Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hans Kjeldsen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hans Kjeldsen.


Science | 2010

Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: Introduction and First Results

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Timothy M. Brown; Douglas A. Caldwell; John C. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Andrea K. Dupree; Thomas Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Y. Kondo; David W. Latham; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Soren Meibom; Hans Kjeldsen; Jack J. Lissauer; David G. Monet; David R. Morrison; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Jill Tarter; Alan P. Boss; D. E. Brownlee

Detecting Distant Planets More than 400 planets have been detected outside the solar system, most of which have masses similar to that of the gas giant planet, Jupiter. Borucki et al. (p. 977, published online 7 January) summarize the planetary findings derived from the first six weeks of observations with the Kepler mission whose objective is to search for and determine the frequency of Earth-like planets in the habitable zones of other stars. The results include the detection of five new exoplanets, which confirm the existence of planets with densities substantially lower than those predicted for gas giant planets. Initial observations confirm the existence of planets with densities lower than those predicted for gas giant planets. The Kepler mission was designed to determine the frequency of Earth-sized planets in and near the habitable zone of Sun-like stars. The habitable zone is the region where planetary temperatures are suitable for water to exist on a planet’s surface. During the first 6 weeks of observations, Kepler monitored 156,000 stars, and five new exoplanets with sizes between 0.37 and 1.6 Jupiter radii and orbital periods from 3.2 to 4.9 days were discovered. The density of the Neptune-sized Kepler-4b is similar to that of Neptune and GJ 436b, even though the irradiation level is 800,000 times higher. Kepler-7b is one of the lowest-density planets (~0.17 gram per cubic centimeter) yet detected. Kepler-5b, -6b, and -8b confirm the existence of planets with densities lower than those predicted for gas giant planets.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler II : Analysis of the first four months of data

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Timothy M. Brown; Stephen T. Bryson; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

On 2011 February 1 the Kepler mission released data for 156,453 stars observed from the beginning of the science observations on 2009 May 2 through September 16. There are 1235 planetary candidates with transit-like signatures detected in this period. These are associated with 997 host stars. Distributions of the characteristics of the planetary candidates are separated into five class sizes: 68 candidates of approximately Earth-size (R_p < 1.25 R_⊕), 288 super-Earth-size (1.25 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 2 R_⊕), 662 Neptune-size (2 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 6 R_⊕), 165 Jupiter-size (6 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 15 R_⊕), and 19 up to twice the size of Jupiter (15 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 22 R_⊕). In the temperature range appropriate for the habitable zone, 54 candidates are found with sizes ranging from Earth-size to larger than that of Jupiter. Six are less than twice the size of the Earth. Over 74% of the planetary candidates are smaller than Neptune. The observed number versus size distribution of planetary candidates increases to a peak at two to three times the Earth-size and then declines inversely proportional to the area of the candidate. Our current best estimates of the intrinsic frequencies of planetary candidates, after correcting for geometric and sensitivity biases, are 5% for Earth-size candidates, 8% for super-Earth-size candidates, 18% for Neptune-size candidates, 2% for Jupiter-size candidates, and 0.1% for very large candidates; a total of 0.34 candidates per star. Multi-candidate, transiting systems are frequent; 17% of the host stars have multi-candidate systems, and 34% of all the candidates are part of multi-candidate systems.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data

Natalie M. Batalha; Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; Fergal Mullally; Susan E. Thompson; Timothy M. Brown; Andrea K. Dupree; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Ronald L. Gilliland; Howard Isaacson; David W. Latham; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Avi Shporer; William J. Borucki; David R. Ciardi; Thomas N. Gautier; Michael R. Haas; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; William Rapin; Gibor Basri; Alan P. Boss

