Hans Theodor Eich

Reduced Treatment Intensity in Patients with Early-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma

BACKGROUND Whether it is possible to reduce the intensity of treatment in early (stage I or II) Hodgkins lymphoma with a favorable prognosis remains unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing four treatment groups consisting of a combination chemotherapy regimen of two different intensities followed by involved-field radiation therapy at two different dose levels. METHODS We randomly assigned 1370 patients with newly diagnosed early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma with a favorable prognosis to one of four treatment groups: four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by 30 Gy of radiation therapy (group 1), four cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of radiation therapy (group 2), two cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy of radiation therapy (group 3), or two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of radiation therapy (group 4). The primary end point was freedom from treatment failure; secondary end points included efficacy and toxicity of treatment. RESULTS The two chemotherapy regimens did not differ significantly with respect to freedom from treatment failure (P=0.39) or overall survival (P=0.61). At 5 years, the rates of freedom from treatment failure were 93.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.5 to 94.8) with the four-cycle ABVD regimen and 91.1% (95% CI, 88.3 to 93.2) with the two-cycle regimen. When the effects of 20-Gy and 30-Gy doses of radiation therapy were compared, there were also no significant differences in freedom from treatment failure (P=1.00) or overall survival (P=0.61). Adverse events and acute toxic effects of treatment were most common in the patients who received four cycles of ABVD and 30 Gy of radiation therapy (group 1). CONCLUSIONS In patients with early-stage Hodgkins lymphoma and a favorable prognosis, treatment with two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of involved-field radiation therapy is as effective as, and less toxic than, four cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy of involved-field radiation therapy. Long-term effects of these treatments have not yet been fully assessed. (Funded by the Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Swiss Federal Government; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00265018.)

Reduced-intensity chemotherapy and PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD15 trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND The intensity of chemotherapy and need for additional radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkins lymphoma has been unclear. We did a prospective randomised clinical trial comparing two reduced-intensity chemotherapy variants with our previous standard regimen. Chemotherapy was followed by PET-guided radiotherapy. METHODS In this parallel group, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (HD15), 2182 patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkins lymphoma aged 18-60 years were randomly assigned to receive either eight cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) (8×B(esc) group), six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) (6×B(esc) group), or eight cycles of BEACOPP(14) (8×B(14) group). Randomisation (1:1:1) was done centrally by stratified minimisation. Non-inferiority of the primary endpoint, freedom from treatment failure, was assessed using repeated CIs for the hazard ratio (HR) according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients with a persistent mass after chemotherapy measuring 2·5 cm or larger and positive on PET scan received additional radiotherapy with 30 Gy; the negative predictive value for tumour recurrence of PET at 12 months was an independent endpoint. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN32443041. FINDINGS Of the 2182 patients enrolled in the study, 2126 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis set, 705 in the 8×B(esc) group, 711 in the 6×B(esc) group, and 710 in the 8×B(14) group. Freedom from treatment failure was sequentially non-inferior for the 6×B(esc) and 8×B(14) groups as compared with 8×B(esc). 5-year freedom from treatment failure rates were 84·4% (97·5% CI 81·0-87·7) for the 8×B(esc) group, 89·3% (86·5-92·1) for 6×B(esc) group, and 85·4% (82·1-88·7) for the 8×B(14) group (97·5% CI for difference between 6×B(esc) and 8×B(esc) was 0·5-9·3). Overall survival in the three groups was 91·9%, 95·3%, and 94·5% respectively, and was significantly better with 6×B(esc) than with 8×B(esc) (97·5% CI 0·2-6·5). The 8×B(esc) group showed a higher mortality (7·5%) than the 6×B(esc) (4·6%) and 8×B(14) (5·2%) groups, mainly due to differences in treatment-related events (2·1%, 0·8%, and 0·8%, respectively) and secondary malignancies (1·8%, 0·7%, and 1·1%, respectively). The negative predictive value for PET at 12 months was 94·1% (95% CI 92·1-96·1); and 225 (11%) of 2126 patients received additional radiotherapy. INTERPRETATION Treatment with six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) followed by PET-guided radiotherapy was more effective in terms of freedom from treatment failure and less toxic than eight cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen. Thus, six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) should be the treatment of choice for advanced stage Hodgkins lymphoma. PET done after chemotherapy can guide the need for additional radiotherapy in this setting. FUNDING Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Swiss Federal Government.

