H. J. Kolb

Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)

In the face of competing first-line treatment options for CML, early prediction of prognosis on imatinib is desirable to assure favorable survival or otherwise consider the use of a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A total of 1303 newly diagnosed imatinib-treated patients (pts) were investigated to correlate molecular and cytogenetic response at 3 and 6 months with progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). The persistence of BCR-ABL transcript levels >10% according to the international scale (BCR-ABLIS) at 3 months separated a high-risk group (28% of pts; 5-year OS: 87%) from a group with >1–10% BCR-ABLIS (41% of pts; 5-year OS: 94%; P=0.012) and from a group with ⩽1% BCR-ABLIS (31% of pts; 5-year OS: 97%; P=0.004). Cytogenetics identified high-risk pts by >35% Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases (Ph+, 27% of pts; 5-year OS: 87%) compared with ⩽35% Ph+ (73% of pts; 5-year OS: 95%; P=0.036). At 6 months, >1% BCR-ABLIS (37% of pts; 5-year OS: 89%) was associated with inferior survival compared with ⩽1% (63% of pts; 5-year OS: 97%; P<0.001) and correspondingly >0% Ph+ (34% of pts; 5-year OS: 91%) compared with 0% Ph+ (66% of pts; 5-year OS: 97%; P=0.015). Treatment optimization is recommended for pts missing these landmarks.

Comparative analysis of the impact of risk profile and of drug therapy on survival in CML using Sokal's index and a new score

Survival times in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) may vary widely depending on the risk profiles of patients. This fact is frequently not, or not sufficiently, considered in evaluating survival in CML, and some studies do not report risk profiles. Therefore we analysed the relative impact of risk profile and therapy on survival using the median survival times of therapy groups and of risk groups of the three‐arm randomized German CML Study I (interferon alpha v hydroxyurea v busulphan; median survival times 65 v 56 v 45 months, n=490, median observation time 70.4 months). The impact of risk profile (Sokal) on survival as determined by the survival difference between high and low risk patients (40 months) was twice the maximum survival difference between treatment groups (20 months). A similar ratio was obtained after stratification for therapy and for risk profile. Since Sokals index has been reported to prognostically discriminate IFN‐treated patients less well than chemotherapy‐treated patients, a new score with better discrimination of IFN‐treated patients was also used. The results were similar for both scores. We conclude that the risk profile at diagnosis is still more important for survival of CML patients than therapy. Therefore patients should be stratified according to risk profile for comparisons of survival times between studies and treatment arms.

Chronic myeloid leukemia in the elderly: long-term results from randomized trials with interferon alpha

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in older patients has not been studied well. To assess the long-term outcome of older patients with Philadelphia- and/or BCR-ABL-positive CML, 199 patients aged ⩾60 years representing 23% of 856 patients enrolled in the German randomized CML-studies I (interferon α (IFN) vs hydroxyurea (HU) vs busulfan (BU) and II (IFN+HU vs HU alone) were analyzed after a median observation time of 7 years. In all, 45 patients were treated with Bu, 63 with HU, and 91 with IFN. The 5-year survival was 38% in patients ⩾60 years and 47% in patients <60 years (P<0.001). Whereas 5-year survival in chemotherapy-treated older patients was inferior to that in younger patients (33 vs 46%, P=0.006 for HU and 29 vs 38%, P=0.042 for Bu), no significant survival difference could be verified in IFN-treated patients (46 vs 53%, P=0.077). Calculation of age-adjusted, relative survival confirmed these results. Adverse effects of IFN were similar in both age groups, but IFN dosage to achieve treatment goals was lower in older patients. We conclude that the course of CML is not different in the elderly. They require lower IFN doses, achieve the same hematologic and cytogenetic response rates and the same survival advantage at comparable toxicity.

