H K Genant

Risk Factors for Severity and Type of the Hip Fracture

More severe hip fractures such as displaced femoral neck (FN) fractures and unstable intertrochanteric (IT) fractures lead to poorer outcomes, but risk factors for severe fractures have not been studied. To identify risk factors for severe types of hip fracture, we performed a prospective cohort study and obtained preoperative hip radiographs from women who sustained an incident hip fracture (excluding traumatic fractures). A single radiologist scored the severity of FN fractures by the Garden System: grades I and II, undisplaced; grades III and IV, displaced. The severity of IT hip fractures was rated by the Kyle System: grades I and II, stable; grades III and IV, unstable. A total of 249 women had FN fractures: 75 (30%) were undisplaced. A total of 213 women had IT fractures: 59 (28%) were stable. Both types of hip fracture increased with age, but older age was even more strongly associated with more severe hip fractures. Low BMD was more strongly related to undisplaced FN fractures (p interaction BMD × FN type, p = 0.0008) and stable IT fractures (p interaction BMD × IT type, p = 0.04). Similar findings were observed for estimated volumetric BMD and hip geometric parameters. Corticosteroid use was only associated with displaced FN fractures, and Parkinsons disease was only associated with stable IT fractures. Little difference was reported in the self‐reported circumstances surrounding each type of fracture. In conclusion, the lower the BMD, the greater the likelihood of experiencing a hip fracture that is less displaced and more stable.

A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture

To compare the accuracy of several approaches for defining prevalent vertebral fractures from measurements of vertebral dimensions (morphometry), we measured the lateral dimensions of vertebral bodies of 115 normal premenopausal and 100 postmenopausal women. Of the postmenopausal women two observers agreed that 49 had definite vertebral fractures and 38 were definitely normal. Using these classifications as an independent reference, women were then classified as fractured or normal by several definitions based on vertebral morphometry. No morphometric definition of vertebral fracture agreed perfectly with the consensus classifications. In general, definitions that involved combinations of measurements of anterior (Ha), middle (Hm), and posterior (Hp) vertebral height classified women more accurately than did definitions based on a single measurement or ratio. The Ha/Hp ratio produced many false positives unless it was adjusted for normal variations in the shapes of different vertebral bodies. Definitions of fracture based on a greater than 15% reduction in heights or ratios had higher sensitivity but more false positives than definitions that used a more stringent (greater than 20%) criterion. All morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture separated the post-menopausal women into two groups (fractured and normal) that had significantly (P less than 0.001) different mean spine bone density by quantitative computed tomography. Definitions that had the lowest rates of false positives also produced the largest differences in bone density between those defined as fractured and those defined as normal.