Hartwig Riediger

The Lymph Node Ratio is the Strongest Prognostic Factor after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer

IntroductionSurvival after surgery of pancreatic cancer is still poor, even after curative resection. Some prognostic factors like the status of the resection margin, lymph node (LN) status, or tumor grading have been identified. However, only few data have been published regarding the prognostic influence of the LN ratio (number of LN involved to number of examined LN). We, therefore, evaluated potential prognostic factors in 182 patients after resection of pancreatic cancer including assessment of LN ratio.MethodsSince 1994, 204 patients underwent pancreatic resection for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Survival was evaluated in 182 patients with complete follow-up evaluations. Of those 182 patients, 88% had cancer of the pancreatic head, 5% of the body, and 7% of the pancreatic tail. Patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (85%), distal resection (12%), or total pancreatectomy (3%). Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier and Cox methods.ResultsIn all 204 resected patients, operative mortality was 3.9% (n = 8). In the 182 patients with follow-up, 70% had free resection margins, 62% had G1- or G2-classified tumors, and 70% positive LN. Median tumor size was 30 (7–80) mm. The median number of examined LN was 16 and median number of involved LN 1 (range 0–22). Median LN ratio was 0.1 (0–0.79). Cumulative 5-year survival (5-year SV) in all patients was 15%. In univariate analysis, a LN ratio ≥ 0.2 (5-year SV 6% vs. 19% with LN ratio < 0.2; p = 0.003), LN ratio ≥ 0.3 (5-year SV 0% vs. 18% with LN ratio < 0.3; p < 0.001), a positive resection margin (p < 0.01) and poor differentiation (G3/G4; p < 0.03) were associated with poorer survival. In multivariate analysis, a LN ratio ≥ 0.2 (p < 0.02; relative risk RR 1.6), LN ratio ≥ 0.3 (p < 0.001; RR 2.2), positive margins (p < 0.02; RR 1.7), and poor differentiation (p < 0.03; RR 1.5) were independent factors predicting a poorer outcome. The conventional nodal status or the number of examined nodes (in all patients and in the subgroups of node positive or negative patients) had no significant influence on survival. Patients with one metastatic LN had the same outcome as patients with negative nodes, but prognosis decreased significantly in patients with two or more LN involved.ConclusionsNot the lymph node involvement per se but especially the LN ratio is an independent prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancers. In our series, the LN ratio was even the strongest predictor of survival. The routine estimation of the LN ratio may be helpful not only for the individual prediction of prognosis but also for the indication of adjuvant therapy and herein related outcome and therapy studies.

Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection

The role of superior mesenteric-portal vein resection (SM-PVR) for vein invasion or tumor adherence during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still under debate. We investigated morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival in patients who underwent PD with or without SM-PVR. Between July 1994 and December 2004, 222 PD (78% pylorus preserving, 19% Whipple, and 3% total pancreatectomy) were performed for malignant disease. Fifty-three patients (24%) had PD with SM-PVR. Sixty-eight percent of the venous resections were performed as wedge excisions and 32% as segmental resections. Long-term survival was analyzed in 165 patients with pancreatic (n=110), ampullary (n=33), or distal bile (n=22) duct cancer using univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox regression) methods. In patients undergoing PD with SM-PVR and conclusive histologic examination of the resected vein specimen (n=42), 60% had true tumor involvement of the venous wall, whereas 40% had no proven tumor infiltration. In the complete study group, negative resection margins were obtained in 69% of patients with SM-PVR and in 79% of patients without SM-PVR (P=0.09). Median duration of surgery was 500 minutes (SM-PVR) versus 440 minutes (no SM-PVR; P<0.001). Volume of intraoperatively transfused blood was 600 ml (median) in both groups. Postoperative surgical complications/mortality occurred in 23%/3.8% (SM-PVR) versus 35%/4.1% (no SM-PVR); P=0.09/0.9. Analysis of long-term survival in all 165 patients included 41 with SM-PVR. Five-year survival rates were 15% in cancer of the pancreatic head, 22% in ampullary cancer, and 24% in distal bile duct cancer (P=0.02). Long-term survival was not influenced by the need for SM-PVR in any of the different tumor entities. In multivariate analysis, a positive resection margin (P<0.01, relative risk [RR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–2.7), a histologically undifferentiated tumor (P=0.01, RR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1–2.5), and the tumor entity (P<0.01) were significant predictors of survival. Univariate survival analysis of the 110 patients with cancer of the pancreatic head revealed that a histologically undifferentiated tumor (P=0.05) and positive resection margins (P=0.02) were associated with a poorer survival. In multivariate analysis, the resection margin (P=0.02, RR: 5.1, 95% CI: 1.1–2.8) and a histologically undifferentiated tumor (P=0.05, RR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.0–2.5) significantly influenced survival. After PD, perioperative morbidity and long-term survival in patients with SM-PVR were similar to those of patients without vein resection. In case of tumor adherence or infiltration, combined resection of the pancreatic head and the vein should always be considered in the absence of other contraindications for resection.

Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy is strongly related to other postoperative complications

Patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenenectomy (PPPD) have a risk of up to 50% for developing delayed gastric emptying (DGE) in the early postoperative course. From 1994 to August 2002, a total of 204 patients underwent PPPD for pancreatic or periampullary cancer (50%), chronic pancreatitis (42%), and other indications (8%). Retrocolic end-to-side duodenojejunostomy was performed below the mesocolon. DGE was defined by the inability to tolerate a regular diet after day 10 (DGE10) or day 14 (DGE14) postoperatively, as well as the need for a nasogastric tube at or beyond day 10 (DGE10GT). Postoperative morbidity was 38%, 30-day mortality was 2.9%, and median postoperative length of stay was 15 days. DGE occurred in 14.7% (DGE10), 5.9% (DGE14), and 6.4% (DGE10GT), respectively. After further exclusion of 21 patients (10.3%) with major complications and no possible oral intake (because of death, reoperation, or mechanical ventilation), the frequencies of DGE10, DGE14, and DGE10GT in the remaining group of 183 patients were 9%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed postoperative complications (P < 0.001), the presence of portalvenous hypertension (P < 0.01), and tumors as indications for surgery (P < 0.01) as independent risk factors for DGE10. The overall incidence of DGE was low after PPPD. In those patients experiencing DGE, however, other postoperative complications were the most important factor associated with its occurrence.

Management of delayed visceral arterial bleeding after pancreatic head resection.

Despite low mortality, postoperative complications are still relatively frequent after pancreatic head resection. The occurrence of delayed visceral arterial bleeding from erosions or pseudoaneurysms of branches of the celiac trunk or from the stump of the gastroduodenal artery is a rare but life-threatening complication and is probably underreported in the literature. During a 10-year period, we diagnosed and treated 12 patients (three referred from other hospitals) with severe visceral arterial bleeding, presenting 7 to 85 days after pancreatic head resection. Clinical presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding (seven patients) or abdominal bleeding (five patients). The bleeding source was identified by angiography in 10 of the 12 cases. Definitive bleeding control was achieved by angiography in six of the 12 patients (stent 2, coiling 4), or by surgery in five patients. None of the six patients with successful angiographic intervention required further surgery for bleeding control. One patient died due to hemorrhage before bleeding was controlled. Median transfusion requirement was 12.5 (range 3–37) units. Of five patients with interventional or surgical occlusion of the common hepatic artery, three developed hepatic abscesses and two had complications of the hepaticojejunostomy. One of those five patients died four months after definitive bleeding control because of recurrent hepatic abscesses. All other patients eventually recovered completely. We conclude that delayed arterial bleeding from visceral arteries is a rare but life-threatening complication after pancreatic head resection. Angiographic stenting with preservation of hepatic blood flow, if technically possible, represents the best treatment option.

Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND Individualization of operations for chronic pancreatitis (CP) offers tailored operative approaches for the management of complications of CP. For the management of the inflammatory head mass and its complications, duodenum-preserving procedures (Frey and Beger operations) compete in efficacy and quality of life with pancreatoduodenectomy procedures (PPPD and Whipple operations). Our aim was to compare the short- and long-term results of duodenum-preserving and duodenum-resecting techniques in a prospective, randomized trial. METHODS Eighty-five patients with CP were randomized to undergo either pylorus-preserving (PPPD) or duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). Perioperative and long term results were evaluated. RESULTS Although the duodenum-preserving operations had a lesser median operating time (360 vs 435 minutes; P = .002), there were no differences in the need for intraoperative blood transfusion (76% vs 79%) or the duration of hospital stay (13 vs 14 days). Postoperative complications in general (33% vs 30%), surgical complications (21% vs 23%), and severe complications such as pancreatic leakage (10% vs 5%) or the need for reoperation (2% vs 2%) did not differ between the DPPHR and the PPPD groups, and there was no mortality (0%). The long-term outcome after a median of >5 years showed no differences between the DPPHR and PPPD regarding quality of life, pain control (67% vs 67%), endocrine status (45% vs 44%), and exocrine insufficiency (76% vs 61%). CONCLUSION Both types of pancreatic head resections are equally effective in pain relief and eventual quality of life after long-term follow-up (>5 years) without differences in endocrine or exocrine function.

Intraoperative Schnellschnittuntersuchungen parapylorischer Lymphknoten bei der pyloruserhaltenden Pankreaskopfresektion: Gibt es eine klinische Relevanz?

Hintergrund: Die pyloruserhaltende Pankreaskopfresektion (PPPD) ist als onkologisches Standardverfahren etabliert. Lokal fortgeschrittene Tumoren können eine erweiterte Resektion erforderlich machen. Ebenso soll früheren Arbeiten zufolge bei Tumornachweis in den parapylorischen Lymphknoten (PLK) eine distale Magenresektion im Sinne einer klassischen Whipple-Operation indiziert sein. Entsprechend diesen Empfehlungen haben wir intraoperative Schnellschnittuntersuchungen der PLK in unseren Routineablauf integriert. Im Rahmen dieser Studie haben wir die klinische Relevanz dieses Vorgehens hinterfragt. Methoden: Bei 105 onkologischen Patienten im Zeitraum von 2006-2012 bestand die Indikation zur PPPD. In allen Fällen erfolgte eine intraoperative Schnellschnittuntersuchung der PLK. Die Patienten wurden bezüglich Primärtumor, Anzahl der untersuchten Lymphknoten (LK) (gesamt und parapylorisch) sowie Auswirkungen auf das operative Konzept untersucht. Es handelt sich um eine retrospektive Studie, die auf prospektiv erhobenen Daten unserer Pankreasdatenbank basiert. Ergebnisse: Die Primärtumoren waren 72 Pankreaskopfkarzinome und 33 extrapankreatische Karzinome (Gallengangskarzinom, Ampullenkarzinom, Duodenalkarzinom). 73 Patienten waren nodalpositiv. Insgesamt wurden 2391 LK untersucht, von denen 325 parapylorisch lokalisiert waren. Die intraoperative Schnellschnittuntersuchung erbrachte lediglich bei 4 Patienten mit Pankreaskopfkarzinom jeweils einen positiven PLK; daraufhin erfolgte eine distale Magenresektion. In keinem der distalen Magenresektate waren Tumorresiduen nachweisbar. Lokale chirurgisch-technische Probleme im Sinne von Durchblutungsstörungen des Magens ergaben sich durch die regionale Lymphadenektomie nicht. PLK waren nur beim Pankreaskarzinom positiv. In der Subgruppe der nodalpositiven Patienten mit Pankreaskopfkarzinom hatten 8% der Patienten einen positiven PLK. Schlussfolgerung: Die regionale parapylorische Lymphadenektomie ist beim Pankreaskarzinom in einigen (5%) Fällen onkologisch sinnvoll. Der Nutzen einer intraoperativen Schnellschnittuntersuchung mit nachfolgender Konsequenz für eine etwaige distale Magenresektion ist anhand unserer Daten nicht belegbar.

Digitale Befunddokumentation in der Behandlung chronischer Wunden: Was ist wichtig?

The role of computer-based information systems is increasing in clinical practice. Treatment of chronic wounds is a specialty that requires specific documentation systems. Digital photo documentation and digital measurement tools generate an objective result. The description of local findings should be done using only parameters that are objective and lead to therapeutic consequences. Documentation of the underlying disease is also restricted to wound-related findings. In general, only parameters should be documented that have a benefit for the treating personnel. It is also important to monitor the effect of the applied dressing with the means of the documentation system. To date, specialized treatment in wound care centers is always interdisciplinary. As a consequence, documentation systems must offer interfaces to other patient information systems in order to provide all findings of a patient at any time.