Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Harry Buhrman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Harry Buhrman.


Theoretical Computer Science | 2002

Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey

Harry Buhrman; Ronald de Wolf

We discuss several complexity measures for Boolean functions: certificate complexity, sensitivity, block sensitivity, and the degree of a representing or approximating polynomial. We survey the relations and biggest gaps known between these measures, and show how they give bounds for the decision tree complexity of Boolean functions on deterministic, randomized, and quantum computers.


symposium on the theory of computing | 1998

Quantum vs. classical communication and computation

Harry Buhrman; Richard Cleve; Avi Wigderson

We present a simple and general simulation technique that transforms any black-box quantum algorithm (a la Grovers database search algorithm) to a quantum communication protocol for a related problem, in a way that fully exploits the quantum parallelism. This allows us to obtain new positive and negative results. The positive results are novel quantum communication protocols that are built from nontrivial quantum algorithms via this simulation. These protocols, combined with (old and new) classical lower bounds, are shown to provide the first asymptotic separation results between the quantum and classical (probabilistic) two-party communication complexity models. In particular, we obtain a quadratic separation for the bounded-error model, and an exponential separation for the zero-error model. The negative results transform known quantum communication lower bounds to computational lower bounds in the black-box model. In particular, we show that the quadratic speed-up achieved by Grover for the OR function is impossible for the PARITY function or the MAJORITY function in the bounded-error model, nor is it possible for the OR function itself in the exact case. This dichotomy naturally suggests a study of bounded-depth predicates (i.e. those in the polynomial hierarchy) between OR and MAJORITY. We present black-box algorithms that achieve near quadratic speed up for all such predicates.


Physical Review A | 1997

SUBSTITUTING QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT FOR COMMUNICATION

Richard Cleve; Harry Buhrman

We show that quantum entanglement can be used as a substitute for communication when the goal is to compute a function whose input data are distributed among remote parties. Specifically, we show that, for a particular function among three parties (each of which possesses part of the functions input), a prior quantum entanglement enables one of them to learn the value of the function with only two bits of communication occurring among the parties, whereas, without quantum entanglement, three bits of communication are necessary. This result contrasts the well-known fact that quantum entanglement cannot be used to simulate communication among remote parties.


foundations of computer science | 1998

Quantum lower bounds by polynomials

Robert Beals; Harry Buhrman; Richard Cleve; Michele Mosca; R.M. de Wolf

We examine the number T of queries that a quantum network requires to compute several Boolean functions on {0,1}/sup N/ in the black-box model. We show that, in the black-box model, the exponential quantum speed-up obtained for partial functions (i.e. problems involving a promise on the input) by Deutsch and Jozsa and by Simon cannot be obtained for any total function: if a quantum algorithm computes some total Boolean function f with bounded-error using T black-box queries then there is a classical deterministic algorithm that computes f exactly with O(T/sup 6/) queries. We also give asymptotically tight characterizations of T for all symmetric f in the exact, zero-error, and bounded-error settings. Finally, we give new precise bounds for AND, OR, and PARITY. Our results are a quantum extension of the so-called polynomial method, which has been successfully applied in classical complexity theory, and also a quantum extension of results by Nisan about a polynomial relationship between randomized and deterministic decision tree complexity.


Reviews of Modern Physics | 2010

Nonlocality and communication complexity

Harry Buhrman; Richard Cleve; Serge Massar; Ronald de Wolf

Quantum information processing is the emerging field that defines and realizes computing devices that make use of quantum mechanical principles, like the superposition principle, entanglement, and interference. Until recently the common notion of computing was based on classical mechanics, and did not take into account all the possibilities that physically-realizable computing devices offer in principle. The field gained momentum after Peter Shor developed an efficient algorithm for factoring numbers, demonstrating the potential computing powers that quantum computing devices can unleash. In this review we study the information counterpart of computing. It was realized early on by Holevo, that quantum bits, the quantum mechanical counterpart of classical bits, cannot be used for efficient transformation of information, in the sense that arbitrary k-bit messages can not be compressed into messages of k − 1 qubits. The abstract form of the distributed computing setting is called communication complexity. It studies the amount of information, in terms of bits or in our case qubits, that two spatially separated computing devices need to exchange in order to perform some computational task. Surprisingly, quantum mechanics can be used to obtain dramatic advantages for such tasks. We review the area of quantum communication complexity, and show how it connects the foundational physics questions regarding non-locality with those of communication complexity studied in theoretical computer science. The first examples exhibiting the advantage of the use of qubits in distributed information-processing tasks were based on non-locality tests. However, by now the field has produced strong and interesting quantum protocols and algorithms of its own that demonstrate that entanglement, although it cannot be used to replace communication, can be used to reduce the communication exponentially. In turn, these new advances yield a new outlook on the foundations of physics, and could even yield new proposals for experiments that test the foundations of physics.


