Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Harman Maxim Bruins is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Harman Maxim Bruins.


European Urology | 2017

Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer

J. Alfred Witjes; Thierry Lebret; Eva Comperat; Nigel C. Cowan; Maria De Santis; Harman Maxim Bruins; V. Hernández; Estefanía Linares Espinós; James Dunn; Mathieu Rouanne; Yann Neuzillet; Erik Veskimäe; Antoine G. van der Heijden; Georgios Gakis; M.J. Ribal

CONTEXT Invasive bladder cancer is a frequently occurring disease with a high mortality rate despite optimal treatment. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer (MIBC) Guidelines are updated yearly and provides information to optimise diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of this patient population. OBJECTIVE To provide a summary of the EAU guidelines for physicians and patients confronted with muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION An international multidisciplinary panel of bladder cancer experts reviewed and discussed the results of a comprehensive literature search of several databases covering all sections of the guidelines. The panel defined levels of evidence and grades of recommendation according to an established classification system. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Epidemiology and aetiology of bladder cancer are discussed. The proper diagnostic pathway, including demands for pathology and imaging, is outlined. Several treatment options, including bladder-sparing treatments and combinations of treatment modalities (different forms of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) are described. Sequencing of these modalities is discussed. Potential indications and contraindications, such as comorbidity, are related to treatment choice. There is a new paragraph on organ-sparing approaches, both in men and in women, and on minimal invasive surgery. Recommendations for chemotherapy in fit and unfit patients are provided including second-line options. Finally, a follow-up schedule is provided. CONCLUSIONS The current summary of the EAU Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer Guidelines provides an up-to-date overview of the available literature and evidence dealing with diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY Bladder cancer is an important disease with a high mortality rate. These updated guidelines help clinicians refine the diagnosis and select the appropriate therapy and follow-up for patients with metastatic and muscle-invasive bladder cancer.


The Journal of Urology | 2009

Clinical outcomes and recurrence predictors of lymph node positive urothelial cancer after cystectomy.

Harman Maxim Bruins; George J. Huang; Jie Cai; Donald G. Skinner; John P. Stein; David F. Penson

PURPOSE Lymph node metastasis in patients who undergo radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell carcinoma is considered a poor prognostic factor. However, patients with minimal lymph node involvement likely have a better outcome than those with extensive disease. We examined outcomes in patients with low volume lymph node metastasis and identified variables associated with disease recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our institution maintains a database of 1,600 patients with bladder transitional carcinoma who underwent radical cystectomy from 1971 to 2005 with intent to cure. All patients with low volume lymph node metastasis, defined as 1 or 2 positive lymph nodes, without concomitant distant metastasis were included in study. RESULTS A total of 181 patients were identified. Median followup was 12.8 years, during which 96 patients experienced recurrence. Estimated 5 and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 43.8% and 40.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that pathological stage/subgroup (RR 1.733, p = 0.015), lymph node density (RR 1.935, p = 0.014) and adjuvant chemotherapy (RR 0.538, p = 0.004) were significant independent predictors of recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS A considerable proportion of patients with low volume lymph node metastasis in our cohort remained free of recurrence during followup. Extravesical tumor extension and lymph node density greater than 4% were associated with a higher recurrence risk and adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk. Although some patients with low volume lymph node metastasis may be cured by surgery alone, these data support adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.


European Urology | 2014

The Impact of the Extent of Lymphadenectomy on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review

Harman Maxim Bruins; Erik Veskimäe; V. Hernández; Mari Imamura; Molly M. Neuberger; Philip Dahm; Fiona Stewart; Thomas Lam; James N’Dow; Antoine G. van der Heijden; Eva Comperat; Nigel C. Cowan; Maria De Santis; Georgios Gakis; Thierry Lebret; M.J. Ribal; Amir Sherif; J. Alfred Witjes

CONTEXT Controversy exists regarding the therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy (LND) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). OBJECTIVE To systematically review the relevant literature assessing the impact of LND on oncologic and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RC for MIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (LILACS) were searched up to December 2013. Comparative studies reporting on no LND, limited LND (L-LND), standard LND (S-LND), extended LND (E-LND), superextended LND (SE-LND), and oncologic and perioperative outcomes were included. Risk-of-bias and confounding assessments were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-three studies reporting on 19,793 patients were included. All but one study were retrospective. Planned meta-analyses were not possible because of study heterogeneity; therefore, data were synthesized narratively. There were high risks of bias and confounding across most studies as well as extreme heterogeneity in the definition of the anatomic boundaries of LND templates. All seven studies comparing LND with no LND favored LND in terms of better oncologic outcomes. Seven of 14 studies comparing (super)extended LND with L-LND or S-LND reported a beneficial outcome for (super)extended LND in at least a subset of patients. No difference in outcome was reported in two studies comparing E-LND and S-LND. The comparative harms of different extents of LND remain unclear. CONCLUSIONS Although the quality of the data was poor, the available evidence indicates that any kind of LND is advantageous over no LND. Similarly, E-LND appears to be superior to lesser degrees of dissection, while SE-LND offered no additional benefits. It is hoped that data from ongoing randomized clinical trials will clarify remaining uncertainties. PATIENT SUMMARY The current literature suggests that removal of lymph nodes in bladder cancer surgery is beneficial and might result in better outcomes in terms of prolonging survival; however, the quality of the available studies is poor, and high-quality studies are needed.


