Håkan Nyström

Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.

A study of the performance of five commercial radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs) for common treatment sites regarding their ability to model heterogeneities and scattered photons has been performed. The comparison was based on CT information for prostate, head and neck, breast and lung cancer cases. The TPSs were installed locally at different institutions and commissioned for clinical use based on local procedures. For the evaluation, beam qualities as identical as possible were used: low energy (6 MV) and high energy (15 or 18 MV) x-rays. All relevant anatomical structures were outlined and simple treatment plans were set up. Images, structures and plans were exported, anonymized and distributed to the participating institutions using the DICOM protocol. The plans were then re-calculated locally and exported back for evaluation. The TPSs cover dose calculation techniques from correction-based equivalent path length algorithms to model-based algorithms. These were divided into two groups based on how changes in electron transport are accounted for ((a) not considered and (b) considered). Increasing the complexity from the relatively homogeneous pelvic region to the very inhomogeneous lung region resulted in less accurate dose distributions. Improvements in the calculated dose have been shown when models consider volume scatter and changes in electron transport, especially when the extension of the irradiated volume was limited and when low densities were present in or adjacent to the fields. A Monte Carlo calculated algorithm input data set and a benchmark set for a virtual linear accelerator have been produced which have facilitated the analysis and interpretation of the results. The more sophisticated models in the type b group exhibit changes in both absorbed dose and its distribution which are congruent with the simulations performed by Monte Carlo-based virtual accelerator.

Acceptance tests and quality control (QC) procedures for the clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using inverse planning and the sliding window technique: experience from five radiotherapy departments

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE An increasing number of radiotherapy centres is now aiming for clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), but--in contrast to conventional treatment--no national or international guidelines for commissioning of the treatment planning system (TPS) and acceptance tests of treatment equipment have yet been developed. This paper bundles the experience of five radiotherapy departments that have introduced IMRT into their clinical routine. METHODS AND MATERIALS The five radiotherapy departments are using similar configurations since they adopted the commercially available Varian solution for IMRT, regarding treatment planning as well as treatment delivery. All are using the sliding window technique. Different approaches towards the derivation of the multileaf collimator (MLC) parameters required for the configuration of the TPS are described. A description of the quality control procedures for the dynamic MLC, including their respective frequencies, is given. For the acceptance of the TPS for IMRT multiple quality control plans were developed on a variety of phantoms, testing the flexibility of the inverse planning modules to produce the desired dose pattern as well as assessing the accuracy of the dose calculation. Regarding patient treatment verification, all five centres perform dosimetric pre-treatment verification of the treatment fields, be it on a single field or on a total plan procedure. During the actual treatment, the primary focus is on patient positioning rather than dosimetry. Intracavitary in vivo measurements were performed in special cases. RESULT AND CONCLUSION The configurational MLC parameters obtained through different methods are not identical for all centres, but the observed variations have shown to be of no significant clinical relevance. The quality control (QC) procedures for the dMLC have not detected any discrepancies since their initiation, demonstrating the reliability of the MLC controller. The development of geometrically simple QC plans to test the inverse planning, the dynamic MLC modules and the final dose calculation has proven to be useful in pointing out the need to remodel the single pencil beam scatter kernels in some centres. The final correspondence between calculated and measured dose was found to be satisfactory by all centres, for QC test plans as well as for pre-treatment verification of clinical IMRT fields. An intercomparison of the man hours needed per patient plan verification reveals a substantial variation depending on the type of measurements performed.

MAGIC-type polymer gel for three-dimensional dosimetry: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy verification

A new type of polymer gel dosimeter, which responds well to absorbed dose even when manufactured in the presence of normal levels of oxygen, was recently described by Fong et al. [Phys. Med. Biol. 46, 3105-3113 (2001)] and referred to by the acronym MAGIC. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using this new type of gel for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) verification. Gel manufacturing was carried out in room atmosphere under normal levels of oxygen. IMRT inverse treatment planning was performed using the Helios software. The gel was irradiated using a linear accelerator equipped with a dynamic multileaf collimator, and intensity modulation was achieved using sliding window technique. The response to absorbed dose was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Measured and calculated dose distributions were compared with regard to in-plane isodoses and dose volume histograms. In addition, the spatial and dosimetric accuracy was evaluated using the gamma formalism. Good agreement between calculated and measured data was obtained. In the isocenter plane, the 70% and 90% isodoses acquired using the different methods are mostly within 2 mm, with up to 3 mm disagreement at isolated points. For the planning target volume (PTV), the calculated mean relative dose was 96.8 +/- 2.5% (1 SD) and the measured relative mean dose was 98.6 +/- 2.2%. Corresponding data for an organ at risk was 34.4 +/- 0.9% and 32.7 +/- 0.7%, respectively. The gamma criterion (3 mm spatial/3% dose deviation) was fulfilled for 94% of the pixels in the target region. Discrepancies were found in hot spots the upper and lower parts of the PTV, where the measured dose was up to 11% higher than calculated. This was attributed to sub optimal scatter kernels used in the treatment planning system dose calculations. Our results indicate great potential for IMRT verification using MAGIC-type polymer gel.

Respiratory motion prediction by using the adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)

The quality of radiation therapy delivered for treating cancer patients is related to set-up errors and organ motion. Due to the margins needed to ensure adequate target coverage, many breast cancer patients have been shown to develop late side effects such as pneumonitis and cardiac damage. Breathing-adapted radiation therapy offers the potential for precise radiation dose delivery to a moving target and thereby reduces the side effects substantially. However, the basic requirement for breathing-adapted radiation therapy is to track and predict the target as precisely as possible. Recent studies have addressed the problem of organ motion prediction by using different methods including artificial neural network and model based approaches. In this study, we propose to use a hybrid intelligent system called ANFIS (the adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system) for predicting respiratory motion in breast cancer patients. In ANFIS, we combine both the learning capabilities of a neural network and reasoning capabilities of fuzzy logic in order to give enhanced prediction capabilities, as compared to using a single methodology alone. After training ANFIS and checking for prediction accuracy on 11 breast cancer patients, it was found that the RMSE (root-mean-square error) can be reduced to sub-millimetre accuracy over a period of 20 s provided the patient is assisted with coaching. The average RMSE for the un-coached patients was 35% of the respiratory amplitude and for the coached patients 6% of the respiratory amplitude.

Interfractional changes in tumour volume and position during entire radiotherapy courses for lung cancer with respiratory gating and image guidance

Introduction. With the purpose of implementing gated radiotherapy for lung cancer patients, this study investigated the interfraction variations in tumour size and internal displacement over entire treatment courses. To explore the potential of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) the variations were measured using a set-up strategy based on imaging of bony landmarks and compared to a strategy using in room lasers, skin tattoos and cupper landmarks. Materials and methods. During their six week treatment course of 60Gy in 2Gy fractions, ten patients underwent 3 respiratory gated CT scans. The tumours were contoured on each CT scan to evaluate the variations in volumes and position. The lung tumours and the mediastinal tumours were contoured separately. The positional variations were measured as 3D mobility vectors and correlated to matching of the scans using the two different strategies. Results. The tumour size was significantly reduced from the first to the last CT scan. For the lung tumours the reduction was 19%, p=0.03, and for the mediastinal tumours the reduction was 34%, p=0.0007. The mean 3D mobility vector and the SD for the lung tumours was 0.51cm (±0.21) for matching using bony landmarks and 0.85cm (±0.54) for matching using skin tattoos. For the mediastinal tumours the corresponding vectors and SDs were 0.55cm (±0.19) and 0.72cm (±0.43). The differences between the vectors were significant for the lung tumours p=0.004. The interfractional overlap of lung tumours was 80–87% when matched using bony landmarks and 70–76% when matched using skin tattoos. The overlap of the mediastinal tumours were 60–65% and 41–47%, respectively. Conclusions. Despite the use of gating the tumours varied considerably, regarding both position and volume. The variations in position were dependent on the set-up strategy. Set-up using IGRT was superior to set-up using skin tattoos.

The role of image guidance in respiratory gated radiotherapy

Respiratory gating for radiotherapy beam delivery is a widely available technique, manufactured and sold by most of the major radiotherapy machine vendors. Respiratory gated beam delivery is intended to limit the irradiation of tumours moving with respiration to selected parts of the respiratory cycle, and thereby enable dose escalation and/or reduction of dose to organs at risk. Without adequate use of respiratory correlated image guidance on a regular basis, respiratory beam gating may however have a detrimental effect on target coverage. Image guidance of tumour respiratory motion is therefore of utmost importance for the safe introduction of respiratory gating. In this short overview, suitable image guidance strategies for respiratory gated radiotherapy are reviewed for two cancer sites; breast cancer and lung tumours.

IGRT of prostate cancer; is the margin reduction gained from daily IG time-dependent?

The aim of this study was to assess the set-up uncertainties and the possible CTV-PTV margin reduction when adopting daily IGRT. Further, to identify any intrafraction time trends in the prostate movements to ensure the margin reduction gained from IGRT. Fifteen prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT using daily IG of three implanted fiducial markers were included. The interfraction uncertainties were assessed by statistically evaluating the daily prostate marker displacement. The intrafraction uncertainties were represented by the difference in prostate marker displacement before and after beam delivery. To evaluate any intrafraction time trends, the data points were divided into two groups with respect to time duration and statistically analysed. This study confirmed that daily IG considerably reduces the set-up uncertainties. Our results implied that if IGRT is performed on a daily basis, both systematic and random set-up errors will be reduced to a minimum, leading to a required set-up margin of only 1.5 mm. Results from measurements of intrafraction motions in time durations ranging from 2 to 27 min, indicated that a margin enlargement of 1 mm was required to account for the intrafraction uncertainties. The results did not suggest any significant time trends in the intrafraction uncertainties.

Physics and high-technology advances in radiotherapy: Are they still worth it?

Radiotherapy was made possible by the startling physics discoveries of X-rays and radioactivity in the 1890s, which were almost immediately applied to treat clinical problems. Radiotherapy development was subsequently driven by the three engines of physics innovation, increasing understanding of radiobiology and systematisation and refinement of clinical approaches. Collaboration between clinicians and physicists has always been vital to this. Application of knowledge from other physics fields provided new treatment modalities [1] allowing higher energies and better dose distributions. Dosimetry measurement and treatment planning methods established and extended the quantitative basis of radiotherapy. Imaging for planning and verification evolved in sophistication as physics methods and available technology were developed. The computer revolution galvanised all areas of radiotherapy and provided the possibility of new approaches to improving the balance of coverage of target versus normal tissues, with computer aided optimisation and control of planning, delivery and verification. One of the most significant developments in radiotherapy was undoubtedly the introduction of CT-based treatment planning, which spurred developments in planning algorithms, as well as in delivery. More precise dose distributions are of limited value unless the localisation of the target and volume to treat is well known and unless treatment dose delivery can be closely checked. Therefore CT planning was a prerequisite for both 3DCRT and IMRT. These in turn required improved real-time verification imaging, initially based on EPIDs and now on volumetric imaging, leading to the rapidly increasing availability of IGRT techniques. In addition to IMRT and IGRT, the quest for improved dose distributions has also recently prompted a new surge of interest in proton therapy, which has been available for decades, but has not been widely available and is still only able to be offered to a very small fraction of the patients who could potentially benefit from the technology. The possibilities from more sophisticated delivery also demand additional information on targets, so multi-modality imaging, incorporating functional as well as anatomic information, has become a more pressing need for input to planning and prompting further developments in image handling, registration and fusion. Thus, radiotherapy has been going through unprecedented change over recent years and continues to do so.

In vivo dose verification of IMRT treated head and neck cancer patients

An independent in vivo dose verification procedure for IMRT treatments of head and neck cancers was developed. Results of 177 intracavitary TLD measurements from 10 patients are presented. The study includes data from 10 patients with cancer of the rhinopharynx or the thyroid treated with dynamic IMRT. Dose verification was performed by insertion of a flexible naso-oesophageal tube containing TLD rods and markers for EPID and simulator image detection. Part of the study focussed on investigating the accuracy of the TPS calculations in the presence of inhomogeneities. Phantom measurements and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for a number of geometries involving lateral electronic disequilibrium and steep density shifts. The in vivo TLD measurements correlated well with the predictions of the treatment planning system with a measured/calculated dose ratio of 1.002±0.051 (1 SD, N = 177). The measurements were easily performed and well tolerated by the patients. We conclude that in vivo intracavitary dosimetry with TLD is suitable and accurate for dose determination in intensity-modulated beams.

A comparative description of three multipurpose phantoms (MPP) for external audits of photon beams in radiotherapy: the water MPP, the Umeå MPP and the EC MPP.

AIM To present a technical description and intercomparison of three multipurpose phantoms (MPP) developed for mailed dosimetry checks of therapeutic photon beams in reference and non-reference conditions. MATERIALS The W-MPP is a water MPP, whereas the Umeâ-MPP, made of perspex (PMMA, Plexiglas), and the EC-MPP, made of polystyrene, are solid MPPs. The W-MPP uses only thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) for dosimetry checks, the EC MPP uses film and TLD; the Umeâ phantom uses film and TLD, and offers in addition the possibility for ionization chamber measurements. Either using TLD or films, the MPPs have been designed to check on-axis and off-axis the following irradiation conditions: square and rectangular fields, asymmetric fields, wedged beams, oblique incidence and, for the solid MPPs, also the influence of inhomogeneities. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The MPPs have been compared for different aspects going from their dosimetric performance (number of dosimetric parameters that can be checked) to some practical consideration in the use of the different MPPs (set-up time, stability, instruction sheets, etc.). From a comparison between the solid multi-purpose phantoms, it turns out that the EC-MPP is capable of checking the largest number of dosimetric parameters per beam, but has the longest set-up time ( approximately 2 h) per beam according to the users. The Umeå-MPP has a smaller number of set-ups (hence a smaller average time) and also includes some parameters not checked with the EC-MPP (e.g. SSD accuracy). The major drawback however of the Umeå-MPP is considered to be its high density (>1.1 g/cm(3)) which increases the difficulty of the analysis with the treatment planning system. The W-MPP checks the smallest number of parameters, but is the fastest in set-up time, the easiest for mailing, and is water equivalent, which is advantageous for the TPS checks. The major drawback of this MPP is however the inability to check complete dose distribution (film) or inhomogeneities.