Harun Ates
University of Tulsa
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Harun Ates.
Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering | 2005
Asnul Bahar; Harun Ates; Maged H. Al-Deeb; Salem E. Salem; Hussein Badaam; Steef Linthorst; Mohan Kelkar
This paper presents an innovative approach to integrate fracture, well test and production data into the static description of a reservoir model as an input to the flow simulation. The approach has been successfully implemented into a field study of a giant naturally fractured carbonate reservoir in the Middle East. This study was part of a full field integrated reservoir characterization and flow simulation project. The main input available for this work includes matrix properties, fracture network, well test and production data. Stochastic models of matrix properties were generated using geostatistical methodology based on well logs, core, seismic data and geological interpretation. Fracture network was described in the reservoir as lineaments (fracture swarms) showing two major fracture trends. The network and its properties, i.e., fracture porosity and permeability, were generated by reconciling seismic, well logs, and dynamic data (well test and PLT). The challenge of the study is to integrate all the input in an efficient and practical way to produce a consistent model between static and dynamic data. As a result, it is expected to reduce the history matching effort. This challenge was solved by an innovative iterative procedure between the static and dynamic models. The static part consists of the calibration of model permeability to match the well test permeability. It is done by comparing their flow potentials, kh. In this analysis the dominant factor in controlling production at each well, either matrix or fracture, was determined. Based on the dominant factor, matrix or fracture permeability was modified accordingly. This way the changes in permeability are kept inline with the geological understanding of the field. The dynamic part was carried out through a full field flow simulation to integrate production data. The flow simulation at this stage was used to match production capacity, i.e. to determine whether the given permeability (matrix and fracture) distribution is enough to produce the fluid at the specified pressure during the producing period of the well. The iteration is stopped once a reasonable production capacity match is obtained. In general, a good match was achieved within 3-4 iterations. The generated reservoir description is expected to substantially reduce the effort required to obtain a good history match.
Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference | 2002
Maged H. Al-Deeb; Gerard Bloch; Salem El-Abd; Mohsen Charfeddine; Asnul Bahar; Harun Ates; Tono Soeriawinata; Mohan Kelkar
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972- 952-9435. Abstract This paper presents the result of fully 3D integrated reservoir description and flow simulation study of a giant oil field in Middle East using the state of the art technology. The overall goal is to develop a representative reservoir model to form the basis for reservoir management and long- term development planning. This is done by generating alternate reservoir descriptions, based on stochastic models, to quantify uncertainties in the future performance. The data that were integrated include well cores and logs, geological interpretation (stratigraphy, rock type, depositional model), seismic (structure, curvature analysis and inversion-derived porosity), well test, SCAL, production data and fracture distribution. The 3D multiple realizations were generated by considering rock type and petrophysical properties at well location, obtained from well logs and cores, and simultaneously constrained by seismic derived porosity. The simulations of properties were generated using simultaneous sequential Gaussian simulation where the seismic constraint was introduced via Bayesian Updating procedure. Special consideration was given to the spatial modeling of data where soft information was derived both from hard data and depositional environment. Fracture distribution, derived from seismic curvature analysis, was used in the integration process to match the core-based derived permeability with well test permeability. This distribution was used to obtain permeability anisotropy distribution using newly developed tensorial approach. A total of forty-eight realizations were generated considering four major types of uncertainties: structure, spatial model, petrophysical properties and simulation path. The results have been used as the basis for fluid in place (STOIIP) calculation using Monte Carlo simulation technique. These realizations are then ranked based on the sweep efficiency, obtained from multiphase streamline simulations, and the STOIIP. Three realizations, representing medium, low and high realizations, were selected and upscaled. An optimum vertical upscaling level was determined using streamline simulator and developing quantitative criterion. This ensures that the representative heterogeneity of the reservoir was maintained during the upscaling process. Comprehensive history matching was done for the three selected realizations for the entire nineteen years of production history using objective criterion so that the quality of the three matches is similar. The observed data matched include water cuts and measured pressures. The parameters used to match the history are restricted to the parameters that have not been accounted for in the static model. Using probabilistic concepts, uncertainties in future performance were quantified for various scenarios.
Spe Production & Facilities | 1998
Harun Ates; Mohan Kelkar
In applying nodal analysis to optimize the performance of a single well, it is critical that we are able to estimate the pressure drop across each of the components of a complete well system, from the outer boundary of the reservoir to the sand face, from the tubing string to the separator including any restrictions, safety valves and surface choke. Relationships for rate versus pressure drop under single and two-phase flow conditions are available for most of the components with the exception of perforations and gravel pack. This paper presents the procedure for calculating the pressure drop across perforations and gravel pack under two-phase flow conditions. Results are presented indicating the difference between single-phase and two-phase flow calculations. It is shown that if the two-phase flow is not properly accounted for, we can significantly underestimate the pressure drop across the gravel pack and perforations.
Archive | 2008
Mohan Kelkar; Asnul Bahar; Harun Ates
Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering | 2005
Harun Ates; Asnul Bahar; Salem E. Salem; Mohsen Charfeddine; Mohan Kelkar
SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition | 2001
Asnul Bahar; Harun Ates; Mohan Kelkar; Maged H. Al-Deeb
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition | 2003
Asnul Bahar; Harun Ates; Maged H. Al-Deeb; Salem E. Salem; Hussein Badaam; Mohan Kelkar
Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference | 2002
Mohsen Charfeddine; Maged H. Al-Deeb; Salem El-Abd; Asnul Bahar; Harun Ates; Tono Soeriawinata; Mohan Kelkar
Software - Practice and Experience | 1998
Harun Ates; Mohan Kelkar
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition | 2009
Harun Ates; Asnul Bahar; Vitaly Krasnov; Mohan Kelkar