BJUI | 2014

The association of preoperative serum albumin level and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score on early complications and survival of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder cancer

Hooman Djaladat; Harman Maxim Bruins; Gus Miranda; Jie Cai; Eila C. Skinner; Siamak Daneshmand

To evaluate the impact of the preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and serum albumin level on complications, recurrences and survival rates of patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial bladder cancer (UBC).


The Journal of Urology | 2013

Incidental Prostate Cancer in Patients with Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma: Comprehensive Analysis of 1,476 Radical Cystoprostatectomy Specimens

Harman Maxim Bruins; Hooman Djaladat; Hamed Ahmadi; Andy Sherrod; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Eila C. Skinner; Siamak Daneshmand

PURPOSE We identified risk factors and determined the incidence and prognosis of incidental, clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma, prostatic urothelial carcinoma and HGPIN in patients treated with radical cystoprostatectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the records of 1,476 patients without a history of prostatic adenocarcinoma. We determined the incidence of clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma, prostatic urothelial carcinoma and HGPIN in the total cohort and in select patient subgroups. Prostatic urothelial carcinoma was stratified as prostatic stromal and prostatic urethral/duct involvement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with multiple variables. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were calculated. Median followup was 13.2 years. RESULTS Of the 1,476 patients 753 (51.0%) had cancer involving the prostate. Prostatic adenocarcinoma, clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma, prostatic urothelial carcinoma and HGPIN were present in 37.9%, 8.3%, 21.1% and 51.2% of patients, respectively. Of the 312 patients (21.1%) with prostatic urothelial carcinoma 163 (11.0%) had prostatic urethral/duct involvement only and 149 (10.1%) had prostatic stromal involvement. We identified risk factors for clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma, prostatic urothelial carcinoma and HGPIN but the absence of these risk factors did not rule out their presence. Ten-year overall survival in patients with no prostatic urothelial carcinoma, and prostatic urethral/duct and prostatic stromal involvement was 47.1%, 43.3% and 21.7%, respectively (p<0.001). No patient with clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma died of prostatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS More than half of the patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy had cancer involving the prostate. Prostatic urothelial carcinoma, particularly with prostatic stromal involvement, was associated with a worse prognosis, while clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma did not alter survival. Preoperative clinical and histopathological risk factors are not reliable enough to accurately predict clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma and/or prostatic urothelial carcinoma.


European Urology | 2016

Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel

Thomas Seisen; Benoit Peyronnet; Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig; Harman Maxim Bruins; Cathy Yuhong Yuan; Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Eva Comperat; Nigel C. Cowan; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Bas W.G. van Rhijn; Richard Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F. Shariat; Morgan Rouprêt

CONTEXT There is uncertainty regarding the oncologic effectiveness of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) compared with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE To systematically review the current literature comparing oncologic outcomes of KSS versus RNU for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A computerised bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting comparative oncologic outcomes of KSS versus RNU. Approaches considered for KSS were segmental ureterectomy (SU) and ureteroscopic (URS) or percutaneous (PC) management. Using the methodology recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, we identified 22 nonrandomised comparative retrospective studies published between 1999 and 2015 that were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. A narrative review and risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment were performed using cancer-specific survival (CSS) as the primary end point. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seven studies compared KSS overall (n=547) versus RNU (n=1376). Information on the comparison of SU (n=586) versus RNU (n=3692), URS (n=162) versus RNU (n=367), and PC (n=66) versus RNU (n=114) was available in 10, 5, and 2 studies, respectively. No significant difference was found between SU and RNU in terms of CSS or any other oncologic outcomes. Only patients with low-grade and noninvasive tumours experienced similar CSS after URS or PC when compared with RNU, despite an increased risk of local recurrence following endoscopic management of UTUC. The RoB assessment revealed, however, that the analyses were subject to a selection bias favouring KSS. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review suggests similar survival after KSS versus RNU only for low-grade and noninvasive UTUC when using URS or PC. However, selected patients with high-grade and invasive UTUC could safely benefit from SU when feasible. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of selection bias. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the studies that compared kidney-sparing surgery versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We found similar oncologic outcomes for favourable tumours when using ureteroscopic or percutaneous management, whereas indications for segmental ureterectomy could be extended to selected cases of aggressive tumours.


BJUI | 2013

Principal component analysis based pre-cystectomy model to predict pathological stage in patients with clinical organ-confined bladder cancer.

