Harald Seeberger

Immune Evasion of the Human Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Elongation Factor Tuf Is a Factor H and Plasminogen Binding Protein

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen that can cause a wide range of clinical symptoms and infections that are frequent in immunocompromised patients. In this study, we show that P. aeruginosa evades human complement attack by binding the human plasma regulators Factor H and Factor H-related protein-1 (FHR-1) to its surface. Factor H binds to intact bacteria via two sites that are located within short consensus repeat (SCR) domains 6–7 and 19–20, and FHR-1 binds within SCR domain 3–5. A P. aeruginosa Factor H binding protein was isolated using a Factor H affinity matrix, and was identified by mass spectrometry as the elongation factor Tuf. Factor H uses the same domains for binding to recombinant Tuf and to intact bacteria. Factor H bound to recombinant Tuf displayed cofactor activity for degradation of C3b. Similarly Factor H bound to intact P. aeruginosa showed complement regulatory activity and mediated C3b degradation. This acquired complement control was rather effective and acted in concert with endogenous proteases. Immunolocalization identified Tuf as a surface protein of P. aeruginosa. Tuf also bound plasminogen, and Tuf-bound plasminogen was converted by urokinase plasminogen activator to active plasmin. Thus, at the bacterial surface Tuf acts as a virulence factor and binds the human complement regulator Factor H and plasminogen. Acquisition of host effector proteins to the surface of the pathogen allows complement control and may facilitate tissue invasion.

Binding of complement factor H to endothelial cells is mediated by the carboxy-terminal glycosaminoglycan binding site

Factor H (FH), the major fluid phase regulator of the alternative complement pathway, mediates protection of plasma-exposed host structures. It has recently been shown that short consensus repeats 19 to 20 of FH are mutational hot spots associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a disease with endothelial cell damage. Domain 20 of FH contains binding sites for heparin, C3b, and the cleavage product C3d. To study the role of these binding sites in target recognition, we performed site-directed mutagenesis in domain 20 and assayed the resulting recombinant proteins. The mutant FH15-20A (substitutions R1203E, R1206E, and R1210S) bound neither heparin nor endothelial cells. Similarly, an aHUS-derived mutant FH protein (E1172Stop, lacking domain 20) failed to bind endothelial cells and showed impaired binding to heparin. Binding of FH to endothelial cells was inhibited by heparin and a specific monoclonal antibody that inhibited heparin but not C3d binding, demonstrating that the heparin site on domains 19 to 20 mediates interaction of FH to endothelial cells. Binding of FH15-20 to heparin was inhibited by several cell surface- and basement membrane-associated glycosaminoglycans, suggesting that binding site specificity is not restricted to heparin. Thus, defective heparin/glycosaminoglycan-binding site on domains 19 to 20 of FH most probably mediates complement-induced endothelial cell damage in aHUS.

Factor H-related protein 1 neutralizes anti-factor H autoantibodies in autoimmune hemolytic uremic syndrome

The autoimmune form of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is characterized by circulating autoantibodies against the complement regulator factor H, and is often associated with deficiency of the factor H-related proteins CFHR1 and CFHR3. Here we studied whether anti-factor H autoantibodies crossreact with CFHR1, and determined functional consequences of this. In ELISA, anti-factor H immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies from 24 atypical HUS patients bound to the short consensus repeat 20 domain of factor H, 21 antibodies also recognized CFHR1, but none CFHR3. Three patients also had anti-factor H IgA autoantibodies crossreacting with CFHR1. Analysis of the IgG fractions in CFHR1-deficient patients found that CFHR1-IgG complexes were formed during plasma exchange treatment, indicating that autoantibodies recognize CFHR1 in vivo. Recombinant CFHR1 prevented hemolysis of sheep erythrocytes caused by patient plasma containing anti-factor H IgG, but it did not inhibit red cell lysis caused by a factor H mutation (W1183 L) in the short consensus repeat 20 domain. Thus, exogenous CFHR1 provided during plasma exchange therapy may neutralize anti-factor H autoantibodies and help in the treatment of autoimmune atypical HUS.

The Major Autoantibody Epitope on Factor H in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Is Structurally Different from Its Homologous Site in Factor H-related Protein 1, Supporting a Novel Model for Induction of Autoimmunity in This Disease.

Background: It is unknown why patients with autoantibodies against complement factor H (CFH) lack homologous CFHR1 protein. Results: The autoantibody epitope on CFH was identified, and the structure of the corresponding part of CFHR1 was solved. Conclusion: The autoantigenic epitope of CFH and its homologous site in CFHR1 are structurally different. Significance: A plausible explanation for formation of autoantibodies due to CFHR1 deficiency in autoimmune atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome was obtained. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is characterized by complement attack against host cells due to mutations in complement proteins or autoantibodies against complement factor H (CFH). It is unknown why nearly all patients with autoimmune aHUS lack CFHR1 (CFH-related protein-1). These patients have autoantibodies against CFH domains 19 and 20 (CFH19–20), which are nearly identical to CFHR1 domains 4 and 5 (CFHR14–5). Here, binding site mapping of autoantibodies from 17 patients using mutant CFH19–20 constructs revealed an autoantibody epitope cluster within a loop on domain 20, next to the two buried residues that are different in CFH19–20 and CFHR14–5. The crystal structure of CFHR14–5 revealed a difference in conformation of the autoantigenic loop in the C-terminal domains of CFH and CFHR1, explaining the variation in binding of autoantibodies from some aHUS patients to CFH19–20 and CFHR14–5. The autoantigenic loop on CFH seems to be generally flexible, as its conformation in previously published structures of CFH19–20 bound to the microbial protein OspE and a sialic acid glycan is somewhat altered. Cumulatively, our data suggest that association of CFHR1 deficiency with autoimmune aHUS could be due to the structural difference between CFHR1 and the autoantigenic CFH epitope, suggesting a novel explanation for CFHR1 deficiency in the pathogenesis of autoimmune aHUS.