Intensified Chemotherapy and Dose-Reduced Involved-Field Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 Trial

PURPOSE Combined-modality treatment consisting of four to six cycles of chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the standard of care for patients with early unfavorable Hodgkins lymphoma (HL). It is unclear whether treatment results can be improved with more intensive chemotherapy and which radiation dose needs to be applied. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 16 to 75 years with newly diagnosed early unfavorable HL were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design to one of the following treatment arms: four cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) + 30 Gy of IFRT; four cycles of ABVD + 20 Gy of IFRT; four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP(baseline)) + 30 Gy of IFRT; or four cycles of BEACOPP(baseline) + 20 Gy of IFRT. RESULTS With a total of 1,395 patients included, the freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) at 5 years was 85.0%, overall survival was 94.5%, and progression-free survival was 86.0%. BEACOPP(baseline) was more effective than ABVD when followed by 20 Gy of IFRT (5-year FFTF difference, 5.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 11.3%). However, there was no difference between BEACOPP(baseline) and ABVD when followed by 30 Gy of IFRT (5-year FFTF difference, 1.6%; 95% CI, -3.6% to 6.9%). Similar results were observed for the radiotherapy question; after four cycles of BEACOPP(baseline), 20 Gy was not inferior to 30 Gy (5-year FFTF difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -5.8% to 4.2%), whereas inferiority of 20 Gy cannot be excluded after four cycles of ABVD (5-year FFTF difference, -4.7%; 95% CI, -10.3% to 0.8%). Treatment-related toxicity occurred more often in the arms with more intensive therapy. CONCLUSION Moderate dose escalation using BEACOPP(baseline) did not significantly improve outcome in early unfavorable HL. Four cycles of ABVD should be followed by 30 Gy of IFRT.

Modern Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Field and Dose Guidelines From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG)

Radiation therapy (RT) is the most effective single modality for local control of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and an important component of therapy for many patients. These guidelines have been developed to address the use of RT in HL in the modern era of combined modality treatment. The role of reduced volumes and doses is addressed, integrating modern imaging with 3-dimensional (3D) planning and advanced techniques of treatment delivery. The previously applied extended field (EF) and original involved field (IF) techniques, which treated larger volumes based on nodal stations, have now been replaced by the use of limited volumes, based solely on detectable nodal (and extranodal extension) involvement at presentation, using contrast-enhanced computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or a combination of these techniques. The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements concepts of gross tumor volume, clinical target volume, internal target volume, and planning target volume are used for defining the targeted volumes. Newer treatment techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy, breath-hold, image guided radiation therapy, and 4-dimensional imaging, should be implemented when their use is expected to decrease significantly the risk for normal tissue damage while still achieving the primary goal of local tumor control. The highly conformal involved node radiation therapy (INRT), recently introduced for patients for whom optimal imaging is available, is explained. A new concept, involved site radiation therapy (ISRT), is introduced as the standard conformal therapy for the scenario, commonly encountered, wherein optimal imaging is not available. There is increasing evidence that RT doses used in the past are higher than necessary for disease control in this era of combined modality therapy. The use of INRT and of lower doses in early-stage HL is supported by available data. Although the use of ISRT has not yet been validated in a formal study, it is more conservative than INRT, accounting for suboptimal information and appropriately designed for safe local disease control. The goal of modern smaller field radiation therapy is to reduce both treatment volume and treatment dose while maintaining efficacy and minimizing acute and late sequelae. This review is a consensus of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) Steering Committee regarding the modern approach to RT in the treatment of HL, outlining a new concept of ISRT in which reduced treatment volumes are planned for the effective control of involved sites of HL. Nodal and extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are covered separately by ILROG guidelines.

Positron emission tomography has a high negative predictive value for progression or early relapse for patients with residual disease after first-line chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma

In the HD15 trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group, the negative predictive value (NPV) of positron emission tomography (PET) using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) was evaluated. A total of 817 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive BEACOPP-based chemotherapy. After completion of chemotherapy, residual disease measuring more than or equal to 2.5 cm in diameter was assessed by PET in 311 patients. The NPV of PET was defined as the proportion of PET(-) patients without progression, relapse, or irradiation within 12 months after PET review panel. The progression-free survival was 96% for PET(-) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 94%-99%) and 86% for PET(+) patients (95% CI, 78%-95%, P = .011). The NPV for PET in this analysis was 94% (95% CI, 91%-97%). Thus, consolidation radiotherapy can be omitted in PET(-) patients with residual disease without increasing the risk for progression or early relapse compared with patients in complete remission. The impact of this finding on the overall survival at 5 years must be awaited. Until then, response adapted therapy guided by PET for HL patients seems to be a promising approach that should be further evaluated in clinical trials. This trial is registered at http://isrctn.org study as #ISRCTN32443041.

Dose-Intensification in Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD14 Trial

PURPOSE In patients with early unfavorable Hodgkins lymphoma (HL), combined modality treatment with four cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) and 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) results in long-term tumor control of approximately 80%. We aimed to improve these results using more intensive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed early unfavorable HL were randomly assigned to either four cycles of ABVD or an intensified treatment consisting of two cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) followed by two cycles of ABVD (2 + 2). Chemotherapy was followed by 30 Gy IFRT in both arms. The primary end point was freedom from treatment failure (FFTF); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS With a total of 1,528 qualified patients included, the 2 + 2 regimen demonstrated superior FFTF compared with four cycles of ABVD (P < .001; hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66), with a difference of 7.2% at 5 years (95% CI, 3.8 to 10.5). The difference in 5-year PFS was 6.2% (95% CI, 3.0% to 9.5%). There was more acute toxicity associated with 2 + 2 than with ABVD, but there were no overall differences in treatment-related mortality or secondary malignancies. CONCLUSION Intensified chemotherapy with two cycles of BEACOPP escalated followed by two cycles of ABVD followed by IFRT significantly improves tumor control in patients with early unfavorable HL.

Involved-Node Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Background and Purpose:Radiotherapy of Hodgkin’s lymphoma has evolved from extended-field to involved-field (IF) radiotherapy reducing toxicity whilst maintaining high cure rates. Recent publications recommend further reduction in the radiation field to involved-node (IN) radiotherapy; however, this concept has never been tested in a randomized trial. The German Hodgkin Study Group aims to compare it with standard IF radiotherapy in their future HD17 trial.Patients and Methods:All patients must be examined by the radiation oncologist before the start of chemotherapy. At that time, patients must have complete staging CT scans. For patients with IN radiotherapy, a radiation planning CT before and after chemotherapy with patients in the treatment position is recommended. Fusion techniques, allowing the overlapping of the pre- and postchemotherapy CT scans, should be used. Usage of PET-CT scans with patients in the treatment position is recommended, whenever possible.Results:The clinical target volume encompasses the initial volume of the lymph node(s) before chemotherapy and incorporates the initial location and extent of the disease taking the displacement of the normal tissues into account. The margin of the planning target volume should be 2 cm in axial and 3 cm in craniocaudal direction. If necessary, it can be reduced to 1–1.5 cm. To minimize lung and cardiac toxicity, the target definition in the mediastinum is different.Conclusion:The concept of IN radiotherapy has been proposed as a means to further improve the therapeutic ratio by reducing the risk of radiation-induced toxicity, including second malignancies. Field sizes will further decrease compared to IF radiotherapy.Hintergrund und Ziel:Die Strahlenbehandlung des Hodgkin-Lymphoms entwickelte sich von der Extended-Field- zur Involved-Field-(IF-)Radiotherapie bei anhaltend hohen Heilungsraten. Kürzlich erschienene Publikationen empfehlen die weitere Reduktion der Bestrahlungsvolumina hin zur Involved-Node-(IN-)Radiotherapie. Allerdings ist dieses Vorgehen bislang nicht innerhalb randomisierter klinischer Studien geprüft worden. Daher wird die Deutsche Hodgkin-Lymphom-Studiengruppe in der zukünftigen HD17-Studie die IF- mit der IN-Radiotherapie vergleichen (Abbildung 1).Patienten und Methodik:Alle Studienpatienten müssen vor dem Start der Chemotherapie vom Radioonkologen untersucht werden. Zu diesem Zeitpunkt muss ein vollständiges bildgebendes Staging vorliegen. Für Patienten, die eine IN-Radiotherapie erhalten, wird ein Planungs-CT in Bestrahlungsposition vor und nach der Chemotherapie empfohlen. Die Überlagerung (Matching) des prätherapeutischen Planungs-CT mit dem Planungs-CT nach Chemotherapie ist wünschenswert. Steht eine prätherapeutische PET-CT zur Verfügung, sollte diese in die Zielvolumendefinition im Rahmen der IN-Radiotherapie einbezogen werden.Ergebnisse:Das klinische Zielvolumen (CTV) umfasst die initial als befallen gewerteten Lymphknoten. Es berücksichtigt die initiale Ausdehnung der Erkrankung inklusive der Verlagerung von Normalgeweben. Der Sicherheitssaum des Planungszielvolumens (PTV) sollte in axialer Ausdehnung 2 cm, in kraniokaudaler Ausrichtung 3 cm betragen (Abbildung 2). Er kann in axialer Ausdehnung auf 1–1,5 cm reduziert werden, um Organtoxizitäten möglichst gering zu halten. Um die pulmonale und kardiale Toxizität gering zu halten, wird im Mediastinum ein anderes Vorgehen empfohlen (Abbildung 3).Schlussfolgerung:Das Konzept der IN-Radiotherapie soll das Auftreten radiogener Toxizitäten inklusive Zweitneoplasien weiter minimieren. Die Feldgrößen werden im Vergleich zur IF-Radiotherapie weiter abnehmen (Abbildung 4).

Role of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin with a high potential of locoregional relapse after surgery alone. This report is an update of our experience in the treatment of MCC. From January 1990 to May 2000, 31 patients with MCC, 13 men and 18 women aged between 34 and 92 years, were treated at the University of Cologne, Germany. Primary tumor sites were in the head and neck region in 13 patients, limbs in 13, and trunk in 5. The tumors were stage I in 26 of 31 patients, stage II in 4 of 31 and stage III in 1 of 31. Treatment included surgery alone in 14 of 31 patients, adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy in 16 of 31 patients, 1 of them had incomplete surgery, and definitive radiotherapy in 1 of 31 patients (stage III). Median overall survival (OS) after first diagnosis was 32 months (95% confidence interval: 0-75 months) with a 3-year OS rate of 47% (95% CI: 25-69%). Six of 31 patients relapsed locally after a median of 4 months, 10 of 31 patients developed regional node metastases, and 7 of 31 patients distant metastases. Nine patients died as a direct result of MCC. Locoregional control and disease-free survival were significantly improved in the group with postoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.023). Uni- and multivariate analysis revealed that head and neck location of the tumor and the lack of postoperative radiotherapy are unfavorable prognostic factors. Postoperative radiotherapy to the primary tumor region and the regional lymphatics is effective in the prevention of locoregional recurrence. Prospective clinical trials should be performed to confirm these observations.

Flow cytometry in cancer stem cell analysis and separation

In recent years, a special type of cancer cell—the cancer stem cell (CSC)—has been identified and characterized for different tumors. CSCs may be responsible for the recurrence of a tumor following a primarily successful therapy and are thought to bear a high metastatic potential. For the development of efficient treatment strategies, the establishment of reliable methods for the identification and effective isolation of CSCs is imperative. Similar to their stem cell counterparts in bone marrow or small intestine, different cluster of differentiation surface antigens have been characterized, thus enabling researchers to identify them within the tumor bulk and to determine their degree of differentiation. In addition, functional properties characteristic of stem cells can be measured. Side population analysis is based on the stem cell‐specific activity of certain ATP‐binding cassette transporter proteins, which are able to transport fluorescent dyes out of the cells. Furthermore, the stem cell‐specific presence of aldehyde dehydrogenase isoform 1 can be used for CSC labeling. However, the flow cytometric analysis of these CSC functional features requires specific technical adjustments. This review focuses on the principles and strategies of the flow cytometric analysis of CSCs and provides an overview of current protocols as well as technical requirements and pitfalls. A special focus is set on side population analysis and analysis of ALDH activity. Flow cytometry‐based sorting principles and future flow cytometric applications for CSC analysis are also discussed.

14-Day Variant of the Bleomycin, Etoposide, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Procarbazine, and Prednisone Regimen in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of a Pilot Study of the German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group

PURPOSE This multicenter pilot study assessed the feasibility and efficacy of a time-intensified bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) regimen given in 14-day intervals (BEACOPP-14) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in advanced Hodgkins lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS From July 1997 until March 2000, 94 patients with Hodgkins lymphoma stage IIB, III, and IV were scheduled to receive eight cycles of BEACOPP-14. Consolidation radiotherapy was administered to regions with initial bulky disease or residual tumor after chemotherapy. RESULTS All patients were assessable for toxicity and treatment outcome. Eighty-six patients received the planned eight cycles of BEACOPP-14. Consolidation radiotherapy was given in 66 patients. Chemotherapy could generally be administered on schedule. Dose reductions varied among drugs but were generally low. Acute toxicity was moderate, with World Health Organization grade 3/4 leukopenia in 75%, thrombocytopenia in 23%, anemia in 65%, and infection in 12% of patients. A total of 88 patients (94%) achieved a complete remission. Four patients had progressive disease. At a median observation time of 34 months, five patients have relapsed, one patient developed a secondary non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and three deaths were documented. The overall survival and freedom from treatment failure rates at 34 months were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93% to 100%) and 90% (95% CI, 84% to 97%), respectively. CONCLUSION Acceleration of the BEACOPP baseline regimen by shortening cycle duration with G-CSF support is feasible and effective with moderate acute toxicity. On the basis of these results, the German Hodgkins Lymphoma Study Group will compare the BEACOPP-14 regimen with BEACOPP-21 escalated in a prospective multicenter randomized trial.