Secondary malignancies in chronic myeloid leukemia patients after imatinib-based treatment: long-term observation in CML Study IV

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been profoundly improved by the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Long-term survival with imatinib is excellent with a 8-year survival rate of ∼88%. Long-term toxicity of TKI treatment, especially carcinogenicity, has become a concern. We analyzed data of the CML study IV for the development of secondary malignancies. In total, 67 secondary malignancies were found in 64 of 1525 CML patients in chronic phase treated with TKI (n=61) and interferon-α only (n=3). The most common malignancies (n⩾4) were prostate, colorectal and lung cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), malignant melanoma, non-melanoma skin tumors and breast cancer. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for all malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin tumors was 0.88 (95% confidence interval (0.63–1.20)) for men and 1.06 (95% CI 0.69–1.55) for women. SIRs were between 0.49 (95% CI 0.13–1.34) for colorectal cancer in men and 4.29 (95% CI 1.09–11.66) for NHL in women. The SIR for NHL was significantly increased for men and women. An increase in the incidence of secondary malignancies could not be ascertained. The increased SIR for NHL has to be considered and long-term follow-up of CML patients is warranted, as the rate of secondary malignancies may increase over time.

Assessment of imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: 10-year survival results of the randomized CML study IV and impact of non-CML determinants

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-study IV was designed to explore whether treatment with imatinib (IM) at 400 mg/day (n=400) could be optimized by doubling the dose (n=420), adding interferon (IFN) (n=430) or cytarabine (n=158) or using IM after IFN-failure (n=128). From July 2002 to March 2012, 1551 newly diagnosed patients in chronic phase were randomized into a 5-arm study. The study was powered to detect a survival difference of 5% at 5 years. After a median observation time of 9.5 years, 10-year overall survival was 82%, 10-year progression-free survival was 80% and 10-year relative survival was 92%. Survival between IM400 mg and any experimental arm was not different. In a multivariate analysis, risk group, major-route chromosomal aberrations, comorbidities, smoking and treatment center (academic vs other) influenced survival significantly, but not any form of treatment optimization. Patients reaching the molecular response milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months had a significant survival advantage. For responders, monotherapy with IM400 mg provides a close to normal life expectancy independent of the time to response. Survival is more determined by patients’ and disease factors than by initial treatment selection. Although improvements are also needed for refractory disease, more life-time can currently be gained by carefully addressing non-CML determinants of survival.

The German competence network 'Acute and chronic leukemias'

R Hehlmann, U Berger, C Aul, Th Büchner, H Döhner, G Ehninger, A Ganser, N Gökbuget, D Hoelzer, K Überla, W Gassmann, WD Ludwig, H Rieder, M Kneba, A Hochhaus, A Reiter, W Hiddemann, OG Ottmann, U Germing, K Adelhard, M Dugas, P Dirschedl, D Messerer, A Böhme, E Harrison-Neu, M Griesshammer, J Kienast, HJ Kolb, AD Ho, M Hallek, A Neubauer, B Schlegelberger, D Niederwieser, G Heil, T Müller and J Hasford Kompetenznetz ‘Akute und chronische Leukämien’, III. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Klinikum Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

Cytogenetic response to prior treatment with interferon- α is predictive for survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia

We investigated the impact of a cytogenetic response (CyR) to IFN prior to and at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on transplant-related mortality (TRM), relapse rate and survival probability after HSCT in 162 transplanted patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. One-hundred-one patients (62.3%) achieved a CyR prior to HSCT. Survival probabilities were higher in patients, who achieved any CyR prior to HSCT than in patients without CyR (63.6 vs 49.2%: P=0.019). Survival probabilities in patients, who achieved a major CyR were better than in patients with minimal and minor CyR or in patients with no CyR (69.4 vs 58.8% vs 49.2%: P=0.040). TRM and survival of chronic phase patients without CyR at the time of HSCT were similar to that of patients transplanted in advanced phase. Both groups combined had an outcome inferior to patients with at least minimal CyR (TRM, Gray test: P=0.016, survival, log-rank test: P=0.002). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified CyR prior to or at HSCT as a strong and independently favorable prognostic factor. We therefore conclude that allogeneic HSCT in CyR should be investigated prospectively as an alternative treatment option in defined patient groups.