Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hannah B Edwards is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hannah B Edwards.


Lancet Neurology | 2014

Childhood arterial ischaemic stroke incidence, presenting features, and risk factors: a prospective population-based study

Andrew A. Mallick; Vijeya Ganesan; Fenella J. Kirkham; Penny Fallon; Tamasine Hedderly; Tony McShane; Alasdair Parker; Evangeline Wassmer; Elizabeth Wraige; Samir Amin; Hannah B Edwards; Kate Tilling; Finbar J. O'Callaghan

BACKGROUND Arterial ischaemic stroke is an important cause of acquired brain injury in children. Few prospective population-based studies of childhood arterial ischaemic stroke have been undertaken. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology and clinical features of childhood arterial ischaemic stroke in a population-based cohort. METHODS Children aged 29 days to less than 16 years with radiologically confirmed arterial ischaemic stroke occurring over a 1-year period (July 1, 2008, to June 30, 2009) residing in southern England (population denominator 5·99 million children) were eligible for inclusion. Cases were identified using several sources (paediatric neurologists and trainees, the British Paediatric Neurology Surveillance Unit, paediatricians, radiologists, physiotherapists, neurosurgeons, parents, and the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network). Cases were confirmed by personal examination of cases and case notes. Details of presenting features, risk factors, and investigations for risk factors were recorded by analysis of case notes. Capture-recapture analysis was used to estimate completeness of ascertainment. FINDINGS We identified 96 cases of arterial ischaemic stroke. The crude incidence of childhood arterial ischaemic stroke was 1·60 per 100 000 per year (95% CI 1·30-1·96). Capture-recapture analysis suggested that case ascertainment was 89% (95% CI 77-97) complete. The incidence of arterial ischaemic stroke was highest in children aged under 1 year (4·14 per 100 000 per year, 95% CI 2·36-6·72). There was no difference in the risk of arterial ischaemic stroke between sexes (crude incidence 1·60 per 100 000 per year [95% CI 1·18-2·12] for boys and 1·61 per 100 000 per year [1·18-2·14] for girls). Asian (relative risk 2·14, 95% CI 1·11-3·85; p=0·017) and black (2·28, 1·00-4·60; p=0·034) children were at higher risk of arterial ischaemic stroke than were white children. 82 (85%) children had focal features (most commonly hemiparesis) at presentation. Seizures were more common in younger children (≤1 year) and headache was more common in older children (>5 years; p<0·0001). At least one risk factor for childhood arterial ischaemic stroke was identified in 80 (83%) cases. INTERPRETATION Age and racial group, but not sex, affected the risk of arterial ischaemic stroke in children. Investigation of such differences might provide causative insights. FUNDING The Stroke Association, UK.


Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry | 2015

Diagnostic delays in paediatric stroke

Andrew A. Mallick; Vijeya Ganesan; Fenella J. Kirkham; Penny Fallon; Tammy Hedderly; Tony McShane; Alasdair Parker; Evangeline Wassmer; Elizabeth Wraige; Samir Amin; Hannah B Edwards; Finbar J. O'Callaghan

Background Stroke is a major cause of mortality in children. Conditions that mimic stroke also cause severe morbidity and require prompt diagnosis and treatment. We have investigated the time to diagnosis in a cohort of children with stroke. Methods A population-based cohort of children with stroke was prospectively identified in the south of England. Case notes, electronic hospital admission databases and radiology records were reviewed. Timing of symptom onset, presentation to hospital, first neuroimaging, first diagnostic neuroimaging and presenting clinical features were recorded. Results Ninety-six children with an arterial ischaemic stroke (AIS) and 43 with a haemorrhagic stroke (HS) were identified. The median time from symptom onset to diagnostic neuroimaging was 24.3 h in AIS and 2.9 h in HS. The initial imaging modality was CT in 68% of cases of AIS. CT was diagnostic of AIS in 66% of cases. MRI was diagnostic in 100%. If initial neuroimaging was non-diagnostic in AIS, then median time to diagnosis was 44 h. CT was diagnostic in 95% of HS cases. Presentation outside normal working hours resulted in delayed neuroimaging in AIS (13 vs 3 h, p=0.032). Diffuse neurological signs or a Glasgow Coma Scale <9 resulted in more expeditious neuroimaging in both HS and AIS. Conclusions The diagnosis of AIS in children is delayed at every stage of the pathway but most profoundly when the first neuroimaging is CT scanning, which is non-diagnostic. MRI should be the initial imaging modality of choice in any suspected case of childhood AIS.


