Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Harveshp Mogal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Harveshp Mogal.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2013

Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: What defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma?

Ana L. Gleisner; Harveshp Mogal; Rebecca M. Dodson; Jon Efron; Susan L. Gearhart; Elizabeth C. Wick; Anne O. Lidor; Joseph M. Herman; Timothy M. Pawlik

BACKGROUND Lymph node ratio (LNR) has been proposed as an optimal staging variable for colorectal cancer. However, the interactive effect of total number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE) and the number of metastatic lymph nodes (NMLN) on survival has not been well characterized. STUDY DESIGN Patients operated on for colon cancer between 1998 and 2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (n = 154,208) and randomly divided into development (75%) and validation (25%) datasets. The association of the TNLE and NMLN on survival was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model with terms for interaction and nonlinearity with restricted cubic spline functions. Findings were confirmed in the validation dataset. RESULTS Both TNLE and NMLN were nonlinearly associated with survival. Patients with no lymph node metastasis had a decrease in the risk of death for each lymph node examined up to approximately 25 lymph nodes, while the effect of TNLE was negligible after approximately 10 negative lymph nodes (NNLN) in those with lymph node metastasis. The hazard ratio varied considerably according to the TNLE for a given LNR when LNR ≥ 0.5, ranging from 2.88 to 7.16 in those with an LNR = 1. The independent effects of NMLN and NNLN on survival were summarized in a model-based score, the N score. When patients in the validation set were categorized according to the N stage, the LNR, and the N score, only the N score was unaffected by differences in the TNLE. CONCLUSIONS The effect of the TNLE on survival does not have a unique, strong threshold (ie, 12 lymph nodes). The combined effect of NMLN and TNLE is complex and is not appropriately represented by the LNR. The N score may be an alternative to the N stage for prognostication of patients with colon cancer because it accounts for differences in nodal samples.


Experimental hematology & oncology | 2013

Metaplastic breast cancer: histologic characteristics, prognostic factors and systemic treatment strategies.

Theresa Schwartz; Harveshp Mogal; Christos N. Papageorgiou; Jula Veerapong; Eddy C. Hsueh

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare subtype of invasive breast cancer that tends to have an aggressive clinical presentation as well as a variety of distinct histologic designations. Few systemic treatment options are available for MBC, as it has consistently shown a suboptimal response to standard chemotherapy regimens. These characteristics result in a worse overall prognosis for patients with MBC compared to those with standard invasive breast cancer. Due to its rarity, data focusing on MBC is limited. This review will discuss the clinical presentation, breast imaging findings, histologic and molecular characteristics of MBC as well as potential future research directions.


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2016

Comparison of observed to predicted outcomes using the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Harveshp Mogal; Nora F. Fino; Clancy J. Clark; Perry Shen

Postoperative outcomes predicted by the ACS NSQIP universal risk calculator have not been validated for specific procedures like pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).


Hpb | 2016

Elevated NLR in gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma – making bad cancers even worse: results from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium

Eliza W. Beal; Lai Wei; Cecilia G. Ethun; Sylvester M. Black; Mary Dillhoff; Ahmed Salem; Sharon M. Weber; Thuy B. Tran; George A. Poultsides; Andre Y. Son; Ioannis Hatzaras; Linda X. Jin; Ryan C. Fields; Stefan Buettner; Timothy M. Pawlik; Charles R. Scoggins; Robert C.G. Martin; Chelsea A. Isom; K. Idrees; Harveshp Mogal; Perry Shen; Shishir K. Maithel; Carl Schmidt

