Hans Jeekel

Reduction of peritoneal trauma by using nonsurgical gauze leads to less implantation metastasis of spilled tumor cells

OBJECTIVESnTo evaluate whether infliction of peritoneal trauma would promote tumor cell adherence to damaged peritoneal surfaces; to investigate whether peritoneal damage could promote tumor growth of extraperitoneal tumors; and to evaluate whether the amount of trauma correlated with the degree of tumor cell adherence and local and distant tumor growth.nnnBACKGROUND DATAnAfter potentially curative resection of colorectal carcinoma, the most common site for recurrence is locoregional. We previously demonstrated that surgical trauma induces a cascade of events leading to adhesion formation. The same mechanisms may be responsible for improved tumor cell adherence and growth facilitation in early local recurrence.nnnMETHODSnA reproducible rat model was used in which peritoneal damage was inflicted by standardized rubbing of the peritoneum with surgical gauzes of different texture. In the first experiment, tumor cell adherence and growth at traumatized and nontraumatized peritoneal sites were assessed semiquantitatively 3 weeks after perioperative intra-abdominal injection of CC-531 tumor cells. In the second experiment, the effect of peritoneal trauma on ectopic tumor growth was investigated (CC-531 implanted under the renal capsule). In the final experiment, we evaluated how soon after peritoneal traumatization tumor cell adhesion and growth-promoting factors were active and whether they could be passively transferred to naïve nontraumatized abdominal cavities.nnnRESULTSnA significant correlation between the amount of peritoneal trauma and the degree of tumor take at damaged peritoneal surfaces was found (p < or = 0.018). Tumor take at remote peritoneal sites not directly traumatized was also significantly higher after severe trauma than after moderate trauma of the peritoneum (p < or = 0.005). In addition, a significant correlation between the degree of peritoneal trauma and the growth of ectopic tumors under the renal capsule was observed (p < or = 0.009). The final experiment demonstrated that within a few hours after infliction of peritoneal trauma, tumor growth-promoting effects could be passively transferred to naïve recipients.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSurgical trauma is an important factor in the promotion of local recurrence. The enhancing effect of trauma is not restricted to the inflicted site but rather has a generalized character. Avoidance of unnecessary surgical trauma by using gentle techniques and materials is therefore indicated.

Guidelines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the world society of emergency surgery (WSES) and peritoneum and surgery (PnS) society

BackgroundObstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) is a challenging matter in terms of obstruction release as well of oncological issues. Several options are available and no guidelines are established. The paper aims to generate evidenced based recommendations on management of OLCC.MethodsThe PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were queried for publications focusing on OLCC published prior to April 2010. A extensive retrieval, analyses, and grading of the literature was undertaken. The findings of the research were presented and largely discussed among panellist and audience at the Consensus Conference of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and Peritoneum and Surgery (PnS) Society held in Bologna July 2010. Comparisons of techniques are presented and final committee recommendation are enounced.ResultsHartmanns procedure should be preferred to loop colostomy (Grade 2B). Hartmanns procedure offers no survival benefit compared to segmental colonic resection with primary anastomosis (Grade 2C+); Hartmanns procedure should be considered in patients with high surgical risk (Grade 2C). Total colectomy and segmental colectomy with intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity, however total colectomy is associated with higher rates impaired bowel function (Grade 1A). Segmental resection and primary anastomosis either with manual decompression or intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity rate (Grade 1A). In palliation stent placement is associated with similar mortality/morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay (Grade 2B). Stents as a bridge to surgery seems associated with lower mortality rate, shorter hospital stay, and a lower colostomy formation rate (Grade 1B).ConclusionsLoop colostomy and staged procedure should be adopted in case of dramatic scenario, when neoadjuvant therapy could be expected. Hartmanns procedure should be performed in case of high risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Subtotal and total colectomy should be attempted when cecal perforation or in case of synchronous colonic neoplasm. Primary resection and anastomosis with manual decompression seems the procedure of choice. Colonic stents represent the best option when skills are available. The literature power is relatively poor and the existing RCT are often not sufficiently robust in design thus, among 6 possible treatment modalities, only 2 reached the Grade A.

Healing of ischemic colonic anastomosis: Fibrin sealant does not improve wound healing

Fibrin adhesives have been advocated as a protective sealant in high-risk colonic anastomoses to prevent leakage. To assess the effect of fibrin glue sealing on the healing ischemic anastomosis, we compared the healing of sutured colonic anastomoses in the rat, with and without fibrin adhesive (Groups IA and IB), and ischemic anastomoses with and without fibrin adhesive (Groups IIA and IIB). On days two, four, and seven, 10 animals in each group were sacrificed. Adhesion formation was scored, and thein situbursting pressure was measured. The collagen concentration and degradation were estimated by measuring hydroxyproline. Adhesion formation was more prominent in Groups IB, IIA, and IIB on day four only; abscesses were noted in the ischemic group in four rats. Anastomotic bursting pressure was significantly lower in sealed (IB) and ischemic anastomoses (IIA) than in normal anastomoses (IA) on day four. Sealing of ischemic anastomoses did not change bursting pressures on days two, four, and seven. The relative decrease of collagen in the sealed anastomoses is significantly higher on day four only. It is concluded that sealing of normal colonic anastomoses in the rat has a negative effect on wound healing. Ischemia at the anastomotic site results in weaker anastomotic strength on day four postoperatively. Also in ischemic anastomoses, fibrin sealant does not improve wound healing during the first seven days. Adhesion formation on ischemic intestinal anastomoses was not prevented by fibrin sealing.

A reproducible model of acute hepatic failure by transient ischemia in the pig.

A model of transient acute hepatic failure has been developed in the pig. Three days after a functional end-to-side portacaval shunt was introduced, 15 ambulant animals underwent total liver ischemia for 4 to 6 h by the closure of a mechanical clamp surrounding the hepatic artery. Four of the eight animals subjected to 4 hr of ischemia survived. All but one of the animals undergoing 6 hr of hepatic ischemia developed grade 4 encephalopathy after 24 to 30 hr and died within 50 hr. Quantitative estimation of liver cell necrosis revealed less than 40% necrosis in the survivors, and approximately 62% (range 49-75%) in animals who died of hepatic coma. As far as the putative toxins are concerned, significant differences were found between animals undergoing 4 and those undergoing 6 hr of ischemia, especially in the plasma ammonia levels and the plasma ratios for tyrosine and phenylalanine. Plasma arginine levels had fallen to zero in both groups at 24 hr and only rose to preischemic values in animals who survived. This large animal model fulfills the accepted criteria of potential reversibility, reproducibility, and death due to hepatic failure.

Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUNDnIncisional hernia is a frequent long-term complication after abdominal surgery, with a prevalence greater than 30% in high-risk groups. The aim of the PRIMA trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of mesh reinforcement in high-risk patients, to prevent incisional hernia.nnnMETHODSnWe did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial at 11 hospitals in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. We included patients aged 18 years or older who were undergoing elective midline laparotomy and had either an abdominal aortic aneurysm or a body-mass index (BMI) of 27 kg/m2 or higher. We randomly assigned participants using a computer-generated randomisation sequence to one of three treatment groups: primary suture; onlay mesh reinforcement; or sublay mesh reinforcement. The primary endpoint was incidence of incisional hernia during 2 years of follow-up, analysed by intention to treat. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00761475.nnnFINDINGSnBetween March, 2009, and December, 2012, 498 patients were enrolled to the study, of whom 18 were excluded before randomisation. Therefore, we included 480 patients in the primary analysis: 107 were assigned primary suture only, 188 were allocated onlay mesh reinforcement, and 185 were assigned sublay mesh reinforcement. 92 patients were identified with an incisional hernia, 33 (30%) who were allocated primary suture only, 25 (13%) who were assigned onlay mesh reinforcement, and 34 (18%) who were assigned sublay mesh reinforcement (onlay mesh reinforcement vs primary suture, OR 0·37, 95% CI 0·20-0·69; p=0·0016; sublay mesh reinforcement vs primary suture, 0·55, 0·30-1·00; p=0·05). Seromas were more frequent in patients allocated onlay mesh reinforcement (34 of 188) than in those assigned primary suture (five of 107; p=0·002) or sublay mesh reinforcement (13 of 185; p=0·002). The incidence of wound infection did not differ between treatment groups (14 of 107 primary suture; 25 of 188 onlay mesh reinforcement; and 19 of 185 sublay mesh reinforcement).nnnINTERPRETATIONnA significant reduction in incidence of incisional hernia was achieved with onlay mesh reinforcement compared with sublay mesh reinforcement and primary suture only. Onlay mesh reinforcement has the potential to become the standard treatment for high-risk patients undergoing midline laparotomy.nnnFUNDINGnBaxter; B Braun Surgical SA.

Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage: A New Experimental Model

BACKGROUNDnAnastomotic leakage is the major complication after colorectal surgery. To date, animal experiments concerning colorectal anastomosis focus on anastomotic healing instead of anastomotic leakage. This study aims to develop a new experimental model for colorectal anastomotic leakage.nnnMETHODSnA control group, receiving an anastomosis with 12 interrupted sutures, was compared to a group receiving an anastomosis with 6 interrupted sutures. When the leakage rate was observed to be too low, the number of sutures was decreased stepwise, to 5 or less. Each group contained 9 C57Bl6-mice. After 7 d the Anastomotic Bursting Pressure (ABP) was determined.nnnRESULTSnIn the first experiment, one mouse (11.1%) in the case group and none in the control group developed leakage. Average ABP was 152.2 mmHg in the control group and 138,8 mmHg in the case group (P=0.111). In the second experiment, case group receiving an anastomosis with 5 sutures, 4 mice (44.4%) in the case group developed leakage. This experiment was repeated twice resulting in leakage rates of 33.3% and 44.4%. The average overall ABP in the case group was 142.7 mmHg vs. 179.9 mmHg (P=0.022) in the control group. The mice without leakage showed a stabilization of average weight loss around day 2 and 3 and a decrease afterwards. The mice with leakage showed a decrease only after day 5. The difference in wellness-scores between the groups with- and without leakage was 2 points, increasing during follow-up.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe model of anastomotic leakage caused by creating an anastomosis with 5 interrupted sutures is feasible. Weight loss and wellness-scores are good predictors of leakage.

Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Objective:Perioperative blood transfusions may adversely affect survival in patients with colorectal malignancy, although definite proof of a causal relationship has never been reported.Background:We report the long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial performed between 1986 and 1991 to co

2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis

Acute calculus cholecystitis is a very common disease with several area of uncertainty. The World Society of Emergency Surgery developed extensive guidelines in order to cover grey areas. The diagnostic criteria, the antimicrobial therapy, the evaluation of associated common bile duct stones, the identification of “high risk” patients, the surgical timing, the type of surgery, and the alternatives to surgery are discussed. Moreover the algorithm is proposed: as soon as diagnosis is made and after the evaluation of choledocholitiasis risk, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be offered to all patients exception of those with high risk of morbidity or mortality. These Guidelines must be considered as an adjunctive tool for decision but they are not substitute of the clinical judgement for the individual patient.

Postoperative adhesion prevention with a new barrier: an experimental study.

Introduction: Postoperative adhesion formation remains a major clinical problem. The aim of this study was to test the effect of a new hydrogel on adhesion formation in a rat model. Materials and Methods: A reproducible rat model was used to induce standardized adhesion formation in three experiments. In experiment 1, a cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) hydrogel (PVA/CMC, A-Part®; B. Braun Aesculap, Germany) was tested in different dosages. In experiment 2, PVA/CMC gel was compared to icodextrin 4% (Adept®; Baxter USA). In both groups, animals were sacrificed after 2 weeks. In experiment 3, histological examination after 4 and 6 weeks was performed. The percentage of adhesions to the defect was measured and the density was determined according to the Zühlke scale. During histological examination of the abdominal wall, the formation of neoperitoneum and potential residues of the agents were assessed. Results: In experiment 1, a significant reduction in amount as well as density of the adhesions was visible with all dosages of PVA/CMC gel. In experiment 2, again quantity and density of the adhesions were diminished by PVA/CMC hydrogel compared to the control group. Icodextrin 4% showed no significant reduction in adhesion formation. In experiment 3, no residues of PVA/CMC gel or icodextrin 4% were found during histological examination after 4 and 6 weeks and neoperitoneum was present in all cases. Conclusion: PVA/CMC hydrogel appears to be a novel effective adhesion prevention agent. Together with an upcoming safety study, these data encourage to start clinical efficacy studies.

Proceedings of the First International Summit on Intestinal Anastomotic Leak, Chicago, Illinois, October 4–5, 2012

OBJECTIVEnThe first international summit on anastomotic leak was held in Chicago in October, 2012 to assess current knowledge in the field and develop novel lines of inquiry. The following report is a summary of the proceedings with commentaries and future prospects for clinical trials and laboratory investigations.nnnBACKGROUNDnAnastomotic leakage remains a devastating problem for the patient, and a continuing challenge to the surgeon operating on high-risk areas of the gastrointestinal tract such as the esophagus and rectum. Despite the traditional wisdom that anastomotic leak is because of technique, evidence to support this is weak-to-non-existent. Outcome data continue to demonstrate that expert high-volume surgeons working in high-volume centers continue to experience anastomotic leaks and that surgeons cannot predict reliably which patients will leak.nnnMETHODSnA one and one-half day summit was held and a small working group assembled to review current practices, opinions, scientific evidence, and potential paths forward to understand and decrease the incidence of anastomotic leak.nnnRESULTSnRESULTS of a survey of the opinions of the group demonstrated that the majority of participants believe that anastomotic leak is a complicated biologic problem whose pathogenesis remains ill-defined. The group opined that anastomotic leak is underreported clinically, it is not because of technique except when there is gross inattention to it, and that results from animal models are mostly irrelevant to the human condition.nnnCONCLUSIONSnA fresh and unbiased examination of the causes and strategies for prevention of anastomotic leak needs to be addressed by a continuous working group of surgeons, basic scientists, and clinical trialists to realize a real and significant reduction in its incidence and morbidity. Such a path forward is discussed.