Hans van Dam

Distinct roles of Jun : Fos and Jun : ATF dimers in oncogenesis

Jun : Fos and Jun : ATF complexes represent two classes of AP-1 dimers that (1) preferentially bind to either heptameric or octameric AP-1 binding sites, and (2) are differently regulated by cellular signaling pathways and oncogene products. To discriminate between the functions of Jun : Fos, Jun : ATF and Jun : Jun, mutants were developed that restrict the ability of Jun to dimerize either to itself, or to Fos(-like) or ATF(-like) partners. Introduction of these mutants in chicken embryo fibroblasts shows that Jun : Fra2 and Jun : ATF2 dimers play distinct, complementary roles in in vitro oncogenesis by inducing either anchorage independence or growth factor independence, respectively. v-Jun : ATF2 rather than v-Jun : Fra2 triggers the development of primary fibrosarcomas in the chicken wing. Genes encoding extracellular matrix components seem to constitute an important subset of v-Jun : ATF2-target genes. Repression of the matrix component SPARC by Jun is essential for the induction of fibrosarcomas. Avian primary cells transformed by either Jun : Fra2 or Jun : ATF2 thus provide powerful tools for the investigation of the downstream pathways involved in oncogenesis. Further genetic studies with Jun dimerization mutants will be required to be precise and extend the specific roles of the Jun : Fos and Jun : ATF dimers during cancer progression in avian and mammalian systems.

Site-Specific Identification of SUMO-2 Targets in Cells Reveals an Inverted SUMOylation Motif and a Hydrophobic Cluster SUMOylation Motif

Reversible protein modification by small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs) is critical for eukaryotic life. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has proven effective at identifying hundreds of potential SUMO target proteins. However, direct identification of SUMO acceptor lysines in complex samples by mass spectrometry is still very challenging. We have developed a generic method for the identification of SUMO acceptor lysines in target proteins. We have identified 103 SUMO-2 acceptor lysines in endogenous target proteins. Of these acceptor lysines, 76 are situated in the SUMOylation consensus site [VILMFPC]KxE. Interestingly, eight sites fit the inverted SUMOylation consensus motif [ED]xK[VILFP]. In addition, we found direct mass spectrometric evidence for crosstalk between SUMOylation and phosphorylation with a preferred spacer between the SUMOylated lysine and the phosphorylated serine of four residues. In 16 proteins we identified a hydrophobic cluster SUMOylation motif (HCSM). SUMO conjugation of RanGAP1 and ZBTB1 via HCSMs is remarkably efficient.

Growth factors can activate ATF2 via a two-step mechanism: phosphorylation of Thr71 through the Ras-MEK-ERK pathway and of Thr69 through RalGDS-Src-p38.

Transcription factor ATF2 regulates gene expression in response to environmental changes. Upon exposure to cellular stresses, the mitogen‐activated proteinkinase (MAPK) cascades including SAPK/JNK and p38 can enhance ATF2s transactivating function through phosphorylation of Thr69 and Thr71. How ever, the mechanism of ATF2 activation by growth factors that are poor activators of JNK and p38 is still elusive. Here, we show that in fibroblasts, insulin, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and serum activate ATF2 via a so far unknown two‐step mechanism involving two distinct Ras effector pathways: the Raf–MEK–ERK pathway induces phosphorylation of ATF2 Thr71, whereas subsequent ATF2 Thr69 phosphorylation requires the Ral–RalGDS–Src–p38 pathway. Cooperation between ERK and p38 was found to be essential for ATF2 activation by these mitogens; the activity of p38 and JNK/SAPK in growth factor‐stimulated fibroblasts is insufficient to phosphorylate ATF2 Thr71 or Thr69 + 71 significantly by themselves, while ERK cannot dual phosphorylate ATF2 Thr69 + 71 efficiently. These results reveal a so far unknown mechanism by which distinct MAPK pathways and Ras effector pathways cooperate to activate a transcription factor.

The TGF-β/Smad pathway induces breast cancer cell invasion through the up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 in a spheroid invasion model system

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) has opposing roles in breast cancer progression by acting as a tumor suppressor in the initial phase, but stimulating invasion and metastasis at later stages. In contrast to the mechanisms by which TGF-β induces growth arrest, the pathways that mediate tumor invasion are not well understood. Here, we describe a TGF-β-dependent invasion assay system consisting of spheroids of MCF10A1 normal breast epithelial cells (M1) and RAS-transformed (pre-)malignant derivatives (M2 and M4) embedded in collagen gels. Both basal and TGF-β-induced invasion of these cell lines was found to correlate with their tumorigenic potential; M4 showing the most aggressive behavior and M1 showing the least. Basal invasion was strongly inhibited by the TGF-β receptor kinase inhibitor SB-431542, indicating the involvement of autocrine TGF-β or TGF-β-like activity. TGF-β-induced invasion in premalignant M2 and highly malignant M4 cells was also inhibited upon specific knockdown of Smad3 or Smad4. Interestingly, both a broad spectrum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor and a selective MMP2 and MMP9 inhibitor mitigated TGF-β-induced invasion of M4 cells, while leaving basal invasion intact. In line with this, TGF-β was found to strongly induce MMP2 and MMP9 expression in a Smad3- and Smad4-dependent manner. This collagen-embedded spheroid system therefore offers a valuable screening model for TGF-β/Smad- and MMP2- and MMP9-dependent breast cancer invasion.

Ultraviolet-radiation induced c-jun gene transcription: two AP-1 like binding sites mediate the response.

Abstract— In HeLa cells transcription of the c‐jun gene is activated strongly and rapidly by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and, to a somewhat lesser extent, by treatment with phorbol ester tumor promoters. In the same cells UV and phorbol esters only marginally enhance the abundance of RNA transcribed from the jun D gene and from the gene coding for the serum response factor (which in turn acts on the UV and phorbol ester response element of the c‐fos gene). In contrast to c‐jun, jun B transcription is induced more efficiently by phorbol ester than by UV irradiation, suggesting that the members of the jun family are differently regulated. The promoter of c‐jun carries two enhancer elements resembling AP‐1 binding sites: the junl UV response element (URE‐71 TGACATCA‐64) and the jun2 URE (‐190 TTACCTCA‐183). These elements act independently in the UV induced expression of c‐jun. In the context of the complete c‐jun promoter they seem not to be required for c‐jun induction by phorbol esters. When fused to the Herpes simplex thymidine kinase promoter, however, the isolated elements mediate induction by both UV and phorbol esters. UV and phorbol ester treatment of cells increases the binding of transcription factors to both elements. Both elements bind factors different in modification or/and constitution from AP‐1, the heterodimeric transcription factor composed of c‐Fos and c‐Jun that controls the activity of the UV and phorbol ester response element (‐72 TGAGTCA‐66) of the human collagenase gene.

A novel function of the transforming domain of E1a : repression of AP-1 activity

Adenovirus E1a represses transcription of the collagenase gene via the phorbol ester-responsive element (collTRE). The mechanism involves inhibition of the trans-activating function of the transcription factor AP-1 without reduction of its synthesis and without any apparent change in DNA binding or composition. The ability of E1a to downmodulate AP-1 is a unique property among dominant oncogenes. This repression depends on conserved region 1, one of the transforming domains of E1a, indicating that it is an integral feature of adenovirus transformation.

Genome-wide assessment of differential roles for p300 and CBP in transcription regulation

Despite high levels of homology, transcription coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein (CBP) are both indispensable during embryogenesis. They are largely known to regulate the same genes. To identify genes preferentially regulated by p300 or CBP, we performed an extensive genome-wide survey using the ChIP-seq on cell-cycle synchronized cells. We found that 57% of the tags were within genes or proximal promoters, with an overall preference for binding to transcription start and end sites. The heterogeneous binding patterns possibly reflect the divergent roles of CBP and p300 in transcriptional regulation. Most of the 16 103 genes were bound by both CBP and p300. However, after stimulation 89 and 1944 genes were preferentially bound by CBP or p300, respectively. Target genes were found to be primarily involved in the regulation of metabolic and developmental processes, and transcription, with CBP showing a stronger preference than p300 for genes active in negative regulation of transcription. Analysis of transcription factor binding sites suggest that CBP and p300 have many partners in common, but AP-1 and Serum Response Factor (SRF) appear to be more prominent in CBP-specific sequences, whereas AP-2 and SP1 are enriched in p300-specific targets. Taken together, our findings further elucidate the distinct roles of coactivators p300 and CBP in transcriptional regulation.

