Harvey Golombek

The relation of personality functions and adaptive skills to self-esteem in early adolescence.

This paper examines the relation, in early adolescence, of competence in personality functions and adaptive skills to self-esteem. As part of a longitudinal study of adolescent personality development, a nonclinical group of 63 adolescents underwent a comprehensive assessment at age 13. Their personality functioning status was assessed by means of a semistructured psychiatric interview. A psychometric battery was administered to assess verbal and nonverbal adaptive skills. In addition, global self-esteem was assessed. The findings indicate that positive self-esteem was associated with competence in both personality functions and in adaptive skills. Both domains contributed to self-esteem to a similar degree.

Personality Dysfunction and Behavioral Disturbance in Early Adolescence

This study examines the prevalence of personality disturbance in a nonclinical sample of young adolescents and the relationship between personality functioning and behavior problems. Sixty-three adolescents, initially screened at age 10 using teacher and parent behavior rating scales, were assessed at age 13 by means of a semistructured psychiatric interview. In addition, their parents and teachers again completed behavior rating scales. The findings indicate a prevalence in the population of 54% who are clear of personality disturbance, 19% who display marked disturbance, and 27% who display some disturbance. Disturbance in personality functions was found to be associated with increased anxiety and depression, school difficulties and interpersonal withdrawal. Behavior indicative of conduct problems and hyperactivity did not differentiate the clear, moderately disturbed, and markedly disturbed adolescents.

Adolescent Personality Development: Three Phases, Three Courses and Varying Turmoil. Findings from the Toronto Adolescent Longitudinal Study

The Toronto Adolescent Longitudinal Study was launched in 1977 to examine personality development in a non-clinical sample of children from ages ten through 19 over an eight year period. Following a description of their conceptualized model of personality and of the nature of the study, the authors summarize their findings which suggest new perspectives in three areas of adolescent personality development: 1) the subphases of adolescence, 2) the routes of passage through which adolescents proceed, and 3) adolescent turmoil.

A study of disturbed and non disturbed adolescents: the Toronto adolescent longitudinal study. I

The Toronto Adolescent Longitudinal Study was undertaken to examine personality development in a non-clinical sample of children from ages 10 through 19. Fifty-nine boys and girls, selected to represent the full range of behavior presentation in regular classrooms, have participated throughout the complete study. Each year the students and at least one parent participated in a full day evaluation during which a comprehensive battery of measures was administered to assess their psychosocial characteristics. Some exemplary results are presented regarding the personality functioning and associated characteristics of the group at age 13. Our results lead us to conclude that adolescence should not be considered as a homogeneous developmental stage. Young adolescents can be differentiated along a dimension of competence in personality functioning which is associated with differences in their clinical presentation, self concept and behavior patterns.

Personality functioning and clinical presentation in early adolescence. II

This study describes the presentation of early adolescents on clinical examination and its relation to personality function competence. As part of a longitudinal study 63 non-clinical subjects at age 13 underwent a semi-structured psychiatric interview. On the basis of their responses their phenomenology, attitudes, defence mechanisms and degree of relatedness to significant others were assessed independently and blindly by two psychiatrists. Our findings show that a significant minority of early adolescents have a definite personality function disturbance and that these adolescents differ from their more competent peers on a number of characteristics identifiable in a clinical interview. Such a relationship was observed in boys as well as girls, with girls presenting no greater amount of turmoil than boys. These results indicate that adolescents cannot be adequately described as a homogeneous group. Differences in individual personality functioning result in differences in the presentation and internal experience of the early adolescent.

Consistency and change in personality characteristics and affect from middle to late adolescence.

Non clinical adolescents in a longitudinal study were examined at ages 16 and 18 to see whether or not there were changes in personality functioning, attitudes and affect over time, and whether or not these were related to each other. Personality functioning remained fairly consistent at both ages, with marked personality problems occurring in about one out of seven. As a group, the older adolescents demonstrated more anxiety and depression, as well as changes in certain attitudes such as more curiosity and interest in people. For individual adolescents it was found that there was considerable predictability of affect and attitudes at age 18 from the presentation at age 16. Furthermore, a relative increase in the amount of anger in middle adolescence was a predictor of personality problems in late adolescence.

The relationship between life events during adolescence and affect and personality functioning.

Bowlbys concept of the internal working model is useful in conceptualizing how a child develops a sense of self and security through the availability of significant relationships. The lack of secure attachments may lead to dysphoric moods and poor personality functioning. We have shown that a proportion of teenagers develop dysphoria as well as personality disturbance during adolescence. A study sample of 59 youths was examined at early, middle and late adolescence. Ratings were made of affect, attitudes and personality functions. At the same time, information was obtained about family status and functioning. Results showed that certain family and life events were more strongly correlated with changes in affect in early adolescence. These affects were both internalized and externalized. Middle adolescence appeared to be quiescent, without any correlations with affect or personality problems. In late adolescence, there were correlations between family changes and personality dysfunction as well as dysphoria. This shows that family changes which threaten the availability of significant attachment figures are linked to emotional and behavioural disturbance in early adolescence and personality and emotional disturbance in late adolescence.

The classification of disturbed personality functioning in early adolescence

This study describes disturbed personality functioning in early adolescence. A non-clinical sample of 63 thirteen year olds underwent a semi-structured psychiatric interview as part of a longitudinal study investigating the relationship between competence in personality functioning and development. The presence of personality disturbance was determined by two psychiatrists who rated the adolescents on a personality functions scale. The raters then described the type of disturbance using Axis II of DSM-III as a guideline. Forty-six percent of the sample were found to have some degree of disturbed personality functioning. Of these, over one-half fell into a cluster comprised of avoidant, dependent, compulsive, or passive-aggressive types, while another third were characterized by antisocial tendencies. Severity of disturbance was not related to type of disturbance. Ratings of behaviour by teachers and parents supported the division of subjects with personality dysfunction into two broad groups: an anxious, fearful, “quiet” cluster; and a group of more “acting out”, disturbing individuals. However, parents and teachers could not distinguish the “quiet” group from teenagers who were free of disturbed personality functioning. These data indicate that it is possible to classify a segment of a non-clinical population of young adolescents who had personality dysfunction using Axis II of DSM-III as a guideline. Furthermore, such a group of teenagers is not homogeneous. They distribute themselves into internalizing and externalizing clusters.