Hannes Barth

Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Saruplase With Streptokinase Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The COMPASS Equivalence Trial

Abstract Objectives. This study sought to demonstrate the equivalence of saruplase and streptokinase in terms of 30-day mortality. Background. The use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction is well established and has been shown to substantially reduce post-myocardial infarction mortality. Methods. Three thousand eighty-nine patients with symptoms compatible with those of acute myocardial infarction for Results. Death of any cause up to 30 days after randomization occurred in 88 (5.7%) of 1,542 patients randomized to receive saruplase and 104 (6.7%) of 1,547 patients randomized to receive streptokinase (odds ratio 0.84, p Conclusions. Saruplase is a clinically safe and effective thrombolytic medication. This profile ranks saruplase favorably among the currently available thrombolytic agents.

Comparison of Saruplase and Alteplase in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Four hundred seventy-three patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were treated with either saruplase (80 mg/hour, n = 236) or alteplase (100 mg every 3 hours, n = 237). Comedication included heparin and acetylsalicylic acid. Angiography was performed at 45 and 60 minutes after the start of thrombolytic therapy. When flow was insufficient, angiography was repeated at 90 minutes. Coronary angioplasty was then performed if Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial 0 to 1 flow was seen. Control angiography was at 24 to 40 hours. Baseline characteristics were similar. Angiography showed comparable and remarkably high early patency rates (TIMI 2 or 3 flow) in both treatment groups: at 45 minutes, 74.6% versus 68.9% (p = 0.22); and at 60 minutes 79.9% versus 75.3% (p = 0.26). Patency rates at 90 minutes before additional interventions were also comparable (79.9% and 81.4%). Angiographic reocclusion rates were not significantly different: 1.2% versus 2.4% (p = 0.68). After rescue angioplasty, angiographic reocclusion rates of 22.0% and 15.0% were observed. Safety data were similar for both groups. Thus, (1) early patency rates were high for saruplase and alteplase treatment, (2) reocclusion rates for both drugs were remarkably low, and (3) complication rates were similar. Thus, saruplase seems to be as safe and effective as alteplase.

Thrombolysis with recombinant unglycosylated single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (saruplase) in acute myocardial infarction : influence of heparin on early patency rate (LIMITS study)

OBJECTIVES The Liquemin in Myocardial Infarction During Thrombolysis With Saruplase (LIMITS) study was instituted to evaluate and characterize the effect of a prethrombolytic heparin bolus (5,000 IU) on the efficacy and safety of saruplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND Heparin has been used after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction to prevent reocclusion of the infarct-related artery. METHODS The study was designed as a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, multicenter trial. Patients were treated within 6 h of onset of symptoms with either a bolus of 5,000 IU of heparin (Liquemin) (n = 56, HSH group) or placebo (n = 62, PSH group) before thrombolytic treatment with saruplase given as a 20-mg bolus followed by an infusion of 60 mg over 60 min. Thirty minutes after completion of thrombolysis, an intravenous heparin infusion was administered for 5 days. Before coronary angiography was performed at 6 to 12 h after start of lysis, an additional bolus of 5,000 IU heparin was given to all patients. End points studied were patency of the infarct-related artery, changes in the hemostatic system and bleeding complications. RESULTS In the HSH group (heparin-saruplase-heparin), 78.6% of patients had an open infarct-related vessel (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 2 or 3) compared with 56.5% in the PSH group (placebo-saruplase-heparin) (intention-to-treat analysis, p = 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to changes in fibrinogen and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products. A total of eight bleeding complications (14.3%) were observed in the HSH group and five (8.1%) in the PSH group; no cerebrovascular event occurred, and no allergic reaction was reported. A total of 12 patients died during the hospital stay, 3 in the HSH group (5.4%) and 9 in the PSH group (14.5%). CONCLUSIONS In acute myocardial infarction, the administration of a heparin bolus before thrombolytic therapy with saruplase is associated with a significantly higher patency at angiography 6 to 12 h after the start of thrombolysis without any appreciable increase in risk of bleeding.

