H. J. Singer

Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions

During the solar wind dynamic pressure enhancement, around 0200 UT on January 11, 1997, at the end of the January 6-11 magnetic cloud event. the magnetopause was pushed inside geosynchronous orbit. The LANL 1994-084 and GMS 4 geosynchronous satellites crossed the magnetopause and moved into the magnetosheath. Also, the Geotail satellite was in the magnetosheath while the Interball 1 satellite observed magnetopause crossings. This event provides an excellent opportunity to test and validate the prediction capabilities and accuracy of existing models of the magnetopause location for producing space weather forecasts. In this paper, we compare predictions of two models: the Petrinec and Russell [1996] model and the Shue et al. [1997] model. These two models correctly predict the magnetopause crossings on the dayside; however. there are some differences in the predictions along the flank. The Shue et al. [1997] model correctly predicts the Geotail magnetopause crossings and partially predicts the Interball 1 crossings. The Petrinec and Russell [1996] model correctly predicts the Interball 1 crossings and is partially consistent with the Geotail observations. We further found that some of the inaccuracy in Shue et al.s predictions is due to the inappropriate linear extrapolation from the parameter range for average solar wind conditions to that for extreme conditions. To improve predictions tinder extreme solar wind conditions, we introduce a nonlinear dependence of the parameters on the solar wind conditions to represent the saturation effects of the solar wind dynamic pressure on the flaring of the magnetopause and saturation effects of the interplanetary magnetic field B z on the subsolar standoff distance. These changes lead to a better agreement with the Interball 1 observations for this event.

A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape

In this study a new functional form, r = r 0 [2/(1 + cos θ)] α , is used to fit. the size and shape of the magnetopause using crossings from ISEE 1 and 2, Active Magnetospheric Particle Tracer Explorers/Ion Release Module (AMPTE/IRM), and IMP 8 satellites. This functional form has two parameters, τ 0 and α, representing the standoff distance and the level of tail flaring. The value r is the radial distance at an angle (θ) between the Sun-Earth line and the direction of τ. It is found that r 0 varies with the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) B z component and has a break in the slope at B z = 0 nT. The best-fit value of τ 0 decreases with increasing southward IMF B z . For northward IMF B z , the best-fit value of τ 0 increases slightly with increasing B z . The best-fit value of α increases monotonically with decreasing IMF B z . The dynamic pressure (D p ) also changes τ 0 and α. The parameters D p and τ 0 are related by a power law of -1/(6.6±0.8). The best-fit value of α is slightly larger for larger dynamic pressure, which implies that D p also has a role in flux transfer from the dayside to the nightside, but the size of this effect is small. An explicit function for the size and shape of the magnetopause, in terms of D p and B z , is obtained by using multiple parameter fitting in a form that is useful for operational space applications such as predicting when satellites at geosynchronous orbit will be found in the magnetosheath.

Global simulation of the Geospace Environment Modeling substorm challenge event

We use a global model of Earths magnetosphere and ionosphere to simulate the Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) substorm challenge event of November 24, 1996. We compare our results to International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects (IMAGE) ground magnetometer data, assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics (AMIE) polar cap potential and field aligned current patterns, Polar Visible Imaging System (VIS) estimates of the polar cap magnetic flux, GOES 8 geosynchronous magnetometer data, IMP 8 magnetometer data, and Geotail plasma and magnetic field data. We find generally good agreement between the simulation and the data. The modeled evolution of this substorm generally follows the phenomenological near-Earth neutral line model. However, reconnection in the tail is very localized, which makes establishing a causal relation between tail dynamics and auroral dynamics difficult, if not impossible. We also find that the model results critically depend on the parameterization of auroral Hall and Pedersen conductances and anomalous resistivity in the magnetosphere. For many combinations of parameters that enter these parameterizations, no substorm develops in the model, but instead the magnetosphere enters a steady convection mode. The main deviation of the model from the data is excessive convection, which leads to a strong, driven westward electrojet in the growth phase, only partial tail loading, and a reduced recovery phase. Possible remedies are a better model for auroral conductances, an improved anomalous resistivity model, and a more realistic treatment of the ring current.

Which magnetic storms produce relativistic electrons at geosynchronous orbit

Relativistic electrons appear in the geosynchronous environment following some, but not all, geomagnetic storms. The ability to identify which storms produce these electrons would bring us much closer to explaining the mechanism responsible for their appearance, and it would provide the space weather community with a means to anticipate the electron hazard to geosynchronous spacecraft. We apply a recently developed statistical technique to produce an hourly time series of relativistic electron conditions at local noon along geosynchronous orbit using several geosynchronous monitors. We use a cross-correlation analysis to determine what parameters in the solar wind and magnetosphere might influence the flux of relativistic electrons. We then perform a superposed epoch analysis to compare storms with and storms without the appearance of these electrons. We investigate a number of solar wind and magnetospheric parameters for these two sets of storms at 1-hour resolution. In particular, sustained solar wind velocity in excess of 450 km s−1 is a strong external indicator of the subsequent appearance of relativistic electrons. In the magnetosphere, long-duration elevated Pc 5 ULF wave power during the recovery phase of magnetic storms appears to discriminate best between those storms that do and do not produce relativistic electrons.

