Hannah Rice

Footwear matters: influence of footwear and foot strike on load rates during running

INTRODUCTION Running with a forefoot strike (FFS) pattern has been suggested to reduce the risk of overuse running injuries, due to a reduced vertical load rate compared with rearfoot strike (RFS) running. However, resultant load rate has been reported to be similar between foot strikes when running in traditional shoes, leading to questions regarding the value of running with a FFS. The influence of minimal footwear on the resultant load rate has not been considered. This study aimed to compare component and resultant instantaneous loading rate (ILR) between runners with different foot strike patterns in their habitual footwear conditions. METHODS Twenty-nine injury-free participants (22 men, seven women) ran at 3.13 m·s along a 30-m runway, with their habitual foot strike and footwear condition. Ground reaction force data were collected. Peak ILR values were compared between three conditions; those who habitually run with an RFS in standard shoes, with an FFS in standard shoes, and with an FFS in minimal shoes. RESULTS Peak resultant, vertical, lateral, and medial ILR were lower (P < 0.001) when running in minimal shoes with an FFS than in standard shoes with either foot strike. When running with an FFS, peak posterior ILR were lower (P < 0.001) in minimal than standard shoes. CONCLUSIONS When running in a standard shoe, peak resultant and component ILR were similar between footstrike patterns. However, load rates were lower when running in minimal shoes with a FFS, compared with running in standard shoes with either foot strike. Therefore, it appears that footwear alters the load rates during running, even with similar foot strike patterns.

High medial plantar pressures during barefoot running are associated with increased risk of ankle inversion injury in Royal Marine recruits

BACKGROUND Ankle inversion injury is common in military populations but associated biomechanical risk factors are largely unknown. This prospective study examined the association between pressure and kinematic variables, and ankle inversion injury risk in Royal Marine (RM) recruits. It was hypothesised that a more medially concentrated pressure at the heel-off phase of stance, greater impulse and peak pressure at the first metatarsal head, greater peak rearfoot eversion angle and greater eversion excursion would be associated with ankle inversion injury. METHODS Data from 145 male, injury-free RM recruits were recorded in week-2 of a 32-week military training programme. Each recruit completed five running trials at 3.6 ms(-1), along a 2m pressure plate. Kinematic data were simultaneously recorded. Injuries sustained during the training programme were prospectively recorded. FINDINGS Data from eleven recruits who had suffered an ankle inversion injury during RM training were compared with 20 uninjured controls. The injury group displayed a higher (P<0.05) peak first metatarsal pressure, peak metatarsal impulse and more medially concentrated pressure at heel-off than control recruits. There were no differences in kinematic variables between groups. The injury group had a lower body mass than controls (P<0.05). INTERPRETATIONS The findings from this study support existing literature, providing evidence that high medial concentration of vertical forces when running are associated with increased ankle inversion injury risk. This may be due to the lateral ankle ligaments being less accustomed to loading, resulting in relatively weak lateral ligaments, or ligaments less able to deal with fatigue than those of the control group.

Why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries

It is believed that human ancestors evolved the ability to run bipedally approximately 2 million years ago. This form of locomotion may have been important to our survival and likely has influenced the evolution of our body form. As our bodies have adapted to run, it seems unusual that up to 79% of modern day runners are injured annually. The etiology of these injuries is clearly multifactorial. However, 1 aspect of running that has significantly changed over the past 50 years is the footwear we use. Modern running shoes have become increasingly cushioned and supportive, and have changed the way we run. In particular, they have altered our footstrike pattern from a predominantly forefoot strike (FFS) landing to a predominantly rearfoot strike (RFS) landing. This change alters the way in which the body is loaded and may be contributing to the high rate of injuries runners experience while engaged in an activity for which they were adapted. In this paper, we will examine the benefits of barefoot running (typically an FFS pattern), and compare the lower extremity mechanics between FFS and RFS. The implications of these mechanical differences, in terms of injury, will be discussed. We will then provide evidence to support our contention that FFS provides an optimal mechanical environment for specific foot and ankle structures, such as the heel pad, the plantar fascia, and the Achilles tendon. The importance of footwear will then be addressed, highlighting its interaction with strike pattern on mechanics. This analysis will underscore why footwear matters when assessing mechanics. Finally, proper preparation and safe transition to an FFS pattern in minimal shoes will be emphasized. Through the discussion of the current literature, we will develop a justification for returning to running in the way for which we were adapted to reduce running-related injuries.

Four biomechanical and anthropometric measures predict tibial stress fracture: A prospective study of 1065 Royal Marines

Background Tibial stress fractures (TSFs) cause a significant burden to Royal Marines recruits. No prospective running gait analyses have previously been performed in military settings. Aim We aimed to identify biomechanical gait factors and anthropometric variables associated with increased risk of TSF. Methods 1065 Royal Marines recruits were assessed in week 2 of training. Bilateral plantar pressure and three-dimensional lower limb kinematics were obtained for barefoot running at 3.6 m/s, providing dynamic arch index, peak heel pressure and lower limb joint angles. Age, bimalleolar breadth, calf girth, passive hip internal/external range of motion and body mass index (BMI) were also recorded. 10 recruits who sustained a TSF during training were compared with 120 recruits who completed training injury-free using a binary logistic regression model to identify injury risk factors. Results 4 variables significantly (p<0.05) predicted increased risk of TSF (ORs and 95% CI): smaller bimalleolar width (0.73, 0.58 to 0.93), lower BMI (0.56, 0.33 to 0.95), greater peak heel pressure (1.25, 1.07 to 1.46) and lower range of tibial rotation (0.78, 0.63 to 0.96). Summary Reduced impact attenuation and ability to withstand load were implicated in tibial stress fracture risk.

Influence of a 12.8-km military load carriage activity on lower limb gait mechanics and muscle activity

Abstract The high stress fracture occurrence in military populations has been associated with frequent load carriage activities. This study aimed to assess the influence of load carriage and of completing a load carriage training activity on gait characteristics. Thirty-two Royal Marine recruits completed a 12.8-km load carriage activity as part of their military training. Data were collected during walking in military boots, pre and post-activity, with and without the additional load (35.5 kg). Ground contact time, lower limb sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics, and electromyographic variables were obtained for each condition. When carrying load, there was increased ground contact time, increased joint flexion and joint moments, and increased plantar flexor and knee extensor muscle activity. Post-activity, there were no changes to kinematic variables, knee extensor moments were reduced, and there was evidence of plantar flexor muscle fatigue. The observed gait changes may be associated with stress fracture development. Practitioner Summary: This study identified gait changes due to load carriage and after a military load carriage training activity. Such activities are associated with lower limb stress fractures. A pre–post study design was used. Gait mechanics changed to a greater extent when carrying load, than after completion of the activity when assessed without load.

Manipulation of Foot Strike and Footwear Increases Achilles Tendon Loading During Running

Background: The Achilles tendon is the most common site of tendon overuse injury in humans. Running with a forefoot strike pattern and in minimal shoes is a topic of recent interest, yet evidence is currently limited regarding the combined influence of foot strike and footwear on Achilles tendon loading. Purpose: To investigate the influence of both foot strike and footwear on Achilles tendon loading in habitual rearfoot strike runners. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Synchronized kinematic and force data were collected from 22 habitual rearfoot strikers (11 male), who habitually ran in nonminimal running shoes, during overground running at 3.6 m·s-1. Participants ran in 3 different footwear conditions (standard running shoe, minimal running shoe, and barefoot) with both a rearfoot strike (RFS) and an imposed forefoot strike (FFS) in each footwear condition. Achilles tendon loading was estimated by use of inverse dynamics, where the Achilles tendon moment arm was determined with a regression equation. A 2-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare conditions. Results: Achilles tendon impulse was greater when subjects ran with an FFS rather than an RFS in minimal shoes. Achilles tendon loading rates were higher when subjects ran either in minimal shoes or barefoot than in standard shoes, regardless of foot strike. Conclusion: In runners who habitually rearfoot strike in standard running shoes, running in minimal shoes or barefoot increased the rate of tendon loading, and running with a forefoot strike in minimal shoes increased the magnitude of tendon loading. Clinical Relevance: Transitioning to these running conditions may increase the risk of tendinopathy.

Changes in lower limb biomechanics and metatarsal stress fracture with different military boots

Cook, J. L., & Purdah, C. R. (2013). The challenge of managing tendinopathy in competing athletes. British Journal of Sports Medicine. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-092078 Knobloch, K., Yoon, U., & Vogt, P. M. (2008). Acute and overuse injuries correlated to hours of training in master running athletes Foot Ankle International, 29(7), 671–676. Lorimer, A., & Hume, P. (2014). Achilles tendon injury risk factors associated with running. Sports Medicine, 44(1), 1459– 1472. Sankey, R. Brooks, J. H. M., Kemp, S. P. T., & Haddad, F. S. (2008). The epidemiology of ankle injuries in professional Rugby Union players. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(12), 2415–2423.

Estimates of tibial shock magnitude in men and women at the start and end of a military drill training programme

Introduction Foot drill is a key component of military training and is characterized by frequent heel stamping, likely resulting in high tibial shock magnitudes. Higher tibial shock during running has previously been associated with risk of lower limb stress fractures, which are prevalent among military populations. Quantification of tibial shock during drill training is, therefore, warranted. This study aimed to provide estimates of tibial shock during military drill in British Army Basic training. The study also aimed to compare values between men and women, and to identify any differences between the first and final sessions of training. Materials and Methods Tibial accelerometers were secured on the right medial, distal shank of 10 British Army recruits (n = 5 men; n = 5 women) throughout a scheduled drill training session in week 1 and week 12 of basic military training. Peak positive accelerations, the average magnitude above given thresholds, and the rate at which each threshold was exceeded were quantified. Results Mean (SD) peak positive acceleration was 20.8 (2.2) g across all sessions, which is considerably higher than values typically observed during high impact physical activity. Magnitudes of tibial shock were higher in men than women, and higher in week 12 compared with week 1 of training. Conclusions This study provides the first estimates of tibial shock magnitude during military drill training in the field. The high values suggest that military drill is a demanding activity and this should be considered when developing and evaluating military training programs. Further exploration is required to understand the response of the lower limb to military drill training and the etiology of these responses in the development of lower limb stress fractures.

Prospective study of biomechanical risk factors for second and third metatarsal stress fractures in military recruits

OBJECTIVES This prospective study investigated anatomical and biomechanical risk factors for second and third metatarsal stress fractures in military recruits during training. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. METHODS Anatomical and biomechanical measures were taken for 1065 Royal Marines recruits at the start of training when injury-free. Data included passive range of ankle dorsi-flexion, dynamic peak ankle dorsi-flexion and plantar pressures during barefoot running. Separate univariate regression models were developed to identify differences between recruits who developed second (n=7) or third (n=14) metatarsal stress fracture and a cohort of recruits completing training with no injury (n=150) (p<0.05). A multinomial logistic regression model was developed to predict the risk of injury for the two sites compared with the no-injury group. Multinomial logistic regression results were back transformed from log scale and presented in Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Lower dynamic arch index (high arch) (RRR: 0.75, CI: 0.63-0.89, p<0.01) and lower foot abduction (RRR: 0.87, CI: 0.80-0.96, p<0.01) were identified as increasing risk for second metatarsal stress fracture, while younger age (RRR: 0.78, CI: 0.61-0.99, p<0.05) and later peak pressure at the second metatarsal head area (RRR: 1.19, CI: 1.04-1.35, p<0.01) were identified as risk factors for third metatarsal stress fracture. CONCLUSIONS For second metatarsal stress fracture, aspects of foot type have been identified as influencing injury risk. For third metatarsal stress fracture, a delayed forefoot loading increases injury risk. Identification of these different injury mechanisms can inform development of interventions for treatment and prevention.

A narrow bimalleolar width is a risk factor for ankle inversion injury in male military recruits: A prospective study

Background: Ankle inversion injuries are one of the most common and burdensome injuries in athletic populations. Research that prospectively identifies characteristics associated with this injury is lacking. This prospective study compared baseline anthropometric and biomechanical gait characteristics of military recruits who sustained an ankle inversion injury during training, with those who remained injury‐free. Methods: Bilateral plantar pressure and three‐dimensional lower limb kinematics were recorded in 1065 male, injury‐free military recruits, during barefoot running. Injuries that occurred during the 32‐week recruit training programme were subsequently recorded. Data were compared between recruits who sustained an ankle inversion injury during training (n = 27) and a sample (n = 120) of those who completed training injury‐free. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for this injury. Findings: A narrower bimalleolar width and an earlier peak pressure under the fifth metatarsal were predictors of ankle inversion injury. Those who sustained an ankle inversion injury also had a lower body mass, body mass index, and a smaller calf girth than those who completed training injury‐free. Interpretation: Anthropometric and dynamic gait characteristics have been identified that may predispose recruits to an ankle inversion injury during Royal Marine recruit training, allowing identification of recruits at higher risk at the start of training. HighlightsLarge prospective study within highly controlled military populationIdentified risk factors for ankle inversion injuryBimalleolar width and time of peak pressure associatedMay be used to identify individuals at greatest risk