Hana Castel

Awareness of Osteoporosis and Compliance with Management Guidelines in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Low-Impact Fractures

Abstract: A pre-existing fracture is a strong predictor of additional osteoporotic fractures. Consequently, current guidelines emphasize the need for treating patients with existing osteoporotic fractures. The present study aimed to assess the implementation of osteoporosis guidelines in routine practice. To this end, we reviewed the hospital charts of women and men aged 50 years and older with new fractures due to low or moderate impact treated in the emergency room, orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation departments. Notation of osteoporosis as a contributing cause for the fracture, performance of screening laboratory tests for possible secondary causes and treatment recommendations were abstracted from the record. In addition, we utilized the centralized pharmacy and laboratory computerized databases of the largest health maintenance organization in the area to follow dispensation of osteoporosis drugs and performance of screening laboratory tests in the community following fracture incidents. During the corresponding periods of January and February 1998 and 1999, 183 patients aged 50 years and older with low-impact fractures were treated in the emergency room only and 113 were hospitalized. Osteoporosis was rarely mentioned in the medical documentation. During the 6 month period after the fracture incident at least 70% of the emergency room patients and 62% of the hospitalized patients received no osteoporosis drugs. However, an encouraging significant trend toward increasing use of osteoporosis drugs, both prior to and after a fracture incident, was noted between the two survey periods among the emergency room fracture patients, but not among the hospitalized patients. Calcium supplements were the most commonly used osteoporosis drug. Bisphosphonates, hormone replacement therapy, raloxifene and calcitonin were rarely prescribed. Men were less likely than women to receive treatment for osteoporosis. Systematic laboratory evaluations for secondary causes of osteoporosis were not performed. We conclude that despite extensive attempts at increasing awareness among health professionals and the public at large, osteoporosis is still rarely singled out as a problem in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures, and the majority of them are not managed according to guidelines. Further studies should address specific problems in physicians’ and patients’ attitude that may account for the present situation.

Individualized Nutritional Intervention During and After Hospitalization: The Nutrition Intervention Study Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that individualized nutritional treatment during and after discharge from acute hospitalization will reduce mortality and improve nutritional outcomes.

Factors related to successful rehabilitation after hip fracture: a case—control study

A case-control study was performed to evaluate factors associated with successful rehabilitation in elderly patients who sustained hip fractures. All 170 patients with fractured hips hospitalized in the geriatrics ward of the Soroka Medical Center in Beer-Sheva, Israel between 1987 and 1991 were studied. Success of rehabilitation was determined by staff evaluation of the patients ability to walk and perform activities of daily living. The independent variables, including sociodemographic and medical variables, and mental and functional assessments, were assessed by chart reviews, staff evaluation and mental tests. One-hundred and twenty-nine patients (75.9%) were successfully rehabilitated. A normal mental state (p < 0.0001), female gender (p < 0.02) and absence of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.008) were associated significantly with successful rehabilitation.

Gender Differences in Factors Associated with Nutritional Status of Older Medical Patients

Objectives: To evaluate gender differences in nutritional risk of older people admitted to an acute-care general medical department, and identify gender-specific risk factors. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Internal Medicine Department in an acute care, university-affiliated hospital in southern Israel. Subjects: 204 cognitively intact patients aged 65 and over, admitted during a 12-month period to a general medical department. Measures of outcome: Evaluation included demographic and clinical data consisting of the sum of medical conditions and of prescribed medications, evaluation of nutritional status, cognitive status, depression assessment and functional ability. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate the gender specific risk factors for under-nutrition. Results: 32.5% of the men and 48.1% of the women admitted to an internal medicine department were at risk for under-nutrition. Those at nutritional risk had a higher rate of depression, lower cognitive and physical ability, poorer reported health status and more diagnosed diseases. Nutritional risk for men was associated with higher depression score, longer hospitalization, and poor appetite. For women, nutritional risk was associated with lower functional status and more diagnosed diseases. In a multivariate analysis, being a female increased the risk of under-nutrition by 3.3 fold. Conclusion: Risk of under-nutrition is prevalent among older in-patients and is gender-related. Female inpatients are at markedly increased risk for under-nutrition. The mechanism of the gender discrepancy in factors related to nutritional deterioration is complex and poorly understood.

Nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal sampling for isolation of potential respiratory pathogens in adults

ABSTRACT The optimal methodology for the identification of colonization by potential respiratory pathogens (PRP) in adults is not well established. The objectives of the present study were to compare the sensitivities of sampling the nasopharynx and the oropharynx for identification of PRP colonization and to compare the sensitivities of samples from the nasopharynx by swab and by washing for the same purpose. The study included 500 participants with a mean age of 65.1 ± 17.8 years. Of these, 300 patients were hospitalized for acute febrile lower respiratory tract infection and 200 were controls. Each participant was sampled by oropharyngeal swab (OPS), nasopharyngeal swab (NPS), and nasopharyngeal washing (NPW). The samples were tested by conventional bacteriological methods to identify Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. OPS detected colonization by S. pneumoniae in 30% of the subjects compared with 89% by NPS and NPW (P < 0.000001). The corresponding rates for H. influenzae were 49% and 64%, respectively (no significant difference [NS]), and for M. catarrhalis were 72% and 46%, respectively (P < 0.0004). NPS identified 61% of the cases of colonization with S. pneumoniae, compared with 76% by NPW (NS). The corresponding rates for H. influenzae were 31% and 56%, respectively (P < 0.04), and for M. catarrhalis were 39% and 33%, respectively (NS). We conclude that the sensitivities of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal sampling for identification of PRP colonization in adults are different for each of the three bacteria in this category. The combined results of sampling from both sites are necessary to obtain a true picture of the rate of colonization. NPW is superior to NPS.

Mixing of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples to identify potential respiratory pathogens in adults.

A mixed culture of oropharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal swabs and nasopharyngeal washings, taken from 400 patients, was compared to separate cultures of the same samples. The mixed culture identified Streptococcus pneumoniae in 37 of 40 (93%) patients with positive samples, Hemophilus influenzae in 28 of 29 (97%), and Moraxella catarrhalis in 94 of 94 (100%). These sensitivity rates clearly justify the use of mixed cultures instead of separate cultures for clinical and epidemiological purposes. The reduction in costs stemming from the use of mixed cultures may have a decisive influence when considering this test for extensive clinical and epidemiological purposes.

Under-detection of depressed mood in older inpatients and related over-prescription of depression-associated medications

Background:  Aging is associated with increased prevalence of depression and with increased use of medications. The aims of this study were to determine the rate of recognition of depressive symptoms and the prevalence of depressed mood among aged inpatients, as well as to assess the use of medications known to enhance depression in this population.