Harald Wajant

Tumor necrosis factor signaling

AbstractA single mouse click on the topic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in PubMed reveals about 50u2009000 articles providing one or the other information about this pleiotropic cytokine or its relatives. This demonstrates the enormous scientific and clinical interest in elucidating the biology of a molecule (or rather a large family of molecules), which began now almost 30 years ago with the description of a cytokine able to exert antitumoral effects in mouse models. Although our understanding of the multiple functions of TNF in vivo and of the respective underlying mechanisms at a cellular and molecular level has made enormous progress since then, new aspects are steadily uncovered and it appears that still much needs to be learned before we can conclude that we have a full comprehension of TNF biology. This review shortly covers some general aspects of this fascinating molecule and then concentrates on the molecular mechanisms of TNF signal transduction. In particular, the multiple facets of crosstalk between the various signalling pathways engaged by TNF will be addressed.

The transmembrane form of tumor necrosis factor is the prime activating ligand of the 80 kDa tumor necrosis factor receptor.

The 60 kDa tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR60) is regarded as the major signal transducer of TNF-induced cellular responses, whereas the signal capacity and role of the 80 kDa TNFR (TNFR80) remain largely undefined. We show here that the transmembrane form of TNF is superior to soluble TNF in activating TNFR80 in various systems such as T cell activation, thymocyte proliferation, and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor production. Intriguingly, activation of TNFR80 by membrane TNF can lead to qualitatively different TNF responses such as rendering resistant tumor cells sensitive to TNF-mediated cytotoxicity. This study demonstrates that the diversity of TNF effects can be controlled through the differential sensitivity of TNFR80 for the two forms of TNF and suggests an important physiological role for TNFR80 in local inflammatory responses.

The TNF-receptor-associated factor family: Scaffold molecules for cytokine receptors, kinases and their regulators

The TNF-receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family is a phylogenetically conserved group of scaffold proteins that link receptors of the IL-1R/Toll and TNF receptor family to signalling cascades, leading to the activation of NF-kappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinases. Furthermore, TRAF proteins serve as a docking platform for a variety of regulators of these signalling pathways and are themselves often regulated at the transcriptional and posttranslational level. In this review, we address the structural and molecular basis of TRAF protein functions and highlight their role in cytokine signalling.

Induction of cell death by tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor 2, CD40 and CD30: a role for TNF-R1 activation by endogenous membrane-anchored TNF.

Several members of the tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNF‐R) superfamily can induce cell death. For TNF‐R1, Fas/APO‐1, DR3, DR6, TRAIL‐R1 and TRAIL‐R2, a conserved ‘death domain’ in the intracellular region couples these receptors to activation of caspases. However, it is not yet known how TNF receptor family members lacking a death domain, such as TNF‐R2, CD40, LT‐βR, CD27 or CD30, execute their death‐inducing capability. Here we demonstrate in different cellular systems that cytotoxic effects induced by TNF‐R2, CD40 and CD30 are mediated by endogenous production of TNF and autotropic or paratropic activation of TNF‐R1. In addition, stimulation of TNF‐R2 and CD40 synergistically enhances TNF‐R1‐induced cytotoxicity. These findings describe a novel pro‐apoptotic mechanism induced by some members of the TNF‐R family.

Non-apoptotic Fas signaling

Fas (Apo-1, CD95) and Fas-Ligand (FasL, CD95L) are typical members of the TNF receptor and TNF ligand family, respectively, with a pivotal role in the regulation of apoptotic processes, including activation-induced cell death, T-cell-induced cytotoxicity, immune privilege and tumor surveillance. Impairment of the FasL/Fas system has been implicated in liver failure, autoimmune diseases and immune deficiency. Thus, the FasL/Fas system was mainly appreciated with respect to its death-inducing capabilities. However, there is increasing evidence that activation of Fas can also result in non-apoptotic responses like cell proliferation or NF-kappaB activation. While the apoptotic features of the FasL/Fas system and the pathways involved are comparably well investigated, the pathways that are utilized by Fas to transduce proliferative and activating signals are poorly understood. This review is focused on the non-apoptotic functions of the FasL/Fas system. In particular, the similarities and differences of the molecular mechanisms of apoptotic and non-apoptotic Fas signaling are addressed.

Inhibition of death receptor-mediated gene induction by a cycloheximide-sensitive factor occurs at the level of or upstream of Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD).

In HeLa cells, induction of apoptosis and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation initiated by TRAIL/Apo2L or the agonistic Apo1/Fas-specific monoclonal antibody anti-APO-1 require the presence of cycloheximide (CHX). Inhibition of caspases prevented TRAIL/anti-APO-1-induced apoptosis, but not NF-κB activation, indicating that both pathways bifurcate upstream of the receptor-proximal caspase-8. Under these conditions, TRAIL and anti-APO-1 up-regulated the expression of the known NF-κB targets interleukin-6, cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 2 (cIAP2), and TRAF1 (TRAF, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associate factor). In the presence of CHX, the stable overexpression of a deletion mutant of the Fas-associated death domain molecule FADD comprising solely the death domain of the molecule but lacking its death effector domain (FADD-(80–208)) led to the same response pattern as TRAIL or anti-APO-1 treatment. Moreover, the ability of death receptors to induce NF-κB activation was drastically reduced in a FADD-deficient Jurkat cell line. TRAIL-, anti-APO-1-, and FADD-(80–208)-initiated gene induction was blocked by a dominant-negative mutant of TRAF2 or the p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580, similar to tumor necrosis factor receptor-1-induced NF-κB activation. CHX treatment rapidly down-regulated endogenous cFLIP protein levels, and overexpression of cellular FLICE inhibitory protein (cFLIP) inhibited death receptor-induced NF-κB activation. Thus, a novel functional role of cFLIP as a negative regulator of gene induction by death receptors became apparent.

The human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 1 gene (TRAF1) is up-regulated by cytokines of the TNF ligand family and modulates TNF-induced activation of NF-κB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase

To understand how the TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) is transcriptionally regulated, in vitroDNA binding assays, promoter-reporter gene assays, and RNase protection assays were performed with the human TRAF1 gene. Binding of NF-κB to three of five putative binding sites within the human TRAF1 promoter was found in electrophoretic mobility shift assay studies, and analysis of TRAF1 gene promoter luciferase constructs confirmed the functional importance of these elements. Moreover, triggering of TNF-R1, CD40, and the interleukin-1 receptor resulted in transcription of the TRAF1 gene, whereas receptors that are not activators or only poor activators of NF-κB in HeLa cells failed to show a significant TRAF1 induction. Because it has been shown that members of the TRAF family are involved in activation of NF-κB and the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by the interleukin-1 receptor and members of the TNF receptor superfamily, a role of TRAF1 in receptor cross-talk and/or feedback regulation of activated receptor signaling complexes can be suggested. In fact, we found that TNF-induced activation of JNK is prolonged in transfectants overexpressing TRAF1, whereas overexpression of a deletion mutant of TRAF1 in which the N-terminal part had been replaced by the green fluorescent protein interfered with TNF-induced activation of NF-κB and JNK.

Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 2 and its role in TNF signaling.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is the prototypic member of the TNF ligand family and has a key role in the regulation of inflammatory processes. TNF exerts its functions by interaction with the death domain-containing TNF-receptor 1 (TNF-R1) and the non-death domain-containing TNF-receptor 2 (TNF-R2), both members of a receptor family complementary to the TNF ligand family. Due to the prototypic features of the TNF receptors and their importance for the regulation of inflammation, the signal transduction mechanisms utilized by these receptors have been extensively studied. Several proteins that interact directly or indirectly with the cytoplasmic domains of TNF-R1 and TNF-R2 have been identified in the recent years giving ideas how these receptors are connected to the apoptotic pathway and the signaling cascades leading to activation of NF-kappaB and JNK. Of special interest are TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 1 and 2, which defines a novel group of adaptor proteins involved in signal transduction by most members of the TNF receptor family, of IL-1 receptor and IL-17 receptor as well as some members of the TOLL-like receptor family. TRAF 2 is currently the best-characterized TRAF family member, having a key role in mediating TNF-R1-induced activation of NF-kappaB and JNK. Moreover, recent studies suggest that TRAF 2 represents an integration point for pro- and antiapoptotic signals. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms that underlay signal initiation by TNF-R1 and TNF-R2, with particular consideration of the role of TRAF 2, and highlights the importance of this molecule for the integration of such antagonizing pathways as death induction and NF-kappaB-mediated surviving signals.

Dominant-negative FADD inhibits TNFR60-, Fas/Apo1- and TRAIL-R/Apo2-mediated cell death but not gene induction.

Fas/Apo1 and other cytotoxic receptors of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family contain a cytoplasmic death domain (DD) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] that activates the apoptotic process by interacting with the DD-containing adaptor proteins TNFR-associated DD protein (TRADD) [12] [13] and Fas-associated DD protein (FADD/MORT1) [14] [15], leading to the activation of cysteine proteases of the caspase family [16]. Stimulation of Fas/Apo1 leads to the formation of a receptor-bound death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), consisting of FADD and two different forms of caspase-8 [17] [18] [19]. Transient expression of a dominant-negative mutant of FADD impairs TNFR60-mediated and Fas/Apo1-mediated apoptosis [13] [20], but has no effect on TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/Apo2L)-induced cell death [7] [8] [9] [10] [21]. To study the function of FADD in DD-receptor signaling in more detail, we established HeLa cells that stably expressed a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged dominant-negative mutant of FADD, GFP-DeltaFADD. Interestingly, expression of this mutant inhibited cell death induced by TNFR60, Fas/Apo1 and TRAIL-R/Apo2. In addition, GFP-DeltaFADD did not interfere with TNF-mediated gene induction or with activation of NF-kappaB or Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), demonstrating that FADD is part of the TNFR60-initiated apoptotic pathway but does not play a role in TNFR60-mediated gene induction. Fas/Apo1-mediated activation of JNK was unaffected by the expression of GFP-DeltaFADD, suggesting that in Fas/Apo1 signaling the apoptotic pathway and the activation of JNK diverge at a level proximal to the receptor, upstream of or parallel to FADD.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor type 2 mediates thymocyte proliferation independently of TNF receptor type 1

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) mediates its biological effects by binding to two distinct but homologous receptor molecules. The type 1 receptor (TNF‐R1) has been shown to be essential and sufficient for most cellular responses to soluble TNF. In contrast, only limited data exist concerning the role of the type 2 receptor (TNF‐R2) in TNF responses, both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we demonstrate by the use of thymocytes from TNF‐R‐deficient mice that the TNF‐R2‐dependent enhancement of proliferation and secretion of granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor is in fact mediated by TNF‐R2 on its own, independent of co‐expression and/or stimulation of TNF‐R1.