Hakan Ozkan

Should we wait until severe pulmonary hypertension develops? Efficacy of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension: A subgroup analysis of our experience.

BACKGROUND The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the immediate and long-term ef-fects of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty (PBMV) on patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) complicated with severe pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS The study population consisted of 85 patients with MS complicated with severe PH (systolic pulmonary pressure > 75 mm Hg). PBMV was performed with Inoue balloon technique. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months and 1 year and yearly thereafter. RESULTS Mitral valve area (MVA) was increased (pre-PBMV MVA was 1.03 ± 0.21 cm2, post-PBMV MVA 1.89 ± 0.34 cm2, p < 0.001) significantly. The mean and the maximum transmitral pressure gradient significantly decreased (pre-PBMV mean transmitral gradient was 18.47 ± 6.59 mm Hg, post-PBMV 6.84 ± 3.84 mm Hg, p < 0.001, pre-PBMV maximum transmitral pressure gradient was 27.6 ± 8.38 mm Hg, post-PBMV 12.68 ± 4.74 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) significantly decreased (pre-PBMV 89.9 ± 23.38 mm Hg, post-PBMV 54.5 ± 14.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Two patients underwent surgery due to rupture of anterior mitral leaflet. There was no peri-procedural mortality. The procedure time was 29.12 ± 11.37 min. Follow-up duration was 108.2 ± 31.4 months. One patient died due to heart failure. One patient underwent re-PBMV and 7 patients mitral valve replacement. At the last follow-up, MVA still remained high (1.52 ± 0.34 cm2) and mean transmitral pressure gradient was low (9.2 ± 5.7 mm Hg). SPAP was 56.5 ± 20.8 mm Hg which was the same as after PBMV. CONCLUSIONS PBMV in patients with MS with severe PH is an effective therapy with low procedure time. However, it is recommended to perform PBMV before developing severe PH.

Atrial Strain and Strain Rate: A Novel Method for the Evaluation of Atrial Stunning

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia seen in adults. Atrial stunning is defined as the temporary mechanical dysfunction of the atrial appendage developing after AF has returned to sinus rhythm (SR). Objectives We aimed to evaluate atrial contractile functions by strain and strain rate in patients with AF, following pharmacological and electrical cardioversion and to compare it with conventional methods. Methods This study included 41 patients with persistent AF and 35 age-matched control cases with SR. All the AF patients included in the study had transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography performed before and after. Septum (SEPsSR), left atrium (LAsSR) and right atrium peak systolic strain rate (RAsSR) were defined as the maximum negative value during atrial contraction and septum (SEPε), left atrium (LAε) and right atrium peak systolic strain (RAε) was defined as the percentage of change. Parameters of two groups were compared. Results In the AF group, 1st hour and 24th hour LAε, RAε, SEPε, LAsSR, RAsSR, SEPsSR found to be significantly lower than in the control group (LAε: 2.61%±0.13, 3.06%±0.19 vs 6.45%±0.27, p<0.0001; RAε: 4.03%±0.38, 4.50%±0.47 vs 10.12%±0.64, p<0.0001; SEPε: 3.0%±0.22, 3.19%±0.15 vs 6.23%±0.49, p<0.0001; LAsSR: 0.61±0.04s-1, 0.75±0.04s-1 vs 1.35±0.04s-1, p<0.0001; RAsSR: 1.13±0.06s-1, 1.23±0.07s-1 vs 2.10±0.08s- 1, p<0.0001; SEPsSR: 0.76±0.04s- 1, 0.78±0.04s- 1 vs 1.42±0.06 s- 1, p<0.0001). Conclusion Atrial strain and strain rate parameters are superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters for the evaluation of atrial stunning in AF cases where SR has been achieved.

Intramyocardial Dissection following Postinfarction Ventricular Wall Rupture Contained by Surrounding Postoperative Adhesions.

Introduction. Dissection of the myocardium is a rare form of cardiac rupture, caused by a hemorrhagic dissection among the spiral myocardial fibers, its diagnosis is rarely established before the operation or death, and extremely few cases have been reported in the literature and none of these cases seem to have a history of previous cardiac surgery which makes our report unique. Case Presentation. A 61-year-old female patient was admitted into the emergency room with complaints of progressive chest pain for 2 days. She had a history of second time prosthetic aortic valve replacement and was under anticoagulation therapy. She was diagnosed with an acute inferoposterior myocardial infarction and underwent emergency coronary angiography revealing spontaneous recanalization of the right coronary artery. During the follow-up, she developed cardiogenic shock and a new occurring systolic ejection murmur. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a left ventricular free wall rupture; then, she was taken in for emergency surgery. During the operation, a rupture zone and a wide intramyocardial dissecting area were detected. Intraventricular patch repair technic with autologous pericardial patch was used to exclude the ruptured area. Following the warming period, despite adequate hemostasis, hemorrhage around suture lines progressively increased, leading to the patients death. Conclusion. Pericardial adhesions might contain left ventricular rupture leading to intramyocardial dissection.

A comparison of off- and on-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass surgery on long-term cardiovascular events.

Summary Objective Our aim was to compare short-term outcomes and long-term major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)-free survival and independent predictors of long-term MACE after off-pump (OPCAB) versus on-pump beating-heart (ONBHCAB) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of all consecutive patients who underwent elective CABG, performed by the same surgeon, from January 2003 to October 2009. A propensity score analysis was carried out to adjust for baseline characteristics and a total of 398 patients were included: ONBHCAB (n = 181), OPCAB (n = 217). Results OPCAB was associated with significantly shorter ventilation times (p < 0.001), intensive care unit stay (p < 0.001) and hospital stay (p < 0.001). The total blood loss was significantly more in the ONBHCAB group (p < 0.001), and accordingly, the number of transfused blood units was significantly lower in the OPCAB group (p < 0.001). Incidence of peri-operative renal complications were significantly higher in the ONBHCAB group (p = 0.004). The OPCAB group showed significantly lower long-term MACE-free survival (p = 0.029). The mean number of transfused blood units was the only independent predictor of MACE (HR: 1.218, 95% CI: 1.089–1.361; p = 0.001). Conclusion OPCAB provided better long-term MACE-free survival compared with ONBHCAB. Fewer units of blood transfused following OPCAB surgery may have been the main reason for this result.