Hans-Iko Huppertz

Adalimumab with or without Methotrexate in Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) has a pathogenic role in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-TNF antibody, in children with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS Patients 4 to 17 years of age with active juvenile rheumatoid arthritis who had previously received treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs underwent stratification according to methotrexate use and received 24 mg of adalimumab per square meter of body-surface area (maximum dose, 40 mg) subcutaneously every other week for 16 weeks. We randomly assigned patients with an American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 30% (ACR Pedi 30) response at week 16 to receive adalimumab or placebo in a double-blind fashion every other week for up to 32 weeks. RESULTS Seventy-four percent of patients not receiving methotrexate (64 of 86) and 94% of those receiving methotrexate (80 of 85) had an ACR Pedi 30 response at week 16 and were eligible for double-blind treatment. Among patients not receiving methotrexate, disease flares (the primary outcome) occurred in 43% of those receiving adalimumab and 71% of those receiving placebo (P=0.03). Among patients receiving methotrexate, flares occurred in 37% of those receiving adalimumab and 65% of those receiving placebo (P=0.02). At 48 weeks, the percentages of patients treated with methotrexate who had ACR Pedi 30, 50, 70, or 90 responses were significantly greater for those receiving adalimumab than for those receiving placebo; the differences between patients not treated with methotrexate who received adalimumab and those who received placebo were not significant. Response rates were sustained after 104 weeks of treatment. Serious adverse events possibly related to adalimumab occurred in 14 patients. CONCLUSIONS Adalimumab therapy seems to be an efficacious option for the treatment of children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00048542.)

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Abatacept in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE We previously documented that abatacept was effective and safe in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who had not previously achieved a satisfactory clinical response with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tumor necrosis factor blockade. Here, we report results from the long-term extension (LTE) phase of that study. METHODS This report describes the long-term, open-label extension phase of a double-blind, randomized, controlled withdrawal trial in 190 patients with JIA ages 6-17 years. Children were treated with 10 mg/kg abatacept administered intravenously every 4 weeks, with or without methotrexate. Efficacy results were based on data derived from the 153 patients who entered the open-label LTE phase and reflect >or=21 months (589 days) of treatment. Safety results include all available open-label data as of May 7, 2008. RESULTS Of the 190 enrolled patients, 153 entered the LTE. By day 589, 90%, 88%, 75%, 57%, and 39% of patients treated with abatacept during the double-blind and LTE phases achieved responses according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30), Pedi 50, Pedi 70, Pedi 90, and Pedi 100 criteria for improvement, respectively. Similar response rates were observed by day 589 among patients previously treated with placebo. Among patients who had not achieved an ACR Pedi 30 response at the end of the open-label lead-in phase and who proceeded directly into the LTE, 73%, 64%, 46%, 18%, and 5% achieved ACR Pedi 30, Pedi 50, Pedi 70, Pedi 90, and Pedi 100 responses, respectively, by day 589 of the LTE. No cases of tuberculosis and no malignancies were reported during the LTE. Pneumonia developed in 3 patients, and multiple sclerosis developed in 1 patient. CONCLUSION Abatacept provided clinically significant and durable efficacy in patients with JIA, including those who did not initially achieve an ACR Pedi 30 response during the initial 4-month open-label lead-in phase.

Immune Responses to Rotavirus Infection and Vaccination and Associated Correlates of Protection

Group A rotavirus (RV) strains are a major cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in infants and young children worldwide [1]. RV disease accounts for more than one-third of all diarrhea-related hospitalizations and 500,000–600,000 deaths per year [2–4]; most deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia [3, 4]. Direct medical and indirect annual costs associated with RV disease are estimated to be €400 million in Europe [5–7] and to exceed US

Intussusception Among Young Children in Europe

1 billion in the United States [8]. RV strains form a genus of the Reoviridae family and possess a genome of 11 segments of double-stranded (ds) RNA, encoding 6 structural viral proteins (VPs) and 6 nonstructural proteins (NSPs). The infectious particle (ie, virion) consists of 3 layers: the inner layer (core) contains the viral genome, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp, VP1), the capping enzyme (VP3), and the scaffolding protein (VP2); the core is surrounded by a middle layer (VP6), and the outer layer consists of VP7 and VP4 [9]. RV infects mature enterocytes in the small intestine. Viral replication leads to increased intracellular Ca2+ level (effected by NSP4), increased Cl- secretion, and shut-off of host cell protein synthesis (effected by NSP3), resulting in acute osmotic and secretory diarrhea (described in [9]). Various RV genes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AGE [10]. After RV infection, a viremic stage of, at present, unclear significance has been identified in humans and experimental animals [11–13]. The RV-encoded NSP1 blocks interferon (IFN) production by various pathways [14–17]. RV infection down-regulates the IFN- and pro-inflammatory cytokine–associated pathways in calves [18]. RV strains have a high genomic and antigenic diversity and are classified into at least 7 different groups (A–G), distinguished by different VP6. Most human RV infections are caused by group A RV strains, which are further subdivided into at least 2 subgroups (I, II), 23 G types (determined by VP7, a glycoprotein), and 31 P types (determined by VP4, a protease-sensitive protein) [9, 19–21]. RV strains with different G and P types cocirculate and change in geographical regions over time [22–25]. In temperate climate regions, most cocirculating RV strains are types G1–G4 and G9 (typically G1P1A[8], G2P1B[4], G3P1A[8], G4P1A[8], and G9P1A[8]), but other G types (G5, G8, G10, and G12), in combination with various P types, may be most prevalent in tropical areas [21, 23, 24]. Nonspecific (innate) and acquired virus-specific humoral and cellular immune responses are elicited by RV infection [26, 27] or RV vaccination [28–33]. Although currently licensed vaccines are highly efficacious in protecting children from severe RV AGE, the molecular mechanisms of protection are not fully understood. This article considers the immune responses to natural RV infection and RV vaccination in both experimental animals and humans as potential correlates of protection.

The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis

Intussusception, a potentially lethal condition with poorly understood etiology, is the most common cause of acute intestinal obstruction in children younger than 5 years old. In some cases, the condition has been associated with administration of the first licensed rotavirus vaccine, the reassortant rhesus-human tetravalent rotavirus vaccine (RRV-TV; RotaShield®). No such association has to date been reported from large phase III safety trials with new rotavirus vaccines. As 2 new, live-attenuated oral rotavirus vaccines are currently under review for approval by the European Union regulatory authorities, a review of the clinical, etiologic and epidemiologic aspects of intussusception in Europe is urgently needed. We conducted a review of Medline literature, published from 1995 onwards on intussusception in the World Health Organization’s European Region. The results are compared with data from previous reviews and other regions. The classic triad of intussusception symptoms (abdominal pain, abdominal mass, bloody stools) was present in 29–33% of patients according to the medical literature reviewed. Conservative treatment (barium, air or saline enema) was the rule (81% of cases), and few complications were observed during treatment. Treatment outcome was generally favorable, with recurrence occurring in ∼1 in 10 patients, and only 1 death reported. Structural lead points were seen in 3% of patients; no other reliable data on the etiology of intussusception were found. The incidence of acute intussusception in young children in Europe, according to 6 heterogeneous hospital-based studies, ranged from 0.66 to 2.24 per 1000 children in inpatient departments and from 0.75 to 1.00 per 1000 children in emergency departments. Peak incidences were found in children 3–9 months of age. There are still gaps in our knowledge of intussusception with respect to its etiology and especially by which mechanisms RRV-TV might have caused it to occur. Data from regions outside Europe showed that rotavirus infection and disease are not associated with intussusception. As new rotavirus vaccines become available for use in Europe, postlicensure surveillance for intussusception is indicated and may be instrumental in further understanding the epidemiology of this condition and in further assessing the safety of future vaccines.

Clinical trials of rotavirus vaccines in Europe

To develop a provisional definition for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) based on the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation juvenile DM core set of variables.

Predictors of poor response to methotrexate in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: analysis of the PRINTO methotrexate trial

Clinical trials of a live oral candidate rotavirus vaccine were started in 1982 and soon demonstrated that severe rotavirus disease can be prevented by vaccination. The first bovine candidate vaccine was withdrawn because of inconsistent efficacy, and studies of a rhesus rotavirus vaccine were initiated. A field trial of rhesus-human reassortant tetravalent rotavirus vaccine in Finland was pivotal for the licensure of this vaccine (RotaShield®) in the United States in 1998. However, this vaccine was withdrawn in 1999 because of association with intussusception. Safety therefore became a major issue in the development of new candidate rotavirus vaccines. A pentavalent bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq®) showed about 70% efficacy against any rotavirus disease and 100% efficacy against severe disease in Finland, according to the Clark scale. A large, multinational safety trial indicated no association of this vaccine with intussusception, and its licensure is under review in the EU. An attenuated human rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414; Rotarix™) was developed from G1 rotavirus strain 89–12. A trial in Finland showed efficacy comparable with that of RotaShield, and a larger trial is under way in several European countries. In the first epidemic season, vaccine efficacy was 73% against any and 90% against severe rotavirus (mostly G1) gastroenteritis, according to the Vesikari scale. A large scale safety trial, conducted in Latin America plus Finland, indicated no increased risk of intussusception among recipients of Rotarix compared with placebo. The licensure of Rotarix is in process in the European Union.

Recombinant or peptide antigens in the serology of Lyme arthritis in children

Objectives To determine whether baseline demographic, clinical, articular and laboratory variables predict methotrexate (MTX) poor response in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Methods Patients newly treated for 6 months with MTX enrolled in the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) MTX trial. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were used to identify baseline predictors of poor response according to the American College of Rheumatology pediatric (ACR-ped) 30 and 70 criteria. Results In all, 405/563 (71.9%) of patients were women; median age at onset and disease duration were 4.3 and 1.4 years, respectively, with anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) detected in 259/537 (48.2%) patients. With multivariate logistic regression analysis, the most important determinants of ACR-ped 70 non-responders were: disease duration >1.3 years (OR 1.93), ANA negativity (OR 1.77), Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) disability index>1.125 (OR 1.65) and the presence of right and left wrist activity (OR 1.55). Predictors of ACR-ped 30 non-responders were: ANA negativity (OR 1.92), CHAQ disability index>1.14 (OR 2.18) and a parents evaluation of childs overall well-being ≤4.69 (OR 2.2). Conclusion The subgroup of patients with longer disease duration, ANA negativity, higher disability and presence of wrist activity were significantly associated with a poorer response to a 6-month MTX course.

Long-term safety of etanercept and adalimumab compared to methotrexate in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)

The performance of ELISAs with the recombinant antigens decorin-binding protein A (DbpA), DbpB, and BBK32 (from Borrelia afzelii, B. garinii, and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto) and VlsE peptide antigen invariable region 6 (IR(6)) were evaluated in the serodiagnosis and follow-up of children with Lyme arthritis (LA). Serum samples were obtained from 52 children with clinically typical and serologically confirmed LA. In IgG ELISAs, at diagnosis, 50 samples were positive for BBK32, 51 for DbpA, 40 for DbpB, and 51 for IR(6). In the posttreatment follow-up, the rate of decline of the antibodies to the recombinant protein antigens or to IR(6) did not appear useful in the prediction of the treatment response or the clinical course of LA. Yet, IR(6) seems to have the greatest potential to be used universally in the diagnostic serology of Lyme borreliosis (LB). Alternate to that, the use of several specific borrelial antigens, in parallel, might improve the accuracy of serology for LB.

Post-Pandemic Seroprevalence of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Infection (Swine Flu) among Children <18 Years in Germany

Importance Published evidence on the long-term safety of etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) is still limited. Objectives To investigate the rates of serious adverse events (SAE) and of events of special interest (ESI) under ETA and ADA treatment. Design, setting and participants Patients with pJIA were prospectively observed in the national JIA biological register, Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie, and its follow-up register, Juvenile arthritis Methotrexate/Biologics long-term Observation. Main outcomes and measures We calculated the relative risks of SAE and ESI for ETA and ADA compared with methotrexate (MTX). Results Among the 1414 patients treated with ETA (n=1414; 4461 exposure years (EY)) and ADA (n=320; 493 EY), significantly more SAE, infections and medically important infections were observed (ETA: 4.5, 5.7, 0.9; ADA: 4.7, 11.4, 0.4 per 100 EY) compared with those treated with MTX alone (n=1455; 2.907 EY; 2.6, 5.5, 0.5 per 100 EY). The risk for malignancies was not significantly increased for ETA and ADA compared with MTX (0.09, 0.27 and 0.07/100 person-years). Patients under ETA monotherapy developed more frequently incident inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and incident uveitis (0.5 and 0.8/100 EY) than patients treated by ETA in combination with MTX (0.1 and 0.2/100 EY) or MTX alone (0.03 and 0.1/100 EY). Conclusions and relevance Our data confirm the acceptable long-term tolerability of ETA and ADA in pJIA. However, whether the onset of IBD and uveitis during ETA monotherapy is a paradoxical effect or an inadequate response to therapy remains unclear and requires further investigation in this growing cohort.