Hamed Ahmadi; Anirban P. Mitra; George A. Abdelsayed; Jie Cai; Hooman Djaladat; Harman Maxim Bruins; Siamak Daneshmand

Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?


Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy | 2008

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of patients with node-positive muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Harman Maxim Bruins; John P. Stein

Radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy is a standard treatment for patients with high-grade, invasive bladder cancer. Although the absolute limits of lymphadectomy at the time of surgery have not been precisely defined, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that an extended lymph node dissection may be beneficial for staging and survival in both node-negative and -positive bladder cancer patients. For lymph node-positive patients, several prognostic factors have been identified to provide risk stratification and direct the need for adjuvant treatment. These include: the pathological stage of the bladder tumor, extent of the lymphadenectomy and nodal tumor burden. The concept of lymph node density has also been identified as a prognostic factor. The literature and data on the extent of lymphadenectomy will be reviewed as well as the current prognostic variables and the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.


European Urology | 2017

Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree

Richard Sylvester; Steven E. Canfield; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Steven MacLennan; Yuhong Yuan; Graeme MacLennan; John Norrie; Muhammad Imran Omar; Harman Maxim Bruins; V. Hernández; Karin Plass; Hendrik Van Poppel; James N'Dow

CONTEXT Clinicians and treatment guideline developers are faced with a dilemma when the results of a new, large, well-conducted randomized controlled trial (RCT) are in direct conflict with the results of a previous systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA). OBJECTIVE To explore and discuss possible reasons for disagreement in results from SRs/MAs and RCTs and to provide guidance to clinicians and guideline developers for making well-informed treatment decisions and recommendations in the face of conflicting data. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The advantages and limitations of RCTs and SRs/MAs are reviewed. Two practical examples that have a direct bearing on European Association of Urology guidelines on treatment recommendations are discussed in detail to illustrate the points to be considered when conflicts exist between the results of large RCTs and SRs/MAs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS RCTs are the gold standard for providing evidence of the effectiveness of interventions. However, concerns regarding the internal and external validity of an RCT may limit its applicability to clinical practice. SRs/MAs synthesize all evidence related to a given research question, but two urologic examples show that the validity of the results depends on the quality of the individual studies, the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the studies, and publication bias. CONCLUSIONS Although SRs/MAs can provide a higher level of evidence than RCTs, the quality of the evidence from both RCTs and SRs/MAs should be investigated when their results conflict to determine which source provides the better evidence. Guideline developers should have a well-defined and robust process to assess the evidence from MAs and RCTs when such conflicts exist. PATIENT SUMMARY We discuss the advantages and limitations of using data from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses in informing clinical practice when there are conflicting results. We provide guidance on how such conflicts should be dealt with by guideline organizations.


Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations | 2016

The effect of the time interval between diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and radical cystectomy on staging and survival: A Netherlands Cancer Registry analysis

Harman Maxim Bruins; Katja K. Aben; T.J.H. Arends; Antoine G. van der Heijden; Alfred Witjes

INTRODUCTION Data from single-center series suggest that a delay in time to radical cystectomy (RC) more than 3 months after diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with pathological upstaging and decreased survival. However, limited data is available from population-based studies. In this study, the effect of delayed RC was assessed in a nationwide cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent RC between 2006 and 2010 with primary clinical T2-T4N0M0 urothelial bladder cancer were selected using the Netherlands Cancer Registry database. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry was supplemented with data from the Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology database in case of incomplete information. The cohort was divided in patients who underwent RC ≤3 months (group I) vs. patients who underwent RC >3 months (group II). Median time from MIBC diagnosis to RC, variables associated with delayed RC >3 and the effect of delayed RC on staging and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and patients who did not. RESULTS A total of 1,782 patients were included. Median follow-up time was 5.1 years for living patients and 1.3 years for deceased patients. Median time from MIBC diagnosis to RC was 50 days (interquartile range: 27 days) and 93% of patients underwent RC≤3 months. Patients older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32-0.77), referred for RC (OR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.69), and treated in a university hospital (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.56) were less likely to undergo RC≤3 months. Pathologic upstaging rate (43.9% vs. 42.1%) and node-positive disease rate (20.2% vs. 21.7%) did not differ for group I and II. Delayed RC>3 months was not associated with decreased OS adjusting for confounding variables (hazard ratio = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.91-1.48; P = 0.25). Median time from MIBC diagnosis to RC in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy (n = 105) was 133 days (interquartile range: 62 days). Adjusting for confounding variables, delayed RC>3 months was not associated with OS (hazard ratio = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.45-1.82). CONCLUSIONS The vast majority of patient underwent RC within 3 months after diagnosis of MIBC, as recommended in the European Association of Urology MIBC guideline. Delayed RC for more than 3 months had no adverse effect on staging and survival.

Collaboration


Dive into the Harman Maxim Bruins's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jie Cai

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gus Miranda

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Siamak Daneshmand

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Lam

University of Aberdeen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.A. Witjes

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Pelkman

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. Hernández

King Juan Carlos University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge