Hanne M. Kooy

Tolerance of cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to radiosurgery

PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery is becoming a more accepted treatment option for benign, deep seated intracranial lesions. However, little is known about the effects of large single fractions of radiation on cranial nerves. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of radiosurgery on the cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus. METHODS AND MATERIALS We examined the tolerance of cranial nerves (II-VI) following radiosurgery for 62 patients (42/62 with meningiomas) treated for lesions within or near the cavernous sinus. Twenty-nine patients were treated with a modified 6 MV linear accelerator (Joint Center for Radiation Therapy) and 33 were treated with the Gamma Knife (University of Pittsburgh). Three-dimensional treatment plans were retrospectively reviewed and maximum doses were calculated for the cavernous sinus and the optic nerve and chiasm. RESULTS Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-49). New cranial neuropathies developed in 12 patients from 3-41 months following radiosurgery. Four of these complications involved injury to the optic system and 8 (3/8 transient) were the result of injury to the sensory or motor nerves of the cavernous sinus. There was no clear relationship between the maximum dose to the cavernous sinus and the development of complications for cranial nerves III-VI over the dose range used (1000-4000 cGy). For the optic apparatus, there was a significantly increased incidence of complications with dose. Four of 17 patients (24%) receiving greater than 800 cGy to any part of the optic apparatus developed visual complications compared with 0/35 who received less than 800 cGy (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION Radiosurgery using tumor-controlling doses of up to 4000 cGy appears to be a relatively safe technique in treating lesions within or near the sensory and motor nerves (III-VI) of the cavernous sinus. The dose to the optic apparatus should be limited to under 800 cGy.

Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

ABSTRACTTHE PURPOSE OF this study was to compare the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The patients had either progressive GBM or pathologically proven GBM at recurrence after previous treatment for a lower grad

The treatment of recurrent brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Between May 1986 and August 1989, we treated 18 patients with 21 recurrent or persistent brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a modified linear accelerator. To be eligible for radiosurgery, patients had to have a performance status of greater than or equal to 70% and have no evidence of (or stable) systemic disease. All but one patient had received prior radiotherapy, and were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery at the time of recurrence. Polar lesions were treated only if the patient had undergone and failed previous complete surgical resection (10 patients). Single doses of radiation (900 to 2,500 cGy) were delivered to limited volumes (less than 27 cm3) using a modified 6MV linear accelerator. The most common histology of the metastatic lesion was carcinoma of the lung (seven patients), followed by carcinoma of the breast (four patients), and melanoma (four patients). With median follow-up of 9 months (range, 1 to 39), all tumors have been controlled in the radiosurgery field. Two patients failed in the immediate margin of the treated volume and were subsequently treated with surgery and implantation of 125I to control the disease. Radiographic response was dramatic and rapid in the patients with adenocarcinoma, while slight reduction and stabilization occurred in those patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. The majority of patients improved neurologically following treatment, and were able to be withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy. Complications were limited and transient in nature and no cases of symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in any patient despite previous exposure to radiotherapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective and relatively safe treatment for recurrent solitary metastases and is an appealing technique for the initial management of deep-seated lesions as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy.

Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma

PURPOSE To compare treatment plans from standard photon therapy to intensity modulated X-rays (IMRT) and protons for craniospinal axis irradiation and posterior fossa boost in a patient with medulloblastoma. METHODS Proton planning was accomplished using an in-house 3D planning system. IMRT plans were developed using the KonRad treatment planning system with 6-MV photons. RESULTS Substantial normal-tissue dose sparing was realized with IMRT and proton treatment of the posterior fossa and spinal column. For example, the dose to 90% of the cochlea was reduced from 101.2% of the prescribed posterior fossa boost dose from conventional X-rays to 33.4% and 2.4% from IMRT and protons, respectively. Dose to 50% of the heart volume was reduced from 72.2% for conventional X-rays to 29.5% for IMRT and 0.5% for protons. Long-term toxicity with emphasis on hearing and endocrine and cardiac function should be substantially improved secondary to nontarget tissue sparing achieved with protons. CONCLUSION The present study clearly demonstrates the advantage of conformal radiation methods for the treatment of posterior fossa and spinal column in children with medulloblastoma, when compared to conventional X-rays. Of the two conformal treatment methods evaluated, protons were found to be superior to IMRT.