Physical Review Letters | 2006

Limit on Nonlocality in Any World in Which Communication Complexity Is Not Trivial

Gilles Brassard; Harry Buhrman; Noah Linden; André Allan Méthot; Alain Tapp; Falk Unger

Bell proved that quantum entanglement enables two spacelike separated parties to exhibit classically impossible correlations. Even though these correlations are stronger than anything classically achievable, they cannot be harnessed to make instantaneous (faster than light) communication possible. Yet, Popescu and Rohrlich have shown that even stronger correlations can be defined, under which instantaneous communication remains impossible. This raises the question: Why are the correlations achievable by quantum mechanics not maximal among those that preserve causality? We give a partial answer to this question by showing that slightly stronger correlations would result in a world in which communication complexity becomes trivial.


foundations of computer science | 1999

Bounds for small-error and zero-error quantum algorithms

Harry Buhrman; Richard Cleve; R.M. de Wolf; Ch. Zalka

We present a number of results related to quantum algorithms with small error probability and quantum algorithms that are zero-error. First, we give a tight analysis of the trade-offs between the number of queries of quantum search algorithms, their error probability, the size of the search space, and the number of solutions in this space. Using this, we deduce new lower and upper bounds for quantum versions of amplification problems. Next, we establish nearly optimal quantum-classical separations for the query complexity of monotone functions in the zero-error model (where our quantum zero-error model is defined so as to be robust when the quantum gates are noisy). Also, we present a communication complexity problem related to a total function for which there is a quantum-classical communication complexity gap in the zero-error model. Finally, we prove separations for monotone graph properties in the zero-error and other error models which imply that the evasiveness conjecture for such properties does not hold for quantum computers.


conference on computational complexity | 2001

Quantum algorithms for element distinctness

Harry Buhrman; Christoph Dürr; Mark Heiligman; Peter Høyer; Frédéric Magniez; Miklos Santha; R.M. de Wolf

We present several applications of quantum amplitude amplification to finding claws and collisions in ordered or unordered functions. Our algorithms generalize those of Brassard, Hoyer, and Tapp (1998), and imply an O(N/sup 3/4/ log N) quantum upper bound for the element distinctness problem in the comparison complexity model. This contrasts with /spl Theta/(N log N) classical complexity. We also prove a lower bound of /spl Omega/(/spl radic/N) comparisons for this problem and derive bounds for a number of related problems.


Physical Review A | 1999

Multiparty quantum communication complexity

Harry Buhrman; Richard Cleve; W.K. van Dam; Peter Høyer; Alain Tapp

Quantum entanglement cannot be used to achieve direct communication between remote parties, but it can reduce the communication needed for some problems. Let each of k parties hold some partial input data to some fixed k-variable function f. The communication complexity of f is the minimum number of classical bits required to be broadcasted for every party to know the value of f on their inputs. We construct a function G such that for the one-round communication model and three parties, G can be computed with n+1 bits of communication when the parties share prior entanglement. We then show that without entangled particles, the one-round communication complexity of G is (3/2)n + 1. Next we generalize this function to a function F. We show that if the parties share prior quantum entanglement, then the communication complexity of F is exactly k. We also show that if no entangled particles are provided, then the communication complexity of F is roughly k*log(k). These two results prove for the first time communication complexity separations better than a constant number of bits.


SIAM Journal on Computing | 2002

Resource-Bounded Kolmogorov Complexity Revisited

Harry Buhrman; Lance Fortnow; Sophie Laplante

We take a fresh look at CD complexity, where CDt(x) is the size of the smallest program that distinguishes x from all other strings in time t(|x|). We also look at CND complexity, a new nondeterministic variant of CD complexity, and time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity, denoted by C complexity. We show several results relating time-bounded C, CD, and CND complexity and their applications to a variety of questions in computational complexity theory, including the following: Showing how to approximate the size of a set using CD complexity without using the random string as needed in Sipsers earlier proof of a similar result. Also, we give a new simpler proof of this result of Sipsers. Improving these bounds for almost all strings, using extractors. A proof of the Valiant--Vazirani lemma directly from Sipsers earlier CD lemma. A relativized lower bound for CND complexity. Exact characterizations of equivalences between C, CD, and CND complexity. Showing that satisfying assignments of a satisfiable Boolean formula can be enumerated in time polynomial in the size of the output if and only if a unique assignment can be found quickly. This answers an open question of Papadimitriou. A new Kolmogorov complexity-based proof that BPP\subseteq\Sigma_2^p

Collaboration


Dive into the Harry Buhrman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michal Koucký

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dieter van Melkebeek

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge