Harm W. Boons

Moderate to large engaging Hill-Sachs defects: an in vitro biomechanical comparison of the remplissage procedure, allograft humeral head reconstruction, and partial resurfacing arthroplasty

BACKGROUND The management of engaging Hill-Sachs defects (HSD) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare 3 treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight specimens were tested on a shoulder simulator. The protocol involved testing 2 unrepaired HSD (30% and 45%), which were then treated with remplissage, humeral head allograft (HHA), and partial resurfacing arthroplasty (PRA). Stability (defect engagement and glenohumeral stiffness) and range of motion (ROM) were measured. RESULTS All 30% and 45% HSDs engaged and dislocated. Remplissage and HHA effectively prevented engagement in all specimens; however, 62% of PRA engaged. No repair exhibited stiffness significantly greater than intact, but 30% and 45% remplissage produced a 74% and 207% increase, respectively, and were significantly greater than the unrepaired states (P ≤ .047). Stiffness results for HHA and PRA closely matched those of intact. In adduction, remplissage reduced internal-external ROM compared with both defects (P ≤ .01), but only 30% remplissage caused a significant decrease compared with intact (P = .049). In abduction, all repairs reduced ROM compared with HSD (P ≤ .04), but none compared with intact (P ≥ 0.05). In extension, remplissage had significantly less ROM than either HHA or PRA (P ≤ .02). CONCLUSION All procedures improved stability; however, unlike remplissage, results from HHA and PRA closely resembled intact. Remplissage (30% and 45%) improved stability and eliminated engagement but caused reductions in ROM. HHA and PRA re-established intact ROM, but PRA could not fully prevent engagement. The effects of each technique are not equivalent and further studies are required.

Does the dynamic sling effect of the Latarjet procedure improve shoulder stability? A biomechanical evaluation

INTRODUCTION Glenohumeral instability with glenoid bone loss is commonly treated with the Latarjet procedure. The procedure involves transfer of the coracoid and conjoint tendon, which is thought to provide a stabilizing sling effect; however, its significance is unknown. This study evaluated the effects of the Latarjet procedure, with and without conjoint tendon loading, on shoulder stability and range of motion (ROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS A custom simulator was used to evaluate anterior shoulder stability and ROM in 8 cadaveric shoulders. Testing conditions included intact, 30% glenoid defect, and Latarjet with and without conjoint loading. Unloaded and 10-N loaded states were tested in adduction and 90° abduction. Outcome variables included dislocation, stiffness (neutral and 60° external rotation), and internal-external rotational ROM. RESULTS All 30% defects dislocated in abduction external rotation. The loaded Latarjet prevented dislocation in all specimens, whereas the unloaded Latarjet stabilized 6 of 8 specimens. In abduction external rotation, there were no significant differences in stiffness between loaded and unloaded transfers (P = .176). In adduction, there were no significant differences between the intact and the loaded Latarjet (P ≥ .228); however, in neutral rotation, the unloaded Latarjet (P = .015) and the 30% defects (P = .011) were significantly less stiff. Rotational ROM in abduction was significantly reduced with the loaded Latarjet (P = .014) compared with unloaded Latarjet, and no differences were found in adduction. CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that glenohumeral stability is improved, but not fully restored to intact, with conjoint tendon loading. The results support the existence of the sling effect and its importance in augmenting stability provided by the transferred coracoid.

The Effect of the Remplissage Procedure on Shoulder Stability and Range of Motion: An in Vitro Biomechanical Assessment

BACKGROUND The remplissage procedure may be performed as an adjunct to Bankart repair to treat recurrent glenohumeral dislocation associated with an engaging Hill-Sachs humeral head defect. The purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study was to examine the effects of the remplissage procedure on glenohumeral joint motion and stability. METHODS Cadaveric shoulders (n = 8) were mounted on a biomechanical testing apparatus that applies simulated loads to the rotator cuff and the anterior, middle, and posterior heads of the deltoid muscle. Testing was performed with the shoulder intact, after creation of the Bankart lesion, and after repair of the Bankart lesion. In addition, testing was performed after Bankart repair with and without remplissage in shoulders with 15% and 30% Hill-Sachs defects. Shoulder motion and glenohumeral translation were recorded with an optical tracking system. Outcomes measured included stability (joint stiffness and defect engagement) and internal-external glenohumeral rotational motion in adduction and in 90° of composite shoulder abduction. RESULTS In specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, Bankart repair combined with remplissage resulted in a significant reduction in internal-external range of motion in adduction (15.1° ± 11.1°, p = 0.039), but not in abduction (7.7° ± 9.9, p = 0.38), compared with the intact condition. In specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect, repair that included remplissage also significantly reduced internal-external range of motion in adduction (14.5° ± 11.3°, p = 0.049) but not in abduction (6.2° ± 9.3°, p = 0.60). In specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, addition of remplissage significantly increased joint stiffness compared with isolated Bankart repair (p = 0.038), with the stiffness trending toward surpassing the level in the intact condition (p = 0.060). In specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect, addition of remplissage restored joint stiffness to approximately normal (p = 0.41 compared with the intact condition). All of the specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect engaged and dislocated after Bankart repair alone. The addition of remplissage was effective in preventing engagement and dislocation in all specimens. None of the specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect engaged or dislocated after Bankart repair. CONCLUSIONS In this experimental model, addition of remplissage provided little additional benefit to a Bankart repair in specimens with a 15% Hill-Sachs defect, and it also reduced specific shoulder motions. However, Bankart repair alone was ineffective in preventing engagement and recurrent dislocation in specimens with a 30% Hill-Sachs defect. The addition of remplissage to the Bankart repair in these specimens prevented engagement and enhanced stability, although at the expense of some reduction in shoulder motion.

