analysis in the subgroup of patients treated with adjuvant therapy (N = 52) showed that lower than median miR-21 expression was associated with a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) for death (HR = 0.316; 95%CI = 0.166–0.600; P = 0.0004) and recurrence (HR = 0.521; 95%CI = 0.280–0.967; P = 0.04). MiR-21 expression status emerged as the single most predictive biomarker for treatment outcome among all 27 biological and 9 clinicopathological factors evaluated. No significant association was detected in patients not treated with adjuvant therapy. In an independent validation cohort of 45 frozen PDAC tissues from Italian cases, all treated with adjuvant therapy, lower than median miR-21 expression was confirmed to be correlated with longer overall as well as disease-free survival. Furthermore, transfection with anti-miR-21 enhanced the chemosensitivity of PDAC cells. Conclusions Significance Low miR-21 expression was associated with benefit from adjuvant treatment in two independent cohorts of PDAC cases, and anti-miR-21 increased anticancer drug activity in vitro. These data provide evidence that miR-21 may allow stratification for adjuvant therapy, and represents a new potential target for therapy in PDAC.

Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Compared with open resection, laparoscopic resection of rectal cancers is associated with improved short-term outcomes, but high-level evidence showing similar long-term outcomes is scarce. We aimed to compare survival outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for patients with mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer. METHODS The Comparison of Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low REctal cancer After Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN) trial was an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial done between April 4, 2006, and Aug 26, 2009, at three centres in Korea. Patients (aged 18-80 years) with cT3N0-2M0 mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either open or laparoscopic surgery. Randomisation was stratified by sex and preoperative chemotherapy regimen. Investigators were masked to the randomisation sequence; patients and clinicians were not masked to the treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was 3 year disease-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 15%. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00470951. FINDINGS We randomly assigned 340 patients to receive either open surgery (n=170) or laparoscopic surgery (n=170). 3 year disease-free survival was 72·5% (95% CI 65·0-78·6) for the open surgery group and 79·2% (72·3-84·6) for the laparoscopic surgery group, with a difference that was lower than the prespecified non-inferiority margin (-6·7%, 95% CI -15·8 to 2·4; p<0·0001). 25 (15%) patients died in the open group and 20 (12%) died in the laparoscopic group. No deaths were treatment related. INTERPRETATION Our results show that laparoscopic resection for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy provides similar outcomes for disease-free survival as open resection, thus justifying its use. FUNDING National Cancer Center, South Korea.

Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation of chronic gastritis, in relation to aging, gender, intestinal metaplasia, and chronic inflammation.

Aberrant hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands is an important mechanism for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. CpG island hypermethylation occurs in relation to tumorigenesis or aging. Gastric cancer is one of the tumors with a high level of aberrant CpG island methylation. However, the data on the methylation status of normal gastric mucosa has been very limited. The present study attempted to compare the methylation status of nonneoplastic gastric mucosa, using clinicopathological parameters, including age, gender, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), acute and chronic inflammation, and intestinal metaplasia. Two hundred sixty-eight nonneoplastic gastric mucosa samples were studied for the methylation status of 11 genes (COX-2, DAP-kinase, E-cadherin, GSTP1, MGMT, hMLH1, p14, p16, THBS1, TIMP3, and RASSF1A), using methylation-specific PCR. CpG island hypermethylation was found in 53.7, 41, 37.7, 23.1, 18.7, 10.9, 10, 4.1, 3.4, 1.7, 0.4% for DAP-kinase, E-cadherin, THBS1, TIMP3, p14, MGMT, p16, COX-2, GSTP1, hMLH1 and RASSF1A, respectively. Five genes (DAP-kinase, E-cadherin, p14, THBS1, and TIMP-3) showed a general progressive increase in the methylation frequency as a function of aging, whereas the other genes (COX-2, GSTP1, MGMT, hMLH1, p16, and RASSF1A) were rarely methylated. Male patients showed higher numbers of methylated genes than females (3.2 vs. 2.1, respectively, P = 0.002). Gastritis samples with marked intestinal metaplasia, showed higher numbers of genes methylated than those without (3.7 vs. 2.6, respectively, P = 0.021). Gastritis samples with marked infiltration of mononuclear cells displayed higher numbers of genes methylated than those with mild or moderate infiltration of mononuclear cells (3.4 vs. 2.5 or 2.5, respectively, P < 0.05). Our results demonstrated that many genes are methylated in the stomach as a function of age, and suggested that male gender, intestinal metaplasia, and chronic inflammation are closely associated with increased methylation in nonneoplastic gastric mucosa samples.

Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation of multiple genes in prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

To date, several reports have been published about CpG island methylation of various genes in prostate cancer. However, most of these studies have focused on cancer tissue only or a single gene and data about concurrent methylation of multiple genes in prostate cancer or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) are limited. The aim of the present study was to determine the methylation profile of 11 tumour‐related genes in prostate cancer and PIN. Seventy‐one samples, including 37 prostate cancers, 14 PINs, and 20 normal prostates, were examined for the methylation status of 11 tumour‐related genes using methylation‐specific PCR. The mean number of genes methylated was significantly higher in prostate cancer and PIN than in non‐neoplastic prostate (4.4, 3, and 0.2, respectively; p < 0.001). In prostate cancer, APC, GSTP1, MGMT, and RASSF1A were frequently methylated at a frequency of 56.8%, 86.5%, 75.7%, and 83.8%, respectively. These genes were methylated in more than 30% of PINs. Prostate cancers with high serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) (more than 8 ng/ml) or a high Gleason score (GS) (3 + 4 or more) showed higher numbers of methylated genes than those with low serum PSA (8 or less) or low GS (3 + 3 or less) (5.4 versus 2.5 and 5.4 versus 3.1, respectively; p < 0.05). The methylation frequency of APC, RASSF1A, and RUNX3 was higher in prostate cancers with high serum PSA or with high GS than in those with low PSA or with low GS, respectively, the differences reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05). A strong association between MGMT methylation and loss of MGMT expression was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. CpG island methylation is a frequent event, occurs early, and accumulates during multi‐step prostatic carcinogenesis. High levels of CpG island hypermethylation might serve as a potential biological marker for aggressive prostate cancer. Copyright

Methylation of RUNX3 in various types of human cancers and premalignant stages of gastric carcinoma.

Accumulating evidence has identified a mechanism potentially responsible for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, namely transcriptional silencing by aberrant methylation of CpG islands. A previous study has shown the loss of RUNX3 expression, due to aberrant methylation of its CpG island, in gastric cancer cell lines, suggesting that RUNX3 is a target for epigenetic gene silencing in gastric carcinogenesis. However, there are limited data on the methylation status of RUNX3 in the neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues in various types of human cancers, including gastric cancer. Here, we report that 60% of gastric cancer cell lines and 64% of primary gastric carcinomas (n=75) were methylated at the RUNX3 CpG island. RUNX3 methylation was also detected in hepatocellular carcinomas (73%, n=48), larynx cancers (62%, n=37), lung cancers (46%, n=24), breast cancers (25%, n=25), prostate cancers (23%, n=44), endometrial cancers (12.5%, n=24), colon cancers (4.9%, n=61) and uterine cervical cancers (2.5%, n=40), showing that RUNX3 methylation is not restricted to gastric cancer. Interestingly, the RUNX3 methylation was especially frequent in tumors from tissues of a foregut derivative, that is, the stomach, liver, larynx and lung. Next, the methylation status of RUNX3 in various non-neoplastic tissues was examined, including the premalignant lesions of gastric carcinomas. The RUNX3 methylation was found in 8.1% of chronic gastritis (n=99), 28.1% of intestinal metaplasia (n=32), 27.3% of gastric adenomas (n=77) and 64% of gastric carcinomas (n=75), but not in chronic hepatitis B, normal prostate and colon mucosa, even though in cases of chronic hepatitis, the methylation frequency of its neoplastic tissues was very high. In conclusion, RUNX3 methylation is frequently found in human cancers, including gastric cancer, and is mostly cancer specific, with the exception of the stomach, and thus, might be useful as a potential diagnostic biomarker of cancer.

Hypermethylation of CpG island loci and hypomethylation of LINE-1 and Alu repeats in prostate adenocarcinoma and their relationship to clinicopathological features.

Promoter CpG island hypermethylation is an important carcinogenic event in prostate adenocarcinoma. Regardless of tissue type, human cancers have in common both focal CpG island hypermethylation and global genomic hypomethylation. The present study evaluated CpG island loci hypermethylation and LINE‐1 and Alu repeat hypomethylation in prostate adenocarcinoma, analysed the relationship between them, and correlated these findings with clinicopathological features. We examined 179 cases of prostate adenocarcinoma and 30 cases of benign prostate hypertrophy for the methylation status of 22 CpG island loci and the methylation levels of LINE‐1 and Alu repeats using methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction and combined bisulphite restriction analysis, respectively. The following 16 CpG island loci were found to display cancer‐related hypermethylation: RASSF1A, GSTP1, RARB, TNFRSF10C, APC, BCL2, MDR1, ASC, TIG1, RBP1, COX2, THBS1, TNFRSF10D, CD44, p16, and RUNX3. Except for the last four CpG island loci, hypermethylation of each of the remaining 12 CpG island loci displayed a close association with one or more of the prognostic parameters (ie preoperative serum prostate specific antigen level, Gleason score sum, and clinical stage). Prostate adenocarcinoma with hypermethylation of each of ASC, COX2, RARB, TNFRSF10C, MDR1, TIG1, RBP1, NEUROG1, RASSF1A, and GSTP1 showed a significantly lower methylation level of Alu or LINE‐1 than prostate adenocarcinoma without hypermethylation. In addition, hypomethylation of Alu or LINE‐1 was closely associated with one or more of the above prognostic parameters. These data suggest that in tumour progression a close relationship exists between CpG island hypermethylation and the hypomethylation of repetitive elements, and that CpG island hypermethylation and DNA hypomethylation contribute to cancer progression. Copyright

Panels of Immunohistochemical Markers Help Determine Primary Sites of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma

CONTEXT Although identification of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma has a profound clinical impact, diagnosing the organ of origin is frequently difficult. Because none of the individual immunohistochemical markers used for tissue identification are both site specific and site sensitive, multiple markers are needed to improve the prediction of primary sites. OBJECTIVE To develop an effective approach to immunohistochemically evaluate metastatic adenocarcinoma for the assignment of a likely primary site of origin. DESIGN Expression profiles of CDX2, cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), MUC2, MUC5AC, SMAD4, estrogen receptor (ER), and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) were generated in adenocarcinomas from 7 primary sites, followed by construction of a decision tree and design of multiple-marker panels. Expression of these markers was evaluated immunohistochemically in 314 primary adenocarcinomas (50 cases each of colorectal, gastric, lung, pancreatic, bile duct, and breast, and 14 cases of ovarian origin) using the tissue array method. Results were validated using 60 cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma with known primaries. RESULTS Organ-specific immunostaining profiles using multiple markers provided high sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in detecting primary adenocarcinomas, as follows: colorectal, TTF-1-/CDX2+/CK7-/CK20+ or TTF-1-/CDX2+/CK7-/CK20-/(CEA+ or MUC2+); ovarian, CK7+/MUC5AC+/TTF-1-/CDX2-/CEA-/GCDFP-15-; breast, GCDFP-15+/TTF-1-/CDX2-/CK7+/CK20- or ER+/ TTF-1-/CDX2-/CK20-/CEA-/MUC5AC-; lung, TTF-1+ or TTF-1-/CDX2-/CK7+/CK20-/GCDFP-15-/ER-/CEA-/ MUC5AC-; pancreaticobiliary, TTF-1-/CDX2-/CK7+/ CEA+/MUC5AC+; and stomach, TTF-1-/CDX2+/CK7+/ CK20-. Overall, these combined phenotypes correctly predicted the tester samples (metastatic adenocarcinomas with known primaries) in 75% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Determination of tissue-specific immunostaining profiles is valuable in the diagnostic differentiation of metastatic adenocarcinomas from seven common primary sites and should help to correctly predict the organ of primary tumor origin.

Treatment Guidelines for Branch Duct Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: When Can We Operate or Observe?

BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to investigate the clinicopathological features of branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and to determine safe criteria for its observation. Most clinicians agree that surgical resection is required to treat main duct-type IPMN because of its high malignancy rate. However, no definite treatment guideline (with respect to surgery or observation) has been issued on the management of branch duct type IPMN.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 138 patients who underwent operations for IPMN between 1993 and 2006 at five institutes in Korea.ResultsOf 138 patients (mean age, 60.6 years; 87 men, 51 women), 76 underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, 39 distal pancreatectomy, 4 total pancreatectomy, and 20 limited pancreatic resection. There were 112 benign cases: 47 adenoma, 63 borderline cases, and 26 malignant cases, with 9 of these being noninvasive and 17 invasive. By univariate analysis, tumor size and the presence of a mural nodule were identified as meaningful predictors of malignancy. By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a tumor size of >2 cm was found to be the most valuable predictor of malignancy. When cases were classified according to tumor size and the presence of a mural nodule, the malignancy rate for a tumor ≤2 cm without a mural nodule was 9.2%, for a tumor of ≤2 cm plus a mural nodule was 25%, and for other conditions such as tumor >2 cm, >25%.ConclusionsMany branch duct IPMNs are malignant. Surgical treatment is recommended, except in cases that are strongly suspected to be benign or cases that present a high operative risk. Observation is only recommended in patients with a tumor size of ≤2 cm without a mural nodule.