Annals of Neurology | 2016

Outcome and recurrence one year after paediatric arterial ischaemic stroke in a population-based cohort

Andrew A. Mallick; Vijeya Ganesan; Fenella J. Kirkham; Penny Fallon; Tammy Hedderly; Tony McShane; Alasdair Parker; Evangeline Wassmer; Elizabeth Wraige; Sam Amin; Hannah B Edwards; Mario Cortina-Borja; Finbar J. O'Callaghan

Arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is an important cause of acquired brain injury in children. Few prospective population‐based studies of childhood AIS have been completed. We aimed to investigate the outcome of childhood AIS 12 months after the event in a population‐based cohort.


BMJ Open | 2017

Low alcohol consumption and pregnancy and childhood outcomes: time to change guidelines indicating apparently ‘safe’ levels of alcohol during pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analyses

Loubaba Mamluk; Hannah B Edwards; Jelena Savovic; Verity Leach; Timothy Jones; Theresa Hm Moore; Sharea Ijaz; Sarah J Lewis; Jenny Donovan; Debbie A. Lawlor; George Davey Smith; Abigail Fraser; Luisa Zuccolo

Objectives To determine the effects of low-to-moderate levels of maternal alcohol consumption in pregnancy on pregnancy and longer-term offspring outcomes. Search strategy Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Psychinfo from inception to 11 July 2016. Selection criteria Prospective observational studies, negative control and quasiexperimental studies of pregnant women estimating effects of light drinking in pregnancy (≤32 g/week) versus abstaining. Pregnancy outcomes such as birth weight and features of fetal alcohol syndrome were examined. Data collection and analysis One reviewer extracted data and another checked extracted data. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where applicable, and a narrative summary of findings was carried out otherwise. Main results 24 cohort and two quasiexperimental studies were included. With the exception of birth size and gestational age, there was insufficient data to meta-analyse or make robust conclusions. Odds of small for gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth were higher for babies whose mothers consumed up to 32 g/week versus none, but estimates for preterm birth were also compatible with no association: summary OR 1.08, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.14), I2 0%, (seven studies, all estimates were adjusted) OR 1.10, 95% CI (0.95 to 1.28), I2 60%, (nine studies, includes one unadjusted estimates), respectively. The earliest time points of exposure were used in the analysis. Conclusion Evidence of the effects of drinking ≤32 g/week in pregnancy is sparse. As there was some evidence that even light prenatal alcohol consumption is associated with being SGA and preterm delivery, guidance could advise abstention as a precautionary principle but should explain the paucity of evidence.


BMJ Open | 2017

Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England

Hannah B Edwards; Elsa M R Marques; William Hollingworth; Jeremy Horwood; Michelle Farr; Elly Bernard; Chris Salisbury; Kate Northstone

