Hanyu Ni

Pre-operative renal function predicts development of chronic renal insufficiency after orthotopic heart transplantation

BACKGROUND Risk factors for the development of chronic renal insufficiency after solid-organ transplantation remain unclear. METHODS We conducted a 5-year retrospective analysis of all adult patients (n = 160) who survived >1 year after orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution from 1985 through 1992. Study subjects were classified into 3 groups based on peri-operative renal function: (1) pre-operative creatinine concentration <1.5 mg/dl and a post-operative (first 4 days) creatinine <2.0 mg/dl (n = 75); (2) pre-operative creatinine of <1.5 mg/dl but a post-operative creatinine of >2.0 mg/dl (n = 47); (3) pre-operative creatinine of >1.5 mg/dl (n = 38). The association between development of chronic renal insufficiency and peri-operative renal dysfunction was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS A total of 47 (29.4%) patients experienced chronic renal insufficiency (serial serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dl on 2 or more monthly examinations). The mean pre-operative serum creatinine was 1.6 mg/dl in patients who experienced chronic renal insufficiency, whereas it was 1.3 mg/dl in patients who did not (p < 0.01). The fraction of patients in whom chronic renal insufficiency developed was highest in Group 3 (55.3%), lower in Group 2 (25.5%), and lowest in Group 1 (18.7%) (p < 0.01). After adjusting for multiple potential confounding variables, including cyclosporine dosage, the risk of chronic renal insufficiency linearly decreased in the 3 groups, stratified by peri-operative renal function (relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.7). However, the difference in relative risk of renal insufficiency was not statistically significant between Group 2 and Group 1. CONCLUSION Pre-operative serum creatinine concentration predicts development of renal insufficiency after heart transplantation.

Clinical profiles of four large pedigrees with familial dilated cardiomyopathy: Preliminary recommendations for clinical practice☆

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to characterize the clinical profile of familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) in the families of four index patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and to provide clinical practice recommendations for physicians dealing with these diseases. BACKGROUND Recent evidence indicates that approximately one-half of patients diagnosed with IDC will have FDC, a genetically transmissible disease, but the clinical profile of families screened for FDC in the U.S. has not been well documented. Additionally, recent ethical guidelines suggest increased responsibilities in caring for patients with newly found genetic cardiovascular disease. METHODS After identification of four families with FDC, we undertook clinical screening including medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Diagnostic criteria for FDC-affected status of asymptomatic family members was based on left ventricular enlargement (LVE). Subjects with confounding cardiovascular diagnoses or body mass indices >35 were excluded. RESULTS We identified 798 living members from the four FDC pedigrees, and screened 216 adults and 129 children (age <16 years). Twenty percent of family members were found to be affected with FDC; 82.8% of those affected were asymptomatic. All four pedigrees demonstrated autosomal dominant patterns of inheritance. The average left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 61.4 mm for affected and 48.4 mm for unaffected subjects, with an average age of 38.3 years (+/- 14.6 years) for affected and 32.1 years for unaffected subjects. The age of onset for FDC varied considerably between and within families. Presenting symptoms when present were decompensated heart failure or sudden death. CONCLUSIONS We propose that with a new diagnosis of IDC, a thorough family history for FDC should be obtained, followed by echocardiographic-based screening of first-degree relatives for LVE, assuming their voluntary participation. If a diagnosis of FDC is established, we suggest further screening of first-degree relatives, and all subjects with FDC undergo medical treatment following established guidelines. Counseling of family members should emphasize the heritable nature of the disease, the age-dependent penetrance and the unpredictable clinical course.

Analysis of trends in hospitalizations for heart failure

BACKGROUND Over the past 10 years, efforts have been made to control the cost of care for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) through reducing hospitalizations and shortening lengths of stay. Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of these intervention strategies on a community basis. METHODS AND RESULTS We analyzed the Oregon hospital discharge database. Multivariable methods were used to assess trends while controlling for confounding factors, such as age, sex, and comorbidity. The hospital admission rates for CHF were stable over time in all age groups. The age- and sex-standardized admission rate among people aged 65 years or older decreased slightly from 13.9/1,000 in 1991 to 12.9/1,000 in 1995. The annual hospital readmission rate remained constant over time, with an average rate of 15.3%. The average length of hospital stay decreased from 5.01 days in 1991 to 3.95 days in 1995. The in-hospital mortality rate decreased from 6.9% in 1991 to 4.7% in 1995, independent of length of stay. CONCLUSION We observed stable hospital admission and readmission rates for CHF, accompanied by a decreasing trend in the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Our findings raise the possibility of improved care management for heart failure over time.

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy: echocardiographic diagnostic criteria for classification of family members as affected.

BACKGROUND Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular enlargement (LVE) used to classify subjects as affected in families with familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) have been inconsistent. A recent report from a large Framingham echocardiographic study provides an opportunity to improve the assignment of LVE and FDC in kindreds, principally with a dilated phenotype. The objective of this study is to evaluate an alternative diagnostic criteria for FDC based only on LVE with no measure of fractional shortening (FS). METHODS AND RESULTS We compared our proposed criteria for LVE and FDC with previous approaches by applying them to 166 adults derived from three large FDC pedigrees. Our proposed FDC diagnostic criteria are a sex- and height-specific method based only on LVE, without regard for FS, set as a 97.5% upper limit for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) from the Framingham study. Other methods used to assign LVE were (1) a 95% upper limit for LVEDD by the Framingham study; (2) the method of Henry et al. (1980) based on age and body surface area (BSA); and (3) the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) method with a cut point of LVEDD greater than 2.7 cm/BSA. Three other commonly used diagnostic criteria for FDC were based on various LVE standards combined with an FS of 27% to 30%. For LVE, the Framingham-97.5% was the most stringent (21 of 134 subjects identified; 15.7%), the NHLBI standard the least stringent (57 of 161 subjects identified; 35.4%), and the Henry-112% method intermediate (44 of 161 subjects identified; 27.3%). More women were identified with the Framingham method (57.1%) versus the Henry-112% (40.9%). The Henry-112% and NHLBI methods identified 11.4% and 7.0% of subjects with body mass indices (BMIs) of 35 or greater, respectively. For FDC, our proposed FDC diagnostic criteria identified similar numbers of subjects (21 subjects) as the three other criteria (range, 22 to 27 subjects), but inconsistency was noted (54.2% to 66.7%), with kappa values from 0.49 to 0.55 resulting from different sensitivities to sex, LVE, FS, and BMI. CONCLUSION Our proposed FDC diagnostic criteria are stringent to assign FDC family members as affected compared with other commonly used criteria. The use of LVEDD alone may be preferable for FDC family screening, although further validation of this approach with phenotypic and genotypic data from other large FDC pedigrees is needed.

Distribution and declines in cardiac allograft radionuclide left ventricular ejection fractions in relation to late mortality

BACKGROUND Cardiac allograft left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important measure of left ventricular systolic function. Despite widespread use of LVEF after transplantation, its normal range and prognostic value in cardiac allografts has not been defined. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study among 292 consecutive adult heart transplant patients. Left ventricular ejection fractions were performed at 1, 3, 12, 24, and 48 months after transplantation using radionuclide ventriculography. Endomyocardial biopsies assessed rejection, right heart catheterization assessed loading conditions, and angiography assessed allograft coronary artery disease. We used Cox proportional hazards model to examine the predictive value of LVEF on late mortality. RESULTS Of the patients who survived > or =4 years, the mean allograft LVEF decreased 4.7 units at 3 months, from 63.8 to 59.7; an additional 4.1 units at 12 months, from 59.7 to 55.6 (p < 0.001); and remained stable afterward. These changes were not associated with concurrent changes in loading conditions, episodes of rejection, or development of allograft coronary artery disease. Left ventricular ejection fraction lower than the 95% normal limit (<40%) at 12 months was inversely associated with risk for late cardiac mortality (relative risk = 3.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.0-12.2), while controlling for recipient age, sex, donor age, and rejection episodes. CONCLUSIONS The cardiac-allograft LVEF frequently decreases in the first year after transplantation. The 95th percentile of allograft LVEF value (<40%) at Year 1 predicts late cardiac mortality among transplant recipients.