Hampig Raphael Kourie

Immune checkpoint inhibitors renal side effects and management

The next decade in cancer therapy will be marked by the expansion of immunotherapies, namely immune checkpoint inhibitors. The increasing number and combination of checkpoint inhibitors and the variety of their mechanisms of action and indications will most likely multiply the side effects associated with these therapies and make their management more complicated and diversified. Given the growing rate of approval of different checkpoint inhibitors in different cancers in multiple settings, a review summarizing the major side effects of the new agents in use today and their management seems to be appropriate. Highlighting these adverse events and their management in a single review might help the daily practice of the physicians and consequently contribute the patients safety and quality of life.

Learning from the “tsunami” of immune checkpoint inhibitors in 2015

2015 was marked by the tsunami of immune checkpoint inhibitors revealed by numerous FDA approvals, publications and abstracts in relation with these drugs in different cancers and settings. First, we reported all new indications of anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 approved by the FDA, the positive clinical trials published and the abstracts with promising results at important scientific meetings during 2015. Then, we discussed different critical issues of these new agents going from their predictive factors, combination therapies, tumor response patterns, efficacy in particular settings, side effect management to cost and economic burden.

Anal cancer treatment: Current status and future perspectives

Anal cancers (AC) are relatively rare tumors. Their incidence is increasing, particularly among men who have sex with other men due to widespread infection by human papilloma virus. The majority of anal cancers are squamous cell carcinomas, and they are treated according to stage. In local and locally advanced AC, concomitant chemoradiation therapy based on mitomycin C and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the current best treatment, while metastatic AC, chemotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin remains the gold standard. There are no indications for induction or maintenance therapies in locally advanced tumors. Many novel strategies, such as targeted therapies, vaccination, immunotherapy and photodynamic therapy are in clinical trials for the treatment of AC, with promising results in some indications.

Side-effects of checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy.

Purpose of review After the dramatic and often long-standing response rates of checkpoint inhibitors as single agents, the new era for checkpoint inhibitors is combined therapy (either with other checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapies, targeted therapies or immunotherapies) that is aiming to do even better. Although one can speculate that these combinations will result in improved results, high cost and potential toxicity are limiting factors for their use. In this review, we plan to report on the different side-effects of the checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies and to discuss the future perspectives of these new modalities. Recent findings Many checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations are associated with high response rates (>50%) in melanomas and nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). As a result, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration; however, 30% of the patients had to discontinue this combination because of high toxicity. In NSCLC, the combination of chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed cell death protein ligand 1 agents is leading to high response rate (exceeding 65%) but with more than 40% of the patients presenting grade 3/4 toxicities. Despite the discouraging results with the combination of ipilimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) with vemurafenib (anti-proto-oncogene protein B-raf-targeted therapy) due to hepatotoxicity, more recent trials are showing less frequent and severe toxicities with other combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. Summary Despite the high toxicity rates observed with some checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies, these combinations will likely become the new paradigm for the management of various malignancies, namely, melanomas, renal cell carcinomas and NSCLC, provided that their side-effects can be effectively managed.

Optimum chemotherapy in the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most devastating solid tumors, and it remains one of the most difficult to treat. The treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) is systemic, based on chemotherapy or best supportive care, depending on the performance status of the patient. Two chemotherapeutical regimens have produced substantial benefits in the treatment of MPC: gemcitabine in 1997; and FOLFIRIONOX in 2011. FOLFIRINOX improved the natural history of MPC, with overall survival (OS) of 11.1 mo. Nab-paclitaxel associated with gemcitabine is a newly approved regimen for MPC, with a median OS of 8.6 mo. Despite multiple trials, this targeted therapy was not efficient in the treatment of MPC. Many new molecules targeting the proliferation and survival pathways, immune response, oncofetal signaling and the epigenetic changes are currently undergoing phase I and II trials for the treatment of MPC, with many promising results.

Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve in association with intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular glaucoma.

Purpose:Evaluate the long-term results of the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in association with bevacizumab (Avastin) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG) patients. Design and Methods:This retrospective institutional study reviewed 39 eyes of 34 patients with NVG who underwent AGV implantation. The intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) group included 19 eyes that received an injection of IVB 7 days preoperatively, whereas the no-IVB group included 20 eyes that did not receive any antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Findings such as intraocular pressure (IOP), number of antiglaucoma medications, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and surgical outcomes were reviewed over a period of 5 years. Results:There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. At last follow-up visit, IOP was 16.37±5.72 mm Hg in the IVB group and 20.05±9.75 mm Hg in the no-IVB group (P=0.16). The number of postoperative antiglaucoma medications was significantly lower in the IVB group (P=0.02). Last visit’s mean BCVA was 2.34±1.00 logMAR in the IVB group and 2.66±1.04 logMAR in the control group (P=0.33). Hyphema was significantly less observed in the IVB group (P=0.02). The probability of success was 63.2% in the IVB group and 70.0% in the control group (P=0.37). Conclusions:Preoperative IVB before AGV was not associated with a better surgical success, IOP control, or BCVA. Its administration significantly decreased postoperative hyphema and number of last visit’s antiglaucoma medications.

Checkpoint inhibitors in bladder and renal cancers: Results and perspectives

The field of immunotherapy in urinary malignancy is expanding in several directions and checkpoint inhibitors are leading the way. The aim of this report is to highlight the efficacy and safety profile of the two classes of molecules, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand type 1, that are under investigation and represent potential candidates to be used in the near future for the management of bladder and renal cell cancer. The preliminary results as well as the future perspectives of this novel immunotherapy are analyzed. Novel immune checkpoint targets are reviewed as well.

Type Distribution of Lymphomas in Lebanon: Five-Year Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND Lymphomas represent the fifth most frequent cancer in Lebanon. However, little is known concerning epidemiologic characteristics and distribution of lymphoid neoplasms according to the 2008 WHO classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of lymphoma cases diagnosed from 2008 till 2012 at Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital. RESULTS A total of 502 new cases of lymphoma were diagnosed at our institution during a five year period: 119 cases (24%) were Hodgkin lymphomas (HL) and 383 cases (76%) were non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). HLs were equally distributed in both sexes with a mean age at diagnosis of 30 years. Among NHL, 87% (332 cases) were B cell lymphomas, 9% (34 cases) were T cell lymphomas and 4%(17 cases) were classified as precursor lymphoid neoplasms. Among B cell lymphomas, 44% (147 cases) were diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL), 20% (65 cases) follicular lymphomas and 8% (27 cases) mantle cell lymphomas. DLBCL were equally distributed in both sexes with a mean age of 58 years. Follicular lymphomas were characterized by a male predominance (57%) and a mean age of 60 years. Mantle cell lymphomas showed a pronounced male predominance (85%) with a mean age of 60 years in men and 70 years in women. Some 72% of patients having T cell lymphomas were men, with a mean age of 57 years in men and 45 years in women, while 65% of patients having precursor lymphoid neoplasms were women with a mean age of 22 years in women and 30 years in men. CONCLUSIONS The lymphoma subtype distribution in Lebanon is unique when compared to other countries from around the world. In fact, Hodgkin and follicular lymphomas are more frequent than in most Far Eastern, European and American countries, while T-cell lymphomas and DLBCL are less frequent.

Is metastatic pancreatic cancer an untargetable malignancy

Metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, known to be chemo-resistant and have been recently considered resistant to some targeted therapies (TT). Erlotinib combined to gemcitabine is the only targeted therapy that showed an overall survival benefit in MPC. New targets and therapeutic approaches, based on new-TT, are actually being evaluated in MPC going from immunotherapy, epigenetics, tumor suppressor gene and oncogenes to stromal matrix regulators. We aim in this paper to present the major causes rendering MPC an untargetable malignancy and to focus on the new therapeutic modalities based on TT in MPC.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of neratinib in HER2-positive breast cancer and breast cancer with HER2 mutations

ABSTRACT Introduction: Despite the availability of several potent HER2-directed targeted agents, primary and acquired resistance continues to influence patient outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer. Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor in late-phase clinical development. Areas covered: This review article focuses on neratinib in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer – early and metastatic stage – and HER2-mutant breast cancer, with particular emphasis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug. Expert opinion: The phase III ExteNET trial shows that neratinib improves 2-year invasive disease-free survival after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, and in particular HER2+/HR+ tumors. Survival data are awaited. The investigational role of neratinib in high-risk patients or conversely in de-escalation dual regimens with other anti-HER2 therapies and without chemotherapy are of interest. Phase II trials show that neratinib has efficacy, either as monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutic or endocrine agents, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and in tumors harboring HER2 mutations. The role of neratinib in therapeutic algorithms of HER2-positive patients, as well as delaying CNS events, awaits the results of ongoing trials such as NALA. Diarrhea, the main toxicity of neratinib, can be effectively managed with early loperamide prophylaxis.