Experimental evidence on the role of the large spatial scale electric field in creating the ring current

This paper presents the first simultaneous in situ measurements of the large-scale convection electric field and the ring current induced magnetic field perturbations in the equatorial plane of the inner magnetosphere and compares them to the evolution of major geomagnetic storms as characterized by Dst. The measurements were obtained from the University of California, Berkeley double-probe electric field experiment and the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory fluxgate magnetometer on the CRRES spacecraft. This spacecraft had an apogee near geosynchronous orbit and a perigee near 300 km altitude. We focus on the major geomagnetic storm on March 24, 1991, for which the maximum negative excursion of Dst was about −300 nT. During the main phase of the storm, the large-scale electric field repeatedly penetrated earthward, maximizing between L = 2 and L = 4 with magnitudes of 6 mV/m. These magnitudes were larger than quiet time values of the electric field by a factor of 60 or more. Electric potential drops across the dusk region from L = 2 to L = 4 ranged up to 50–70 kV in concert with increases in Kp up to 9 and dDst/dt (an indicator of the net ring current injection rate) which ranged up to −50 nT/hr. These electric fields lasted for time periods of the order of an hour or more and were capable of injecting ring current ions from L = 8 to L = 2.4 and energizing particles from initial plasma sheet energies of 1–5 keV up to 300 keV through conservation of the first adiabatic invariant. The data obtained during the recovery phase of this storm provide the first direct experimental evidence in the equatorial plane that the electric field is systematically diminished or shielded earthward of the inner edge of the ring current during this phase of the geomagnetic storm. Also observed during the 2-week recovery phase were episodic enhancements in the electric field which coincided and were colocated with enhancements of in situ ring current intensity and which also coincided with decreases in Dst. These enhancements in the electric field and in the ring current magnetic field perturbation occurred at progressively larger radial positions as the recovery phase continued. Evidence for regions of reversed convection near midnight during the recovery phase is provided. An unexpected and important feature of this data set, during both main and recovery phases, near 1800–2100 MLT, is that electric fields are often much stronger earthward of L = 4 or L = 5 than at positions more distant than L = 6. This suggests important features of the interaction between the hot ring current plasma and the large-scale electric field in the inner magnetosphere are not yet understood.

Magnetotail flow bursts: Association to global magnetospheric circulation, relationship to ionospheric activity and direct evidence for localization

A series of bursty bulk flow events (BBFs) were observed by GEOTAIL and WIND in the geomagnetotail. IMP8 at the solar wind showed significant energy coupling into the magnetosphere, while the UVI instrument on POLAR evidenced significant energy transfer to the ionosphere during two substorms. There was good correlation between BBFs and ionospheric activity observed by UVI even when ground magnetic signatures were absent, suggesting that low ionospheric conductivity at the active sector may be responsible for this observation. During the second substorm no significant flux transport was evidenced past WIND in stark contrast to GEOTAIL and despite the small intersatellite separation ((3.54, 2.88, −0.06) RE). Throughout the intervals studied there were significant differences in the individual flow bursts at the two satellites, even during longitudinally extended ionospheric activations. We conclude that the half-scale-size of transport-bearing flow bursts is less than 3 RE.

Comprehensive study of the magnetospheric response to a hot flow anomaly

We present a comprehensive observational study of the magnetospheric response to an interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) tangential discontinuity, which first struck the postnoon bow shock and magnetopause and then swept past the prenoon bow shock and magnetopause on July 24, 1996. Although unaccompanied by any significant plasma variation, the discontinuity interacted with the bow shock to form a hot flow anomaly (HFA), which was observed by Interball-1 just upstream from the prenoon bow shock. Pressures within and Earthward of the HFA were depressed by an order of magnitude, which allowed the magnetopause to briefly (∼7 min) move outward some 5 RE beyond its nominal position and engulf Interball-1. A timing study employing nearby Interball-1 and Magion-4 observations demonstrates that this motion corresponded to an antisunward and northward moving wave on the magnetopause. The same wave then engulfed Geotail, which was nominally located downstream in the outer dawn magnetosheath. Despite its large amplitude, the wave produced only minor effects in GOES-8 geosynchronous observations near local dawn. Polar Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) observed a sudden brightening of the afternoon aurora, followed by an even more intense transient brightening of the morning aurora. Consistent with this asymmetry, the discontinuity produced only weak near-simultaneous perturbations in high-latitude postnoon ground magnetometers but a transient convection vortex in the prenoon Greenland ground magnetograms. The results of this study indicate that the solar wind interaction with the bow shock is far more dynamic than previously imagined and far more significant to the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction.