New transiting planet candidates are identified in 16 months (2009 May-2010 September) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly 5000 periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1108 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis that identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (R_P/R_★), reduced semimajor axis (d/R_★), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (201% for candidates smaller than 2 R_⊕ compared to 53% for candidates larger than 2 R_⊕) and those at longer orbital periods (124% for candidates outside of 50 day orbits versus 86% for candidates inside of 50 day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from 13 months (Quarters 1-5) to 16 months (Quarters 1-6) even in regions of parameter space where one would have expected the previous catalogs to be complete. Analyses of planet frequencies based on previous catalogs will be affected by such incompleteness. The fraction of all planet candidate host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the habitable zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2010

Kepler Mission Design, Realized Photometric Performance, and Early Science

David G. Koch; William J. Borucki; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Timothy M. Brown; Douglas A. Caldwell; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Jon M. Jenkins; Y. Kondo; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; David G. Monet; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; D. E. Brownlee; John Caldwell; Andrea K. Dupree; Steve B. Howell; Hans Kjeldsen; Soeren Meibom; David Morrison; Tobias Owen

The Kepler Mission, launched on 2009 March 6, was designed with the explicit capability to detect Earth-size planets in the habitable zone of solar-like stars using the transit photometry method. Results from just 43 days of data along with ground-based follow-up observations have identified five new transiting planets with measurements of their masses, radii, and orbital periods. Many aspects of stellar astrophysics also benefit from the unique, precise, extended, and nearly continuous data set for a large number and variety of stars. Early results for classical variables and eclipsing stars show great promise. To fully understand the methodology, processes, and eventually the results from the mission, we present the underlying rationale that ultimately led to the flight and ground system designs used to achieve the exquisite photometric performance. As an example of the initial photometric results, we present variability measurements that can be used to distinguish dwarf stars from red giants.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

KEPLER'S FIRST ROCKY PLANET: KEPLER-10b*

Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; Edward W. Dunham; Francois Fressin; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Hans Kjeldsen; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Sara Seager; Jason H. Steffen; Guillermo Torres; Gibor Basri; Timothy M. Brown; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Bruce D. Clarke; William D. Cochran

NASAs Kepler Mission uses transit photometry to determine the frequency of Earth-size planets in or near the habitable zone of Sun-like stars. The mission reached a milestone toward meeting that goal: the discovery of its first rocky planet, Kepler-10b. Two distinct sets of transit events were detected: (1) a 152 ± 4 ppm dimming lasting 1.811 ± 0.024 hr with ephemeris T [BJD] = 2454964.57375^(+0.00060)_(–0.00082) + N * 0.837495^(+0.000004)_(–0.000005) days and (2) a 376 ± 9 ppm dimming lasting 6.86 ± 0.07 hr with ephemeris T [BJD] = 2454971.6761^(+0.0020)_(–0.0023) + N * 45.29485^(+0.00065) _(–0.00076) days. Statistical tests on the photometric and pixel flux time series established the viability of the planet candidates triggering ground-based follow-up observations. Forty precision Doppler measurements were used to confirm that the short-period transit event is due to a planetary companion. The parent star is bright enough for asteroseismic analysis. Photometry was collected at 1 minute cadence for >4 months from which we detected 19 distinct pulsation frequencies. Modeling the frequencies resulted in precise knowledge of the fundamental stellar properties. Kepler-10 is a relatively old (11.9 ± 4.5 Gyr) but otherwise Sun-like main-sequence star with T_(eff) = 5627 ± 44 K, M_⋆ = 0.895 ± 0.060 M_⊙ , and R_⋆ = 1.056 ± 0.021 R_⊙. Physical models simultaneously fit to the transit light curves and the precision Doppler measurements yielded tight constraints on the properties of Kepler-10b that speak to its rocky composition: M_P = 4.56^9+1.17)_(–1.29) M_⊕, R_P = 1.416^(+0.033)_(–0.036) R_⊕, and ρ_P = 8.8^(+2.1)_(–2.9) g cm^(–3). Kepler-10b is the smallest transiting exoplanet discovered to date.


Nature | 2011

Gravity modes as a way to distinguish between hydrogen- and helium-burning red giant stars

Timothy R. Bedding; Benoit Mosser; Daniel Huber; Josefina Montalban; P. G. Beck; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Yvonne P. Elsworth; Rafael Arenas Garcia; Andrea Miglio; D. Stello; T. R. White; Joris De Ridder; S. Hekker; Conny Aerts; C. Barban; K. Belkacem; Anne-Marie Broomhall; Timothy M. Brown; Derek L. Buzasi; Fabien Carrier; William J. Chaplin; Maria Pia di Mauro; Marc-Antoine Dupret; S. Frandsen; Ronald L. Gilliland; M. J. Goupil; Jon M. Jenkins; T. Kallinger; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen

Red giants are evolved stars that have exhausted the supply of hydrogen in their cores and instead burn hydrogen in a surrounding shell. Once a red giant is sufficiently evolved, the helium in the core also undergoes fusion. Outstanding issues in our understanding of red giants include uncertainties in the amount of mass lost at the surface before helium ignition and the amount of internal mixing from rotation and other processes. Progress is hampered by our inability to distinguish between red giants burning helium in the core and those still only burning hydrogen in a shell. Asteroseismology offers a way forward, being a powerful tool for probing the internal structures of stars using their natural oscillation frequencies. Here we report observations of gravity-mode period spacings in red giants that permit a distinction between evolutionary stages to be made. We use high-precision photometry obtained by the Kepler spacecraft over more than a year to measure oscillations in several hundred red giants. We find many stars whose dipole modes show sequences with approximately regular period spacings. These stars fall into two clear groups, allowing us to distinguish unambiguously between hydrogen-shell-burning stars (period spacing mostly ∼50 seconds) and those that are also burning helium (period spacing ∼100 to 300 seconds).


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Characteristics Of Kepler Planetary Candidates Based On The First Data Set

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Alan P. Boss; Timothy M. Brown; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Andrea K. Dupree; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Hans Kjeldsen; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; David G. Monet; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Jill Tarter; David Charbonneau; Laurance R. Doyle; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

In the spring of 2009, the Kepler Mission commenced high-precision photometry on nearly 156,000 stars to determine the frequency and characteristics of small exoplanets, conduct a guest observer program, and obtain asteroseismic data on a wide variety of stars. On 15 June 2010 the Kepler Mission released data from the first quarter of observations. At the time of this publication, 706 stars from this first data set have exoplanet candidates with sizes from as small as that of the Earth to larger than that of Jupiter. Here we give the identity and characteristics of 306 released stars with planetary candidates. Data for the remaining 400 stars with planetary candidates will be released in February 2011. Over half the candidates on the released list have radii less than half that of Jupiter. The released stars include five possible multi-planet systems. One of these has two Neptune-size (2.3 and 2.5 Earth-radius) candidates with near-resonant periods.


Nature | 2012

Fast core rotation in red-giant stars as revealed by gravity-dominated mixed modes

P. G. Beck; Josefina Montalban; T. Kallinger; Joris De Ridder; Conny Aerts; R. A. García; S. Hekker; Marc-Antoine Dupret; Benoit Mosser; P. Eggenberger; D. Stello; Y. Elsworth; S. Frandsen; Fabien Carrier; M. Hillen; M. Gruberbauer; Joergen Christensen-Dalsgaard; A. Miglio; M. Valentini; Timothy R. Bedding; Hans Kjeldsen; Forrest R. Girouard; Jennifer R. Hall; Khadeejah A. Ibrahim

When the core hydrogen is exhausted during stellar evolution, the central region of a star contracts and the outer envelope expands and cools, giving rise to a red giant. Convection takes place over much of the star’s radius. Conservation of angular momentum requires that the cores of these stars rotate faster than their envelopes; indirect evidence supports this. Information about the angular-momentum distribution is inaccessible to direct observations, but it can be extracted from the effect of rotation on oscillation modes that probe the stellar interior. Here we report an increasing rotation rate from the surface of the star to the stellar core in the interiors of red giants, obtained using the rotational frequency splitting of recently detected ‘mixed modes’. By comparison with theoretical stellar models, we conclude that the core must rotate at least ten times faster than the surface. This observational result confirms the theoretical prediction of a steep gradient in the rotation profile towards the deep stellar interior.


Science | 2012

Kepler-36: A Pair of Planets with Neighboring Orbits and Dissimilar Densities

Joshua A. Carter; Eric Agol; W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Katherine M. Deck; Y. Elsworth; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; S. J. Hale; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Matthew J. Holman; Daniel Huber; Christopher Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; Jack J. Lissauer; Eric D. Lopez; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; T. S. Metcalfe; A. Miglio; Leslie A. Rogers; D. Stello; William J. Borucki; Steve Bryson

So Close and So Different In our solar system, the rocky planets have very distinct orbits from those of the gas giants. Carter et al. (p. 556, published online 21 June) report on a planetary system where this pattern does not apply, posing a challenge to theories of planet formation. Data from the Kepler space telescope reveal two planets with radically different densities orbiting the same star with very similar orbital periods. One planet has a rocky Earth-like composition and the other is akin to Neptune. The Kepler spacecraft detected a super-Earth and a Neptune-like planet in very tightly spaced orbits around the same star. In the solar system, the planets’ compositions vary with orbital distance, with rocky planets in close orbits and lower-density gas giants in wider orbits. The detection of close-in giant planets around other stars was the first clue that this pattern is not universal and that planets’ orbits can change substantially after their formation. Here, we report another violation of the orbit-composition pattern: two planets orbiting the same star with orbital distances differing by only 10% and densities differing by a factor of 8. One planet is likely a rocky “super-Earth,” whereas the other is more akin to Neptune. These planets are 20 times more closely spaced and have a larger density contrast than any adjacent pair of planets in the solar system.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS)

George R. Ricker; Joshua N. Winn; R. Vanderspek; David W. Latham; G. Á. Bakos; Jacob L. Bean; Zachory K. Berta-Thompson; Timothy M. Brown; Lars A. Buchhave; Nathaniel R. Butler; R. Paul Butler; W. J. Chaplin; David Charbonneau; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Mark Clampin; Drake Deming; John P. Doty; Nathan De Lee; Courtney D. Dressing; Edward W. Dunham; Michael Endl; Francois Fressin; Jian Ge; Thomas Henning; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard; Shigeru Ida; Jon M. Jenkins; Garrett Jernigan; John Asher Johnson

The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS ) will search for planets transiting bright and nearby stars. TESS has been selected by NASA for launch in 2017 as an Astrophysics Explorer mission. The spacecraft will be placed into a highly elliptical 13.7-day orbit around the Earth. During its two-year mission, TESS will employ four wide-field optical CCD cameras to monitor at least 200,000 main-sequence dwarf stars with IC (approximately less than) 13 for temporary drops in brightness caused by planetary transits. Each star will be observed for an interval ranging from one month to one year, depending mainly on the stars ecliptic latitude. The longest observing intervals will be for stars near the ecliptic poles, which are the optimal locations for follow-up observations with the James Webb Space Telescope. Brightness measurements of preselected target stars will be recorded every 2 min, and full frame images will be recorded every 30 min. TESS stars will be 10-100 times brighter than those surveyed by the pioneering Kepler mission. This will make TESS planets easier to characterize with follow-up observations. TESS is expected to find more than a thousand planets smaller than Neptune, including dozens that are comparable in size to the Earth. Public data releases will occur every four months, inviting immediate community-wide efforts to study the new planets. The TESS legacy will be a catalog of the nearest and brightest stars hosting transiting planets, which will endure as highly favorable targets for detailed investigations.

Collaboration


Dive into the Hans Kjeldsen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. J. Chaplin

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Y. Elsworth

University of Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. Arentoft

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. A. García

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge