Harpreet Pall

Management of Ingested Foreign Bodies in Children: A Clinical Report of the NASPGHAN Endoscopy Committee

Foreign body ingestions in children are some of the most challenging clinical scenarios facing pediatric gastroenterologists. Determining the indications and timing for intervention requires assessment of patient size, type of object ingested, location, clinical symptoms, time since ingestion, and myriad other factors. Often the easiest and least anxiety-producing decision is the one to proceed to endoscopic removal, instead of observation alone. Because of variability in pediatric patient size, there are less firm guidelines available to determine which type of object will safely pass, as opposed to the clearer guidelines in the adult population. In addition, the imprecise nature of the histories often leaves the clinician to question the timing and nature of the ingestion. Furthermore, changes in the types of ingestions encountered, specifically button batteries and high-powered magnet ingestions, create an even greater potential for severe morbidity and mortality among children. As a result, clinical guidelines regarding management of these ingestions in children remain varied and sporadic, with little in the way of prospective data to guide their development. An expert panel of pediatric endoscopists was convened and produced the present article that outlines practical clinical approaches to the pediatric patient with a variety of foreign body ingestions. This guideline is intended as an educational tool that may help inform pediatric endoscopists in managing foreign body ingestions in children. Medical decision making, however, remains a complex process requiring integration of clinical data beyond the scope of these guidelines. These guidelines should therefore not be considered to be a rule or to be establishing a legal standard of care. Caregivers may well choose a course of action outside of those represented in these guidelines because of specific patient circumstances. Furthermore, additional clinical studies may be necessary to clarify aspects based on expert opinion instead of published data. Thus, these guidelines may be revised as needed to account for new data, changes in clinical practice, or availability of new technology.

Monitoring of 25-OH vitamin D levels in children with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND Patients with cystic fibrosis are at risk for malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins, and those with low 25-OH vitamin D levels have a higher risk of low bone mineral density and long-term skeletal complications. It is currently recommended that vitamins A and E be monitored yearly; however, no recommendations exist for 25-OH vitamin D. Because all three vitamins are fat-soluble, the hypothesis in the current study was that low levels of vitamins A and E could identify patients at risk for low 25-OH vitamin D, so that 25-OH vitamin D measurements could be obtained in only selected circumstances. METHODS Forty (21 girls) patients with CF, age 10.5 +/- 3.9 (SD) years, were assessed in a cross-sectional survey for ideal weight for height (percentage of predicted), spirometry (percentage of predicted FEV1, 33/40 patients), and serum levels of vitamins A, E, 25-OH vitamin D, and cholesterol (37/40 patients). RESULTS Nine (22.5%) of 40 patients were malnourished (percentage of predicted ideal weight for height <85%), 7 (21.2%) of 33 had moderate to severe lung disease (FEV1 <60%), 4 (10%) of 40 had low levels of vitamin A, 3 (7.5%) of 40 had low vitamin E levels, 4 (10.8%) of 37 low vitamin E/cholesterol levels, and 4 (10%) of 40 had marginal or low levels of 25-OH vitamin D (<40 mmol/l). The patients with low 25-OH vitamin D were older, with no child < 12 years of age having a 25-OH vitamin D level less than 40 mmol/l. They also had lower vitamin E and vitamin E/cholesterol levels than those with normal 25-OH vitamin D levels. The groups did not differ in percentage of predicted ideal weight for height, lung function, or vitamin A levels. The best positive predictor for 25-OH vitamin D less than 40 mmol/l was low vitamin E (66.7%), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. 25-OH vitamin D levels correlated with vitamin E/cholesterol levels (r = 0.41, P < 0.01) and weakly with vitamin E levels (r = 0.28, P < 0.08), but not with vitamin A levels. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that children aged less than 12 years and older children with normal vitamin E levels are especially unlikely to have low 25-OH vitamin D levels, and this measure can therefore be omitted. In contrast, those children with low vitamin E levels may warrant monitoring.

Bowel Preparation for Pediatric Colonoscopy: Report of the NASPGHAN Endoscopy and Procedures Committee

ABSTRACT Pediatric bowel preparation protocols used before colonoscopy vary greatly, with no identified standard practice. The present clinical report reviews the evidence for several bowel preparations in children and reports on their use among North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition members. Publications in the pediatric literature for bowel preparation regimens are described, including mechanisms of action, efficacy and ease of use, and pediatric studies. A survey distributed to pediatric gastroenterology programs across the country reviews present national practice, and cleanout recommendations are provided. Finally, further areas for research are identified.

NASPGHAN Capsule Endoscopy Clinical Report

Wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) was introduced in 2000 as a less invasive method to visualize the distal small bowel in adults. Because this technology has advanced it has been adapted for use in pediatric gastroenterology. Several studies have described its clinical use, utility, and various training methods but pediatric literature regarding CE is limited. This clinical report developed by the Endoscopic and Procedures Committee of the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition outlines the current literature, and describes the recommended current role, use, training, and future areas of research for CE in pediatrics.

Setting up the Pediatric Endoscopy Unit

As pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy continues to develop and evolve, pediatric gastroenterologists are more frequently called on to develop and direct a pediatric endoscopy unit. Lack of published literature and focused training in fellowship can render decision making about design, capacity, operation, equipment purchasing, and staffing challenging. To help guide management decisions, we distributed a short survey to 18 pediatric gastroenterology centers throughout the United States and Canada. This article provides practical guidance by summarizing available expert opinions on the topic of setting up a pediatric endoscopy unit.

Results From a Patient Experience Study in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Objective: Gastrointestinal endoscopy in children has become a standard diagnostic and therapeutic modality. The aim of our study was to characterize the most memorable elements of the patient experience from the parent’s and patient’s perspective and determine ways to improve the overall quality of their experience. Methods: Using a structured questionnaire, we conducted 47 phone interviews with families who had recently undergone gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Results: Our study showed clear communication and mutual agreement on care decisions contributed to positive experiences. Inadequate communication of information regarding alternatives to the procedure and risk of complications during the informed consent discussion contributed to negative patient experiences. Standardization of postprocedure follow-up and timely communication of pathology findings also had potential for improvement. Conclusion: Our study revealed 2 areas for quality improvement interventions: The need to ensure that alternatives and complications are thoroughly discussed and the need for standardization of postprocedure follow-up.

Impact of Pre-Procedure Interventions on No-Show Rate in Pediatric Endoscopy

Pediatric endoscopy has evolved into an indispensable tool in the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal diseases in children. However, there is limited literature focusing on quality improvement initiatives in pediatric endoscopy. The primary goal of this project was to reduce the no-show rate in the pediatric endoscopy unit. Also, we aimed to improve patient and family satisfaction with the procedure by identifying opportunities for improvement. A checklist was designed based on the potential causes of no-show. The endoscopy nurse coordinator reviewed the checklist when scheduling the procedure to identify patients at high risk for non-compliance. Once a risk factor was identified, appropriate actions were taken. She also made a pre-procedure phone call as a reminder and to address any of these risks for non-compliance if present. A patient satisfaction survey was used to identify potential areas for improvement. The no-show rate decreased from an average of 7% in the pre-intervention phase to 2% in the post-intervention phase (p = 0.009). 91% of the patients/family recorded an overall satisfaction of 4 or 5 on a scale of 1–5 (5 being best). Quality improvement strategies decreased the no-show rate in the pediatric endoscopy unit. A patient satisfaction survey helped in identifying areas for improvement.

Developing the Pediatric Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit: A Clinical Report by the Endoscopy and Procedures Committee.

ABSTRACT There is significant variability in the design and management of pediatric endoscopy units. Although there is information on adult endoscopy units, little guidance is available to the pediatric endoscopy practitioner. The purpose of this clinical report, prepared by the NASPGHAN Endoscopy and Procedures Committee, is to review the important considerations for setting up an endoscopy unit for children. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken in the preparation of this report regarding the design, management, needed equipment, motility setup, billing and coding, and pediatric specific topics.

Impact of Educational Cartoon on Pediatric Bowel Preparation Quality at Time of Colonoscopy

Objective: To evaluate if addition of educational cartoon to pediatric bowel preparation instructions improves the quality of bowel preparation and patient experience. Methods: Patients were randomized to control group receiving standard bowel preparation instructions or intervention group receiving additional educational cartoon. To objectively rate bowel preparation, a blinded endoscopist completed numeric Ottawa score (0-14, with 0 being best). The family also completed a questionnaire rating the bowel preparation process. Results: Data from 23 patients were analyzed. Mean Ottawa score in the intervention group compared with controls was not significantly different (mean scores 3.73 and 3.33, respectively; P = .384). Level of education was significantly correlated with better Ottawa score in the overall population (ρ = −.462, P = .026) and within the control group (ρ = −.658, P = .02). Both groups of patients reported positive experience with bowel preparation. Conclusion: There may be benefit to further investigation of this educational cartoon in parents with less than college level education or non-English-speaking families in larger population of patients.

Side-to-side bowel anastomosis mimicking intussusception in a 2-year-old child with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a rare autosomal dominant inherited condition characterized by hamartomatous gastrointestinal polyps, mucocutaneous pigmentation, and a predisposition for malignancy. Most patients with PJS are diagnosed in the second or third decade of life, and commonly have intussusception as a complication. This report describes an unusual case of a 2-year-old male known to have PJS, who had previously developed a small bowel intussusception caused by a polyp requiring a very short segmental small bowel resection. The patient remained asymptomatic several months after the surgery and then presented with acute abdominal discomfort. On abdominal ultrasound, a target sign measuring 2.7 cm was noted in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen, suggesting a small bowel-small bowel intussusception. There was no evidence of intussusception or bowel obstruction otherwise on diagnostic laparoscopy. It was thought that the previous side-to-side anastomosis had mimicked intussusception on the ultrasound examination. A repeat abdominal ultrasound was performed 1 week after the laparoscopy when the patient was asymptomatic. This again demonstrated a target sign identical in appearance to the previous ultrasound and confirmed that the side-to side anastomosis had in fact mimicked intussusception. It is important that the pediatric gastroenterology, radiology, and surgery communities are aware of this ultrasound finding; it could impact the decision on whether to operate emergently. To our knowledge this is the first report describing this unusual scenario in humans.