A double-blind multicenter comparison of the efficacy and safety ofsaruplase andurokinase in thetreatment ofacutemyocardialinfarction: Report of the SUTAMI study group

Background: Urokinase or two-chain urokinasetype plasminogen activator has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Its parent molecule, single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scu-PA), unlike urokinase, can selectively activate fibrinbound plasminogen. The induced clot lysis is amplified by plasmin-triggered conversion of scu-PA to urokinase and by further plasmin generation. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant unglycosylated scu-PA, or saruplase, and urokinase at doses considered optimal in patients with acute myocardial infarction within 6 hours of onset of pain. Methods and results: In a double-blind trial 543 patients were randomized to saruplase (20 mg bolus + 60 mg/hr) or urokinase (1.5 million unit bolus + 1.5 million units/hr). Primary endpoint: The patency rates at 24–72 hours were 75.4% (95% CI 70.3–80.5%) for saruplase and 74.2% (95% CI 69.0–79.4%;P=0.77) for urokinase. Secondary endpoint: The incidence of bleeding events in both groups was 10.7%. There were three hemorrhagic strokes in the saruplase group (ns). Other efficacy and safety evaluations: Apart from the generation of more fibrinogen degradation products under saruplase, the changes in hemostatic parameters did not differ. Hospital mortality was 4.4% for saruplase and 8.1% for urokinase. This nonsignificant difference was maintained for 1 year. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of saruplase and urokinase in the regimens used are very similar.

Bolus Administration of Saruplase in Europe (BASE), a Pilot Study in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

To study the safety and efficacy of the thrombolytic agent saruplase as a bolus, the angiographic and clinical outcomes of three bolus regimens were investigated in a pilot study conducted in 192 patients with an acute myocardial infarction and were compared with the standard regimen. Fifty-two patients received a double bolus of 40 mg and 40 mg after 30 minutes, 51 patients a bolus of 80 mg, and 36 patients a bolus of 60 mg. Fifty-three patients received the standard regimen (a bolus of 20 mg and 60 mg IV infusion over 1 hour). At 60 minutes TIMI 2 and 3 flow were, respectively, 9.6% and 61.5% with the 40/40-mg bolus, 15.7% and 51.0% with the 80-mg bolus, 16.7% and 30.6% with the 60-mg bolus, and 7.5% and 54.7% with the standard 20/60-mg infusion. At 90 minutes TIMI 2 and 3 flow improved to 9.6% and 73.1%, 15.7% and 56.9%, 13.9% and 36.1%, and 5.7% and 71.7%, respectively. The primary endpoint, persistent patency (TIMI 2 + 3) at 24–45 hours, was seen in 69.2%, 64.7%, 44.4%, and 67.9% of patients who had no rescue PTCA, respectively. Inclusion in the 60-mg bolus group was prematurely stopped because of their low patency rates. The 40/40-mg bolus group had the highest mortality rate (13.5%), whereas the 60-mg bolus group had no deaths. Other adverse event rates were similar in the four groups. This clinical outcome is highly influenced by rescue PTCA of patients with insufficient TIMI flow. This pilot study indicates that in patients with an acute myocardial infarction, a double bolus of 40/40 mg resulted in the highest patency but also had the highest complication rate. The 80-mg single bolus is an attractive alternative for further evaluation because of its acceptable patency and event profile, and its easy form of administration.

Thrombolysis with saruplase versus streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: Five-year results of the PRIMI Trial ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★

BACKGROUND Short-term safety and efficacy of thrombolysis with saruplase in acute myocardial infarction have been shown in several trials. To assess long-term outcome of patients treated with saruplase or streptokinase for myocardial infarction, a 5-year follow-up of patients included in the Pro-Urokinase in Myocardial Infarction Trial was performed. METHODS AND RESULTS Follow-up data are available from 8 centers on 255 (92.4%) of 276 included patients. The 5-year mortality rate was comparable with 20.8% of patients in the saruplase group and 16.9% in the streptokinase group (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 2.42). In both groups, a considerable number of fatal cardiovascular events occurred more than 1 year after study inclusion. Rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting were comparable in both groups. Reinfarction within 5 years occurred in 19.0% of patients in the saruplase group and tended to be less frequent at 10.8% after streptokinase treatment (odds ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 3.84). In both groups, the majority of reinfarctions took place more than 3 months after study inclusion. The 5-year stroke rate was 3.6% and 7.2% in the saruplase and streptokinase groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 1.47). Subjective symptoms of heart failure and angina pectoris were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Our data are consistent with a similar long-term outcome for patients treated with saruplase or streptokinase. Despite the low-risk profile of the patient cohort, there were considerable adverse event rates over a 5-year period.

Saruplase Is a Safe and Effective Thrombolytic Agent; Observations in 1698 Patients: Results of the PASS Study

Saruplase (unglycosylated human-type high molecular weight single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator) was given to 1698 patients in the open-label Practical Applicability of Saruplase Study (PASS), which assessed the safety and efficacy of saruplase in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Thirty-seven hospitals in Europe participated in the study. All patients received 20 mg saruplase as a bolus followed by an infusion of 60 mg saruplase over 1 hour. Prior to the infusion of saruplase, 62% of the patients received a bolus of 5000 U of heparin, and after saruplase a 24-hour intravenous infusion of heparin was given to 95% of patients. The mean age of the patients was 59 years and 80.1% were male. The median delay from the onset of chest pain to the start of saruplase infusion was 145 minutes. Acute angiography was performed in 8 of the participating 37 centers in 350 patients (20.6%), on average 85 minutes (median) after the start of the saruplase infusion. TIMI 3 flow was obtained in 186 patients (53.1%) and TIMI 2 flow in 61 patients (17.4%). Patency rates were similar for patients with anterior and inferior infarction. ECG signs suggestive of reperfusion were seen in 63% of the patients. In-hospital mortality was low (92 patients; 5.4%), and nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction was seen in 60 patients (3.5%). Severe bleeding complications occurred in 92 patients (5.4%), 21 of whom (1.2%) needed a blood transfusion. An intracerebral hemorrhage was observed in eight patients (0.5%), and seven patients (0.4%) suffered from a thromboembolic stroke. At discharge 85.9% of the patients were in NYHA functional class I. One-year mortality was low (142 patients; 8.4%). Mortality was high in patients with TIMI 0 or 1 flow at the acute angiography who did not undergo rescue PTCA (9/39; 23.1%), lower in patients with TIMI 0 or 1 flow followed by successful rescue PTCA (7/64; 10.9%), and low in patients with TIMI 2 flow (1/61; 1.6%) or with TIMI 3 flow (2/186; 1.1%). Patency rates and (bleeding) complications did not differ between patients with a body weight greater than or less than 70 kilograms. No antibodies against saruplase were detected in samples from 455 patients. In conclusion, it can be stated that saruplase, given in combination with aspirin and intravenous heparin, can be given safely and effectively to patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Saruplase in myocardial infarction

Saruplase is an unglucosylated single-chain recombinant urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Dose finding studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction indicated that a dose of 80 mg of saruplase, given as a bolus of 20 mg and iv infusion of 60 mg in one hour, led to excellent patency figures.Saruplase is most effective when combined with a bolus of 5000 IU heparin followed by an iv heparin infusion for at least 24 hours.When saruplase is compared to other thrombolytic agents (streptokinase, alteplase, urokinase), it becomes apparent that its profile is excellent. Early patency rates are at least comparable to alteplase. Further reocclusion rates of saruplase after one day are lower than those of streptokinase and alteplase. Patency rates 24–72 hours after start of medication are comparable between saruplase and urokinase.The large database in over 6000 patients shows that saruplase, in comparison to the other thrombolytic agents, is safe. Its bleeding complication rate is significantly lower than streptokinase, and a trend to lower in-hospital mortality is observed when compared to urokinase.Summarizing, when comparing to the presently available thrombolytic agents, saruplase is a fast acting, effective and safe thrombolytic agent.