Recurrent geomagnetic storms and relativistic electron enhancements in the outer magnetosphere: ISTP coordinated measurements

New, coordinated measurements from the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics (ISTP) constellation of spacecraft are presented to show the causes and effects of recurrent geomagnetic activity during recent solar minimum conditions. It is found using WIND and POLAR data that even for modest geomagnetic storms, relativistic electron fluxes are strongly and rapidly enhanced within the outer radiation zone of the Earths magnetosphere. Solar wind data are utilized to identify the drivers of magnetospheric acceleration processes. Yohkoh solar soft X-ray data are also used to identify the solar coronal holes that produce the high-speed solar wind streams which, in turn, cause the recurrent geomagnetic activity. It is concluded that even during extremely quiet solar conditions (sunspot minimum) there are discernible coronal holes and resultant solar wind streams which can produce intense magnetospheric particle acceleration. As a practical consequence of this Sun-Earth connection, it is noted that a long-lasting E>1MeV electron event in late March 1996 appears to have contributed significantly to a major spacecraft (Anik E1) operational failure.

Magnetospheric and auroral activity during the 18 April 2002 sawtooth event

We examine the 18 April 2002 sawtooth event. We find that the strong magnetic field dipolarizations observed in association with each tooth are not global in occurrence but are rather confined to the nightside. In addition, we find that the flux increases are not globally dispersionless. Instead, each tooth is associated with a nonglobal, but wider-than-usual, dispersionless injection region that is consistent with the high Kp versions of the standard injection boundary model (which places the entire nightside segment of geosynchronous orbit tailward of the injection boundary for values of Kp above about 5). We also find evidence that at least one of the teeth was likely triggered by a pressure pulse. The auroral distribution shows a repeatable evolution in which a wide double-oval configuration gradually thins. Following this, a localized substorm-like brightening in the dusk to midnight sector occurs on the lower branch of the double oval which subsequently expands rapidly poleward and azimuthally. A new expanded double oval configuration emerges from this expansion phase activity and the cycle repeats itself for the duration of the sawtooth event. The observations presented give considerable support to the contention that sawtooth events are actually sequences of quasi-periodic substorms. We suggest that sawtooth events can be viewed as a magnetospheric mode similar to Steady Magnetospheric Convection intervals (SMCs) except that for sawtooth events, the flow of energy from the solar wind into the magnetosphere becomes too large to dissipate without the periodic occurrence of substorms. We further suggest that the quasi-periodicity arises because the magnetosphere may only become susceptible to external or internal triggering after it has been driven beyond a stability threshold. This hypothesis can account for the existence of more potential external triggers (in the interplanetary magnetic field or solar wind) than teeth in that the magnetosphere may be selectively responsive to them.

Observations in the vicinity of substorm onset: Implications for the substorm process

Multi-instrument data sets from the ground and satellites at both low and high altitude have provided new results concerning substorm onset and its source region in the magnetosphere. Twenty-six out of 37 substorm onset events showed evidence of azimuthally spaced auroral forms (AAFs) prior to the explosive poleward motion associated with optical substorm onset. The azimuthal wavelengths associated with these onsets were found to range between 132 and 583 km with a mean value of 307±115 km. The occurrence rate increased with decreasing wavelength down to a cutoff wavelength near 130 km. AAFs can span 8 hours of local time prior to onset and generally propagate eastward in the morning sector. Onset itself is, however, more localized spanning only about 1 hour local time. The average location of the peak intensity for 80 onsets was 65.9±3.5 CGMlat, 22.9±1.2 Mlt, whereas the average location of the AAF onsets was at 63.8±3.3 CGMlat, 22.9±1.1 Mlt. AAF onsets occur during time periods when the solar wind pressure is relatively high. These low-latitude wavelike onsets appear as precursors in the form of long-period magnetic pulsations (Pc 5 band) and frequently occur on the equatorward portion of the double oval distribution. AAFs brighten in conjunction with substorm onset leading to the conclusion that they are a growth phase activity causally related to substorm onset. Precursor activity associated with these AAFs is also seen near geosynchronous orbit altitude and examples show the relationship between the various instrumental definitions of substorm onset. The implied mode number (30 to 135) derived from this work is inconsistent with cavity mode resonances but is consistent with a modified flute/ballooning instability which requires azimuthal pressure gradients. It is suggested that this instability exists in growth phase but that an additional factor exists in the premidnight sector which results in an explosive onset. The extended source region and the distance to the open-closed field line region constrain reconnection theory and local mechanisms for substorm onset. It is demonstrated that multiple onset substorms can exist for which localized dipolarizations and the Pi 2 occur simultaneously with tail stretching existing elsewhere. Further, the tail can be less stretched at geosynchronous orbit during the optical auroral onset than during the precursor pseudobreakups. These pseudobreakups can be initiated by auroral streamers which originate at the most poleward set of arc systems and drift to the more equatorward main UV oval. Observations are presented of these AAFs in conjunction with low- and high-altitude particle and magnetic field data. These place the activations at the interface between dipolar and taillike field lines probably near the peak in the cross-tail current. These onsets are put in the context of a new scenario for substorm morphology which employs individual modules which operate independently or couple together. This allows particular substorm events to be more accurately described and investigated.