Hans-Gert Heuft

Large-Scale Isolation of Human Hepatocytes for Therapeutic Application:

During the last decade, hepatocyte transplantation has been suggested as a safe and potentially effective clinical option for the treatment of acute or decompensating chronic liver failure as well as for hereditary liver disease. Currently, one of the major limiting factors for clinical application is the insufficient access to suitable liver cell preparations. In cooperation with the German and Catalane organ procurement organizations, a routine procedure for the isolation of hepatocytes from donor organs rejected for transplantation (n = 117) has been established. The process is performed according to the current EC Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) and all corresponding national laws and regulations concerning donor organ and tissue procurement. In about 50% of the cases (n = 58) the three-step perfusion procedure has been completed with an average total cell yield of 5.9 × 109 cells per organ, the cell preparations displaying a mean viability of 64%. The mean specific yield was 3.6 × 106 total and 2.6 × 106 viable cells per gram liver tissue, respectively. Specific cell yields from three infantile donor livers were considerably higher. No correlation between isolation efficiency and cold ischemia time or donor age was found within the adult organ donors. In contrast, organs with a severe steatosis generally did not result in successful cell isolation. Results of sterility and endotoxin determination are also presented. In summary, a standardized and cGMP conform method of hepatocyte isolation from nontransplantable liver organs was established, which reproducibly yields large amounts of hepatocytes suitable for therapeutic application.

Collection of WBC-reduced single-donor PLT concentrates with a new blood cell separator: results of a multicenter study†

BACKGROUND: A new cell separator (COM.TEC, Fresenius) was recently developed aimed at efficient collection of WBC‐reduced single‐donor PLT concentrates (SDPs).

Equivalent mobilization and collection of granulocytes for transfusion after administration of glycosylated G–CSF (3 μg/kg) plus dexamethasone versus glycosylated G–CSF (12 μg/kg) alone

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to find a regimen for mobilization and collection of granulocytes that combines low‐dose G–CSF administration with satisfactory PMN mobilization and apheresis at a low rate of donor adverse reactions.

Intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST-2 randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

Aims Intracoronary infusion of autologous nucleated bone marrow cells (BMCs) enhanced the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the randomised-controlled, open-label BOOST trial. We reassessed the therapeutic potential of nucleated BMCs in the randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind BOOST-2 trial conducted in 10 centres in Germany and Norway. Methods and results Using a multiple arm design, we investigated the dose-response relationship and explored whether γ-irradiation which eliminates the clonogenic potential of stem and progenitor cells has an impact on BMC efficacy. Between 9 March 2006 and 16 July 2013, 153 patients with large STEMI were randomly assigned to receive a single intracoronary infusion of placebo (control group), high-dose (hi)BMCs, low-dose (lo)BMCs, irradiated hiBMCs, or irradiated loBMCs 8.1 ± 2.6 days after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to guideline-recommended medical treatment. Change in LVEF from baseline (before cell infusion) to 6 months as determined by MRI was the primary endpoint. The trial is registered at Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN17457407). Baseline LVEF was 45.0 ± 8.5% in the overall population. At 6 months, LVEF had increased by 3.3 percentage points in the control group and 4.3 percentage points in the hiBMC group. The estimated treatment effect was 1.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.6 to 4.7; P = 0.57). The treatment effect of loBMCs was 0.5 percentage points (-3.0 to 4.1; P = 0.76). Likewise, irradiated BMCs did not have significant treatment effects. BMC transfer was safe and not associated with adverse clinical events. Conclusion The BOOST-2 trial does not support the use of nucleated BMCs in patients with STEMI and moderately reduced LVEF treated according to current standards of early PCI and drug therapy.

Window period donations during primary cytomegalovirus infection and risk of transfusion-transmitted infections

Donors with short interdonation intervals (e.g., apheresis donors) have an increased risk of window period donations. The frequency of cytomegalovirus (CMV) window period donations is important information to decide whether selection of seronegative donors might be advantageous for patients at risk for transfusion‐transmitted CMV infections (TT‐CMV).

Desmopressin (DDAVP) improves recruitment of activated platelets to collagen but simultaneously increases platelet endothelial interactions in vitro

Platelet dysfunction can cause clinically relevant bleeding. Treatment with DDAVP is advocated for this condition. DDAVP increases von Willebrand factor (VWF) on endothelial cells (ECs) and in plasma. VWF could facilitate platelet deposition on subendothelial collagen. VWF also facilitates platelet/EC interactions. Therefore DDAVP could precipitate thromboembolic events. We used a flow chamber model to study in vitro and ex vivo if DDAVP alters recruitment of platelets to EC and collagen. Resting or TRAP-activated platelets and EC were treated individually or simultaneously with 0.4 ng/ml DDAVP. Fluorophor-labeled platelets (106/ml) were resuspended in reconstituted blood and superfused across EC and collagen in an in vitro flow chamber model at arterial shear (320 s−1). Adhesion of platelets to the respective surface was recorded fluorescence microscopically and platelet covered area was assessed. TRAP significantly induced adhesiveness of platelets for collagen and EC. DDAVP pretreatment of platelets did not affect adhesiveness of resting or TRAP-activated platelets for collagen or EC. Adhesiveness of resting but not TRAP-activated platelets was induced on DDAVP-treated EC. DDAVP-conditioned EC supernatant contained vWF and significantly increased platelet deposition on collagen. Platelets from patients with clinically suspected platelet dysfunction undergoing aortic valve replacement exhibited decreased platelet deposition on collagen surfaces. In summary, our data confirm that DDAVP can induce release of platelet adhesion promoting factors from EC, which is most likely vWF. DDAVP has no direct effect on platelets. Blood samples from DDAVP-treated patients do not exhibit significantly augmented platelet deposition on collagen ex vivo. This influence of released promoting factors might cause an increase of undesirable interactions of platelets with EC.

A General Change of the Platelet Transfusion Policy from Apheresis Platelet Concentrates to Pooled Platelet Concentrates is Associated with a Sharp Increase in Donor Exposure and Infection Rates

Background: We compare the actual with the potential donor exposure and possible infection rates in the Hanover Medical School (MHH) platelet (PLT) transfusion recipients if the current MHH standard of apheresis PLT concentrate (A-PC) supply would be replaced by a pooled PLT concentrate (P-PC) transfusion regimen. Donors, Patients, and Methods: The electronic records of the MHH Institute of Transfusion Medicine and the MHH Department of Medical Controlling were evaluated to assess the development of PLT needs and supply at MHH from 2003–2006. For 2006, we evaluated all PLT transfusion recipients with respect to their overall transfusion needs, classified them for low and high PLT transfusion needs, and related them to the diagnostic groups that underlie their PLT demands. We assumed a P-PC preparation procedure using 4 whole blood-derived buffy coats for all calculations for potential donor exposure. To predict the possible infection rates of an unrecognized viral infection with low prevalence in the general population to A-PC or to P-PC recipients and the influence of neutralizing agent specific antibodies (NAB), we established a mathematical contamination/ infection model based on the current PLT transfusion mode and data about GBV-C virus infection among Hanover blood donors. Results: From 2003 to 2006, the 1,300–1,400 persons comprising MHH apheresis donor pool covered a 36% increase in PC transfusions. The exclusive use of P-PCs instead of A-PC would require a total of 36,240–49,276 whole blood donations to meet MHH demands, corresponding to a more than 1 log step increase in donor exposure. For individual hematological patients, the change to P-PCs would imply an 80–125%, for individual surgical patients a 40–50% higher donor exposure. Our infection model revealed an approximately 4 times higher infection. Conclusions: A change to P-PC would imply a more than one log step higher donor exposure, and an unrecognized infection with a prevalence around 1% leads to an up to 4 times higher infection rate. A general change in the PC transfusion policy that favors P-PCs is dangerous and must be avoided.

A dose‐response analysis of lenograstim plus dexamethasone for neutrophil mobilization and collection

BACKGROUND: The objective was to evaluate the dose‐response relationship of lenograstim plus dexamethasone for neutrophil mobilization and collection.

Effects of platelet concentrate storage time reduction in patients after blood stem cell transplantation.

To evaluate the clinical effect of platelet concentrate (PC) transfusions after PC storage time reduction to 4 days.

Prolonged isolated red blood cell transfusion requirement after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: identification of patients at risk.

BACKGROUND: Delayed donor red blood cell chimerism (DRCC), pure red blood cell aplasia (PRCA), and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) are poorly documented complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The clinical variable “prolonged isolated red blood cell transfusion requirement” (PRTR) was evaluated as a trigger for an extended diagnostic workup.