Automatic three‐dimensional correlation of CT‐CT, CT‐MRI, and CT‐SPECT using chamfer matching

Image correlation is often required to utilize the complementary information in CT, MRI, and SPECT. A practical method for automatic image correlation in three-dimensions (3D) based on chamfer matching is described. The method starts with automatic extraction of contour points in one modality and automatic segmentation of the corresponding feature in the other modality. A distance transform is applied to the segmented volume and a cost function is defined that operates between the contour points and the distance transform. Matching is performed by iteratively optimizing the cost function for 3D translation, rotation, and scaling of the contour points. The complete matching process including segmentation requires no user interaction and takes about 100 s on an HP715/50 workstation. Perturbation tests on clinical data with cost functions based on mean, rms, and maximum distances in combination with two general purpose optimization procedures have been performed. The performance of the methods has been quantified in terms of accuracy, capture range, and reliability. The best results on clinical data are obtained with the cost function based on the mean distance and the simplex optimization method. The accuracy is 0.3 mm for CT-CT, 1.0 mm for CT-MRI, and 0.7 mm for CT-SPECT correlation of the head. The accuracy is usually at subpixel level but is limited by global geometric distortions, e.g., for CT-MRI correlation. Both for CT-CT and CT-MRI correlation the capture range is about 6 cm, which is higher than normal differences in patient setup found on the scanners (less than 4 cm). This means that the correlation procedure seldom fails (better than 98% reliability) and user interaction is unnecessary. For CT-SPECT matching the capture range is about 3 cm (80% reliability), and must be further improved. The method has already been introduced in clinical practice.

Radiosurgery as part of the initial management of patients with malignant gliomas.

PURPOSE Between May 1988 and May 1991, 41 patients with malignant gliomas were enrolled onto a prospective study designed to evaluate the role of radiosurgery as a component of initial management. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-seven patients underwent radiosurgery according to the protocol and were assessable for survival and complications of treatment. Diagnoses included glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in 23 (62%) cases and anaplastic astrocytoma in 14 (38%) cases. In 20 (54%) cases, surgical resection was attempted initially, whereas 17 (46%) patients underwent biopsy only. Patients in the study group received external-beam radiotherapy that consisted of 5,940 cGy given in 33 fractions to partial brain fields that encompassed the primary tumor with a 3 to 4 cm margin. Radiosurgery, used as a technique for boosting the dose to any residual contrast-enhancing mass lesion, was given 2 to 4 weeks after the completion of conventional radiotherapy. Minimum radiosurgical doses ranged from 1,000 to 2,000 cGy (median, 1,200 cGy), whereas maximum doses ranged from 1,250 to 2,500 cGy (median, 1,500 cGy). The median tumor volume at the time of radiosurgery was 4.8 cm3 (range, 1.2 to 72 cm3). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not given. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 19 months, only nine of 37 (24%) patients have died. Six patients (all glioblastoma multiforme) died of recurrent tumor, whereas death was attributable to complications of treatment in two cases and intercurrent disease in one case. Four patients with recurrent tumor failed at the margins of the radiosurgical treatment volume, whereas two patients progressed locally. One patient is alive with local and marginal failure. Seven (19%) patients underwent reoperation at a median time of 5 months (range, 1 to 14 months) after radiosurgery. CONCLUSION We conclude that radiosurgery is a useful adjunct to other modalities in the initial management of patients with small, radiographically well-defined malignant gliomas.

Variables associated with the development of complications from radiosurgery of intracranial tumors

Between 5/21/86 and 11/1/89, we treated 64 recurrent or inoperable intracranial tumors in 60 patients (40 primary, 24 metastatic) with stereotactic radiosurgery using a modified 6 MeV linear accelerator at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. Patients were followed until death or 1/1/90. The median follow-up was 8 months (2-43 months). Fourteen patients experienced complications from 12 hours to 7 months (median 3 months, but only two patients more than 4 months) following radiosurgery. To determine variables related to complication, we calculated integral dose-volume histograms for 61/64 lesions and the surrounding CT-defined normal tissue. We excluded 16 lesions in 15 patients for follow-up less than 4 months (12 patients) or insufficient treatment information (3 patients). The variables for which higher values were associated with significantly more toxicity in a univariate score test were: a) tumor dose inhomogeneity (p less than 0.00001), b) maximum tumor dose (p = 0.00002), c) number of isocenters (p = 0.00002), d) maximum normal tissue dose (p = 0.00005) and e) tumor volume (p = 0.0001). These variables were all highly correlated with tumor dose inhomogeneity (coefficients of rank correlation 0.75-0.81). Tumor dose inhomogeneity had a much higher loglikelihood in a logistic model than any other single variable and a higher loglikelihood than any other two variables combined. None of the 21 patients with metastatic lesions experienced a complication. When we excluded the metastatic lesions, the above five variables remained significant in univariate tests. The mean tumor dose, number of treatment arcs, total degrees of arc, tumor location, previous radiotherapy, tumor geometry, pretreatment performance status, collimator size, and age were not significantly associated with toxicity. We conclude that radiosurgery of intracranial tumors is associated with a low risk of complications for lesions less than 10cc treated with a single isocenter to maximum tumor doses less than 25 Gy with tumor dose inhomogeneity less than 10 Gy, but that treatment of larger lesions will require new treatment strategies which reduce the tumor dose inhomogeneity associated with multiple isocenter treatments.

Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE To determine the extent and predictors for prostatic motion in a large number of patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during radiotherapy, and evaluate the implications of these data on the design of appropriate treatment margins for patients receiving high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty patients underwent four serial computerized tomography (CT) scans, consisting of an initial planning scan and subsequent scans at the beginning, middle, and end of the treatment course. Each scan was performed with the patient in the prone treatment position within an immobilization device used during therapy. Contours of the prostate and seminal vesicles were drawn on the axial CT slices of each scan, and the scans were matched by alignment of the pelvic bones with a chamfer matching algorithm. Using the contour information, distributions of the displacement of the organ center of mass and organ border from the planning position were determined separately for the prostate and seminal vesicles in each of the three principle directions: anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) and left-right (LR). Each distribution was fitted to a normal (Gaussian) distribution to determine confidence limits in the center of mass and border displacements and thereby evaluate for the optimal margins needed to contain target motion. RESULTS The most common directions of displacement of the prostate center of mass (COM) were in the AP and SI directions and were significantly larger than any LR movement. The mean prostate COM displacement (+/- 1 standard deviation, SD) for the entire population was -1.2 +/- 2.9 mm, -0.5 +/- 3.3 mm and -0.6 +/- 0.8 mm in the, AP and SI and LR directions respectively (negative values indicate posterior, inferior or left displacement). The mean (+/- 1 SD) seminal vesicle COM displacement for the entire population was - 1.4 +/- 4.9 mm, 1.3 +/- 5.5 mm and -0.8 +/- 3.1 mm in the AP and SI and LR directions, respectively. The data indicate a tendency for the population towards posterior displacements of the prostate from the planning position and both posterior and superior displacements of the seminal vesicles. AP movement of both the prostate and seminal vesicles were correlated with changes in rectal volume (P = 0.0014 and < 0.0001, respectively) more than with changes in bladder volume (P = 0.030 for seminal vesicles and 0.19 for prostate). A logistic regression analysis identified the combination of rectal volume > 60 cm3 and bladder volumes > 40 cm3 as the only predictor of large ( > 3 mm) systematic deviations for the prostate and seminal vesicles (P = 0.05) defined for each patient as the difference between organ position in the planning scan and mean position as calculated from the three subsequent scans. CONCLUSIONS Prostatic displacement during a course of radiotherapy is more pronounced among patients with initial planning scans with large rectal and bladder volumes. Such patients may require more generous margins around the CTV to assure its enclosure within the prescription dose region. Identification and correction of patients with large systematic errors will minimize the extent of the margin required and decrease the volume of normal tissue exposed to higher radiation doses.

Proton beam therapy

Conventional radiation therapy directs photons (X-rays) and electrons at tumours with the intent of eradicating the neoplastic tissue while preserving adjacent normal tissue. Radiation-induced damage to healthy tissue and second malignancies are always a concern, however, when administering radiation. Proton beam radiotherapy, one form of charged particle therapy, allows for excellent dose distributions, with the added benefit of no exit dose. These characteristics make this form of radiotherapy an excellent choice for the treatment of tumours located next to critical structures such as the spinal cord, eyes, and brain, as well as for paediatric malignancies.

Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility

Monte Carlo dosimetry calculations are essential methods in radiation therapy. To take full advantage of this tool, the beam delivery system has to be simulated in detail and the initial beam parameters have to be known accurately. The modeling of the beam delivery system itself opens various areas where Monte Carlo calculations prove extremely helpful, such as for design and commissioning of a therapy facility as well as for quality assurance verification. The gantry treatment nozzles at the Northeast Proton Therapy Center (NPTC) at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) were modeled in detail using the GEANT4.5.2 Monte Carlo code. For this purpose, various novel solutions for simulating irregular shaped objects in the beam path, like contoured scatterers, patient apertures or patient compensators, were found. The four-dimensional, in time and space, simulation of moving parts, such as the modulator wheel, was implemented. Further, the appropriate physics models and cross sections for proton therapy applications were defined. We present comparisons between measured data and simulations. These show that by modeling the treatment nozzle with millimeter accuracy, it is possible to reproduce measured dose distributions with an accuracy in range and modulation width, in the case of a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), of better than 1 mm. The excellent agreement demonstrates that the simulations can even be used to generate beam data for commissioning treatment planning systems. The Monte Carlo nozzle model was used to study mechanical optimization in terms of scattered radiation and secondary radiation in the design of the nozzles. We present simulations on the neutron background. Further, the Monte Carlo calculations supported commissioning efforts in understanding the sensitivity of beam characteristics and how these influence the dose delivered. We present the sensitivity of dose distributions in water with respect to various beam parameters and geometrical misalignments. This allows the definition of tolerances for quality assurance and the design of quality assurance procedures.