The shoulder remplissage procedure for Hill-Sachs defects: does technique matter?

BACKGROUND This biomechanical study evaluated the effects of 3 remplissage techniques on shoulder stability and motion in a Hill-Sachs (HS) instability model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cadaveric forequarters were tested on an active shoulder simulator. Three remplissage techniques were performed for 15% and 30% HS defects. Testing conditions included intact and 15% and 30% HS defects, and the 3 remplissage techniques: T1, anchors in the defect valley; T2, anchors in humeral head rim; and T3, anchors in valley with medial suture placement. Outcomes included stability, internal-external rotation range of motion (IE-ROM), and joint stiffness. RESULTS All remplissage techniques improved shoulder stability. In 15% HS defects tested in adduction, T3 significantly reduced IE-ROM (P = .037), whereas T1 and T2 did also (mean IE-ROM reductions: T1, 14°; T2, 11°; T3, 21°), but not to significance (P ≥ .088). In abduction, no significant reductions in IE-ROM occurred (P ≥ .060). In 30% HS defects tested in adduction (mean reduction IE-ROM: T1, 11°; T2, 19°; T3, 28°) and abduction (mean reduction: T1, 9°; T2, 15°; T3, 21°), all techniques significantly reduced IE-ROM (P ≤ .046). All techniques increased joint stiffness from 100% to 320% beyond the Bankart repair alone. A significant increase in joint stiffness was observed for T3 compared with the 30% HS group (P = .004), whereas T2 trended toward an increase (P = .078). There was no significant increase in joint stiffness with T1 (P = .249). CONCLUSIONS All remplissage techniques enhanced shoulder stability, restricted ROM, and increased joint stiffness. No significant differences were found between anchors placed in the valley (T1) vs those placed in the humeral head rim (T2). Medial suture placement (T3) resulted in the greatest joint stiffness values and mean restriction in motion.

The effect of the conjoined tendon of the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis on shoulder stability and kinematics during in-vitro simulation

The kinematics and stability of the shoulder during in-vitro simulation are affected by the muscles chosen for simulation and their loads. Existing simulators have commonly actuated the rotator cuff and deltoids; however, the contribution of secondary muscles, such as those which form the conjoined tendon, are not well understood. The conjoined tendon consists of the origins of the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis (SH&C), and is thought to produce an anterior stabilizing effect. This study investigated the effect of SH&C tension at four loading levels: 0, 5, 10, 15N. Our primary outcome variable was glenohumeral stiffness for anterior loading but internal/external rotation and extension ranges of motion were also measured. Four joint configurations were tested: adduction and 90° combined abduction, each in neutral and maximal external rotation. Increasing SH&C load resulted in a significant trend of increased glenohumeral stiffness across the average of all joint configurations (p=0.008). In abduction, neutral rotation differences were found between the stiffness at 10 and 15N compared to 0N (p=0.038 and 0.043, respectively); however, no differences were found for the three other joint configurations. There was a tendency for a decrease in the range of shoulder extension with increasing SH&C load, but this did not achieve significance (p=0.065). These findings demonstrate that the SH&C provides a stabilizing barrier effect, but only in configurations when it wraps directly anterior to the humeral head. Thus SH&C loading is likely critical to in-vitro simulation due to its effect on joint stability and kinematics.

A biomechanical assessment of superior shoulder translation after reconstruction of anterior glenoid bone defects: The Latarjet procedure versus allograft reconstruction

Background: The coracoacromial ligament (CAL) is an important restraint to superior shoulder translation. The effect of CAL release on superior stability following the Latarjet is unknown; therefore, our purpose was to compare the effect of two Latarjet techniques and allograft reconstruction on superior instability. Materials and Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a simulator. Superior translation was monitored following an axial force in various glenohumeral rotations (neutral, internal, and external) with and without muscle loading. Three intact CAL states were tested (intact specimen, 30% glenoid bone defect, and allograft reconstruction) and two CAL deficient states (classic Latarjet (classicLAT) and congruent-arc Latarjet (congruentLAT)). Results: In neutral without muscle loading, a significant increase in superior translation occurred with the classicLAT as compared to 30% defect (P = 0.046) and allograft conditions (P = 0.041). With muscle loading, the classicLAT (P = 0.005, 0.002) and the congruentLAT (P = 0.018, 0.021) had significantly greater superior translation compared to intact and allograft, respectively. In internal rotation, only loaded tests produced significant results; specifically, classicLAT increased translation compared to all intact CAL states (P < 0.05). In external rotation, only unloaded tests produced significant results with classicLAT and congruentLAT allowing greater translations than intact (P ≤ 0.028). For all simulations, the allograft was not significantly different than intact (P > 0.05) and no differences (P = 1.0) were found between classicLAT and congruentLAT. Discussion: In most simulations, CAL release with the Latarjet lead to increased superior humeral translation. Conclusion: The choice of technique for glenoid bone loss reconstruction has implications on the magnitude of superior humeral translation. This previously unknown effect requires further study to determine its clinical and kinematic outcomes.

Complete avulsion of the rotator cuff footprint in an irreducible traumatic posterior glenohumeral fracture-dislocation due to infraspinatus interposition

The glenohumeral joint is the most frequently dislocated joint of the human body. Posterior dislocations are rare and account for only 2% to 5% of all shoulder dislocations. Risk factors for posterior dislocations include seizures, electrocution, and high-energy trauma. These risk factors should make the attending clinician suspicious of the diagnosis. Posterior dislocations occur during seizures and electrocution because of the stronger internal rotators, which are more powerful than the external rotators. In this case report, we describe a rare case of traumatic irreducible posterior shoulder dislocation due to rotator cuff interposition. Only a few cases have been described in which soft-tissue interposition of the rotator cuff caused an irreducible dislocation of the glenohumeral joint.