Ras-Dependent Regulation of c-Jun Phosphorylation Is Mediated by the Ral Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor-Ral Pathway

ABSTRACT The transcription factor c-Jun is critically involved in the regulation of proliferation and differentiation as well as cellular transformation induced by oncogenic Ras. The signal transduction pathways that couple Ras activation to c-Jun phosphorylation are still partially elusive. Here we show that an activated version of the Ras effector Rlf, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) of the small GTPase Ral, can induce the phosphorylation of serines 63 and 73 of c-Jun. In addition, we show that growth factor-induced, Ras-mediated phosphorylation of c-Jun is abolished by inhibitory mutants of the RalGEF-Ral pathway. These results suggest that the RalGEF-Ral pathway plays a major role in Ras-dependent c-Jun phosphorylation. Ral-dependent regulation of c-Jun phosphorylation includes JNK, a still elusive JNKK, and possibly Src.

Induction of ATF3 by ionizing radiation is mediated via a signaling pathway that includes ATM, Nibrin1, stress-induced MAPkinases and ATF-2

Exposure of human cells to genotoxic agents induces various signaling pathways involved in the execution of stress- and DNA-damage responses. Inappropriate functioning of the DNA-damage response to ionizing radiation (IR) is associated with the human diseases ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) and Nijmegen Breakage syndrome (NBS). Here, we show that IR efficiently induces Jun/ATF transcription factor activity in normal human diploid fibroblasts, but not in fibroblasts derived from A-T and NBS patients. IR was found to enhance the expression of c-Jun and, in particular, ATF3, but, in contrast to various other stress stimuli, did not induce the expression of c-Fos. Using specific inhibitors, we found that the ATM- and Nibrin1-dependent activation of ATF3 does neither require p53 nor reactive oxygen species, but is dependent on the p38 and JNK MAPkinases. Via these kinases, IR activates ATF-2, one of the transcription factors acting on the atf3 promoter. The activation of ATF-2 by IR resembles ATF-2 activation by certain growth factors, since IR mainly induced the second step of ATF-2 phosphorylation via the stress-inducible MAPkinases, phosphorylation of Thr69. As IR does not enhance ATF-2 phosphorylation in ATM and Nibrin1-deficient cells, both ATF-2 and ATF3 seem to play an important role in the protective response of human cells to IR.

Specific interactions between Smad proteins and AP-1 components determine TGFβ-induced breast cancer cell invasion

Deregulation of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signal transduction cascade is functionally linked to cancer. In early phases, TGFβ acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, whereas in late phases, it can act as a tumor promoter by stimulating tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Smad transcriptional effectors mediate TGFβ responses, but relatively little is known about the Smad-containing complexes that are important for epithelial–mesenchymal transition and invasion. In this study, we have tested the hypothesis that specific members of the AP-1 transcription factor family determine TGFβ signaling specificity in breast cancer cell invasion. Using a 3D model of collagen-embedded spheroids of MCF10A-MII premalignant human breast cancer cells, we identified the AP-1 transcription factor components c-Jun, JunB, c-Fos and Fra1 as essential factors for TGFβ-induced invasion and found that various mesenchymal and invasion-associated TGFβ-induced genes are co-regulated by these proteins. In situ proximity ligation assays showed that TGFβ signaling not only induces complexes between Smad3 and Smad4 in the nucleus but also complexes between Smad2/3 and Fra1, whereas complexes between Smad3, c-Jun and JunB could already be detected before TGFβ stimulation. Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitations showed that c-Jun, JunB and Fra1, but not c-Fos, are required for TGFβ-induced binding of Smad2/3 to the mmp-10 and pai-1 promoters. Together these results suggest that in particular formation of Smad2/3-Fra1 complexes may reflect activation of the Smad/AP-1-dependent TGFβ-induced invasion program.