Hani M. Wadei

Predicting subsequent decline in kidney allograft function from early surveillance biopsies

Identifying factors that are predictive of allograft loss might be an important step toward prolonging kidney allograft survival. In this study we sought to determine the association between histologic changes on 1‐year surveillance biopsies, changes in graft function and survival. This analysis included 292 adults, recipients of kidneys from living donors (69%) or deceased donors (31%), transplanted between 1998 and 2001 and followed up for 46 ± 14 months. The primary end point was death‐censored graft loss or a >50% reduction in GFR beyond 1 year. One‐year biopsies were classified as: (i) Normal (N = 87, 30%), (ii) inflammation (N = 6, 2%), (iii) fibrosis (N = 131, 45%), (iv) fibrosis and inflammation (N = 53, 18%) and (v) transplant glomerulopathy (N = 15, 5%). By multivariate Cox analysis, survival related to biopsy classification (HR = 4.2, p = 0.001), graft function (HR = 0.97, p = 0.001) and HLA mismatches (HR = 1.003, p = 0.004). Using normal histology as a reference, fibrosis and inflammation (HR = 8.5, p < 0.0001) and glomerulopathy (HR = 10, p < 0.0001) related to poorer survival but mild fibrosis alone did not. Importantly, the degree of inflammation associated with fibrosis generally did not qualify for the diagnosis of borderline rejection. In conclusion, inflammation and glomerulopathy 1 year post‐transplant predict loss of graft function and graft failure independently of function and other variables.

Continued influence of preoperative renal function on outcome of orthotopic liver transplant (OLTX) in the US: where will MELD lead us?

Renal function is a component of the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD), We queried the 1999–2004 OPTN/UNOS database to determine whether preoperative renal function remained an important determinant of survival in primary deceased donor liver transplant alone patients (DDLTA) or primary combined kidney liver transplant patients (KLTX). We examined preoperative creatinine, renal replacement therapy (RRT), incidence of KLTX, and patient survival in the 34 months before and after introduction of MELD and performed a multivariate Cox regression analysis of time to death.

Kidney Transplant Function and Histological Clearance of Virus Following Diagnosis of Polyomavirus‐Associated Nephropathy (PVAN)

Polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN) is managed by reduced immunosuppression with or without antiviral therapy. Data from 55 patients with biopsy‐proven PVAN were analyzed for adverse outcomes and influence of baseline variables and interventions. During 20 ± 11 months follow‐up, the frequencies of graft loss, major and any functional decline were 15%, 24% and 38%, respectively. Repeat biopsies were performed in 45 patients with persistent PVAN in 47%. Low‐dose cidofovir, IVIG and cyclosporine conversion were used in 55%, 20% and 55% of patients. No single intervention was associated with improved outcome. Of the variables examined, only degree of interstitial fibrosis at diagnosis was associated with kidney function decline. In contrast, donor source, interstitial fibrosis, proportion of BKV positive tubules and plasma viral load at diagnosis were all associated with failure of histological viral clearance. This retrospective, nonrandomized analysis suggests that: (i) Graft loss within 2 years of PVAN diagnosis is now uncommon, but ongoing functional decline and persistent infection occur frequently. (ii) Low‐dose cidofovir, IVIG and conversion to cyclosporine do not abrogate adverse outcomes following diagnosis. (iii) Fibrosis at the time of diagnosis predicts subsequent functional decline. Further elucidation of the natural history of PVAN and its response to individual interventions will require prospective clinical trials.

Urine but not serum soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) may identify cases of recurrent FSGS in kidney transplant candidates.

Background Recently, serum soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) has been proposed as a cause of two thirds of cases of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). It was noted to be uniquely elevated in cases of primary FSGS, with higher levels noted in cases that recurred after transplantation. It is also suggested as a possible target and marker of therapy. Methods We studied serum and urine suPAR from pretransplantation banked samples from 86 well-characterized kidney transplant recipients and 10 healthy controls to determine its prognostic utility. Causes of native kidney disease were primary FSGS, diabetic nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, immunoglobulin A nephropathy, and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. suPAR was measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Urinary suPAR was indexed to creatinine. Results Both serum and urine suPAR correlated with proteinuria and albuminuria. Serum suPAR was found to be elevated in all transplant candidates with advanced renal disease compared with healthy controls and could not differentiate disease diagnosis. Urine suPAR was elevated in cases of recurrent FSGS compared with all other causes of end-stage renal disease. Recurrent FSGS cases had substantially higher proteinuria compared with all other cases. However, elevated urinary suPAR showed a trend in providing additional prognostic information beyond proteinuria in the small cohort of recurrent FSGS cases. Conclusion In advanced renal disease, elevated serum suPAR is not unique to FSGS cases. Urinary suPAR appears to be higher in cases of FSGS destined for recurrence and merits further evaluation.

Kidney allocation to liver transplant candidates with renal failure of undetermined etiology: Role of percutaneous renal biopsy

The feasibility, value and risk of percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) in liver transplant candidates with renal failure are unknown. PRB was performed on 44 liver transplant candidates with renal failure of undetermined etiology and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 37) or on renal replacement therapy (RRT) (n = 7). Patients with ≥30% interstitial fibrosis (IF), ≥40% global glomerulosclerosis (gGS) and/or diffuse glomerulonephritis were approved for simultaneous‐liver‐kidney (SLK) transplantation. Prebiopsy GFR, urinary sodium indices, dependency on RRT and kidney size were comparable between 27 liver‐transplant‐alone (LTA) and 17 SLK candidates and did not relate to the biopsy diagnosis. The interobserver agreement for the degree of IF or gGS was moderate‐to‐excellent. After a mean of 78 ± 67 days, 16 and 8 patients received LTA and SLK transplants. All five LTA recipients on RRT recovered kidney function after transplantation and serum creatinine was comparable between LTA and SLK recipients at last follow‐up. Biopsy complications developed in 13, of these, five required intervention. PRB is feasible in liver transplant candidates with renal failure and provides reproducible histological information that does not relate to the pretransplant clinical data. Randomized studies are needed to determine if PRB can direct kidney allocation in this challenging group of liver transplant candidates.

Diurnal Blood Pressure Changes One Year after Kidney Transplantation: Relationship to Allograft Function, Histology, and Resistive Index

Loss of circadian BP change has been linked to target organ damage and accelerated kidney function loss in hypertensive patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Ambulatory BP-derived data from 119 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who presented for the first annual evaluation were examined in relation to allograft function, histology, and ultrasound findings. A total of 101 (85%) patients were receiving antihypertensive medications (median 2), and 85 (71%) achieved target awake average systolic BP (SBP) of <135 mmHg. A day-night change in SBP by 10% or more (dippers) was detected in 29 (24%). Dipping status was associated with younger recipient age, lack of diabetes, low chronic vascular score, and low resistive index. Nondippers and reverse dippers had lower GFR compared with dippers (P = 0.04). For every 10% nocturnal drop in SBP, GFR increased by 4.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (R = 0.3, P = 0.003). Nondippers and reverse dippers were equally common in recipients with normal histology and in those with pathologic findings on surveillance biopsy. On multivariate analysis, percentage of nocturnal fall in SBP and elevated resistive index independently correlated with GFR. This study indicates that lack of nocturnal fall in SBP is related to poor allograft function, high chronic vascular score, and high resistive index irrespective of allograft fibrosis. Further studies are needed to determine whether restoration of normal BP pattern will confer better allograft outcome.

Excellent Renal Allograft Survival in Donor-Specific Antibody Positive Transplant Patients—Role of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin

Background. Timely transplantation of sensitized kidney recipients remains a challenge. Patients with a complement-dependent cytotoxicity negative and flow cytometry (FC) positive crossmatch carry increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and thus graft loss. Solid phase assays are available to confirm donor specificity for antibody identified by FC crossmatch. Treatment using induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may allow successful transplant of these high-risk patients. Methods. A retrospective study of 264 consecutive patients after exclusions yielded 94 complement-dependent cytotoxicity anti-human globulin crossmatch-negative patients, including group 1: 58 primary transplants with panel-reactive antibody (PRA) less than 20%, group 2: 16 retransplants and PRA more than 20% who were FC crossmatch-negative, and group 3: 20 retransplants and PRA more than 20% who were FC crossmatch-positive. All were treated with RATG induction and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Only group 3 received IVIG at 500 mg/kg daily in three doses. Results. Eighteen of 20 patients in group 3 had donor-specific antibody identified by solid phase assay. Cellular- and antibody-mediated rejections were statistically higher in group 3. Two-year serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate along with 3-year patient and graft survival were comparable between the groups. Conclusions. Sensitized patients with positive FC crossmatch and donor-specific antibody identified by solid phase assays can be successfully transplanted using standard RATG induction, IVIG, and maintenance immunosuppression with equal renal function and graft survival to immunologically lower risk recipients. Given these results, this patient group should not be excluded from transplantation based on antibody specificities determined by virtual crossmatch techniques.

Preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: do the benefits extend to all recipients?

Background. Preemptive kidney transplantation (prior to the institution of dialysis) avoids the morbidity and mortality of dialysis; however, detailed studies of high-risk patients are lacking. The aim of the current study was to compare recent outcomes of preemptive (P) versus nonpreemptive (NP) living donor kidney transplantation with an emphasis on high-risk recipients. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 438 sequential solitary living donor kidney transplants at our institution between January 2000 and December 2002. In all, 44% were preemptive. NP recipients were dialyzed for 21±36 months (range 1–312 months). Results. Overall, three-year patient survival was similar in the NP and P groups. When stratified by diabetes and age >65 years, P and NP recipients again showed similar survival. Death-censored three-year graft survival was better in the P group (97% vs. 90%, P=0.01), but was not significant by multivariate analysis. Delayed graft function was more frequent in NP vs. P (10% vs. 4%; P=0.01), but other early complications were similar including: acute rejection, 16% vs. 11% (P=0.11); primary nonfunction, 3% vs. 2% (P=0.38); and wound complications, 19% vs. 17% (P=0.54). Glomerular filtration rate at three years was similar in the two groups (53±23 preemptive vs. 52±20 ml/min nonpreemptive; P=0.37). Conclusion. With prompt referral and workup, preemptive kidney transplantation can be performed successfully in a large percentage of renal allograft recipients. Preemptive transplantation avoids unnecessary dialysis and should be emphasized as initial therapy for many patients with end-stage renal disease.

Hypertension in the Kidney Transplant Recipient

Elevated arterial blood pressure is common after kidney transplantation and contributes to shortened patient and allograft survivals and increased fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Unfortunately, current evidence indicates that arterial blood pressure remains poorly controlled in kidney transplant recipients. One concern is how best to evaluate treated levels of arterial pressure in transplant recipients as office and clinic measurements often differ from blood pressure readings obtained using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Some antihypertensive drugs interact with immunosuppressive medications and adversely affect electrolyte balance and kidney function, which complicates the management of kidney transplant patients. Target blood pressure readings have been suggested by different guidelines, but patient-specific management plan is still lacking. Understanding the basic mechanisms responsible for the persistent hypertension after kidney transplantation is helpful in drafting patient-directed management plan that includes both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions to achieve target blood pressure control. In this review, we propose a multilayered treatment plan that addresses hypertension in both the early and late posttransplant periods, bearing in mind complications of antihypertensive medications, interactions with immunosuppressive drugs, patient comorbidities, and patient-specific cardiovascular risk factors in the posttransplant period.

Sirolimus‐Induced Angioedema

Sirolimus (SRL) is a macrolide immunosuppressant that has gained widespread use in organ transplantation. Its full spectrum of side‐effects is yet to be defined. We describe herein three cases of SRL‐induced angioedema (AE) in African‐American (AA) primary renal allograft recipients who received SRL in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. In two cases, AE manifested after SRL was restarted after a period of discontinuation. The third case presented upon initial exposure to the drug. None of the patients was receiving any drug that has been previously associated with AE. Complete resolution occurred only after SRL was withdrawn. AE has not recurred in any of the patients during a follow‐up period of up to 21 months. We conclude that AE is a previously unrecognized adverse event associated with SRL use. Close monitoring for this side‐effect, especially in AA patients, is warranted.