BACKGROUND Gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary malignancies are aggressive tumors with high risk of recurrence and death. We hypothesize that elevated preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratios (NLR) are associated with poor prognosis among patients undergoing resection of gallbladder or extrahepatic biliary cancers. METHODS Patients who underwent complete surgical resection between 2000-2014 were identified from 10 academic centers (n=525). Overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by stratifying patients with normal (<5) versus elevated (>5) NLR. RESULTS Overall, 375 patients had NLR <5 while 150 patients had NLR >5. Median OS was 24.5 months among patients with NLR<5 versus 17.0 months among patients with NLR>5 (p<0.001). NLR was also associated with OS in subgroup analysis of patients with gallbladder cancer. In fact, on multivariable analysis, NLR>5, dyspnea and preoperative peak bilirubin were independently associated with OS in patients with gallbladder cancer. Median RFS was 26.8 months in patients with NLR<5 versus 22.7 months among patients with NLR>5 (p=0.030). NLR>5 was independently associated with worse RFS for patients with gallbladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS Elevated NLR was associated with worse outcomes in patients with gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary cancers after curative-intent resection. NLR is easily measured and may provide important prognostic information.


JAMA Surgery | 2017

Association of Optimal Time Interval to Re-resection for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer With Overall Survival: A Multi-Institution Analysis From the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium

Cecilia G. Ethun; Lauren M. Postlewait; Nina Le; Timothy M. Pawlik; Stefan Buettner; George A. Poultsides; Thuy B. Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A. Isom; Ryan C. Fields; Linda X. Jin; Sharon M. Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C.G. Martin; Charles R. Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza W. Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; David A. Kooby; Shishir K. Maithel

Importance The current recommendation is to perform re-resection for select patients with incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer. The optimal time interval for re-resection for both patient selection and long-term survival is not known. Objective To assess the association of time interval from the initial cholecystectomy to reoperation with overall survival. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014 at 10 US academic institutions. A total of 207 patients with incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer who underwent reoperation and had available data on the date of their initial cholecystectomy were included. Exposures Time interval from the initial cholecystectomy to reoperation: group A: less than 4 weeks; group B: 4 to 8 weeks; and group C: greater than 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcome was overall survival. Results Of 449 patients with gallbladder cancer, 207 cases (46%) were discovered incidentally and underwent reoperation at 3 different time intervals from the date of the original cholecystectomy: group A: less than 4 weeks (25 patients, 12%); B: 4 to 8 weeks (91 patients, 44%); C: more than 8 weeks (91 patients, 44%). The mean (SD) ages of patients in groups A, B, and C were 65 (9), 64 (11), and 66 (12) years, respectively. All groups were similar for baseline demographics, extent of resection, presence of residual disease, T stage, resection margin status, lymph node involvement, and postoperative complications. Patients who underwent reoperation between 4 and 8 weeks had the longest median overall survival (group B: 40.4 months) compared with those who underwent early (group A: 17.4 months) or late (group C: 22.4 months) reoperation (log-rank P = .03). Group A and C time intervals (vs group B), presence of residual disease, an R2 resection, advanced T stage, and lymph node involvement were associated with decreased overall survival on univariable Cox regression. Only group A (hazard ratio, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.25-5.54) and group C (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.17-3.66) time intervals (vs group B), R2 resection (hazard ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.27-5.69), and advanced Tstage (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.11-3.08) persisted on multivariable Cox regression analysis. Conclusions and Relevance The optimal time interval for re-resection for incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer appears to be between 4 and 8 weeks after the initial cholecystectomy.


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2016

Assessing the impact of common bile duct resection in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer.

Faiz Gani; Stefan Buettner; Georgios A. Margonis; Cecilia G. Ethun; George A. Poultsides; Thuy B. Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A. Isom; Ryan C. Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M. Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C.G. Martin; Charles R. Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza W. Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K. Maithel; Timothy M. Pawlik

Although radical re‐resection for gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been advocated, the optimal extent of re‐resection remains unknown. The current study aimed to assess the impact of common bile duct (CBD) resection on survival among patients undergoing surgery for GBC.


Surgery | 2017

Overall survival after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma at academic cancer centers versus community cancer centers: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

Nicholas G. Berger; Jack P. Silva; Harveshp Mogal; Callisia N. Clarke; M. Bedi; John A. Charlson; Kathleen K. Christians; Susan Tsai; T. Clark Gamblin

Background Operative resection remains the definitive curative therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Data published recently show a correlation between improved outcomes for complex oncologic operations and treatment at academic centers. For large retroperitoneal sarcomas, operative resection can be complex and require multidisciplinary care. We hypothesized that survival rates vary between type of treating center for patients undergoing resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Methods Patients with stage I to III nonmetastatic retroperitoneal sarcomas who underwent operative resection were identified from the National Cancer Database during the years 2004–2013. Treating centers were categorized as academic cancer centers or community cancer centers. Overall survival was analyzed by log‐rank test and graphed using Kaplan‐Meier method. Results A total of 2,762 patients were identified. A majority of patients (59.4%, n = 1,642) underwent resection at an academic cancer centers. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years old. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was more common at academic cancer centers, while adjuvant radiotherapy was more common at community cancer centers. Improved overall survival was seen at academic cancer centers across all stages compared with community cancer centers (P = .014) but, after multivariable Cox regression analysis, was not a significant independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval, 0.79–1.04, P = .171). Academic cancer centers exhibited a greater rate of R0 resection (55.9% vs 47.0%, P < .001) and a lesser odds of positive margins (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.99, P = .044) after multivariable logistic regression. Conclusion Resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma performed at academic cancer centers was an independent predictor of margin‐negative resection but was not a statistically significant factor for survival. This observation suggests that site of care may contribute to some aspect of improved oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma.


American Journal of Surgery | 2014

Clopidogrel use as a risk factor for poor outcomes after kidney transplantation

Jennifer M. Williams; Janet E. Tuttle-Newhall; Mark A. Schnitzler; Nino Dzebisashvili; Huiling Xiao; David A. Axelrod; Harveshp Mogal; Krista L. Lentine

BACKGROUND Limited data are available on outcome implications of clopidogrel use before kidney transplantation. METHODS A novel dataset linking national transplant registry data with records from a large pharmacy claims clearinghouse (2005 to 2010) was examined to estimate risks of post-transplant death and graft failure associated with clopidogrel fills within 90 or more than 90 days before transplant. RESULTS Clopidogrel fills within 90 days of transplant were associated with 61% of increased relative mortality risk and 23% of increased graft failure risk. Risks were higher in those whose last clopidogrel fill was more than 90 days before transplantation (111% for death, 59% for graft loss). Adverse prognostic associations persisted among recipients of live and deceased donor allografts, older recipients, and those with diabetes or reported cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS Clopidogrel use before kidney transplantation portends increased risks of post-transplant death and graft loss. Pharmacy claims may identify novel prognostic markers not currently captured in the transplant registry.


Journal of gastrointestinal oncology | 2016

Repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: review of indications and outcomes

Harveshp Mogal; Konstantinos Chouliaras; Edward A. Levine; Perry Shen; Konstantinos I. Votanopoulos

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an established treatment option in selected patients with peritoneal dissemination from a variety of epithelial primaries. Even though a small proportion will be alive and potentially cured at 10 years, the majority will eventually develop recurrent disease. Repeat CRS/HIPEC is a valid consideration in a selected subpopulation of patients with isolated peritoneal recurrence. This review summarizes the data on patient selection, feasibility, limitations and outcomes of repeat CRS/HIPEC.


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2018

Oncologic effects of preoperative biliary drainage in resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Percutaneous biliary drainage has no adverse effects on survival

Xu Feng Zhang; Eliza W. Beal; Katiuscha Merath; Cecilia G. Ethun; Ahmed Salem; Sharon M. Weber; Thuy B. Tran; George A. Poultsides; Andre Y. Son; Ioannis Hatzaras; Linda X. Jin; Ryan C. Fields; Matthew J. Weiss; Charles R. Scoggins; Robert C.G. Martin; Chelsea A. Isom; K. Idrees; Harveshp Mogal; Perry Shen; Shishir K. Maithel; Carl Schmidt; Timothy M. Pawlik

The objective of the current study was to define long‐term survival of patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) after preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) versus endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD).

Collaboration


Dive into the Harveshp Mogal's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Perry Shen

Wake Forest University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy M. Pawlik

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan C. Fields

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sharon M. Weber

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl Schmidt

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge