Hans-Jörg Martus

In vivo transgenic mutation assays.

Transgenic rodent gene mutation models provide quick and statistically reliable assays for mutations in the DNA from any tissue. For regulatory applications, assays should be based on neutral genes, be generally available in several laboratories, and be readily transferable. Five or fewer repeated treatments are inadequate to conclude that a compound is negative but more than 90 daily treatments may risk complications. A sampling time of 35 days is suitable for most tissues and chemicals, while shorter sampling times might be appropriate for highly proliferative tissues. For phage‐based assays, 5 to 10 animals per group should be analyzed, assuming a spontaneous mutant frequency (MF) of ∼3 × 10−5 mutants/locus and 125,000–300,000 plaque or colony forming units (PFU or CFU) per tissue. Data should be generated for two dose groups but three should be treated, at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), two‐thirds the MTD, and one‐third the MTD. Concurrent positive control animals are only necessary during validation, but positive control DNA must be included in each plating. Tissues should be processed and analyzed in a block design and the total number of PFUs or CFUs and the MF for each tissue and animal reported. Sequencing data would not normally be required but might provide useful additional information in specific circumstances. Statistical tests used should consider the animal as the experimental unit. Nonparametric statistical tests are recommended. A positive result is a statistically significant dose‐response and/or statistically significant increase in any dose group compared to concurrent negative controls using an appropriate statistical model. A negative result is statistically nonsignificant with all mean MF within two standard deviations of the control. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35:253–259, 2000

Use of the alkaline comet assay for industrial genotoxicity screening : comparative investigation with the micronucleus test

We evaluated the suitability of the alkaline comet assay as a screening test in industrial routine testing of new chemicals. Thirty-six pharmaceutical compounds with unknown genotoxic potential were tested comparatively in the comet assay and micronucleus test (MNT) using V79 Chinese hamster cells. The comparison of results is generally based on at least two independent experiments, each with two replicate cultures at a minimum of three concentrations. We found a high degree of concordance between results of the comet assay and MNT. All compounds with negative MNT results were also negative in the comet assay. All positive compounds in the comet assay were also positive in the MNT. However, 16 of 38 positive MNT results were negative in the comet assay. Some of the contrary findings may be due to aneugenic effects, which are detected in the MNT but not in the comet assay. However, the majority of the contrary results may be a consequence of cytotoxicity, which can induce elevated micronucleus frequencies but may not lead to positive effects in the comet assay. Additional data of 39 compounds tested in the Ames test and the comet assay were compared. Four of these compounds that were Ames positive were also positive in the comet assay. However, the comet assay also detected 16 compounds that were negative in the Ames test. We believe that the comet assay in vitro is a useful, fast screening system in mammalian cells that can be used in a test battery during drug development.

Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: Combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing

A working group convened at the 2009 5th IWGT to discuss possibilities for improving in vivo genotoxicity assessment by investigating possible links to standard toxicity testing. The working group considered: (1) combination of acute micronucleus (MN) and Comet assays into a single study, (2) integration of MN assays into repeated-dose toxicity (RDT) studies, (3) integration of Comet assays into RDT studies, and (4) requirements for the top dose when integrating genotoxicity measurements into RDT studies. The working group reviewed current requirements for in vivo genotoxicity testing of different chemical product classes and identified opportunities for combination and integration of genotoxicity endpoints for each class. The combination of the acute in vivo MN and Comet assays was considered by the working group to represent a technically feasible and scientifically acceptable alternative to conducting independent assays. Two combination protocols, consisting of either a 3- or a 4-treament protocol, were considered equally acceptable. As the integration of MN assays into RDT studies had already been discussed in detail in previous IWGT meetings, the working group focussed on factors that could affect the results of the integrated MN assay, such as the possible effects of repeated bleeding and the need for early harvests. The working group reached the consensus that repeated bleeding at reasonable volumes is not a critical confounding factor for the MN assay in rats older than 9 weeks of age and that rats bled for toxicokinetic investigations or for other routine toxicological purposes can be used for MN analysis. The working group considered the available data as insufficient to conclude that there is a need for an early sampling point for MN analysis in RDT studies, in addition to the routine determination at terminal sacrifice. Specific scenarios were identified where an additional early sampling can have advantages, e.g., for compounds that exert toxic effects on hematopoiesis, including some aneugens. For the integration of Comet assays into RDT studies, the working group reached the consensus that, based upon the limited amount of data available, integration is scientifically acceptable and that the liver Comet assay can complement the MN assay in blood or bone marrow in detecting in vivo genotoxins. Practical issues need to be considered when conducting an integrated Comet assay study. Freezing of tissue samples for later Comet assay analysis could alleviate logistical problems. However, the working group concluded that freezing of tissue samples can presently not be recommended for routine use, although it was noted that results from some laboratories look promising. Another discussion topic centred around the question as to whether tissue toxicity, which is more likely observed in RDT than in acute toxicity studies, would affect the results of the Comet assay. Based on the available data from in vivo studies, the working group concluded that there are no clear examples where cytotoxicity, by itself, generates increases or decreases in DNA migration. The working group identified the need for a refined guidance on the use and interpretation of cytotoxicity methods used in the Comet assay, as the different methods used generally lead to inconsistent conclusions. Since top doses in RDT studies often are limited by toxicity that occurs only after several doses, the working group discussed whether the sensitivity of integrated genotoxicity studies is reduced under these circumstances. For compounds for which in vitro genotoxicity studies yielded negative results, the working group reached the consensus that integration of in vivo genotoxicity endpoints (typically the MN assay) into RDT studies is generally acceptable. If in vitro genotoxicity results are unavailable or positive, consensus was reached that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is acceptable as the top dose in RDT studies in many cases, such as when the RDT study MTD or exposure is close (50% or greater) to an acute study MTD or exposure. Finally, the group agreed that exceptions to this general rule might be acceptable, for example when human exposure is lower than the preclinical exposure by a large margin.

Genotoxicity assessment of the antiepileptic drug AMP397, an Ames-positive aromatic nitro compound.

AMP397 is a novel antiepileptic agent and the first competitive AMPA antagonist with high receptor affinity, good in vivo potency, and oral activity. AMP397 has a structural alert (aromatic nitro group) and was mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, TA98 and TA100 without S9, but negative in the nitroreductase-deficient strains TA98NR and TA100NR. The amino derivative of AMP397 was negative in wild-type strains TA98 and TA100. AMP397 was negative in a mouse lymphoma tk assay, which included a 24h treatment without S9. A weak micronucleus induction in vitro was found at the highest concentrations tested in V79 cells with S9. AMP397 was negative in the following in vivo studies, which included the maximum tolerated doses of 320mg/kg in mice and 2000mg/kg in rats: MutaMouse assay in colon and liver (5x320mg/kg) at three sampling times (3, 7 and 31 days after the last administration); DNA binding study in the liver of mice and rats after a single treatment with [14C]-AMP397; comet assay (1x2000mg/kg) in jejunum and liver of rats, sampling times 3 and 24h after administration; micronucleus test (2x320mg/kg) in the bone marrow of mice, sampling 24h after the second administration. Based on these results, it was concluded that AMP397 has no genotoxic potential in vivo. In particular, no genotoxic metabolite is formed in mammalian cells, and, if formed by intestinal bacteria, is unable to exert any genotoxic activity in the adjacent intestinal tissue. These data were considered to provide sufficient safety to initiate clinical development of the compound.

Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests

In 2008 we published recommendations on chemicals that would be appropriate to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of new/modified mammalian cell genotoxicity tests, in particular to avoid misleading positive results. In light of new data it is appropriate to update these lists of chemicals. An expert panel was convened and has revised the recommended chemicals to fit the following different sets of characteristics: • Group 1: chemicals that should be detected as positive in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests. Chemicals in this group are all in vivo genotoxins at one or more endpoints, either due to DNA-reactive or non DNA-reactive mechanisms. Many are known carcinogens with a mutagenic mode of action, but a sub-class of probable aneugens has been introduced. • Group 2: chemicals that should give negative results in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests. Chemicals in this group are usually negative in vivo and non-DNA-reactive. They are either non-carcinogenic or rodent carcinogens with a non-mutagenic mode of action. • Group 3: chemicals that should give negative results in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests, but have been reported to induce gene mutations in mouse lymphoma cells, chromosomal aberrations or micronuclei, often at high concentrations or at high levels of cytotoxicity. Chemicals in this group are generally negative in vivo and negative in the Ames test. They are either non-carcinogenic or rodent carcinogens with an accepted non-mutagenic mode of action. This group contains comments as to any conditions that can be identified under which misleading positive results are likely to occur. This paper, therefore, updates these three recommended lists of chemicals and describes how these should be used for any test evaluation program.

Automatic analysis of the micronucleus test in primary human lymphocytes using image analysis

The in vitro micronucleus test (MNT) is a well-established test for early screening of new chemical entities in industrial toxicology. For assessing the clastogenic or aneugenic potential of a test compound, micronucleus induction in cells has been shown repeatedly to be a sensitive and a specific parameter. Various automated systems to replace the tedious and time-consuming visual slide analysis procedure as well as flow cytometric approaches have been discussed. The ROBIAS (Robotic Image Analysis System) for both automatic cytotoxicity assessment and micronucleus detection in human lymphocytes was developed at Novartis where the assay has been used to validate positive results obtained in the MNT in TK6 cells, which serves as the primary screening system for genotoxicity profiling in early drug development. In addition, the in vitro MNT has become an accepted alternative to support clinical studies and will be used for regulatory purposes as well. The comparison of visual with automatic analysis results showed a high degree of concordance for 25 independent experiments conducted for the profiling of 12 compounds. For concentration series of cyclophosphamide and carbendazim, a very good correlation between automatic and visual analysis by two examiners could be established, both for the relative division index used as cytotoxicity parameter, as well as for micronuclei scoring in mono- and binucleated cells. Generally, false-positive micronucleus decisions could be controlled by fast and simple relocation of the automatically detected patterns. The possibility to analyse 24 slides within 65h by automatic analysis over the weekend and the high reproducibility of the results make automatic image processing a powerful tool for the micronucleus analysis in primary human lymphocytes. The automated slide analysis for the MNT in human lymphocytes complements the portfolio of image analysis applications on ROBIAS which is supporting various assays at Novartis.

Quantitative correlation between radiation‐induced mutagenesis in endogenous genes and transgenes of mouse spermatogonial stem cells

In order to evaluate the pUR288‐plasmid transgenic mouse model, utilizing the bacterial lacZ gene as the mutational target, radiation‐induced mutagenesis was primarily analyzed in spermatogonial stem cells. A combined hydroxyurea (HU)–X‐ray treatment protocol was used, known to sensitize dramatically the induction of mutations in endogenous genes. In the testes of untreated animals, a mutant frequency of 6.7 ± 4.4 × 10–5 was found. In animals treated with HU or X ray alone, moderate elevations were seen (factors of about 4 and 2 over untreated animal values). In testes of mice having received the HU + X‐ray combination treatment, a mutant frequency of 63.0 ± 36.1 × 10–5 was found. The results obtained showed a good quantitative correlation between endogenous genes and the transgene, indicating the suitability of pUR288 transgenic mice for also efficiently recording radiation‐induced genetic damage. Radiosensitization, seen in spermatogonial stem cells, was not observed in other studied organs such as spleen, brain, or lung. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 34:216–220, 1999

Gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence for the detection of tissue-specific genotoxicity in vivo : Gamma-H2AX Tissue-specific Genotoxicity

The phosphorylation of histone H2AX in Serine 139 (gamma‐H2AX) marks regions of DNA double strand breaks and contributes to the recruitment of DNA repair factors to the site of DNA damage. Gamma‐H2AX is used widely as DNA damage marker in vitro, but its use for genotoxicity assessment in vivo has not been extensively investigated. Here, we developed an image analysis system for the precise quantification of the gamma‐H2AX signal, which we used to monitor DNA damage in animals treated with known genotoxicants (EMS, ENU and doxorubicin). To compare this new assay to a validated standard procedure for DNA damage quantification, tissues from the same animals were also analyzed in the comet assay. An increase in the levels of gamma‐H2AX was observed in most of the tissues from animals treated with doxorubicin and ENU. Interestingly, the lesions induced by doxorubicin were not easily detected by the standard comet assay, while they were clearly identified by gamma‐H2AX staining. Conversely, EMS appeared strongly positive in the comet assay but only mildly in the gamma‐H2AX immunofluorescence. These observations suggest that the two methods could complement each other for DNA damage analysis, where gamma‐H2AX staining allows the detection of tissue‐specific effects in situ. Moreover, since gamma‐H2AX staining can be performed on formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded tissue sections generated during repeated‐dose toxicity studies, it does not require any further treatments or extra procedures during dissection, thus optimizing the use of resources and animals. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:4–16, 2019.