Hannes G. Lienhart

Developing alternative strategies for the treatment of traumatic haemorrhagic shock.

Purpose of reviewThe optimal strategy of stabilizing haemodynamic function in uncontrolled traumatic haemorrhagic shock states is unclear. Although fluid replacement is established in controlled haemorrhagic shock, its use in uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock is controversial, because it may worsen bleeding. Recent findingsIn the refractory phase of severe haemorrhagic shock, arginine vasopressin has been shown to be beneficial in selected cases due to an increase in arterial blood pressure, shift of blood away from a subdiaphragmatic bleeding site towards the heart and brain, and decrease in fluid resuscitation requirements. Especially in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, rapid stabilization of cardiocirculatory function is essential to ensure adequate brain perfusion and thus to prevent neurological damage and to improve outcome. In addition, despite wide distribution of highly developed and professional emergency medical systems in western industrialized countries, survival chances of patients with uncontrolled traumatic haemorrhagic shock in the prehospital setting are still poor. SummaryA multicenter, randomized, controlled, international clinical trial is being initiated to assess the effects of arginine vasopressin (10 IU) vs. saline placebo in prehospital traumatic haemorrhagic shock patients, not responding to standard shock treatment, being managed by helicopter emergency medical services [vasopressin in traumatic haemorrhagic shock (VITRIS.at) study].

Vasopressin During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Different Shock States

Vasopressin administration may be a promising therapy in the management of various shock states. In laboratory models of cardiac arrest, vasopressin improved vital organ blood flow, cerebral oxygen delivery, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological recovery compared with epinephrine (adrenaline). In a study of 1219 adult patients with cardiac arrest, the effects of vasopressin were similar to those of epinephrine in the management of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity; however, vasopressin was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. Furthermore, vasopressin followed by epinephrine resulted in significantly higher rates of survival to hospital admission and hospital discharge. The current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommend intravenous vasopressin 40IU or epinephrine 1mg in adult patients refractory to electrical countershock. Several investigations have demonstrated that vasopressin can successfully stabilize hemodynamic variables in advanced vasodilatory shock. Use of vasopressin in vasodilatory shock should be guided by strict hemodynamic indications, such as hypotension despite norepinephrine (noradrenaline) dosages >0.5βlg/kg/min. Vasopressin must never be used as the sole vasopressor agent. In our institutional routine, a fixed vasopressin dosage of 0.067 IU/min (i.e. 100 IU/50mL at 2 mL/h) is administered and mean arterial pressure is regulated by adjusting norepinephrine infusion. When norepinephrine dosages decrease to 0.2βg/kg/min, vasopressin is withdrawn in small steps according to the response in mean arterial pressure. Vasopressin also improved short-and long-term survival in various porcine models of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. In the clinical setting, we observed positive effects of vasopressin in some patients with life-threatening hemorrhagic shock, which had no longer responded to adrenergic catecholamines and fluid resuscitation. Clinical employment of vasopressin during hemorrhagic shock is experimental at this point in time.

A Prediction Model for Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND: We created a prediction model to be used in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts as a decision tool to omit futile CPR attempts and to save resources. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, we assessed predictive parameters for neurological recovery after successful CPR. The original study was designed as a blinded, randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial. RESULTS: We identified 1166 prehospital cardiac arrest patients being treated with advanced cardiac life support. Seven hundred eighty-six of 1166 patients (67.4%) died at the scene and 380 of 1166 (32.6%) were brought to the hospital. Two hundred sixty-five of 1166 patients (22.7%) died in the hospital. One hundred fifteen of 1166 (9.8%) were discharged from the hospital and 92 of the 115 patients (80%) could be followed-up. Good cerebral performance was regained by 54% of discharged patients (50 of 92 patients). In 46% of patients (42/92), unconsciousness or severe disability remained. Ventricular fibrillation was more likely to have occurred in patients with good neurological recovery (42/50 = 84.0%), whereas asystole was more likely in patients with poor neurological recovery (9/42 = 21.4%). A score was developed to predict the probability of death using logistic regression analysis. Predicting death in the hospital revealed a sensitivity of 99.8% (953/955), but only a specificity of 2.9% (3/104; threshold 0.5). Predicting survival until discharge from the hospital revealed a sensitivity of 99% (103/104), but only a specificity of 8% (72/955; threshold 0.99). A receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve of 0.795 (0.751-0.839) at a confidence interval of 95%. CONCLUSION: For out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest, parameters documented in the field did not allow accurate prediction of hospital survival.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a near-drowned child with a combination of epinephrine and vasopressin.

Objective: To report a cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt in a 20-month-old child employing a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine. Design: Case report. Setting: Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patient: A 20-month-old child found in cardiac arrest after submersion. Interventions and Results: Dispatcher-assisted basic life support was initiated immediately after pulling the child out of the water. The emergency medical service crew arrived approximately 6 mins later and found a hypothermic, cyanotic child in cardiocirculatory arrest. The first electrocardiogram showed sinus bradycardia. After intubation and administration of epinephrine and atropine with no effect, an intravenous bolus of 0.2 mg of epinephrine and 10 IU of vasopressin resulted in restoration of spontaneous circulation. The boy was flown to a hospital and was discharged 23 days later to a rehabilitation facility. He returned home 6 months after the accident, where further rehabilitation efforts are pending. Conclusion: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, early and aggressive advanced life support, rewarming, and the combination of intravenous epinephrine and vasopressin were associated with sustained return of spontaneous circulation following hypothermic submersion-associated cardiac arrest.