Hans Modig

COMBINED ORCHIECTOMY AND EXTERNAL RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR NONMETASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER WITH OR WITHOUT PELVIC LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

PURPOSE We compare the combination of orchiectomy and radiotherapy to radiotherapy alone as treatment for pelvic confined prostate cancer, that is T1-4, pN0-3, M0 (TNM classification). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective study 91 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were, after surgical lymph node staging, randomized to receive definitive external beam radiotherapy (46) or combined orchiectomy and radiotherapy (45). Patients treated with radiotherapy alone had androgen ablation at clinical disease progression. The effects on progression-free, disease specific and overall survival rates were calculated. RESULTS After a median followup of 9.3 years (range 6.0 to 11.4) clinical progression was seen in 61% of the radiotherapy only patients (group 1) and in 31% of the combined treatment patients (group 2) (p = 0.005). The mortality was 61 and 38% (p = 0.02), and cause specific mortality was 44 and 27%, respectively (p = 0.06), in groups 1 and 2. The differences in favor of combined treatment were mainly caused by lymph node positive tumors. For node negative tumors there was no significant difference in survival rates. CONCLUSIONS The progression-free, disease specific and overall survival rates for patients with prostate cancer and pelvic lymph node involvement are significantly better after combined androgen ablation and radiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone. These results strongly suggest that early androgen deprivation is better than deferred endocrine treatment for these patients.

Quality of life and symptoms in a randomized trial of radiotherapy versus deferred treatment of localized prostate carcinoma.

Treatment of localized prostate carcinoma (LPC) using radiotherapy (RT) can induce disturbances in a patients quality of life (QOL) and urinary and intestinal function. Late symptoms and QOL were evaluated in a randomized trial between RT and deferred treatment (DT).

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized Phase III study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In 1986 a prospective, randomized, multi-centre trial for evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was initiated. As survival in this group of patients is poor the purpose was to find a possible survival benefit of the chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy only. METHODS Four-hundred sixty-one patients from Denmark, Norway and Sweden with tumors in oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were randomized to receive either standard treatment (radiotherapy or radiotherapy followed by surgery) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by standard treatment. Chemotherapy included three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on day 1 followed by 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 per day continuous i.v. infusion for 120 hours. Radiotherapy 64-70 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction, 5 times/week, was given to patients in both treatment arms. RESULTS Response rate was 71% for patients randomized to chemotherapy-radiotherapy and 66% for patients randomized to standard treatment (not statistically significant). Residual tumors were excised if possible. After surgery 62% of the patients randomized to chemotherapy-radiotherapy and 60% of the patients in the standard treatment group were clinically tumor free. CONCLUSIONS No statistically significant benefit in survival was observed for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. Nor was there any impact of chemotherapy on the number of patients achieving loco-regional tumor control after primary treatment.

Bleomycin/cis-platin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical radiotherapy in localized, inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus: A prospective randomized multicentre study: The second Scandinavian trial in esophageal cancer

Survival and swallowing function were studied in a randomized trial of 97 patients with inoperable, localized esophageal carcinoma. Radical radiotherapy was given to 51 patients, while 46 patients had two courses of bleomycin/cisplatin before radiotherapy. The survival was 29% after one year, and 6% after 3 years in the radiotherapy group. The survival in the combined treatment group was 18 and 0%, respectively; p = 0.1895. The number of patients who could swallow any food increased from 6% before treatment to 38% after 3 months in the radiotherapy group, and from 0% to 23% in the combined group. No benefit was found by combining bleomycin/cisplatin with radiotherapy.

Two-year results from a Swedish study on conventional versus accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma The ARTSCAN study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Studies on accelerated fractionation (AF) in head and neck cancer have shown increased local control and survival compared with conventional fractionation (CF), while others have been non-conclusive. In 1998 a national Swedish group decided to perform a randomised controlled clinical study of AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with verified squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except glottic T1-T2, N0) and hypopharynx were included. Patients with prior chemotherapy or surgery were excluded. Patients were randomised to either CF (2Gy/day, 5days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68Gy) or to AF (1.1Gy+2.0Gy/day, 5days/week for 4.5weeks, total dose 68Gy). An extensive quality assurance protocol was followed throughout the study. The primary end point was loco-regional tumour control (LRC) at two years after treatment. RESULTS The study was closed in 2006 when 750 patients had been randomised. Eighty-three percent of the patients had stages III-IV disease. Forty eight percent had oropharyngeal, 21% laryngeal, 17% hypopharyngeal and 14% oral cancers. There were no significant differences regarding overall survival (OS) or LRC between the two regimens. The OS at two years was 68% for AF and 67% for CF. The corresponding figures for LRC were 71% and 67%, respectively. There was a trend towards improved LRC for oral cancers treated (p=0.07) and for large tumours (T3-T4) (p=0.07) treated with AF. The AF group had significantly worse acute reactions, while there was no significant increase in late effects. CONCLUSION Overall the AF regimen did not prove to be more efficacious than CF. However, the trend towards improved results in AF for oral cancers needs to be further investigated.

Pretreatment p53 immunoreactivity does not infer radioresistance in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE To test, in a clinical context, the hypothesis that p53 aberrations, assessed by immunoreactivity, are related to radioresistance as suggested by several experimental studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixty patients with prostate cancer who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate or biopsy prior to definitive external beam therapy were retrospectively identified. The endpoint in the study was cancer specific survival. The nuclear accumulation of the aberrant p53 protein was evaluated by immunohisto-chemistry with the pantropic, monoclonal Ab-6 anti-p53 antibody (clone DO-1) on pretreatment biopsies. Immunoreactivity was related to stage, grade, and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS There was a correlation between p53 immunoreactivity and low tumor stage (p < 0.001), but no relation between p53 status and grade was found. Moreover, no significant difference was found in cancer-specific survival between the p53 positive tumors (109 months) and the p53 negative tumors (99 months). CONCLUSIONS No disadvantage regarding survival was seen for patients with p53 immunoreactive tumors, implicating that p53 immunoreactivity does not infer radioresistance in prostate cancer. This suggests that the p53 inactivation may be a less important determinant of tumor response to radiotherapy in some human cancers than in the previously studied experimental situations. Thus, other mechanisms may be more important in determining outcome after radiation. However, the series is small and data should be interpreted with caution.

Morbidity after Preoperative Radiotherapy and Cystectomy in Patients with Bladder Cancer

The therapy-related morbidity was evaluated in 121 patients with muscle-invasive or recurrent superficial bladder cancer treated with radiotherapy and cystectomy. In 103 patients cystectomy succeeded 39-52 Gray (Gy) preoperative irradiation and in 18 patients cystectomy was done as a salvage procedure after previous full-dose radiotherapy. The overall frequency of complications was high; 71% of the patients treated with preoperative and 78% treated with full-dose radiotherapy had clinically relevant complications related to radiotherapy or surgery or both. The rate of intestinal complications was 39% for preoperative and 67% for full-dose radiotherapy. The overall mortality rate in intestinal complications was 3.3%. This study shows that the combination of radiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with bladder cancer is associated with a high rate of intestinal complications. The complications are significantly related to the irradiation dose and are long lasting and even life threatening.