Objectives Evaluation of a pilot study of an online consultation system in primary care. We describe who used the system, when and why, and the National Health Service costs associated with its use. Design 15-month observational study. Setting Primary care practices in South West England. Results 36 General practices covering 396 828 patients took part in the pilot. The online consultation website was viewed 35 981 times over the pilot period (mean 9.11 visits per 1000 patients per month). 7472 patients went on to complete an ‘e-consultation’ (mean 2.00 online consultations per 1000 patients per month). E-consultations were mainly performed on weekdays and during normal working hours. Patient records (n=485) were abstracted for eight practices and showed that women were more likely to use e-consultations than men (64.7% vs 35.3%) and users had a median age of 39 years (IQR 30–50). The most common reason for an e-consultation was an administrative request (eg, test results, letters and repeat prescriptions (22.5%)) followed by infections/immunological issues (14.4%). The majority of patients (65.2%) received a response within 2 days. The most common outcome was a face-to-face (38%) or telephone consultation (32%). The former were more often needed for patients consulting about new conditions (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.27, p=0.049). The average cost of a practice’s response to an e-consultation was £36.28, primarily triage time and resulting face-to-face/telephone consultations needed. Conclusions Use of e-consultations is very low, particularly at weekends. Unless this can be improved, any impact on staff workload and patient waiting times is likely to be negligible. It is possible that use of e-consultations increases primary care workload and costs. Online consultation systems could be developed to improve efficiency both for staff and patients. These findings have implications for software developers as well as primary care services and policy-makers who are considering investing in online consultation systems.


British Journal of General Practice | 2018

Use of an electronic consultation system in primary care: a qualitative interview study

Jon Banks; Michelle Farr; Chris Salisbury; Elly Bernard; Kate Northstone; Hannah B Edwards; Jeremy P Horwood

Background The level of demand on primary care continues to increase. Electronic or e-consultations enable patients to consult their GP online and have been promoted as having potential to improve access and efficiency. Aim To evaluate whether an e-consultation system improves the ability of practice staff to manage workload and access. Design and setting A qualitative interview study in general practices in the West of England that piloted an e-consultation system for 15 months during 2015 and 2016. Method Practices were purposefully sampled by location and level of e-consultation use. Clinical, administrative, and management staff were recruited at each practice. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Results Twenty-three interviews were carried out across six general practices. Routine e-consultations offered benefits for the practice because they could be completed without direct contact between GP and patient. However, most e-consultations resulted in GPs needing to follow up with a telephone or face-to-face appointment because the e-consultation did not contain sufficient information to inform clinical decision making. This was perceived as adding to the workload and providing some patients with an alternative route into the appointment system. Although this was seen as offering some patient benefit, there appeared to be fewer benefits for the practices. Conclusion The experiences of the practices in this study demonstrate that the technology, in its current form, fell short of providing an effective platform for clinicians to consult with patients and did not justify their financial investment in the system. The study also highlights the challenges of remote consultations, which lack the facility for real time interactions.


Archives of Disease in Childhood | 2017

Immunotherapy for arterial ischaemic stroke in childhood: a systematic review

Hannah B Edwards; Andrew A Mallick; Finbar J K O'Callaghan

Background There is little evidence about either prevention or treatment of childhood arterial ischaemic stroke (AIS). However, drugs that regulate the immune and inflammatory response could theoretically prevent occurrence or recurrence of AIS. Additionally, as an acute treatment, they may limit the neurological damage caused by AIS. Here, we systematically review the evidence on the use of immunotherapy in childhood AIS. Design A systematic review of publications in databases Embase and Medline from inception. All types of evidence were included from trials, cohorts, case–control and cross-sectional studies and case reports. Results 34 reports were included: 32 observational studies and 2 trials. Immunotherapy was used in two key patient groups: arteriopathy and acute infection. The majority were cases of varicella and primary angiitis of the central nervous system. All three cohorts and 80% of the case studies were treated with steroids. Recurrence rates were low. Analytical studies weakly associated steroids with lower odds of new stroke and neurological deficits, and better cognitive outcomes in the context of Moyamoya disease and tuberculosis. Conclusions Immunotherapies are used in children with AIS, mainly as steroids for children with arteriopathy. However, there is currently little robust evidence to either encourage or discourage this practice. There is weak evidence consistent with the hypothesis that in certain children at risk, steroids may both reduce the risk of occurrent/recurrent stroke and enhance neurological outcomes. As the potential benefit is still uncertain, this indicates that a trial of steroids in childhood AIS may be justified.


Annals of Neurology | 2016

Outcome and recurrence 1 year after pediatric arterial ischemic stroke in a population-based cohort

Andrew A. Mallick; Vijeya Ganesan; Fenella J. Kirkham; Penny Fallon; Tammy Hedderly; Tony McShane; Alasdair Parker; Evangeline Wassmer; Elizabeth Wraige; Sam Amin; Hannah B Edwards; Mario Cortina-Borja; Finbar J. O'Callaghan

Arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is an important cause of acquired brain injury in children. Few prospective population‐based studies of childhood AIS have been completed. We aimed to investigate the outcome of childhood AIS 12 months after the event in a population‐based cohort.


Resuscitation | 2018

Can early warning scores identify deteriorating patients in pre-hospital settings? A systematic review

Rita Patel; Manjula D. Nugawela; Hannah B Edwards; Alison Richards; Hein Le Roux; Anne Pullyblank; Penny F Whiting

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness and predictive accuracy of early warning scores (EWS) to predict deteriorating patients in pre-hospital settings. METHODS Systematic review. Seven databases searched to August 2017. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. A narrative synthesis is presented. ELIGIBILITY Studies that evaluated EWS predictive accuracy or that compared outcomes in populations that did or did not use EWS, in any pre-hospital setting were eligible for inclusion. EWS were included if they aggregated three or more physiological parameters. RESULTS Seventeen studies (157,878 participants) of predictive accuracy were included (16 in ambulance service and 1 in nursing home). AUCs ranged from 0.50 (CI not reported) to 0.89 (95%CI 0.82, 0.96). AUCs were generally higher (>0.80) for prediction of mortality within short time frames or for combination outcomes that included mortality and ICU admission. Few patients with low scores died at any time point. Patients with high scores were at risk of deterioration. Results were less clear for intermediate thresholds (≥4 or 5). Five studies were judged at low or unclear risk of bias, all others were judged at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS Very low and high EWS are able to discriminate between patients who are not likely and those who are likely to deteriorate in the pre-hospital setting. No study compared outcomes pre- and post-implementation of EWS so there is no evidence on whether patient outcomes differ between pre-hospital settings that do and do not use EWS. Further studies are required to address this question and to evaluate EWS in pre-hospital settings.


BMJ Open | 2016

Quality of relationships as predictors of outcomes in people with dementia: a systematic review protocol

Hannah B Edwards; Jelena Savović; Penny F Whiting; Verity Leach; Alison Richards; Sarah Cullum; Richard Cheston

Introduction Serious adverse outcomes for people with dementia include institutionalisation, hospitalisation, death, development of behavioural and psychiatric symptoms, and reduced quality of life. The quality of the relationship between the person with dementia and their informal/family carer is thought to affect the risk of these outcomes. However, little is known about which aspects of relationship quality are important, or how they affect outcomes for people with dementia. Methods and analysis This will be a systematic review of the literature. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Database, ALOIS and OpenGrey will be searched from inception. 2 independent reviewers will screen results for eligibility with standardised criteria. Data will be extracted for relevant studies, and information on the associations between relationship quality and dementia outcomes will be synthesised. Meta-analysis will be performed if possible to calculate pooled effect sizes. Narrative synthesis will be performed if study heterogeneity rules out meta-analysis. Ethics and dissemination Ethical review is not necessary as this review summarises data from previous studies. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication. Results will also be disseminated to a patient and public involvement group and an expert panel for their views on the findings and implications for future work. Trial registration number CRD42015020518.

Collaboration


Dive into the Hannah B Edwards's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew A. Mallick

Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tony McShane

John Radcliffe Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vijeya Ganesan

UCL Institute of Child Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Wraige

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge