Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Hans van de Koot is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Hans van de Koot.


Linguistic Inquiry | 2002

The Configurational Matrix

Ad Neeleman; Hans van de Koot

This article presents a theory of grammatical dependencies that is in accordance with basic assumptions of bare phrase structure theory. It explains Kosters (1987) configurational matrix, the observation that such dependencies share five properties: c-command by the antecedent, obligatoriness, uniqueness of the antecedent, nonuniqueness of the dependent, and locality. The theory is based on two primitive syntactic relations (copying and function application) and a nonatomic view of nodes.


Journal of Neurolinguistics | 2016

Syntactic predictions and asyntactic comprehension in aphasia: Evidence from scope relations

Maria Varkanitsa; Dimitrios Kasselimis; Andrew J. B. Fugard; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Judit Druks; Constantin Potagas; Hans van de Koot

People with aphasia (PWA) often fail to understand syntactically complex sentences. This phenomenon has been described as asyntactic comprehension and has been explored in various studies cross-linguistically in the past decades. However, until now there has been no consensus among researchers as to the nature of sentence comprehension failures in aphasia. Impaired representations accounts ascribe comprehension deficits to loss of syntactic knowledge, whereas processing/resource reduction accounts assume that PWA are unable to use syntactic knowledge in comprehension due to resource limitation resulting from the brain damage. The aim of this paper is to use independently motivated psycholinguistic models of sentence processing to test a variant of the processing/resource reduction accounts that we dub the Complexity Threshold Hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, PWA are capable of building well-formed syntactic representations, but, because their resources for language processing are limited, their syntactic parser fails when processing complexity exceeds a certain threshold. The source of complexity investigated in the experiments reported in this paper is syntactic prediction. We conducted two experiments involving comprehension of sentences with different types of syntactic dependencies, namely dependencies that do not require syntactic prediction (i.e. unpredictable dependencies in sentences that require Quantifier Raising) and dependencies whose resolution requires syntactic predictions at an early stage of processing based on syntactic cues (i.e. predictable dependencies in movement-derived sentences). In line with the predictions of the Complexity Threshold Hypothesis, the results show that the agrammatic patients that participated in this study had no difficulties comprehending sentences with the former type of dependencies, whereas their comprehension of sentences with the latter type of dependencies was impaired.


The Linguistic Review | 2010

Information-structural restrictions on Ā-scrambling

Ad Neeleman; Hans van de Koot

Abstract Ā-scrambling in Dutch gives rise to ungrammaticality if it places an element subordinate in information structure in a position where it c-commands a superordinate element, even though a base-generated configuration of this type is well-formed. We propose an account of this phenomenon based on two claims: (i) Ā-scrambling is a scope-marking movement and (ii) scope-extending movement creates a barrier for QR. The bulk of our evidence comes from interactions between topics and foci, but we also consider interactions between foci that are in a superordinate/subordinate relation from an information-structural perspective. Exploration of the focus data reveals a further constraint that affects foci accompanied by a focus-sensitive particle: their surface c-command relations must directly correspond to their information-structural position, even if no Ā-scrambling takes place. We argue that this is because QR cannot pied-pipe focus-sensitive particles, possibly because it involves feature movement.


The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics | 2008

Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates

Ad Neeleman; Hans van de Koot


Syntax | 2010

A Local Encoding of Syntactic Dependencies and Its Consequences for the Theory of Movement

Ad Neeleman; Hans van de Koot


Lingua | 1995

The computational complexity of natural language recognition: A tutorial overview*

Hans van de Koot


Archive | 1994

On the Status of the Projection Principle in the Minimalist Program

Hans van de Koot


Archive | 2016

Word Order and Information Structure

Ad Neeleman; Hans van de Koot


Archive | 2012

Chapter 2. Towards a Unified Encoding of Contrast and Scope

Ad Neeleman; Hans van de Koot


Lingua | 2006

Neil Smith's linguistics

Robyn Carston; Diane Blakemore; Hans van de Koot

Collaboration


Dive into the Hans van de Koot's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ad Neeleman

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judit Druks

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robyn Carston

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Constantin Potagas

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dimitrios Kasselimis

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ioannis Evdokimidis

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge